17 you DRT

mcdawg22

Heisman
Sep 18, 2004
13,226
10,939
113
I never bet on State. But I should have. Hell I put a self imposed year ban, which would benefit everyone but me. TBone, we knew it. We dominated that game never in question. 17 you ESPN.
 

drt7891

Redshirt
Dec 6, 2010
6,727
0
0
It was in question until we "recovered" the piss poor attempt at an onside kick. You are telling me if they recovered it, the game still wouldn't be in question?

I'm eating my crow, but don't be stupid.
 

was21

Senior
May 29, 2007
9,944
592
113
I wouldn't 17 him or you either...but I was wrong too...but 17 ESPN..especially the announcers
 

mcdawg22

Heisman
Sep 18, 2004
13,226
10,939
113
It was in question until we "recovered" the piss poor attempt at an onside kick. You are telling me if they recovered it, the game still wouldn't be in question?

I'm eating my crow, but don't be stupid.
I am the ultimate State fan. I always feel the sky is falling, but Dak threw NO pass that was even close to being picked. If we needed 6 we got 7 unless Hogan Walley Fumbled. We destroyed them and we are feared in the red zone. Eat your ******* crow and shut the **** up for a month or two.
 

drt7891

Redshirt
Dec 6, 2010
6,727
0
0
I disagree, but I'm done arguing.

Like I said, I felt we played too conservative at the end (we ran prevent defense that whole last drive... until the play we got the sack), but we won and I'm eating my crow. I was wrong and our team came through on the road. Proud of them. Hail State.
 

ronpolk

All-Conference
May 6, 2009
9,166
4,774
113
It was in question until we "recovered" the piss poor attempt at an onside kick. You are telling me if they recovered it, the game still wouldn't be in question?

I'm eating my crow, but don't be stupid.

It was never in question. They never even got in the end zone. You are just an idiot.
 

drt7891

Redshirt
Dec 6, 2010
6,727
0
0
Dude... they were in the red zone 4 times and got to the 1 yard line twice. Our defense came through when we needed it most, but I'm failing to see how the game was "never in question?" Are you telling me if they had recovered the onside kick with 1:04 to go in the game and down 8 points, the game would still "not be in question?" Because it was until the moment that kick went out of bounds.

I realize I was wrong on the outcome, but I don't see where I was too off-base with most of my initial analysis. Barbour ran all over us, but our defense held when they had to. I'm glad we won, and have fun calling me an idiot, but I'm not being ridiculous, nor am I out of line for saying any of this.

I'm done arguing. Hail State.
 

dawgdoug1962

Redshirt
Oct 14, 2013
279
8
18
Dude... they were in the red zone 4 times and got to the 1 yard line twice. Our defense came through when we needed it most, but I'm failing to see how the game was "never in question?" Are you telling me if they had recovered the onside kick with 1:04 to go in the game and down 8 points, the game would still "not be in question?" Because it was until the moment that kick went out of bounds.

I realize I was wrong on the outcome, but I don't see where I was too off-base with most of my initial analysis. Barbour ran all over us, but our defense held when they had to. I'm glad we won, and have fun calling me an idiot, but I'm not being ridiculous, nor am I out of line for saying any of this.

I'm done arguing. Hail State.

IF you are done arguing then QUIT arguing every point from other posters......
 

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
39,502
19,079
113
The game was never within one possession in the 2nd half and Auburn having the ball. It was never in question. I do agree we didn't play well.
 
Sep 25, 2013
1,627
0
0
Shut up
Dude... they were in the red zone 4 times and got to the 1 yard line twice. Our defense came through when we needed it most, but I'm failing to see how the game was "never in question?" Are you telling me if they had recovered the onside kick with 1:04 to go in the game and down 8 points, the game would still "not be in question?" Because it was until the moment that kick went out of bounds.

I realize I was wrong on the outcome, but I don't see where I was too off-base with most of my initial analysis. Barbour ran all over us, but our defense held when they had to. I'm glad we won, and have fun calling me an idiot, but I'm not being ridiculous, nor am I out of line for saying any of this.

I'm done arguing. Hail State.
 

Shamoan

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2013
12,466
0
0
put the screws to him guys. this is just dumb. " It was in question until we "recovered" the piss poor attempt at an onside kick. You are telling me if they recovered it, the game still wouldn't be in question? "
 

Shamoan

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2013
12,466
0
0
i wouldnt even say that. they just did their damn job. the offense never had to put up big numbers as long as the defense kept them out of the ez, which they did. easily diaz's best gameplan.
 

MeridianDog

Freshman
Sep 3, 2008
3,226
80
48
Dude... they were in the red zone 4 times and got to the 1 yard line twice. Our defense came through when we needed it most, but I'm failing to see how the game was "never in question?" Are you telling me if they had recovered the onside kick with 1:04 to go in the game and down 8 points, the game would still "not be in question?" Because it was until the moment that kick went out of bounds.

You are the very worst kind of fan. In your opinion every play, every snap, every drive is a chance for us to lose.

Go somewhere else.

Hail State. Go Dogs!
 

ronpolk

All-Conference
May 6, 2009
9,166
4,774
113
Dude... they were in the red zone 4 times and got to the 1 yard line twice. Our defense came through when we needed it most, but I'm failing to see how the game was "never in question?" Are you telling me if they had recovered the onside kick with 1:04 to go in the game and down 8 points, the game would still "not be in question?" Because it was until the moment that kick went out of bounds.

I realize I was wrong on the outcome, but I don't see where I was too off-base with most of my initial analysis. Barbour ran all over us, but our defense held when they had to. I'm glad we won, and have fun calling me an idiot, but I'm not being ridiculous, nor am I out of line for saying any of this.

I'm done arguing. Hail State.

They got in the red zone but never got in and they kicked the onside but couldn't get recover it.

If they could have scored some touch downs and not kicked that onside kick out of bounce it may have been a close game.
 
Aug 26, 2015
4,054
284
83
Guys the vibe from DRT was it will be a tough game...

Am I missing something, was that not a tough game---Auburn had more yards, more 1st downs, and more time of possession than us...they threw an INT on our goal line and we had to make a goal line stand on them as well.

Some may say "we lead the whole way" "never REALLY in doubt"---guys until MSU is up by at least 20 points I PERSONALLY AM NOT COMFORTABLE.

Cut DRT some slack, he is happy we won---historically when it comes to MSU football you hope for the best but prepare for the worst.
 

treeddeep

Redshirt
Jun 7, 2013
1,061
0
0
Yeah, not so comfortable with all of the attacks on DRT. We are all fans, we all have different ways of coping with tough losses, expectations, etc. He admits he was wrong. Let's not string him up and beat him with cowbells.
 

hatfieldms

All-Conference
Feb 20, 2008
8,655
2,231
113
Actually the vibe from him was we would lose

And we didn't. He has earned this
 

LawDawg97

Redshirt
Sep 7, 2012
1,138
0
0
Well no kidding playing in Auburn is a tough game. No one needs to be told that. Drt ran his mouth over and over about how we better play our best game or we would be run out of the stadium. Well we didn't play our best game and still controlled the score the whole game.

If he wants to run his mouth like he's some kind of expert he can handle it if he gets called out. You know he would have been on here immediately telling us all he told us so if we lost.