Student loan forgiveness....

TinyDan

Junior
Dec 26, 2020
116
301
0

I listened to this podcast episode a while back featuring the Purdue University President. He has some interesting (and I think good) ideas regarding higher education. Worth a listen on your next long car ride, flight, etc

The big one I liked was the “Back a Boiler” program where “investors” can loan students money. For example, a chemical engineering student will get a lower interest rate than a French literature student due to a higher starting salary/lower risk of default.
 

iceheart08

Heisman
Sep 1, 2005
14,236
23,901
113

I listened to this podcast episode a while back featuring the Purdue University President. He has some interesting (and I think good) ideas regarding higher education. Worth a listen on your next long car ride, flight, etc

The big one I liked was the “Back a Boiler” program where “investors” can loan students money. For example, a chemical engineering student will get a lower interest rate than a French literature student due to a higher starting salary/lower risk of default.

Freakanomics is a fantastic podcast btw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee'sForClosers

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,744
22,406
113
Just like corporate subsidies and tax breaks...

Also, I haven't seen this 250k number anywhere. Got a link?

Standard defense. Corporate tax breaks aren't fair so we're going to provide a really dumb, unfair handout to those that so desperately need it most - college educated people making up to $250K.

Just call it what it is - buying votes.

It's all over twitter links on TMB.

 

iceheart08

Heisman
Sep 1, 2005
14,236
23,901
113
Standard defense. Corporate tax breaks aren't fair so we're going to provide a really dumb, unfair handout to those that so desperately need it most - college educated people making up to $250K.

Just call it what it is - buying votes.

It's all over twitter links on TMB.



You call it buying votes I call it sound policy. You call corporate subsidies and tax breaks good policy, I call it buying votes.

Get it?
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,744
22,406
113
You call it buying votes I call it sound policy. You call corporate subsidies and tax breaks good policy, I call it buying votes.

Get it?

I don't call those good policy. So no, I don't get it.

Walk me through how this is sound economic policy vs. what I proposed earlier (which actually addresses the root cause of the problem)? Hell, just walk me through how it is sound economic policy in a period of high inflation, low unemployment and runaway government spending?
 

Willence

Heisman
Dec 26, 2003
14,826
36,066
113
You call it buying votes I call it sound policy. You call corporate subsidies and tax breaks good policy, I call it buying votes.

Get it?

This is your issue. You think I am for tax subsidies which are really just tax breaks to try and control behavior? HELL NO. There should be no business taxes of any kind. I believe @scotchtiger feels the same way. So I am against ALL of it. None of this crap should be permitted. Both sides do it but Democrats are so much worse about it because they actually think it's "good policy." That's just insane!

And it is 100% about buying votes.
 

PAWrocka

Heisman
Nov 3, 2008
21,123
28,468
103
no need to over think this ...

This is terrible ... terrible policy ... terrible idea ... I dont support it at all ... how could any responsible person support this?

I could possibly get behind it ... maybe ... if the Federal Govt got out of the student loan business and/or capped tuition costs ... first.


This is just so irresponsible ...
 

other1

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
14,929
14,016
113
no need to over think this ...

This is terrible ... terrible policy ... terrible idea ... I dont support it at all ... how could any responsible person support this?

I could possibly get behind it ... maybe ... if the Federal Govt got out of the student loan business and/or capped tuition costs ... first.


This is just so irresponsible ...
If anything, cancel the interest but still pay back the loan. All these kids willingly borrowed the money, therefor, they should be expected to pay it back.
 

Willence

Heisman
Dec 26, 2003
14,826
36,066
113
If anything, cancel the interest but still pay back the loan. All these kids willingly borrowed the money, therefor, they should be expected to pay it back.

This is something I could get on-board with to resolve this problem. I'm a mortgage banker. I see the avalanche of debt so many people have. I know it's a problem. College costs a sinful amount of money. That being said, just absolving this isn't the answer.
 

