ok.I’ve been around 10 years I’d say. Don’t get too caught up in the names of posters and what they represent (aside from the obvious ulismyman and smooth) but I can’t recall Kev seeming like a bad poster/poser fan.
I also am curious how he will respond to being forced into a 5 role quite a bit. As you've admitted, Bolden still sucks balls and delaurier is a good energy guy, but lacks real skills to be too reliable, plus fouls a lot.
If Tre Jones is out until January, which I've heard could be the case, who played guard and who runs the offense?
Yeah, but if your #1 pg option is out until January you are in deep trouble. He'll be playing catch-up the rest of the season and it's not like he is all that great anyway. He's nowhere near as good as his brother and he isn't a good shooter.Here’s a simple formula, if a team doesn’t have its starting point guard who is a 5 start talent and that forces its best player to play out of position, don’t use that as an indicator of how that team will play.
KU will be pretty good too....
Go to dukembb instagram. Jones is literally practicing in videos from last week. He’s held out as precaution because of what an impact might do to complicate recovery but he’s full go on running jumping and is a full participant in practices.
I dunno, man. I've heard it could easily be January, and that was from Duke people. Hip surgery is no joke.Go to dukembb instagram. Jones is literally practicing in videos from last week. He’s held out as precaution because of what an impact might do to complicate recovery but he’s full go on running jumping and is a full participant in practices.
Here’s a simple formula, if a team doesn’t have its starting point guard who is a 5 start talent and that forces its best player to play out of position, don’t use that as an indicator of how that team will play.
I didn't think it was that serious because there is literally zero talk about it on their Rivals board.
How tall does zion look on the floor with collegiate players? 6’6” or 6’8”
Last year Duke was deeper, more talented across the board as a team, had experience and shooters, yet it still wasnt enough. I wouldn't even have Duke in my top 7 or 8 teams currently.Your statement has nothing to do with the point I made.
Jones could play all season for all I care. I still have doubts about a healthy Jones and healthy Bolden and their ability to fill out the needed roles for a potential Duke title.
1. You guys need the interior players to step up. That's a major concern.
2. You'll need Jones to play at a high level when he returns. That's a major question mark.
3. You'll need to find at least two consistent shooters all season. O'Connell supposedly represents one of those two shooters, but there's still question marks about how much K trust him as a rotational player. Also, more minutes for Alex means less for either Barrett or Reddish, unless of course K plans on lying to Zion by placing him on the low block.
4. You don't have depth. Not at all. That should concern any objective Duke fan out there. Hoping that DeLaurier, Bolden, O'Connell, or Baker can take the step forward is in a holding pattern right now. We simply don't have the needed sample size available to project any of these four players as legitimately capable of filling a large role on the current Duke team.
Your statement has nothing to do with the point I made.
Jones could play all season for all I care. I still have doubts about a healthy Jones and healthy Bolden and their ability to fill out the needed roles for a potential Duke title.
1. You guys need the interior players to step up. That's a major concern.
2. You'll need Jones to play at a high level when he returns. That's a major question mark.
3. You'll need to find at least two consistent shooters all season. O'Connell supposedly represents one of those two shooters, but there's still question marks about how much K trust him as a rotational player. Also, more minutes for Alex means less for either Barrett or Reddish, unless of course K plans on lying to Zion by placing him on the low block.
4. You don't have depth. Not at all. That should concern any objective Duke fan out there. Hoping that DeLaurier, Bolden, O'Connell, or Baker can take the step forward is in a holding pattern right now. We simply don't have the needed sample size available to project any of these four players as legitimately capable of filling a large role on the current Duke team.
Being a threat is relative. To me their chances of winning it all are pretty low if they are forced to play zone or don’t have a 40% three point shooter playing 30 minutes per game.So asking a question constitutes being upset?
I'd rather see Duke with all their pieces in November.
I think UK wins in November and probably in the spring if they face each other again, but some of the narratives being spun tonight are shortsighted. Duke is a threat this year. Not like they were in 2015, when they had a complete team with real veterans, but anytime possessing playmaking scorers like Zion, RJ, and Reddish is automatically a threat.
You don't think KU and Gonzaga are worth a damn? I thought it was UK and KU, maybe throw Nevada and Gonzaga in there.
