I think it's pretty obvious we never wanted Kohler anyway.
Weird situation where you’re positive and I’m not. It’s like bizarro world.You can't go wrong with Mitchell. If you land Mitchell, you're getting an All-SEC guy who also happens to be a high-level passer from the 4 spot (almost 4 assists per game last year).
39% on 49 three point attempts also isn't bad. He'll take more in Pope's system obviously. He also gives you a legit low post scoring threat.
He'd be the #1 portal recruit if he had been eligible back in April.
He would’ve been starting 2g meaning no Wilkins. I’d rather have Wilkins any day over Chandler. And no he isn’t better than Mason Williams. I’ll stand on that. You also made my point by comparing Chandler to backups for us.All that is true, but the team would be better with him. Losing him wasn’t an addition. He’s worlds better than Morton and/or Williams. What you said was losing him wasn’t an upgrade. That’s false.
UK has to pull out from being the drive up the price school. Cheapens the image.He was driving up his price. Standard stuff once agents are involved. Happens in the NFL and NBA every day
Let’s think about what you just said. “He can’t shoot and he will bog down the offense”. Why would Pope even recruit a guy who “can’t shoot” and will “bog down” his offense?Weird situation where you’re positive and I’m not. It’s like bizarro world.
I don’t see the fit with Mitchell — excellent player but he can’t shoot and he will bog down the offense. I’m worried about next year and hope to be wrong, with or without Mitchell.
I think Kohler is the better fit for Popes offense as well but he wants to go back home and BYU needs him so bad they would match anything we threw at him. So Mitchell who is more talented is the plan and not a bad one.I would love to get Mitchell but I’m not sure why wanting Kohler means you don’t understand basketball. Mitchell definitely has strengths Kohler doesn’t, I’m just not sure the ones you listed are facts.
He’s a better overall scorer for sure, interior scoring can be debated. He’s not near the rebounder Kohler is and actually blocked less shots than Kohler and that’s saying something, so not really sure on the “physical presence” part. Also a bigger threat from three than Mitchell.
I’m neither a hater nor blinded by Pope I do know basketball and my first choice would have been Kohler but I will be very happy if we get Mitchell.
Maybe you don’t know how recruiting works. UK had the #3 portal class and if they get Mitchell it could be #1.It seems like plenty of them don’t want to.
Yep he’s very goodYou can't go wrong with Mitchell. If you land Mitchell, you're getting an All-SEC guy who also happens to be a high-level passer from the 4 spot (almost 4 assists per game last year).
39% on 49 three point attempts also isn't bad. He'll take more in Pope's system obviously. He also gives you a legit low post scoring threat.
He'd be the #1 portal recruit if he had been eligible back in April.
Vargas played like 1 min a game lolThat's a weird take. Every team needs backups. Do you remember who we had backing up Davis in 2012, champ?
Eloy Vargas.
Try again, homie.
Is he the one Pope was referring to as as sending home? Makes sense if it was. Good for Pope for doing that too.He never wanted to leave byu just playing around
Do you go through life walking the streets being this dumb or do you just bless us with your stupidity here online.Vargas played like 1 min a game lol
Yeah, then Wright spinned it in an interview saying he knew his heart was always at BYU in the first few hours of his visit.Is he the one Pope was referring to as as sending home? Makes sense if it was. Good for Pope for doing that too.
Realt question is who is peanut m&m
None of them unless you have small nuts.
Isn't that the idiot kid who heard rumblings about Frank lolDo you go through life walking the streets being this dumb or do you just bless us with your stupidity here online.
Curious as to what makes you say he bogs down the offense? His usage rating was at essentially 25% (for reference Otega's the last 2 years were 26 and 28% respectively) and he averaged 3.6 assists per game. For comparison, Amari averaged 3.2 assists at 24% usage rating. Mitchell also averaged right at 2 turnovers so close to a 2:1a/to as a power forward and focal point of the defense.Weird situation where you’re positive and I’m not. It’s like bizarro world.
I don’t see the fit with Mitchell — excellent player but he can’t shoot and he will bog down the offense. I’m worried about next year and hope to be wrong, with or without Mitchell.
Yep. Also the guy that became a “Uk fan” because his dad showed him high school game tapes of KAT in a parking lot when he was 10 years old.Isn't that the idiot kid who heard rumblings about Frank lol
As well as an Ohio State footbal fanYep. Also the guy that became a “Uk fan” because his dad showed him high school game tapes of KAT in a parking lot when he was 10 years old.
39% from three,I think MM would be a great fit. Love his game!!Curious as to what makes you say he bogs down the offense? His usage rating was at essentially 25% (for reference Otega's the last 2 years were 26 and 28% respectively) and he averaged 3.6 assists per game. For comparison, Amari averaged 3.2 assists at 24% usage rating. Mitchell also averaged right at 2 turnovers so close to a 2:1a/to as a power forward and focal point of the defense.
In my mind, Mitchell is a legitimate offensive hub who can also go and get his own without detracting from his teammates.
