Akok and Floyd Articles

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
We still have 3 open scholarships. I know Pike likes to leave one open. That still leaves 2 spots. Apparently he is saving one for Caleb, but that's still one spot. We haven't heard much about any targets besides guards since Quinn early before Cliff declared he was coming back.

A high upside target with multiple years left makes sense with one slot
 

MLBash93

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2012
1,507
2,175
113
I don't think Pike is going to leave a Scholly open purposely to put a walk on on scholarship. If he can land a kid who's good he will use that last scholarship
 

NBKnight

Heisman
Jul 8, 2008
24,660
15,578
61
I don't think Pike is going to leave a Scholly open purposely to put a walk on on scholarship. If he can land a kid who's good he will use that last scholarship
Steve has repeatedly said that is hard to keep 13 scholarship guys happy. It is not to put a walk on a scholarship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,304
12,626
78
Steve has repeatedly said that is hard to keep 13 scholarship guys happy. It is not to put a walk on a scholarship.
Ideally - the last one would be used on a big who comes in just wanting to play for a decent high major. Maybe a kid who is interested in an RU graduate program. We could use another back up big - if only for the practice squad. Nathan was a veteran. And we’re losing Agee too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Ideally - the last one would be used on a big who comes in just wanting to play for a decent high major. Maybe a kid who is interested in an RU graduate program. We could use another back up big - if only for the practice squad. Nathan was a veteran. And we’re losing Agee too.
I hear Mamadou Doucoure is in the portal.
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
We could use another big to actually contribute too
We kind of run into the same problem at every position now: Anyone we can bring in that would be an upgrade is going to want more playing time than we would be offering.
 

jordkap

All-Conference
Jul 11, 2016
2,829
4,469
77
We still have 3 open scholarships. I know Pike likes to leave one open. That still leaves 2 spots. Apparently he is saving one for Caleb, but that's still one spot. We haven't heard much about any targets besides guards since Quinn early before Cliff declared he was coming back.

A high upside target with multiple years left makes sense with one slot
Caleb’s shouldn’t count either. Same with Geo last year
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,211
12,474
113
We kind of run into the same problem at every position now: Anyone we can bring in that would be an upgrade is going to want more playing time than we would be offering.
Teams get better by recruiting players that upgrade needs .Status quo strategy depending on player development is hard to sustain when the best scorers leave in the same season.The transfer portal is meant to fill immediate needs which includes bench scoring.
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
That may have been a one year thing. Does anyone know for sure?

I don't think it's been officially ruled on, but expectation at the time was that it'd be a 1-year thing. They'd still get their 6th year of eligibility, but in 2022 and beyond it would count against the scholarship limit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and kcg88

bowlgoal

Heisman
Jul 20, 2004
12,208
11,422
93
It was said yesterday that since we took Spencer; we were not going to take Hammond and yet Hammond was supposedly visiting yesterday and today?

Did Hammond's visit get cut short right after Spencer committed?