Bingo..Right on Cue....

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,947
1,662
113
WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.
The officials and others interviewed declined to flesh out why some of the special counsel’s investigators viewed their findings as potentially more damaging for the president than Mr. Barr explained. Under the regulations, Mr. Barr can publicly release as much of the document as he deems appropriate.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.
The officials and others interviewed declined to flesh out why some of the special counsel’s investigators viewed their findings as potentially more damaging for the president than Mr. Barr explained. Under the regulations, Mr. Barr can publicly release as much of the document as he deems appropriate.
Saw that. More unnamed sources. No specifics. Hanging on tight. Setting up to later claim redacted material was damning to trump. Kick the can again.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/go...tions-that-mueller-team-misrepresented-emails

Shortly before Special Counsel Robert Mueller filed his report on the Russia investigation last month, Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., alerted Attorney General Bill Barr to what they described as the "selective" use of emails in Mueller court filings -- as well as potential “improper political influence, misconduct, and mismanagement” in the FBI's original Russia probe.

In a March 8 letter, Grassley and Graham referred Barr to a letter sent to Mueller in late 2017 that alleged his investigators had cherry-picked details from emails to include in court documents, urging him to review the materials. They also notified him that they had asked DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz a year earlier to review the original FBI probe.


READ THE MUELLER REPORT FINDINGS

It's unclear if Barr reviewed the senators' letter; a DOJ representative declined to comment on the missive.

But Fox News is told the lawmakers wanted Barr to have this material before he reviewed the Mueller report, out of concern some emails were selectively quoted to give a “nefarious” impression.

Grassley Letter to Mueller by Fox News on Scribd

Fox News has also obtained the 2017 letter (above) from Grassley to Mueller, which spelled out the lawmakers' concerns about the “absence of additional context” in the court filings -- as well as concerns over how those documents were covered in the media. "The glaring lack of [context] feeds speculation and innuendo that distorts the facts," Grassley wrote at the time.

Video
In their March letter to Barr, Grassley and Graham pointed specifically to emails quoted in the Statement of Offense against former Trump adviser George Papadopoulos.

That court filing said Papadopoulos emailed another campaign official in May 2016 with the subject line, "Request from Russia to meet Mr. Trump." The document said the email stated that Russia "has been eager to meet Mr. Trump for quite sometime and have been reaching out to me to discuss," adding in a footnote that the official forwarded the email to another campaign official asking to discuss: "We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal."

The senators said media outlets then seized on the fragments to report a "Campaign official suggested 'low level' staff should go to Russia." However, they said the full emails -- obtained from the Trump campaign -- tell a different story.

“In full context, the emails in question actually show that the Trump Campaign wanted someone 'low level' to decline these types of invitations,” Grassley and Graham wrote in the letter to Barr.

Video
The senators added: “Another citation was reported by some news outlets as evidence that the campaign, notably Papadopoulos and Sam Clovis, encouraged personnel to meet with the Russians." This line in the original court document said that a campaign supervisor (later identified as Clovis) told Papadopoulos "I would encourage you" and another adviser to "make the trip" if possible, with regard to a meeting with Russians.

The senators wrote, however, that "additional context shows that Papadopoulos had conversations with representatives from multiple governments, not just Russia, and that Clovis had opposed any trip to Russia for Mr. Trump and the campaign."

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to making false statements to FBI agents in October 2017 in connection to the Russia investigation and is currently on a 12-month supervised release from federal prison. He is now seeking a pardon from Trump.

Meanwhile, in late February of last year, Graham and Grassley also sent a letter to Horowitz requesting that his office look into “potential improper political influence, misconduct, and mismanagement” of the counterintelligence and criminal investigations into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia before Mueller’s appointment.

“The referral was based in part on materially inconsistent statements reportedly made by Christopher Steele, the author of the anti-Trump dossier funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign during the 2016 presidential election,” their letter to Barr states.

