Calipari digging that hole deeper

Cattorney

Junior
Dec 2, 2024
471
398
63
It's clear you don't have all your crayons in your box and what few you do have aren't the least bit sharp. If you comprehended anything at all I said I appreciated cal for what he did here. I understand the reasons for leaving and it was time for a speration. I clearly stated I was all for him getting his flowers after he leaves Arkansas. Not sure how I'm not processing his departure. He's clearly a hypocrite because he always played in the gray area of eligibility from his time at UMass to Kentucky. My issue is he always been about "players first" but now all of a sudden he's not. He wants his players first. He only cares about rules now because it doesn't benefit him. He didn't give two sh*ts if a player was gonna be cut he just wanted to make sure his team got the benefit. You could see that if coach cal wasn't in your mouth.
He's being a hypocrite by saying he is fine with it but we should allow all players to be able to enter if they want?

Good God, how is that hypocritical? How is that not players first?

How is he trying to get his team a benefit?

Do you even know what you're talking about?
 

ukwildcat2004

Heisman
Jan 12, 2003
5,207
12,498
113
He's being a hypocrite by saying he is fine with it but we should allow all players to be able to enter if they want?

Good God, how is that hypocritical? How is that not players first?

How is he trying to get his team a benefit?

Do you even know what you're talking about?

Are you being stupid as a joke? There's no way you're this ignorant in real life.

He's a hypocrite Ellen because he has always argued for eligibility for players. Always gave them the benefit of a doubt. But now all of a sudden we have to have strict rules for eligibility when he has said otherwise for years? Enes Kanter ring a bell to you? He was one of the first professionals from Europe ever to attempt to play college basketball. Cal was all over the place advocating for his eligibility knowing good and well Kanter indeed received money. Where is that player advocacy now? Where is that energy now? It's no where to be found because the player in question was going to help us not his team. (Read this part slow or have someone read it to you) But he didn't want Mitchell in Lexington because it made us better than Arkansas. His only way to prevent it was to act like he cares about rules all of a sudden therefore benefiting him and his team. You know good and well if Mitchell had committed to Arkansas he never would have said what he said in that interview about eligibility.
 

Cattorney

Junior
Dec 2, 2024
471
398
63
Are you being stupid as a joke? There's no way you're this ignorant in real life.

He's a hypocrite Ellen because he has always argued for eligibility for players. Always gave them the benefit of a doubt. But now all of a sudden we have to have strict rules for eligibility when he has said otherwise for years? Enes Kanter ring a bell to you? He was one of the first professionals from Europe ever to attempt to play college basketball. Cal was all over the place advocating for his eligibility knowing good and well Kanter indeed received money. Where is that player advocacy now? Where is that energy now? It's no where to be found because the player in question was going to help us not his team. (Read this part slow or have someone read it to you) But he didn't want Mitchell in Lexington because it made us better than Arkansas. His only way to prevent it was to act like he cares about rules all of a sudden therefore benefiting him and his team. You know good and well if Mitchell had committed to Arkansas he never would have said what he said in that interview about eligibility.
Dude, he's literally telling you he is fine with it, it should be equal for all. And you're, like, Cal hates UK and all players and only does things to benefit himself.

The strict rule: "it should be equal for everyone" hahaha!

Imagine being mad and not even knowing what you're mad at . That's you!
 

Johnnie Africa

All-Conference
Feb 27, 2003
1,102
3,402
113
Dude, he's literally telling you he is fine with it, it should be equal for all. And you're, like, Cal hates UK and all players and only does things to benefit himself.

The strict rule: "it should be equal for everyone" hahaha!

Imagine being mad and not even knowing what you're mad at . That's you!

Are you still pretending to be an attorney?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CatPatrick13

ukwildcat2004

Heisman
Jan 12, 2003
5,207
12,498
113
Dude, he's literally telling you he is fine with it, it should be equal for all. And you're, like, Cal hates UK and all players and only does things to benefit himself.

The strict rule: "it should be equal for everyone" hahaha!

Imagine being mad and not even knowing what you're mad at . That's you!

