2nd Letter

[Uncle Ruckus]

Don't think I've seen it said, but was this a 2nd NOA or an addendum to the 1st NOA? Couldn't the former have larger implications?

 

[mcdawg22]

I read somewhere that it's semantics. It doesn't really matter what the title is, it's what's in it that determines the level of severity. I don't know if that's true or not.

 

[patdog]

Since they STILL haven't released the letter, nobody knows. Don't think it matters though. The implications are as big as they could possibly be either way.

 

[Beckerdawg]

The general public doesn't have a clue what's in the noa. We only know what they've told us. I don't understand why the press isn't asking to see the whole thing. How do we know the total # of allegations, are we suppose to just believe them?

 

[engie]

Rosey has a public records request in -- which they are going to have trouble skirting -- since Bjork read from the NOA.

Rumor I'm hearing is that the book is not closed and are still investigating. Which doesn't make sense to me -- but that's the rumor.

 

[Uncle Ruckus]

Follow up question
Has anyone on either side came out and said that this concluded the investigation? Are we certain it's over?

 

[engie]

I don't think we can be certain of anything -- until someone other than OM says it.

 

[Willow Grove Dawg]

They will release the full NOA on their timeline to 'friendly media"

before they send it to Rosie. I assume it will be Bruce Feldman or Edwin Ashcroft at ESPN if not the Clarion Ledger or Daily Journal maybe even the Commercial Appeal.

 

[Bobby Ricigliano]

I think Vitter said it was over in the hostage video, but that doesn't mean anything.

 

[Uncle Ruckus]

We haven't heard that before **