Cal just torched him too. Go make fun of Cal too while you're at it.
I don't think I've made fun of anyone, other than picking at how many Bilas threads there have been.
But hey, it's a great day, and I'm enjoying our success!
Cal just torched him too. Go make fun of Cal too while you're at it.
You can't have too many anti Bilas threadsHere we go again........
Bilas thread # 222.
[laughing]
It sounded like he was upset with their bracket - getting into the same bracket with Nova, the overall #1 seed.
The irony about this is how Duke fans for years have complained about Bilas. He has always tended to take the pro-UNC stance, both with their teams and with their off the court problems. (He acted like a personal agent for PJ Hairston during his suspension.)
To be honest I've always kind of had a "yea right" thought at all the Bilas love here and elsewhere. Now all of a sudden he is sternly making a pro-Duke argument on something and he's immediately thrown away all this collateral and good will that he had built up.
I didn't care for him then or now.
Neue, Bilas has been sliding for a while now in the eyes of Cat fans. I think we always liked the fact that he tried not to favor Duke but then he started defending PJ, then UNC, then Grayson (who should have been suspended by the conference, IMO) and now he has this crusade to have Duke a one seed. He has lost ALL objectivity.
You're exaggerating....there's only been 207 threads....Here we go again........
Bilas thread # 222.
[laughing]
The irony about this is how Duke fans for years have complained about Bilas. He has always tended to take the pro-UNC stance, both with their teams and with their off the court problems. (He acted like a personal agent for PJ Hairston during his suspension.)
To be honest I've always kind of had a "yea right" thought at all the Bilas love here and elsewhere. Now all of a sudden he is sternly making a pro-Duke argument on something and he's immediately thrown away all this collateral and good will that he had built up.
I didn't care for him then or now.
Haven't cared for him for a while. Many are coming around.
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend." For many, as long as Jay blasted the NCAA, they were Bilas fans.
Bilas is actually one of the better analysts out there. The committee didn't do a great job. But then again the nature of their job, they will always get low approvals from fans.
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend." For many, as long as Jay blasted the NCAA, they were Bilas fans.
The irony about this is how Duke fans for years have complained about Bilas. He has always tended to take the pro-UNC stance, both with their teams and with their off the court problems. (He acted like a personal agent for PJ Hairston during his suspension.)
To be honest I've always kind of had a "yea right" thought at all the Bilas love here and elsewhere. Now all of a sudden he is sternly making a pro-Duke argument on something and he's immediately thrown away all this collateral and good will that he had built up.
I didn't care for him then or now.
Hey - @morgousky - just for the record, my optimism won out over your realism and pessimism so far.
You ever see this team winning 11 straight?
You're welcome. [banana]
He seems to think he's always right. He also seems to think that only formers players\coaches should be on the committee because everybody else isn't worthy or smart enough to get it right.
He'd be a nightmare on the committee, telling all "non-basketball people" they don't know what they are talking about.
I figured it could go good or bad. Anything from a 3 seed to a 7 seed what my guess. They did better than I expected.
Still don't like where they are necessarily. Our inability to fully put people away at home this year really stands out to me.
Sorry. He's right. No reason for academics to take part in the discussion. As we see constantly they get in their own way like most brainiacs always do. Over think and over analyze.
If Bilas is the guy on the committee, I'll stick with what we have now.
Sorry. He's right. No reason for academics to take part in the discussion. As we see constantly they get in their own way like most brainiacs always do. Over think and over analyze.
And then the SOB's come out and lie about it. They lie about the criteria and lie about not setting up match upsThis is a false statement that is made every year and it's a lazy way of looking at the bigger picture.
The committee gets he'll because their brackets always suck and they never have consistency. Some of the grief they catch is fully self inflicted. I don't want UK to be given a title, but evening out the bracket isn't that hard and they like to pretend it's rocket science. My two year old could use better logic spreading out the talent.
So I guess the media should stop voting for the Heisman, Naismith, etc
after the bracket came out. Beforehand he was also pimping Duke for a 1 seed to a ridiculous degreeI think we're missing his point. He argued Duke deserved the 1 over UNC, based on side-by-side comparison. That had nothing to do with other teams/seeds