You have to be top 5 dumbest posters on this board and that's really something.

He's a hypocrite because:

1. He has advocated for player eligibility for years and being pretty open about it and with minimum stipulations. In 2017/2018 or thereabouts he didn't even care if G league players came back if they were drafted in the second round. Now he wants strict rules for it.

2. He also hypocritical because he said if we were to add 5th year players the players only our roster would be negatively impacted but in all reality a player from Mizzou is negatively impacted because they go from scholarship to walk on or whatever term they are using now.

Now if you don't understand that's just because you refuse to want to believe it. You got some kind of weird love triangle with Cal and Ellen or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CatPatrick13

Cattorney

Junior
Dec 2, 2024
471
398
63
You have to be top 5 dumbest posters on this board and that's really something.

He's a hypocrite because:

1. He has advocated for player eligibility for years and being pretty open about it and with minimum stipulations. In 2017/2018 or thereabouts he didn't even care if G league players came back if they were drafted in the second round. Now he wants strict rules for it.

2. He also hypocritical because he said if we were to add 5th year players the players only our roster would be negatively impacted but in all reality a player from Mizzou is negatively impacted because they go from scholarship to walk on or whatever term they are using now.

Now if you don't understand that's just because you refuse to want to believe it. You got some kind of weird love triangle with Cal and Ellen or something.
Yet, you keep arguing with the person you labeled as top 5 dumbest. Lol, what's that say about you?

He is still advocating it. "I have no problem with it, I just think we should allow all players to do it to be fair!" How is that anti player?

Right, which is why he is also advocating for the Mizzou players to be able to hit the portal with Mitchell coming back of they choose to do so.
Also, as has already been explained. That mizzou player isn't being kicked off the team and will simply get a different scholarship. What's the impact?

That again sounds good for the athletes, no?

What am I supposed to believe? You've literally proved Cal is being pro player here. You just seem too upset with Cal to comprehend that.
 

wildcatdon

Heisman
Oct 17, 2012
10,626
13,616
113
What damage did he do?

In 2 of his last 4 years here we were a 2 seed and a 3 seed. Oh, the horrors!

But if you mean Cal leaving and opening the door for Pope to be here then I agree, that’s real damage!!

But I don’t think Cal had anything to do with Pope getting hired. He could have prevented it by staying though.
You dont remember us losing to st peters and oakland and having a losing record one season and never winning the conference or the conference tournament for many years? Sounds like you have selective memory.
 

Cattorney

Junior
Dec 2, 2024
471
398
63
There's no way someone pays you for your services based on this message board interaction.
Shockingly, they sure do. My job is to tell people they are morons for a living and hold them accountable. Not sure why that would be shocking.
 

sk73

All-Conference
Feb 16, 2013
3,238
3,314
113
You mean obsessed with defending him?

I bet you argued OJ was innocent..
Nothing to defend here man. If any other coach had said the same words, it would not have been posted on this board, or any board. This is the Pre-wadded Panty Guild here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TeamAmerica

BigBluefoot

All-American
Jul 4, 2025
2,068
7,375
113
So who was cut? Are they eligible to be grandfathered into a walk-on role?

Were they a practice player? Were they just an extra addition for the time being? What are the circumstances of said player you can't even identify?

Lol, clearly Cal makes your a little irrational. Best of luck with that!
Are you seriously attempting to litigate basic math?
Michael Richards Yes GIF
 

Corporal Upham

Heisman
Jan 2, 2017
7,325
27,662
81
Another three page thread about the same interview? Cal went to Arkansas and made it to the sweet16 year one with an man roster… Kentucky has had one of the highest paid rosters two plus years in a row… Cal ain’t the issue.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
43,418
66,051
113
Here is where Cal was passive aggressively digging at other coaches and UK. After he says he does not begrudge coaches for trying to make their teams better, he lays down this load of contrary crap:

"For me, what does that do to the players in my program if I did it? What does it to do a player that I have recruited and talked to, maybe one that was waiting his turn? Maybe it's a freshman," Calipari said. "How do you have trust when you walk in, in September, and say, 'We just changed. I know what we told you, but that's not going to happen now because this kid's coming in.'"

