2027 Recruiting Thread

PSUForever

All-Conference
Feb 17, 2007
1,462
1,492
113
That's not what I said. I said unless we do really well in the portal.

PSU loses Becht and at this point the backups are modestly ranked and inexperienced. We also lose other key starters that came over from Iowa State like Hansen (RB), Brahmer (TE), Sowell (WR), and Bacon (LB). That's on top of original PSU players like Rojas & Collins. PSU lost almost all of it's recruiting class from 2026 so there aren't many up and coming players. Without those transfers our high school recruiting class was ranked next to last in the BiG and 65th overall. The 2027 class average player rating is 6th in the BiG and most of those kids won't be making a huge contribution as true freshmen anyway.

The 2027 schedule includes @ Indiana, @ Oregon, Michigan, Washington, etc. I stand by my way too early prediction that unless we do very well in the portal 2027 & 2028 could be rebuilding years with 8-4 type seasons.
You're afraid of every opponent who looks to have a pulse. Glad you aren't the coach.

What does "unless we do very well in the portal" even mean? So if we replace 10 guys or however many you reeled off with premium portal talent then we will be very good and back to 10-2 or 11-1? What if we replace half of them? So you already know that whomever the backups are that are on the roster now will be non effective in 2027? So much can change in 16 months. How do you know we don't have a QB on the roster now that can replace Becht without missing a beat? You make it sound like after this year our roster talent drops to MAC level and we need to get all of our starters from the portal. So what will be our record in 2027 since you are such a sky is falling person about the year sans "doing very well in the portal"? I want it on record from you now. Don't hide behind the portal excuse just give me what you think it will be.
 

PSUForever

All-Conference
Feb 17, 2007
1,462
1,492
113
And you know Penn State cooled on Bourque how? Asking for a friend.
When they sent the whole coaching staff to Wood's home for starters but not for Bourque. Add to that the fact that Wood has been moving up the rankings and fits better in the offense than Bourque. But you can go on believing that we really wanted Bourque but he shunned us so we had to settle for a 2nd tier QB and Campbell is inferior to BGJ in recruiting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSU4U

Marshall2323

All-Conference
Aug 7, 2024
3,819
4,555
113
Key retentions:
QB - 0
RB - 0
WR - 0
TE - Rapp
OL - Donkoh, Cousins
DE - Maybe Granville
DT - 0
LB - Rojas if healthy
DB - Tracy, Collins, Dixson

That's not a lot but we did get an experienced QB, RB, WR, DE, and LB from Iowa State in the portal
The QB RB WR TE etc. all played for Campbell and the OC last year. This offense is flush with returning starters.
 

PSU4U

All-American
Aug 6, 2019
7,115
7,489
113
ND is loading up on offensive linemen. They just flipped a kid from UCLA. That already had a commitment from two other OL players including Halter, a four star OT from Pittsburgh Central Catholic, who is the fourth ranked player in PA. In addition, they just got a commitment from the #1 player in NJ, a five star OT. Now, they are the favorites to land the #1 player in DE who was previously committed to PSU. They aren’t messing around.
I didn't think it were possible for me to hate Neuter Dome more but after reading this I do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LB99

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,405
4,343
113
Irrelevant. Some if tge players you listed were not starters either. Did Granvill play a down?
I shouldn't have included Granville on my list but word was he would have started if not for injury.

That doesn't change my point which is that we lost a lot of starters from 2025 and we lost most our entire 2026 class in the portal. We had an extremely depleted roster except for the Iowa State transfers. They should help make us competitive this fall but many are seniors and the 65th ranked 2026 recruiting class isn't close to what we need to be competitive in 2027. For that to happen PSU is going to need a lot of portal help.
 

PSUFTG

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2021
2,298
3,539
113
As of today, the PSU recruiting class is a bit over 1/2 way completed.
The average quality (as per the "recruiting gurus") is 87.65. As classes fill out across the country - barring PSU's quality among the later part of the class increases substantially - it will be a 25ish ranked class nationally (And middle of the pack in the Big Ten. That is just "math")

Those are about the only "facts" available.
People can think what they want about how meaningful recruiting rankings are - they can certainly choose to think high school recruiting is very important - or not important at all. But those are "feelings", which are worthless (except to the person whose feelings they are). And in most cases, one's feelings change by the minute, depending on whatever allows them to think things are super-duper (or, in some cases. non-super-duper).


But the facts are that this is on track to be PSU's worst recruiting class in some time..... aside from last year, which was just about on par with this year, and the 2021 fiasco, which was also just about on par with this year in quality. 2021 was a 17 person class - of which only 4 made impactful on field contributions (the King brothers, and the safety duo of Wheatley and Reed)

Does high school recruiting matter anymore? YMMV - most people probably reasonably think it is somewhat less important than in the past, due to the proliferation of the "portal". But, to the degree that it is still impactful, this one - from on objective read - is not nearly on track with PSU's historical standards or what is necessary (if it becomes the norm) to be consistently competitive in the Big Ten.

