BB: Mitchell or Bust? UK out on Jaxon Kohler

Im The Village Idiot

All-American
Sep 7, 2025
2,142
5,322
113
You can't go wrong with Mitchell. If you land Mitchell, you're getting an All-SEC guy who also happens to be a high-level passer from the 4 spot (almost 4 assists per game last year).

39% on 49 three point attempts also isn't bad. He'll take more in Pope's system obviously. He also gives you a legit low post scoring threat.

He'd be the #1 portal recruit if he had been eligible back in April.
Weird situation where you’re positive and I’m not. It’s like bizarro world.

I don’t see the fit with Mitchell — excellent player but he can’t shoot and he will bog down the offense. I’m worried about next year and hope to be wrong, with or without Mitchell.
 

BluWildcatz

Sophomore
Jun 16, 2026
78
108
33
mms GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThreeDogNight2

ScWildcat3

All-Conference
Sep 27, 2005
811
1,234
93
All that is true, but the team would be better with him. Losing him wasn’t an addition. He’s worlds better than Morton and/or Williams. What you said was losing him wasn’t an upgrade. That’s false.
He would’ve been starting 2g meaning no Wilkins. I’d rather have Wilkins any day over Chandler. And no he isn’t better than Mason Williams. I’ll stand on that. You also made my point by comparing Chandler to backups for us.
 

BBN9

Freshman
Jun 8, 2026
68
90
18
Weird situation where you’re positive and I’m not. It’s like bizarro world.

I don’t see the fit with Mitchell — excellent player but he can’t shoot and he will bog down the offense. I’m worried about next year and hope to be wrong, with or without Mitchell.
Let’s think about what you just said. “He can’t shoot and he will bog down the offense”. Why would Pope even recruit a guy who “can’t shoot” and will “bog down” his offense?
 
Jun 23, 2026
232
632
93
I would love to get Mitchell but I’m not sure why wanting Kohler means you don’t understand basketball. Mitchell definitely has strengths Kohler doesn’t, I’m just not sure the ones you listed are facts.

He’s a better overall scorer for sure, interior scoring can be debated. He’s not near the rebounder Kohler is and actually blocked less shots than Kohler and that’s saying something, so not really sure on the “physical presence” part. Also a bigger threat from three than Mitchell.

I’m neither a hater nor blinded by Pope I do know basketball and my first choice would have been Kohler but I will be very happy if we get Mitchell.
I think Kohler is the better fit for Popes offense as well but he wants to go back home and BYU needs him so bad they would match anything we threw at him. So Mitchell who is more talented is the plan and not a bad one.
 

theKybluedude

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
814
1,789
93
You can't go wrong with Mitchell. If you land Mitchell, you're getting an All-SEC guy who also happens to be a high-level passer from the 4 spot (almost 4 assists per game last year).

39% on 49 three point attempts also isn't bad. He'll take more in Pope's system obviously. He also gives you a legit low post scoring threat.

He'd be the #1 portal recruit if he had been eligible back in April.
Yep he’s very good
 
Apr 6, 2026
106
248
43
Weird situation where you’re positive and I’m not. It’s like bizarro world.

I don’t see the fit with Mitchell — excellent player but he can’t shoot and he will bog down the offense. I’m worried about next year and hope to be wrong, with or without Mitchell.
Curious as to what makes you say he bogs down the offense? His usage rating was at essentially 25% (for reference Otega's the last 2 years were 26 and 28% respectively) and he averaged 3.6 assists per game. For comparison, Amari averaged 3.2 assists at 24% usage rating. Mitchell also averaged right at 2 turnovers so close to a 2:1a/to as a power forward and focal point of the defense.
In my mind, Mitchell is a legitimate offensive hub who can also go and get his own without detracting from his teammates.
 

CATALCOHOLIC

Junior
Apr 13, 2018
212
364
52
Curious as to what makes you say he bogs down the offense? His usage rating was at essentially 25% (for reference Otega's the last 2 years were 26 and 28% respectively) and he averaged 3.6 assists per game. For comparison, Amari averaged 3.2 assists at 24% usage rating. Mitchell also averaged right at 2 turnovers so close to a 2:1a/to as a power forward and focal point of the defense.
In my mind, Mitchell is a legitimate offensive hub who can also go and get his own without detracting from his teammates.
39% from three,I think MM would be a great fit. Love his game!!
 