I really think Duke is in trouble. They will be weak defensively (coach K + young team = no defense) plus Jones being out until January is really going to throw a stick.into their spokes.
Oh, it also.looks like they won't have their typical 3 point shooting ability either, defenses are going to pack the paint on them, we know how that goes all too well.
Last year Duke was deeper, more talented across the board as a team, had experience and shooters, yet it still wasnt enough. I wouldn't even have Duke in my top 7 or 8 teams currently.
1. Why? Interior players are marginalized in today’s games. Guards and wings are what matters.
2. That’s true of every team. You don’t get quality pg play, you aren’t winning.
3. O’Connell is established so save your supposedly. Reddish will be 2 and Barrett will be 3 (watch). Your assumption about pt is false. When you have players that can actually play multiple positions and not just call themselves a 2 when they are obviously a 3/4, is that there are a lot of lineups that make sense. Plenty of pt for all that matter.
4. So? K plays 7-8 no matter what. Duke has that when healthy. You don’t win titles based on your 8th, 9th and 10th guys. You win because your studs show up. If you want to run your 7,8,9 out there for extended minutes against any teams 2,3,4 that’s not going to go well.
Again, I’m not saying duke will or won’t win. I’m saying that playing short handed, Duke didn’t look any better or worse than uk did in their game 1 when they went out and threw up 2-20 from 3. Teams improve and this season (not just nov 6) will be won or lost based on how quickly these unproven teams and players improve.
Last year Duke relied on 2 bigs that are way more talented than anyone in college hoops this year and Duke still had to deal with a constantly clogged lane and needed shooting to spread that out. That depth didn’t mean a thing. Should really be a cautionary tale about relying on multiple bigs and depth.
Duke needed more shooters last year? What?Last year Duke relied on 2 bigs that are way more talented than anyone in college hoops this year and Duke still had to deal with a constantly clogged lane and needed shooting to spread that out. That depth didn’t mean a thing. Should really be a cautionary tale about relying on multiple bigs and depth.
You all had a sr grayson allen at SF, who could shoot well and run the point when needed. You had Trent Jr. that was also a great shooter when he got going. Duval is also a better pg than you have now aside from his shooting. You also had 2 of the best bigs in CBB, that complimented each other nicely and both could shoot out to the 3 relatively well. Your bench is exactly the same this year, however, you have no quality 5's and only 1 possibly reliable guard who may be out until January recovering from hip surgery. Dukies are concerned and I see why.Last year Duke relied on 2 bigs that are way more talented than anyone in college hoops this year and Duke still had to deal with a constantly clogged lane and needed shooting to spread that out. That depth didn’t mean a thing. Should really be a cautionary tale about relying on multiple bigs and depth.
Duke needed more shooters last year? What?
You all had a sr grayson allen at SF, who could shoot well and run the point when needed. You had Trent Jr. that was also a great shooter when he got going. Duval is also a better pg than you have now aside from his shooting. You also had 2 of the best bigs in CBB, that complimented each other nicely and both could shoot out to the 3 relatively well. Your bench is exactly the same this year, however, you have no quality 5's and only 1 possibly reliable guard who may be out until January recovering from hip surgery. Dukies are concerned and I see why.
That team was something to behold on offense before they switched to zone and lost their transition element. They had four guys on the court, including those supposedly unreliable big men Bagley and Carter, who could shoot the three. And they had maybe the best transition PG in the country.Apparently he thinks Reddish, Zion and Jones are upgrades on Allen/Trent when it comes to perimeter shooting.
Maybe they will be, although it currently seems like a stretch.
Ehh, UK played good D, had great energy and intensity throughout. They Got off to a hot start, rebounded the hell out of the ball, made a lot of jumpers just inside the arc and showcased a lot of quality depth. We took care of the ball very well, showcased our half court and full court transition game and looked light years ahead of where we should be for this point in the season. Against grown men no less. Aside from 3pt shooting, UK looked quite well in their first game.1. Why? Interior players are marginalized in today’s games. Guards and wings are what matters.