Time will tell.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,405
4,343
113
ND is loading up on offensive linemen. They just flipped a kid from UCLA. That already had a commitment from two other OL players including Halter, a four star OT from Pittsburgh Central Catholic, who is the fourth ranked player in PA. In addition, they just got a commitment from the #1 player in NJ, a five star OT. Now, they are the favorites to land the #1 player in DE who was previously committed to PSU. They aren’t messing around.
:mad:
 

Nits1989

All-Conference
Oct 29, 2021
1,297
1,866
113
As of today, the PSU recruiting class is a bit over 1/2 way completed.
The average quality (as per the "recruiting gurus") is 87.65. As classes fill out across the country - barring PSU's quality among the later part of the class increases substantially - it will be a 25ish ranked class nationally (And middle of the pack in the Big Ten. That is just "math")

Those are about the only "facts" available.
People can think what they want about how meaningful recruiting rankings are - they can certainly choose to think high school recruiting is very important - or not important at all. But those are "feelings", which are worthless (except to the person whose feelings they are). And in most cases, one's feelings change by the minute, depending on whatever allows them to think things are super-duper (or, in some cases. non-super-duper).


But the facts are that this is on track to be PSU's worst recruiting class in some time..... aside from last year, which was just about on par with this year, and the 2021 fiasco, which was also just about on par with this year in quality. 2021 was a 17 person class - of which only 4 made impactful on field contributions (the King brothers, and the safety duo of Wheatley and Reed)

Does high school recruiting matter anymore? YMMV - most people probably reasonably think it is somewhat less important than in the past, due to the proliferation of the "portal". But, to the degree that it is still impactful, this one - from on objective read - is not nearly on track with PSU's historical standards or what is necessary (if it becomes the norm) to be consistently competitive in the Big Ten.

Time will tell.
Maybe I’m foolish, but with money ruling recruiting, why do we still assume that other teams with fewer recruits but higher average rating per recruit will continue to fill their classes with higher rated recruits? Why is that the assumption? Why do we not consider that they might have to take more lower rated recruits due to cost issues?
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,405
4,343
113
The QB RB WR TE etc. all played for Campbell and the OC last year. This offense is flush with returning starters.
I'm talking about 2027. Becht, Hansen, Sowell, Brahmer, and Bacon were very good and much needed additions that should give PSU a chance at a good 2026 season. The problem is they're all seniors and the 2026 recruiting class was ranked 17th in the BiG.
 

rigi19041

Freshman
Apr 1, 2026
135
54
28
As of today, the PSU recruiting class is a bit over 1/2 way completed.
The average quality (as per the "recruiting gurus") is 87.65. As classes fill out across the country - barring PSU's quality among the later part of the class increases substantially - it will be a 25ish ranked class nationally (And middle of the pack in the Big Ten. That is just "math")

Those are about the only "facts" available.
People can think what they want about how meaningful recruiting rankings are - they can certainly choose to think high school recruiting is very important - or not important at all. But those are "feelings", which are worthless (except to the person whose feelings they are). And in most cases, one's feelings change by the minute, depending on whatever allows them to think things are super-duper (or, in some cases. non-super-duper).


But the facts are that this is on track to be PSU's worst recruiting class in some time..... aside from last year, which was just about on par with this year, and the 2021 fiasco, which was also just about on par with this year in quality. 2021 was a 17 person class - of which only 4 made impactful on field contributions (the King brothers, and the safety duo of Wheatley and Reed)

Does high school recruiting matter anymore? YMMV - most people probably reasonably think it is somewhat less important than in the past, due to the proliferation of the "portal". But, to the degree that it is still impactful, this one - from on objective read - is not nearly on track with PSU's historical standards or what is necessary (if it becomes the norm) to be consistently competitive in the Big Ten.

Time will tell.


Your projections are facts???? Yea, wrong.



Psu will be higher than 25th.

The fact is both rivals and 247 add points for quantity in team rankings. If two teams have the same exact 20 recruits with an average of 88.1234 and one team then adds 15 more 3*s who have an average ranking of 87.0 The team with 15 extra recruits does NOT lose ground.
 
Last edited:

DaytonRickster

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,714
3,167
113
I shouldn't have included Granville on my list but word was he would have started if not for injury.

That doesn't change my point which is that we lost a lot of starters from 2025 and we lost most our entire 2026 class in the portal. We had an extremely depleted roster except for the Iowa State transfers. They should help make us competitive this fall but many are seniors and the 65th ranked 2026 recruiting class isn't close to what we need to be competitive in 2027. For that to happen PSU is going to need a lot of portal help.
Agree PSU will need lots of portal help the next few years because of the 2026 class issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionsAndBears

LionsAndBears

All-Conference
Dec 7, 2009
2,263
4,090
113
I'm thinking that part of why we turned to Wood instead of Bourque was because we knew that we were going to have to go out and get a 7 figure QB in the Transfer Portal next year.