Im The Village Idiot

All-American
Sep 7, 2025
2,142
5,322
113
Curious as to what makes you say he bogs down the offense? His usage rating was at essentially 25% (for reference Otega's the last 2 years were 26 and 28% respectively) and he averaged 3.6 assists per game. For comparison, Amari averaged 3.2 assists at 24% usage rating. Mitchell also averaged right at 2 turnovers so close to a 2:1a/to as a power forward and focal point of the defense.
In my mind, Mitchell is a legitimate offensive hub who can also go and get his own without detracting from his teammates.
He cannot shoot. He made 39% but on extremely low volume. Just like Dioubate shot 46% the year before on low volume. Again, I said he’s a really good player, excellent even. But yes I think having a non-shooting PF will bog down the offense.
 

MdWIldcat55

Heisman
Dec 9, 2007
21,566
86,802
113
He cannot shoot. He made 39% but on extremely low volume. Just like Dioubate shot 46% the year before on low volume. Again, I said he’s a really good player, excellent even. But yes I think having a non-shooting PF will bog down the offense.
That’s a simplistic look at Mitchell, in my opinion. What does Kentucky’s roster lack right now? Elite athleticism, a defender capable of guarding either forward position, lateral quickness, someone who can overpower most inside defenders one-on-one, strength under the boards.

Does that sound like anyone? As for offense: Watch some video. Teams that stopped Mitchell did it by playing zones. When anyone tried to stop him man-to-man (Alabama, Arkansas) he overwhelmed them. Teams wouldn’t be able to pack defenses inside on Kentucky with Momcilovic on other Cats on the perimeter. They’d have to play him honest.
 

Im The Village Idiot

All-American
Sep 7, 2025
2,142
5,322
113
That’s a simplistic look at Mitchell, in my opinion. What does Kentucky’s roster lack right now? Elite athleticism, a defender capable of guarding either forward position, lateral quickness, someone who can overpower most inside defenders one-on-one, strength under the boards.

Does that sound like anyone? As for offense: Watch some video. Teams that stopped Mitchell did it by playing zones. When anyone tried to stop him man-to-man (Alabama, Arkansas) he overwhelmed them. Teams wouldn’t be able to pack defenses inside on Kentucky with Momcilovic on other Cats on the perimeter. They’d have to play him honest.
I didn’t say anything about the defense and rebounding. I said the “offense will get bogged down” and I stand by it. If we add him and then we get 25% of the way through the year and then all of a sudden everyone starts asking why we are going back to high pick and roll and why our Zoom offense is getting blown up, that’s on y’all. I like Pope, heck I want it to work with him and I am definitely not the type to find something petty to complain about. I think people are seeing what they want to see with Mitchell and not thinking about him next to the current pieces.

Mitchell (non-shooter), Moreno (non-shooter), Momcilovic (shooter), Wilkins (streaky shooter), Diallo (non-shooter).

Remember this post when everyone gets “blindsided” by the lack of shooting. I’ll not wear the blue glasses for anyone. You’ll always get my honest takes regardless of how bad you may think they are.
 

bnewt5

Senior
Feb 17, 2026
544
672
93
Rob Wright was playing a game and got sent home just a few hrs into his visit.

Chandler tried to get UK to match BYU offer and we didn’t.

Kholer was headed to BYU from the jump and Pope reached out just to see if there was a chance.

So you’re upset that we lost 3 battles to BYU that never received a NIL offer? Some of you believe that just because UK is mentioned in a recruitment that we are all in.
Never heard that Wright was sent home.
You sure about that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cornbreadnmilk

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
47,086
86,101
113
Weird situation where you’re positive and I’m not. It’s like bizarro world.

I don’t see the fit with Mitchell — excellent player but he can’t shoot and he will bog down the offense. I’m worried about next year and hope to be wrong, with or without Mitchell.
Must be bizarro world. I think we become a legit team with Mitchell lol.
 

Im The Village Idiot

All-American
Sep 7, 2025
2,142
5,322
113
No comparison
Mitchell is head and shoulders better than mo
Obviously he is. That’s why my post says he is an EXCELLENT player. Cmon guys. At least contend with what I’m saying he took 1.5 threes per game. I wonder why. And he’s never attempted more than that. The reason is obvious. He’s a non-shooter.
 
KSR

Latest

  1. 01 KSR Mark Mitchell's hearing in Louisville postponed to Friday
  2. 02 KSR Big Blue Madness has been scheduled -- and it's coming early!
  3. 03 KSR Surprising Things You Didn't Know About the Kentucky Football Team
  4. 04 KSR The NBA's Christmas Day games are LOADED with over a dozen former Wildcats
  5. 05 KSR Ty Bryant is a nominee for award known as 'Academic Heisman'