![]()
Mississippi State men's basketball team is working and pushing towards a promising new season.
More...
Storm? It’s been a shipwreck for years.
National Championship or bust.
I am looking forward to watching this group play, knowing full well that this is still going to be the Howland experience to a tee. We will show flashes of being really good, win just enough to accomplish the bare minimum, but that’s about it, and we will have some incredibly frustrating losses along the way (one of them most likely being to Ole Miss).
Anyone expecting anything different probably hasn’t paid that close attention the last six years. You kinda know what you’re getting from Howland at this point. It’s by no means bad, it just has a definite ceiling.
The one consistency with with Ben Howland teams since he's been in Starkville is how inconsistent they are. Can put on a show for two straight games and then go lose to a bottom dweller two games in a row.
You just never know what you're going to get. You'll see the showcases of talent and then the next week the apathy. We know the talent is there on paper for the 2021-2022 season but we know they'll be up and down all season. Six seasons at MSU...we've all seen it. 51-57 in SEC play
Really wish the people that hate basketball would permanently stop commenting on basketball threads. It's so annoying. Same thing doesn't happen in football or baseball threads and maybe that's because there's way less people that hate those two sports but there's certainly a ton of people that hate basketball and they all seem to love to comment toxicity into every single basketball thread ever posted.
I doubt many here hate basketball. I don't think that's the same thing as hating that our program isn't what it used to be or that we've been maddeningly inconsistent under Howland. Those aren't controversial positions to take.
I doubt many here hate basketball. I don't think that's the same thing as hating that our program isn't what it used to be or that we've been maddeningly inconsistent under Howland. Those aren't controversial positions to take.
What did it used to be? An inconsistent program under Rick Stansbury. You can go back to every single year since after 96 and show examples of inconsistency.
Competing for SEC titles? More frequent trips to the big dance? Packed arenas and fanbase enthusiasm? A more aggressive style of play, particularly on the defensive end?
If you're saying we were inconsistent and even underperforming at times under Stansbury, I'm not going to disagree with that at all. I thought moving on from Stansbury was the wise move at the time and it wasn't canning Stansbury that set us back - but rather who we hired to replace him. Some reseating decisions by the administration also contributed to the downfall. But we are not where we once were as a program right now and that's not a controversial position to take, either.
If you were told on the day we hired Howland what our program would look like five years later, would you have been excited about that? We all expected more when he was hired than what we've gotten to this point. Again, I don't think that's even controversial.
Yup.Would Howland have more wins here if the athletic department didn't destroy the Hump's atmosphere and if he wasn't following Rick Ray?
Would Howland have more wins here if the athletic department didn't destroy the Hump's atmosphere and if he wasn't following Rick Ray?
Why do you think we deserve better when we put like 2k in the Hump for SEC home games and our high school recruiting base is kin to Guatemala in talent?
When besides 96? The 2004 team was good but their stiffest competition in the SEC that year was a Tubby Smith UK team lead by Kelena Azubuike and a Florida team led by Matt Walsh.
Deflect. Typical Drebin.