Pretty sure it was an Applebee's parking lot and they were selling jerseys out of their car trunk.Yep. Also the guy that became a “Uk fan” because his dad showed him high school game tapes of KAT in a parking lot when he was 10 years old.
He cannot shoot. He made 39% but on extremely low volume. Just like Dioubate shot 46% the year before on low volume. Again, I said he’s a really good player, excellent even. But yes I think having a non-shooting PF will bog down the offense.Curious as to what makes you say he bogs down the offense? His usage rating was at essentially 25% (for reference Otega's the last 2 years were 26 and 28% respectively) and he averaged 3.6 assists per game. For comparison, Amari averaged 3.2 assists at 24% usage rating. Mitchell also averaged right at 2 turnovers so close to a 2:1a/to as a power forward and focal point of the defense.
In my mind, Mitchell is a legitimate offensive hub who can also go and get his own without detracting from his teammates.
Or 7…which I get isn’t a lot but we’re asking Franck for 10 and he’s 100x better.Vargas played like 1 min a game lol
No other doesn't. Every team is in the same boat LMAO. Every kid we aren't in on has a final 8 then final four list. Don't be ridiculousUK has to pull out from being the drive up the price school. Cheapens the image.
That’s a simplistic look at Mitchell, in my opinion. What does Kentucky’s roster lack right now? Elite athleticism, a defender capable of guarding either forward position, lateral quickness, someone who can overpower most inside defenders one-on-one, strength under the boards.He cannot shoot. He made 39% but on extremely low volume. Just like Dioubate shot 46% the year before on low volume. Again, I said he’s a really good player, excellent even. But yes I think having a non-shooting PF will bog down the offense.
I didn’t say anything about the defense and rebounding. I said the “offense will get bogged down” and I stand by it. If we add him and then we get 25% of the way through the year and then all of a sudden everyone starts asking why we are going back to high pick and roll and why our Zoom offense is getting blown up, that’s on y’all. I like Pope, heck I want it to work with him and I am definitely not the type to find something petty to complain about. I think people are seeing what they want to see with Mitchell and not thinking about him next to the current pieces.That’s a simplistic look at Mitchell, in my opinion. What does Kentucky’s roster lack right now? Elite athleticism, a defender capable of guarding either forward position, lateral quickness, someone who can overpower most inside defenders one-on-one, strength under the boards.
Does that sound like anyone? As for offense: Watch some video. Teams that stopped Mitchell did it by playing zones. When anyone tried to stop him man-to-man (Alabama, Arkansas) he overwhelmed them. Teams wouldn’t be able to pack defenses inside on Kentucky with Momcilovic on other Cats on the perimeter. They’d have to play him honest.
Hopefully we get it done. I really wanted him as he is a legit All SEC forward.
Yeah and Franck is an AA compared to Vargas. Granted no reason for Davis to ever leave the floor but Big Franck is a legit backup.That's a weird take. Every team needs backups. Do you remember who we had backing up Davis in 2012, champ?
Eloy Vargas.
Try again, homie.
Never heard that Wright was sent home.Rob Wright was playing a game and got sent home just a few hrs into his visit.
Chandler tried to get UK to match BYU offer and we didn’t.
Kholer was headed to BYU from the jump and Pope reached out just to see if there was a chance.
So you’re upset that we lost 3 battles to BYU that never received a NIL offer? Some of you believe that just because UK is mentioned in a recruitment that we are all in.
It was confirmed by insiders and Pope himself without saying Rob’s name.Never heard that Wright was sent home.
You sure about that?
Must be bizarro world. I think we become a legit team with Mitchell lol.Weird situation where you’re positive and I’m not. It’s like bizarro world.
I don’t see the fit with Mitchell — excellent player but he can’t shoot and he will bog down the offense. I’m worried about next year and hope to be wrong, with or without Mitchell.
No comparisonHe cannot shoot. He made 39% but on extremely low volume. Just like Dioubate shot 46% the year before on low volume. Again, I said he’s a really good player, excellent even. But yes I think having a non-shooting PF will bog down the offense.
Again. Hope to be wrong. I can see teams faceguarding Mom and us struggling to score dependably from three and us getting gapped and not having the shooters to reverse it. We will see.Must be bizarro world. I think we become a legit team with Mitchell lol.
Obviously he is. That’s why my post says he is an EXCELLENT player. Cmon guys. At least contend with what I’m saying he took 1.5 threes per game. I wonder why. And he’s never attempted more than that. The reason is obvious. He’s a non-shooter.No comparison
Mitchell is head and shoulders better than mo
KSR
Ty Bryant is a nominee for award known as 'Academic Heisman'
KSR
Kentucky is a finalist for 2028 QB Trey Wright with decision coming soon
KSR
Bio Blast: Missouri forward Mark Mitchell
KSR
Surprising Things You Didn't Know About the Kentucky Football Team
KSR
Wildcat Spotlight: Aaron Gates