Willence

Heisman
Dec 26, 2003
14,826
36,066
113
What Biden is trying to do is estimated to cost over $300b. That's a huge expense. Of course, this comes after we have the amended build back better passed.
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,744
22,406
113
Reading some of the reasonable alternatives (interest rate reduction for example) just highlights how mindblowingly stupid this idea is. The resident libs kind of have to defend it, but it’s terrible policy and blatant vote buying.

Has an executive order (with no congressional approval) ever cost more than $300 BILLION? This has to be a record.
 

CUT93

Heisman
Jan 8, 2006
5,887
10,669
113
the concept of "well i paid off mine so no one should get theirs paid off" is some incredibly selfish line of thinking. i paid the last of mine off 3 years ago and i'd be thrilled if others had some debt forgiveness. it'll also probably do great for the economy considering you'll have people with an extra $1-$2k/month in expendable money being able to buy **** or go on vacations that they previously couldn't afford
Why should I have to pay for you to go on vacation?
 

Hammerdawg.NEAR

All-Conference
Jun 28, 2021
1,588
2,609
25
You all want corporate tax breaks and deregulation, you all want subsidies given to banks and large corporations but you bristle at any support for working people struggling to make ends meet.

You are being naive if you think there's going to be some kind of meaningful backlash that impacts electoral politics. This is an overwhelmingly popular decision.
NOPE
 
  • Like
Reactions: loveoysters

gardentiger

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
4,992
4,040
113
Student loan forgiveness will cost more the first year than the inflation reduction act saves in 10 years. The bills will not be allowed in the same press briefing room at the same time. F*cking people are better than gutter salesmen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,368
13,493
102
Reading some of the reasonable alternatives (interest rate reduction for example) just highlights how mindblowingly stupid this idea is. The resident libs kind of have to defend it, but it’s terrible policy and blatant vote buying.

Has an executive order (with no congressional approval) ever cost more than $300 BILLION? This has to be a record.

I'll be interested in seeing the actual details. But I have never been a fan of student loan forgiveness.
 

Captainclemson

Heisman
Aug 5, 2009
3,884
13,015
83
As someone who will have well over 300K in student loans when I graduate from dental school in 4 years (and who is unaffected by this forgiveness due to parent compensation and being after the deadline by 3 days) I would like to say that my orthodontists school cost 1100 a year when he was there in the 60s. Adjusted for inflation, it’s about 8,000 a year now. My first year alone cost around 84K.

That is an unreal number, and I would gladly participate in federal government programs that would forgive some of that. Even with the income of a dentist, that will take me forever to pay back with interest.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,472
23,185
113
Reading some of the reasonable alternatives (interest rate reduction for example) just highlights how mindblowingly stupid this idea is. The resident libs kind of have to defend it, but it’s terrible policy and blatant vote buying.

Has an executive order (with no congressional approval) ever cost more than $300 BILLION? This has to be a record.

I'm not defending it because I graduated with 0 debt but I don't feel it's my place to speak for people with different circumstances.

Having said that, I don't like it in general unless it's much more targeted. For example, I have a friend I've known since childhood(a conservative btw) who due to some hard knocks in life now owes triple the amount of the original loan and he's probably paid the principal three times over. He'll never pay that off and it's a huge anchor around his neck that prevents him from enjoying a decent standard of living. In a case like that, I certainly think he should qualify for forgiveness.

Beyond that, I'd narrow it down to a much narrower band of people - maybe if you've been paying on it for 10 years and you still owe 25,000+ and make less than $80,000 for example.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Willence

Heisman
Dec 26, 2003
14,826
36,066
113


Good read on the whole plan. I wasn’t even aware of some of the other parts of their plan


Part I - Government buys support
Part II - Government takes over and becomes even more involved in things it has no business in
Part III - We are all subject to whatever the government wants to do because they control our well being

No thank you sir! Reasonable people can disagree I suppose but I want nothing to do with the government in any way and I certainly don't want them further meddling in the affairs of the people in this country. They have caused many financial disasters, under-educated our people, destroyed dreams, brought about ruin to our cities and generally impaired the prosperity and future success of the people in this nation.
 