It continues: “The documents we have reviewed also raise questions about the role Bruce Ohr, a senior Justice Department official whose wife worked for Fusion GPS, had in passing allegations from Steele and Fusion GPS to the FBI after the FBI had terminated Mr. Steele as a source.”

The IG's office is reviewing potential surveillance abuses by the FBI, as well as leaks out of the bureau and improper gifts received by officials.
 

The Dunedein

Junior
Aug 1, 2003
2,123
274
83
Wouldn't it be nice for us to be able to read the [properly redacted] Mueller Report and form our own opinions from the information and documents making up the report, instead of relying on an Attorney General who wrote a memo trashing the investigation before he even saw the evidence or the report, and instead of relying on "unnamed sources"? Mr. Gorbachev (sp.), tear down that wall! Mr. Barr, release the hounds, er, the report!
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Wouldn't it be nice for us to be able to read the [properly redacted] Mueller Report and form our own opinions from the information and documents making up the report, instead of relying on an Attorney General who wrote a memo trashing the investigation before he even saw the evidence or the report, and instead of relying on "unnamed sources"? Mr. Gorbachev (sp.), tear down that wall! Mr. Barr, release the hounds, er, the report!
Barr said all along he would release it as early as next week. The only contention here is the dems pushing for it sooner and unredacted
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,231
3,298
113
Wouldn't it be nice for us to be able to read the [properly redacted] Mueller Report and form our own opinions from the information and documents making up the report, instead of relying on an Attorney General who wrote a memo trashing the investigation before he even saw the evidence or the report, and instead of relying on "unnamed sources"? Mr. Gorbachev (sp.), tear down that wall! Mr. Barr, release the hounds, er, the report!
You’re going to see it.

Do you not realize this is the Dems posturing trying to make it seem like the President is trying to hide something? Then when it’s released they can claim a small victory while they cherry pick ******** for the MSM loons to take completely out of context and push a ******** narrative?
 

eerdoc

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
24,014
26
48
Saw that. More unnamed sources. No specifics. Hanging on tight. Setting up to later claim redacted material was damning to trump. Kick the can again.
No real reason to believe anything that they printed. Some un-named person told un-named friends (associates) what was published. Could just as well be a totally made up story as was so much coming from the NYTimes during the past two years. Mueller was produce the definitive document to uphold all their factual presentations of wrong doing. Didn't happen and mr. Mueller has not gone on record refuting what has been said regarding this whole affair.
What was published in the Times is rubbish. The headlines relate to TWO SenTenCES in the entire 1500 words. READ IT ALL before concluding that it reveals a lot more negatives about Trump.
NOT TRUE. Just more lies and un- substantiated innuendo from the unknown darkness.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
LMAO!

And you believe trump had the biggest inauguration crowd ever and graduated the top of his class.
So he Barr didnt say it would be to Congress by mid April or sooner? I bet he did. Are you really this stupid? Of course you are creeper.
 

boomerwv

Freshman
Jan 16, 2008
9,988
79
48
You’re going to see it.

Do you not realize this is the Dems posturing trying to make it seem like the President is trying to hide something? Then when it’s released they can claim a small victory while they cherry pick ******** for the MSM loons to take completely out of context and push a ******** narrative?

Or, and hear me out, Barrs summary did not fully represent what is in the actual report.

I know, hard to believe that this administration would lie about something.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,947
1,662
113
So he Barr didnt say it would be to Congress by mid April or sooner? I bet he did. Are you really this stupid? Of course you are creeper.
Yes....the ***** moron IS indeed that stupid.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Or, and hear me out, Barrs summary did not fully represent what is in the actual report.

I know, hard to believe that this administration would lie about something.
Keep hoping. I mean Barr has a great rep so why not waste it.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,947
1,662
113
Or, and hear me out, Barrs summary did not fully represent what is in the actual report.

