This is the USA you little $&(#@)@@)! ing Communist !!! And just so happens to have two UK players and a UK coach.
You said we had no excuse not winning by 10+ each game......
And recruits
This is the USA you little $&(#@)@@)! ing Communist !!! And just so happens to have two UK players and a UK coach.
You said we had no excuse not winning by 10+ each game......
Pay attention to all the neg tweets and post on Cal. They are showing themselves.
Cal just be:
Lol, ALMOST lost the NC game (to a pretty good ku team) drops him to a C in game coach? SmhThere are those here who feel any criticism against the team, the coach, players, or anything related to the program makes you a bad fan. There are also those that will defend against any of those negative comments no matter what. OK. I feel a discussion board is for discussion.
Cal is obviously a great coach and recruiter, he is in the Hall of Fame, has been to several final fours and has a national championship. You can't be bad and accomplish what he has achieved. Nevertheless, I agree with an earlier poster who said he gets a grade C on in or during the game coaching. Let's be honest. We almost lost that Championship game to Kansas when the last several minutes we slowed down and the coach allowed it to happen. A great defensive play by MKG ended any chance for the Kansas come-back. But, those same observations hurt and cost us against Wisconsin with a clearly superior Kentucky team. Same thing that occurred today happened against West Virginia. John Wall, Eric Bledsoe, Patrick Patterson, Demarcus Cousins losing to that WVU team who was missing their starting Point Guard who had been injured in the game before???? This Under 19 team had much more talent on their roster than Canada. Canada made adjustments and took advantage of individual player weaknesses and the USA didn't. It also bothered me in that one kid's blog that talked about how Cal doesn't correct or get upset with mistakes and just coaches on effort. Really? That to me was not a ringing endorsement.
Cal is an amazing recruiter and an amazing psychologist in helping a team bond and play unselfish overall. But, he has been out-coached by others during a game. He is going to continue to be a great representative for Kentucky and I wouldn't want any other coach, but can't you say both the good and the bad?
Goodman has already started. I expect Forde to tweet out a dig at Cal or like a negative tweet any moment now.
Jeff GoodmanVerified account@GoodmanESPN
Jeff Goodman Retweeted USA Basketball
Canada beats Calipari-coached USA team in the semis of the U-19s.
There are those here who feel any criticism against the team, the coach, players, or anything related to the program makes you a bad fan. There are also those that will defend against any of those negative comments no matter what. OK. I feel a discussion board is for discussion.
Cal is obviously a great coach and recruiter, he is in the Hall of Fame, has been to several final fours and has a national championship. You can't be bad and accomplish what he has achieved. Nevertheless, I agree with an earlier poster who said he gets a grade C on in or during the game coaching. Let's be honest. We almost lost that Championship game to Kansas when the last several minutes we slowed down and the coach allowed it to happen. A great defensive play by MKG ended any chance for the Kansas come-back.
Well, to be fair, the 2011 team underperformed all season and then BK carried us through the tournament.
Also, 2014 wildly underperformed throughout the season, and shouldn't have been an 8 seed in the first place. Then lived up to the preseason expectations in the tournament. (Still shouldn't have lost the championship game)
No, He just had to put in there "Calipari coached USA team". It was a subtle dig at Cal, because he has an agenda against him. Everyone knows who the coach is. You think he would've done that with any other coach?I hate that goober but his tweet was fine. Are people supposed to ignore this loss completely and not report it?
There are those here who feel any criticism against the team, the coach, players, or anything related to the program makes you a bad fan. There are also those that will defend against any of those negative comments no matter what. OK. I feel a discussion board is for discussion.
Cal is obviously a great coach and recruiter, he is in the Hall of Fame, has been to several final fours and has a national championship. You can't be bad and accomplish what he has achieved. Nevertheless, I agree with an earlier poster who said he gets a grade C on in or during the game coaching. Let's be honest. We almost lost that Championship game to Kansas when the last several minutes we slowed down and the coach allowed it to happen. A great defensive play by MKG ended any chance for the Kansas come-back. But, those same observations hurt and cost us against Wisconsin with a clearly superior Kentucky team. Same thing that occurred today happened against West Virginia. John Wall, Eric Bledsoe, Patrick Patterson, Demarcus Cousins losing to that WVU team who was missing their starting Point Guard who had been injured in the game before???? This Under 19 team had much more talent on their roster than Canada. Canada made adjustments and took advantage of individual player weaknesses and the USA didn't. It also bothered me in that one kid's blog that talked about how Cal doesn't correct or get upset with mistakes and just coaches on effort. Really? That to me was not a ringing endorsement.
Cal is an amazing recruiter and an amazing psychologist in helping a team bond and play unselfish overall. But, he has been out-coached by others during a game. He is going to continue to be a great representative for Kentucky and I wouldn't want any other coach, but can't you say both the good and the bad?
It should be reported but was the USA loss today all about bad coaching or bad play by the players?I hate that goober but his tweet was fine. Are people supposed to ignore this loss completely and not report it?
