I heard from another source that he will be terminated during the "Open Week". All of this is just hearsay.
Dabloo or Bleamer? Or both?
I will agree with you on if he gets terminated that will likely not coach again, but hothead Voldemort loves the attention of getting in front of the camera and talking. I believe he will get a job with the ACC Network so he can tell the story of his glory days.I'm pretty sure this will be the last season for both. And, ironically, I believe the Clemson powers that be CANNOT afford (from a public That way, he gets to be a positive ambassador to Clemson, the public will be satisfied, and Clemson will continue on, virtually untarnished.
I will agree with you on if he gets terminated that will likely not coach again, but hothead Voldemort loves the attention of getting in front of the camera and talking. I believe he will get a job with the ACC Network so he can tell the story of his glory days.
I do not think it would be fair for an interim coach to take the heat for the rest of the season. If a change is made do it at the end of the season.
Hold up my man.....I do not think it would be fair for an interim coach to take the heat for the rest of the season. If a change is made do it at the end of the season.
I like Coach Briles and I believe if there is a coaching change he will still be here next season. I do not think he can cure the recurring issue with the defensive passing coverage so why should he hurt is creditability as a interim coach. Coach Beamer has a eight million dollar salary this season and part of the reason you receive that money is being on the hot seat. I think he needs to be the owner of this.What about giving Briles a shot tonprive himself? That was the conspiracy theory over the summer. Might it come true?
I like Coach Briles and I believe if there is a coaching change he will still be here next season. I do not think he can cure the recurring issue with the defensive passing coverage so why should he hurt is creditability as a interim coach. Coach Beamer has a eight million dollar salary this season and part of the reason you receive that money is being on the hot seat. I think needs to be the owner of this.
I'd have no problem with that. None. - But, with the NIL nowadays and recruiting for the future to "build" a team.....that crap is over. You're basically building a new team every offseason, so I wouldn't mind giving XYZ coach a 1 year contract. Interim this year + 1 yr next year to give him an offseason, spring training, etc... Come to think of it, no coach nowadays should ever have more than a 2 yr contract. That might just be what these universities have to do in order to survive because these 5 yr, multimillion dollar contracts with huge buyouts is not sustainable and is largely based on the old model of college football.What about giving Briles a shot tonprive himself? That was the conspiracy theory over the summer. Might it come true?
Not saying it would be a majority, but some people would expect immediate change if you fired a coach during the season. Why else would you remove a coach in the middle of the season?I'd have no problem with that. None. - But, with the NIL nowadays and recruiting for the future to "build" a team.....that crap is over. You're basically building a new team every offseason, so I wouldn't mind giving XYZ coach a 1 year contract. Interim this year + 1 yr next year to give him an offseason, spring training, etc... Come to think of it, no coach nowadays should ever have more than a 2 yr contract. That might just be what these universities have to do in order to survive because these 5 yr, multimillion dollar contracts with huge buyouts is not sustainable and is largely based on the old model of college football.
Maybe players need 2-3 year contracts.....I'd have no problem with that. None. - But, with the NIL nowadays and recruiting for the future to "build" a team.....that crap is over. You're basically building a new team every offseason, so I wouldn't mind giving XYZ coach a 1 year contract. Interim this year + 1 yr next year to give him an offseason, spring training, etc... Come to think of it, no coach nowadays should ever have more than a 2 yr contract. That might just be what these universities have to do in order to survive because these 5 yr, multimillion dollar contracts with huge buyouts is not sustainable and is largely based on the old model of college football.
Because of human nature. - With coach A) who everyone wants gone - there is no hope. With coach B) - you restore hope.Not saying it would be a majority, but some people would expect immediate change if you fired a coach during the season. Why else would you remove a coach in the middle of the season?
They had them and THEY fought to get it changed to year to year so they could portal out whenever they wantedMaybe players need 2-3 year contracts.....
I don't think many would blame Briles if he failed to turn it around. On the other hand, if he somehow salvaged a decent season, he would almost certainly become the front-runner for the permanent position.Not saying it would be a majority, but some people would expect immediate change if you fired a coach during the season. Why else would you remove a coach in the middle of the season?
They had them and THEY fought to get it changed to year to year so they could portal out whenever they wanted
GamecockCentral Football
Thoughts on South Carolina's loss to Kentucky, themes this season
GamecockCentral Football
Beyond the Box Score: 20 observations from South Carolina's overtime loss to Kentucky
GamecockCentral Football
10 takeaways from South Carolina's loss to Kentucky
GamecockCentral Football
How every team on South Carolina's schedule played this weekend
GamecockCentral Football
South Carolina rushing attack diminishes in second half against Kentucky