I know, hard to believe that this administration would lie about something.
It was a summary......but we all know that Mueller DID NOT CHARGE Trump with a crime. Sure..... the Dems with the MSM will come up with all kinds of accusations when they see the report....that is a given.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
It was a summary......but we all know that Mueller DID NOT CHARGE Trump with a crime. Sure..... the Dems with the MSM will come up with all kinds of accusations when they see the report....that is a given.
Between releasing this report and Trump's taxes, you and your pals better take up weed smoking and chill out. You're two tents.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Between releasing this report and Trump's taxes, you and your pals better take up weed smoking and chill out. You're two tents.
Its just the same ******** different week with you motard. Stay stupid.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,947
1,662
113
Between releasing this report and Trump's taxes, you and your pals better take up weed smoking and chill out. You're two tents.
Gave up smokin years ago and I'm chillin right watching you wingnuts getting yourselves all worked up agin......just sayin.
Release the whole report and get his taxes.......it's still just what it has always been since he won the election........a total smear campaign by the MSM,the Dems and people like you.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Gave up smokin years ago and I'm chillin right watching you wingnuts getting yourselves all worked up agin......just sayin.
Release the whole report and get his taxes.......it's still just what it has always been since he won the election........a total smear campaign by the MSM,the Dems and people like you.
Funniest part about the little dumb dumbs is that the timeline has been given and every day closer they turn up the heat thinking they can affect the outcome. At the end of the day the report will be released and every one of them will disappear for 2+ days crying like they did when Mueller released his report because they know they cant defend their ********.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Gave up smokin years ago and I'm chillin right watching you wingnuts getting yourselves all worked up agin......just sayin.
Release the whole report and get his taxes.......it's still just what it has always been since he won the election........a total smear campaign by the MSM,the Dems and people like you.

Manafort, Cohen, Papadopoulos, Gates, Flynn, Stone, Pinedo, and Van der Zwaan all disagree.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Gave up smokin years ago and I'm chillin right watching you wingnuts getting yourselves all worked up agin......just sayin.
Release the whole report and get his taxes.......it's still just what it has always been since he won the election........a total smear campaign by the MSM,the Dems and people like you.
Trump doesn't need Dems to give him black eyes, he does that well himself.
 

The Dunedein

Junior
Aug 1, 2003
2,123
274
83
You’re going to see it.

Do you not realize this is the Dems posturing trying to make it seem like the President is trying to hide something? Then when it’s released they can claim a small victory while they cherry pick ******** for the MSM loons to take completely out of context and push a ******** narrative?
I certainly respect your passion to avoid a ******** narrative, and i’m sure your passion extends to both political parties. I agree with you on that.

I don’t give two cents what the Democrats want. I don’t give two cents what the Republicans want. As i’ve said for a long time, the report should be made available to the public. My desire for the report to be made available to the public has nothing to do with the Dems, the Repubs, etc. I want to form my own conclusions from the evidence gathered. If Trump did something illegal, prosecute him, whether he is a sitting president or not. If he didn’t, support the office of the American president. The narrative i support is full disclosure of the evidence (minus the obligatory properly redacted materials). Sunshine is a disinfectant, etc.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
I called this shot yesterday. Why else would the left focus so much time crying for an unredacted copy when they know that is impossible.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
There is zero reason the house or senate intelligence committees need a redacted version.
Not true at all. Neither committee can see grand jury testimony unless the focus of the grand jury was afforded a chance to testify on their own behalf to the grand jury.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
you know the crimes that Manafort got jail time for...

from 10 years ago ?

He was working for Biden & Zero in the Ukraine...
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,053
4,029
113
WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.
The officials and others interviewed declined to flesh out why some of the special counsel’s investigators viewed their findings as potentially more damaging for the president than Mr. Barr explained. Under the regulations, Mr. Barr can publicly release as much of the document as he deems appropriate.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...am-mueller-if-you-dont-indict-you-cant-incite