2. That’s true of every team. You don’t get quality pg play, you aren’t winning.
3. O’Connell is established so save your supposedly. Reddish will be 2 and Barrett will be 3 (watch). Your assumption about pt is false. When you have players that can actually play multiple positions and not just call themselves a 2 when they are obviously a 3/4, is that there are a lot of lineups that make sense. Plenty of pt for all that matter.
4. So? K plays 7-8 no matter what. Duke has that when healthy. You don’t win titles based on your 8th, 9th and 10th guys. You win because your studs show up. If you want to run your 7,8,9 out there for extended minutes against any teams 2,3,4 that’s not going to go well.
Again, I’m not saying duke will or won’t win. I’m saying that playing short handed, Duke didn’t look any better or worse than uk did in their game 1 when they went out and threw up 2-20 from 3. Teams improve and this season (not just nov 6) will be won or lost based on how quickly these unproven teams and players improve.
Why is there a Duke game thread on this board?
I can assure Zion and Barrett won't hit that. Reddish maybe, but I still don't see him higher than 35% or 36%.They'll pencil Reddish/ Cam/ Zion in at 35 to 40% three point clips on the season.
They seem to forget how difficult it is to shoot in that percentage range for a full season.
But we end up well from three the next three games. Duke should Be afraidEhh, UK played good D, had great energy and intensity throughout. They Got off to a hot start, rebounded the hell out of the ball, made a lot of jumpers just inside the arc and showcased a lot of quality depth. We took care of the ball very well, showcased our half court and full court transition game and looked light years ahead of where we should be for this point in the season. Against grown men no less. Aside from 3pt shooting, UK looked quite well in their first game.
Because I think we are a deep and dominant team and I feel they will struggle with the pcs they have. I believe RJ will force a lot of action and Zion will wear down in games. Also at 285 I can see his ankles not holding up. They are already down 2 guys, it is safe to say they will have a guy or two banged up or hurt throughout the season. they are young and there is no one to turn to when it starts going bad. just my opinion, but I am not that worried about them. KU is a bigger concern for me with the guard pay they can match. Our guards and front court is so much deeper than Dook and I don't see how they match up against us for 40.Why don't they have a chance against us? They've played 3/4ths of their first game where they're missing 40% of their starters.
We could just as easily end up with another poor shooting performance during the Duke game, but regardless I think we win without much issue.But we end up well from three the next three games. Duke should Be afraid
Watch Dook ,your kidding right ? As my grandad used to say I wouldn’t give fifty cents to see that bunch of SOB,s eat a bail of hay !,figured anyone whos gonna watch could post their honest opinions about it, whos gonna be watching?
Why is there a Duke game thread on this board?
How tall does zion look on the floor with collegiate players? 6’6” or 6’8”
Silents, did you start a new account?
And no NBA team would want you evaluating talent if you don’t look at Zion and drool. I don’t care who he’s playing. The things he was doing can not be done by just anyone. He is a physical freak with that size and athleticism. If he shoots well as he did, he will be by far the best player in college basketball and Duke will be in the running for the national title. That being said, hitting shots in one game against poor does not mean he hit jump shots against quality competition. If he does he will have an Anthony Davis like impact but that’s a big if.
Dude your not as good as KY. It's OK just admit it and move forward with therapy that *** whopping gonna bring.1. Why? Interior players are marginalized in today’s games. Guards and wings are what matters.
2. That’s true of every team. You don’t get quality pg play, you aren’t winning.
3. O’Connell is established so save your supposedly. Reddish will be 2 and Barrett will be 3 (watch). Your assumption about pt is false. When you have players that can actually play multiple positions and not just call themselves a 2 when they are obviously a 3/4, is that there are a lot of lineups that make sense. Plenty of pt for all that matter.
4. So? K plays 7-8 no matter what. Duke has that when healthy. You don’t win titles based on your 8th, 9th and 10th guys. You win because your studs show up. If you want to run your 7,8,9 out there for extended minutes against any teams 2,3,4 that’s not going to go well.
Again, I’m not saying duke will or won’t win. I’m saying that playing short handed, Duke didn’t look any better or worse than uk did in their game 1 when they went out and threw up 2-20 from 3. Teams improve and this season (not just nov 6) will be won or lost based on how quickly these unproven teams and players improve.