Imagine what I think of all these guysDude. Just stop. Please. I am so tired of trying to scroll past all your posts.
Please, just stop
Imagine what I think of all these guysDude. Just stop. Please. I am so tired of trying to scroll past all your posts.
Please, just stop
I don't think anyone here is arguing she isn't a great rebounder. She is. But that's literally the only thing she's good at. Lol.
Why have all you guys not put him on ignore?Dude. Just stop. Please. I am so tired of trying to scroll past all your posts.
Please, just stop
Being 6'4" in a league where nobody has any vertical doesn't hurt.#MeBounds
I don't have to imagine.........Imagine what I think of all these guys
It's more fun to drive him insane. But that is a personal preference..........Why have all you guys not put him on ignore?
You are right. It will totally clean up my feed.Why have all you guys not put him on ignore?
So was as used like this?Bro, this probably the third time this distinction has had to be made.
AGAIN, it's the difference between,"WAS", and, "IS (currently)".
This is not difficult to understand
OK, I can see where in, "I didn't say either player was better", the "was" can be confusing.So was as used like this?
‘I didn't say either player was better.’
And in the same post
‘Paige was always better.’
Where you use was in both?
Or when you use ‘is’
‘If I had a gun to my head, I'd say PB is better.’
So you have a ‘was’ better and an ‘is’ better.
but according to you, neither has been typed by you…… well until you tell us why you typed it.
I am not sure what motivates people to go to a team they don’t follow and troll like you do. Do you troll like this on your favorite teams board?
I will say your ‘read better’ direction has helped me point out your errors. Will you get more subtle or will it always be this easy?
Iowa > NebraskaOK, I can see where in, "I didn't say either player was better", the "was" can be confusing.
But if you follow the context, it was in response to Evil having posted, "CC > Paige". So perhaps sloppy wording there. But it's pretty much implied through context, that we were speaking of the comparison between the two players, at present.
Yes, if I had a gun to my head, I would say PB is better. But that's the closest thing I've said to saying PB is currently the better player.
It's all in this thread. Nice try again, I guess. Smh.
And I am a Hawkeye fan, you idiot
Damn right!Iowa > Nebraska
Deflection. Nice attempt.One player to watch is Olivia Miles, for the Lynx.
She looked like easily one of the best players in the league tonight.
The Mercury's defense was awful, as Miles was able to drive and pass through it like a hot knife on butter. But good Lord, she was a surgeon.
Would love to see what she looks like playing against the Valkyrie's D.
The Lynx are loaded whenever Phee comes back
There isn’t much confusion. This reading thing is paying dividends.OK, I can see where in, "I didn't say either player was better", the "was" can be confusing.
But if you follow the context, it was in response to Evil having posted, "CC > Paige". So perhaps sloppy wording there. But it's pretty much implied through context, that we were speaking of the comparison between the two players, at present.
Yes, if I had a gun to my head, I would say PB is better. But that's the closest thing I've said to saying PB is currently the better player.
It's all in this thread. Nice try again, I guess. Smh.
And I am a Hawkeye fan, you idiot
Read better, bro.There isn’t much confusion. This reading thing is paying dividends.
To summarize, you have typed both
Was better and is better. Whether it was a response to another poster or not or whether the moons were aligned or dogs and cats were living as one…………… you typed was better and just because the hypothetical gun was to your head, is better.
Since you feel skilled enough to teach the rest of us how to read better you can move on to typing better, be accurate and stop being dishonest in your posts. When you double down on it like you have you just appear to be a liar. Kind of like when you claim to be an Iowa fan.
I could not take it and put on "ignore" long ago. He/she is nauseating IMO.I've watched the W enough to have been a profitable bettor at it all but three of years of it's existence.
What does this have to with anything regarding coaching, defensive adjustments, or anything basketball related? Hell, I've bet A'Ja and Plum overs on pts per game and I'm doing just fine.
If it wasn't so comically entertaining watching you troll everyone, you'd have been on ignore a long time ago.
StopDeflection. Nice attempt.
I'm not a hesheI could not take it and put on "ignore" long ago. He/she is nauseating IMO.
So other than reading exactly what you typed, verbatimRead better, bro.
All of this has been answered and clarified a couple times now.
I will not be wasting the time to do it again. And again, what's been laid out can still be found in the thread. So have fun with yourself.
And why the truck would you think I'm not an Iowa fan? You're really beginning to embarrass yourself. And I ask that you not make that claim again
What he's trying to say is you said "was always" and "is" for the same reference point, and then tried to argue they mean two different things after the fact........when others would argue you could've done a better job of just clarifying that to begin with, but you intentionally chose not to.There isn’t much confusion. This reading thing is paying dividends.
To summarize, you have typed both
Was better and is better. Whether it was a response to another poster or not or whether the moons were aligned or dogs and cats were living as one…………… you typed was better and just because the hypothetical gun was to your head, is better.
Since you feel skilled enough to teach the rest of us how to read better you can move on to typing better, be accurate and stop being dishonest in your posts. When you double down on it like you have you just appear to be a liar. Kind of like when you claim to be an Iowa fan.
So get a life, unless you want to also be called things that you are not