In your world Texas A&M would have won a couple nattys over the last 10 years because they always have a ton of talent and a highly ranked recruiting class.Unless PSU signs several high 4 stars and perhaps a 5 star, they will not be in the final top 10. Ratings are skewed by numbers and not quality. Since PSU will likely have one of the largest classes, their rating will be artificially inflated. Recruiting average players (88) isn't going to produce talent to beat (91). It's been the same for years. The "portal era" means nothing if you aren't securing the top talent from there, Bottom line, if you don't have the money to sign the blue chips....where will you get the cash to win the free agent frenzy, which is the portal? I don't know what I'm talking about, but I can decipher numbers. There are about 17 schools that have a higher rating per commit than PSU currently boasts.
My assertion is that if they continue to recruit at the current level.....which is similar to what Franklin achieved, the results will be similar. "Coaching them up" is for cheerleaders, because other schools have coaches too.
I fail to see how it's being butt hurt to insist that game changers are needed at several positions and they are currently not committed. Perhaps that will happen? Getting a commit from QB #7 and 80 nationally will be evidence of a foundation.
Yes, you need talent. Your premise though is flawed because you are only looking at HS recruiting rankings and then projecting that to play out the exact same way on the field. In your world a team with an average player ranking of 89 can never beat a team with an average player ranking of 92 or 93. What positions do the most talented players on the 89 average player team play? What are you doing in the portal? Not just getting the highest rated guy available but strategically filling a need with a guy who fits your culture. What about intangibles like veteran leadership or mental and physical toughness? Player development? Many factors to consider.