Wofford totally outcoached

[Cardsstink]

He's not smart enough to know when to quit and when to apologize. He's nothing but a punk.

There won't be an "I'm sorry" thread.

You’re a nobody bro, nothing but a nobody that comes running when you have numbers on your side. That’s a sissy move. People like you wonder why they have a lot of problems in life like you said you did. Look in the mirror.

 

[STL_Cat]

Alright, I tried to help. Did my good deed and you didn’t take my advice. Have fun continuing to make an *** out of yourself.

 

[Cardsstink]

Alright, I tried to help. Did my good deed and you didn’t take my advice. Have fun continuing to make an *** out of yourself.

You take yourself too seriously. I’m at Twin Peaks and laughing at all of this. Steak dinner at Ruth’s Chris in an hour. Enjoy the night.

 

[STL_Cat]

You take yourself too seriously. I’m at Twin Peaks and laughing at all of this. Steak dinner at Ruth’s Chris in an hour. Enjoy the night.

You’re at twin peaks with all that T&A walking around and you’re consciously making the decision to make an *** out of yourself here? Even dumber.

 

[Crawfords Corner]

You’re at twin peaks with all that T&A walking around and you’re consciously making the decision to make an *** out of yourself here? Even dumber.

Or a liar.

 

[kyjeff1]

You’re a nobody bro, nothing but a nobody that comes running when you have numbers on your side. That’s a sissy move. People like you wonder why they have a lot of problems in life like you said you did. Look in the mirror.

Ah, so now you're going to resort to thee ole keyboard cowboy ********.

Just give me your address bro, I'll be waiting in your driveway in the morning for you.

 

[morgousky]

My cedibuly is fine. You, wildlman in-Stl, Rupps runts and one or two others swarm like bees because you run in a little pack, try to bully anybody that stands up to you because none of you can stand in your own. Definition of coward. You guys are 1/10000/th of 1% of this board. So basically you’re NOBODY. Cry it all out.

Why is it when people make a stupid thread and like uh..., everyone agrees, then it becomes a “me against the world” mentality and everyone is packing up?

I’ve been rolled before. I never thought of it like that. I just said Nick didn’t actually play well in a thread where everyone thinks he did. Are they packin’ up on me?

Woffords coach wasn’t outcoached. They don’t play the way you want them to, he’s trying to win a game. Watch Duke if you want flops for fouls and teams playing to win by whistle. That’s not what that game was. He did just fine.

 

[HedgeCat1]

Why is it when people make a stupid thread and like uh..., everyone agrees, then it becomes a “me against the world” mentality and everyone is packing up?

I’ve been rolled before. I never thought of it like that. I just said Nick didn’t actually play well in a thread where everyone thinks he did. Are they packin’ up on me?

Woffords coach wasn’t outcoached. They don’t play the way you want them to, he’s trying to win a game. Watch Duke if you want flops for fouls and teams playing to win by whistle. That’s not what that game was. He did just fine.

I don't think it has occurred to @Cardsstink that shooters shoot. That's what they do. They have a kid that's one of the best in the country at shooting threes. Yes, he missed several. He missed early, and kept shooting. He missed late, and kept shooting. Any coach that knows anything is going to tell that kid to "keep shooting".


Wofford doesn't have some incredibly effective inside game with multiple guys available to do damage on the block. Otherwise I would imagine they would have tried to exploit that. What they have is a kid that is incredible from the perimeter and they went with him. It didn't work out. He missed shots, but it was still there best option. Let's say they go inside and try to do damage like you suggested. Let's say it doesn't work. Then everyone will say "they got the best three point shooter in the country and they tried to go inside"?


Since you keep pushing it, maybe you should apply that same standard to Calipari in 2010 against West Virginia where a bad three-point shooting team (Kentucky) shot 29 of them and proceeded to lose the game. Cousins, Patterson, Orton all on that team and you don't pound it in the paint? If you're (cardsstink) are trying to bait this point from a poster, well you got it.


Now, mods, put this baby to rest. @Cardsstink is done.

 

[kyjeff1]

I don't think it has occurred to @Cardsstink that shooters shoot. That's what they do. They have a kid that's one of the best in the country at shooting threes. Yes, he missed several. He missed early, and kept shooting. He missed late, and kept shooting. Any coach that knows anything is going to tell that kid to "keep shooting".


Wofford doesn't have some incredibly effective inside game with multiple guys available to do damage on the block. Otherwise I would imagine they would have tried to exploit that. What they have is a kid that is incredible from the perimeter and they went with him. It didn't work out. He missed shots, but it was still there best option. Let's say they go inside and try to do damage like you suggested. Let's say it doesn't work. Then everyone will say "they got the best three point shooter in the country and they tried to go inside"?


Since you keep pushing it, maybe you should apply that same standard to Calipari in 2010 against West Virginia where a bad three-point shooting team (Kentucky) shot 29 of them and proceeded to lose the game. Cousins, Patterson, Orton all on that team and you don't pound it in the paint? If you're (cardsstink) are trying to bait this point from a poster, well you got it.


Now, mods, put this baby to rest. @Cardsstink is done.

Wofford has 2 of the best shooters in college basketball, but they also have THE BEST shooter of all time in college basketball.

So yeah, shooting threes is what they do. But they are a complete team and played well at all facets of the game.

For some reason, Cardsstink thinks Wofford's coach is dumb because he didn't go after our bigs since they were in foul trouble.

But he doesn't get it. You run what you bring. They didn't have the size or the slashing guard play to pull that off.

They would have won if McGee hit a couple threes. He had 3 or 4 that were open, he just didn't make them.

The fact that he thinks someone got out coached and taking threes is a bad game plan, is all the proof you need to say he has no clue about this game.