purple2

All-American
Dec 15, 2002
4,317
5,801
113
Lololol standard lip service. I've spent my entire career in politics running campaigns at the highest level..I assure you this isn't "standard lip service".
Blah Blah Blah Whatever GIF by Minions
 

WapPride

All-American
Mar 17, 2021
3,977
6,334
0
the $10k forgiveness will wipe out the debt for a 3rd of all holders. that's good and all, but the one part of this plan that is flying under the radar that is probably the most important is the IDR changes which mean no more interest accruals. that's going to be huge for borrowers to get out from underwater on their debt obligations.
 

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,368
13,493
102
the $10k forgiveness will wipe out the debt for a 3rd of all holders. that's good and all, but the one part of this plan that is flying under the radar that is probably the most important is the IDR changes which mean no more interest accruals. that's going to be huge for borrowers to get out from underwater on their debt obligations.

it is pretty entertaining that right after Marjorie Taylor Green made the rounds on TV today complaining about debt forgiveness being a handout, it came out that her own company received $186K in PPP loans. She never paid it back because the debt was forgiven.

my company got $150K, never spent a dime of it, and I paid it back with an additional $6K of interest.

F that trick.
 

Willence

Heisman
Dec 26, 2003
14,826
36,066
113
it is pretty entertaining that right after Marjorie Taylor Green made the rounds on TV today complaining about debt forgiveness being a handout, it came out that her own company received $186K in PPP loans. She never paid it back because the debt was forgiven.

my company got $150K, never spent a dime of it, and I paid it back with an additional $6K of interest.

F that trick.

One has nothing to do with the other but feel free to keep going with that. The PPP loans were to keep companies in business and people employed at a time when the government forced to shut down. Not to mention the fact that it was handled in such a way that it was incredibly damaging to the tax returns the small businesses and affected their creditworthiness in a dramatic way because they have to show the loss of the investment to make the PPP loan forgivable but not the income from the loan when it is forgiven. So it creates a fake tax situation where businesses look like they lost their *** when they didn't. It's intellectually dishonest to make a comparison between the two. But I know that won't stop you from doing it. The government does not do anything well. Not one thing except screw things up with amazing proficiency.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

gardentiger

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
4,992
4,040
113
Forgiving a small amount of debt (10k) for borrowers making under a certain threshold (125k) seems pretty reasonable to me.

This is a subsidy placed directly into the hands of Americans who will put this money directly back into the economy.

You all want corporate tax breaks and deregulation, you all want subsidies given to banks and large corporations but you bristle at any support for working people struggling to make ends meet.

You are being naive if you think there's going to be some kind of meaningful backlash that impacts electoral politics. This is an overwhelmingly popular decision.
That's 250k/household. Nurses funding doctors debt???
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clemsonpm07

Kelbo

Heisman
Sep 5, 2015
8,635
24,829
101
it is pretty entertaining that right after Marjorie Taylor Green made the rounds on TV today complaining about debt forgiveness being a handout, it came out that her own company received $186K in PPP loans. She never paid it back because the debt was forgiven.

my company got $150K, never spent a dime of it, and I paid it back with an additional $6K of interest.

F that trick.
Good on you.

Props
 

dfoste

Freshman
Sep 4, 2004
84
75
0
I really hope this doesn't happen, but I am sure based on the reports that it will. If it does this will make me so angry. We busted our asses to pay off our student loans and so should everyone else who takes them out. Americans who paid their loans off and Americans that chose not to go to college should not have to subsidize the education of other people. I really hope that the backlash to this is dramatic. It's going to cost a fortune at a time that we really can't afford to spend more money.

And any Republican who's going to get upset about this needs to realize the last fiscally conservative President we had in this country was Bill Clinton. Both sides have spent us into oblivion and it should no longer be tolerated.
Here’s a novel thought - honor your contracts.