Sing his praise (Barrett) to the highest. It was just "ONE DAY". Life is not based on 1 day. I hope for the young man he makes future fans say "Lebron who" but Totally unlikely. Salute to him and his teammates for winning the game today handedly.He deserves to be criticized, any USA basketball team losing to another country is an embarrassment. 1 future NBA player just single handedly beat at least 8 of them.
It should be reported but was the USA loss today all about bad coaching or bad play by the players?
Look at the box score. USA shot less than 33% from the field.
http://www.fiba.com/ls/#13204&13213-47-A
Was Canada's D that good?
Absolutely correct. That doesn't mean Cal shouldn't be criticized, he's the first USA coach to lose since 2011, that's an embarrassment no matter how well Barrett played.Sing his praise (Barrett) to the highest. It was just "ONE DAY". Life is not based on 1 day. I hope for the young man he makes future fans say "Lebron who" but Totally unlikely. Salute to him and his teammates for winning the game today handedly.
Canada won the game because they had the best player and because as a team, they wanted the win more than the USA team.
Some people embarrass easily. You realize this is flash news, here today and gone tomorrow type news. I wanted the USA to win today but it didn't turn out that way. Enjoying following the games of the USA team. I will monitor the game tomorrow cause I don't have access to espn3 right now.Absolutely correct. That doesn't mean Cal shouldn't be criticized, he's the first USA coach to lose since 2011, that's an embarrassment no matter how well Barrett played.
If you're that embarrassed, why not find a new team to support? Because Cal is going to be here, WINNING, for a long time.Absolutely correct. That doesn't mean Cal shouldn't be criticized, he's the first USA coach to lose since 2011, that's an embarrassment no matter how well Barrett played.
A stagnant offense on a Cal coached team, imagine that.
How could you imply that Cal coaches a "non attack" offense? If the players cannot execute what the coach asked them to do, who is wrong with that? (The coach?)A stagnant offense on a Cal coached team, imagine that.
Absolutely correct. That doesn't mean Cal shouldn't be criticized, he's the first USA coach to lose since 2011, that's an embarrassment no matter how well Barrett played.
Everyone in the world aside from most UK fans know Cal is a mediocre floor coach. This is another example of that.
Cal=Trump
When it comes to media coverage
He's the first USA U19 Coach to lose in World Cup play since 2011.
There are those here who feel any criticism against the team, the coach, players, or anything related to the program makes you a bad fan. There are also those that will defend against any of those negative comments no matter what. OK. I feel a discussion board is for discussion.
Cal is obviously a great coach and recruiter, he is in the Hall of Fame, has been to several final fours and has a national championship. You can't be bad and accomplish what he has achieved. Nevertheless, I agree with an earlier poster who said he gets a grade C on in or during the game coaching. Let's be honest. We almost lost that Championship game to Kansas when the last several minutes we slowed down and the coach allowed it to happen. A great defensive play by MKG ended any chance for the Kansas come-back. But, those same observations hurt and cost us against Wisconsin with a clearly superior Kentucky team. Same thing that occurred today happened against West Virginia. John Wall, Eric Bledsoe, Patrick Patterson, Demarcus Cousins losing to that WVU team who was missing their starting Point Guard who had been injured in the game before???? This Under 19 team had much more talent on their roster than Canada. Canada made adjustments and took advantage of individual player weaknesses and the USA didn't. It also bothered me in that one kid's blog that talked about how Cal doesn't correct or get upset with mistakes and just coaches on effort. Really? That to me was not a ringing endorsement.
Cal is an amazing recruiter and an amazing psychologist in helping a team bond and play unselfish overall. But, he has been out-coached by others during a game. He is going to continue to be a great representative for Kentucky and I wouldn't want any other coach, but can't you say both the good and the bad?
And recruits
A stagnant offense on a Cal coached team, imagine that.
He deserves to be criticized, any USA basketball team losing to another country is an embarrassment. 1 future NBA player just single handedly beat at least 8 of them.
I just think it's a lazy repeated take that isn't even true. People say it like it's some sort of compromise, but it isn't accurate.
The implication is that if you have better talent, you can only lose to a coach who is better than you, and anyone who's ever been around any sport in any capacity knows that's false, but especially in basketball where sometimes even superior talent just makes fewer shots. Even great shooters miss half the time.
Gotta look at it from a macro perspective. And over 30 years Cal has done plenty to completely overshadow the individual insrances where he falls short.
Besides, mediocre means middle of the road. Start naming coaches better than Cal and let us dissect their resume and see how it holds up.
Just completely insane.
Being a great coach and coaching well in a game aren't the same. It happens. This team excelled by getting pts in transition and off their pressure defense. To come out and use the strategy, build a 10 pt lead and then go away from it? Why? Only he/coaches know.
The attitude from the get go was tenuous with guys not sure they wanted to go, etc...and it just was a crappy way to end this. Commend the young men and Coaches for taking on the challenge, but just wish they had played the style that they were best suited to play. Roy Rana is a very good Coach and Canada is going to be tough moving forward (Wiggins, Barrett, Murray in a one game scenario is not going to be fun to face in FIBA) but Team USA helped them as that was going to have to happen. Some was physical, but strategically it was awful from US perspective.