The apologist who have turned off the brain cells or are Hog fans say he was talking hypothetically or about himself. We have listened to Cal for years. We know he often has an underlying message that is implied. Often directed at recruits. So, what is he saying?

He is saying you cannot trust the coaches like Pope who was trying to land Mitchell. He is saying Pope misled the guys and now saying, “We just changed. I know what we told you, but that's not going to happen now because this kid's coming in.” He isn’t talking about himself because he has made it clear he claims he is not that guy. So, who is that guy?

You have to be an idiot to read it any other way. The only question is to whom he is speaking. Some high school senior, I assume, but he was talking about others. Not himself.
 

Mad Max

All-American
Nov 28, 2015
4,105
7,675
93
You can't publicly side with someone who's keeping UK from getting a major player and not have negative feedback.


He preaches "players first" ....but only if it's HIS players.


Dickie V and the rest will now criticize us for not giving a Cal a standing ovation in Rupp this winter. Or God forbid we actually boo a man that went to a rival school who helped the SEC stand their ground.
Well, he did walk away from $35m basically as a favor.

Romance Crush GIF by BuzzFeed
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Beatle Bum

Pygmy Sasquatch

Heisman
Mar 27, 2009
9,765
10,853
113
Some of these posters didn't read the entire article, have poor reading comprehension, or both.
 
Last edited:

Mad Max

All-American
Nov 28, 2015
4,105
7,675
93
Arkansas bailed out Barnhart's dumb rear. It wasn't some act of benevolence from Cal.
I guess if that’s how you choose to see it.
But reality is, he saved us $35m
Cal was so benevolent that he tried for a day to get his job back.......as you say he didn't do Kentucky any favors. He got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and couldn't walk it back after getting his bluff called.
Cal Derangement Syndrome, LOL. I’m with you though, wish we had to pay that buyout!
 

ukwildcat2004

Heisman
Jan 12, 2003
5,207
12,498
113
Who me? I don't care what he does personally. I appreciate the good times we had but I also acknowledge the fact a separation was probably a good thing. But no one needs to pretend he did it as a favor for us. He never intended to go to Arkansas. He got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Tried to use it as a bargaining tool to stay here. Tried to actively stay. Though Mitch has many many faults he stuck to his guns here and didn't let Cal come back or bargain a new deal.
 

TeamAmerica

All-American
Jul 3, 2025
1,625
5,212
113
So who is getting hurt here in this situation since Cal decided to weigh in?

A we have an open roster spot and money to pay him. The worst thing is Mcbride and Osumane go from 25 mins a game to 15? OR a return to Mizzou where a kid is getting cut from the roster to make room for him?

Again who's really coming out worse?
Nobody is getting cut from Missouri's roster.
 

sk73

All-Conference
Feb 16, 2013
3,238
3,314
113
Here is where Cal was passive aggressively digging at other coaches and UK. After he says he does not begrudge coaches for trying to make their teams better, he lays down this load of contrary crap:

"For me, what does that do to the players in my program if I did it? What does it to do a player that I have recruited and talked to, maybe one that was waiting his turn? Maybe it's a freshman," Calipari said. "How do you have trust when you walk in, in September, and say, 'We just changed. I know what we told you, but that's not going to happen now because this kid's coming in.'"

The apologist who have turned off the brain cells or are Hog fans say he was talking hypothetically or about himself. We have listened to Cal for years. We know he often has an underlying message that is implied. Often directed at recruits. So, what is he saying?

He is saying you cannot trust the coaches like Pope who was trying to land Mitchell. He is saying Pope misled the guys and now saying, “We just changed. I know what we told you, but that's not going to happen now because this kid's coming in.” He isn’t talking about himself because he has made it clear he claims he is not that guy. So, who is that guy?

You have to be an idiot to read it any other way. The only question is to whom he is speaking. Some high school senior, I assume, but he was talking about others. Not himself.
Cal , and other coaches, have questions thrown at them regularly. The Mitchell saga was a common topic for discussion a week ago. I see nothing wrong with his answer. Many, myself included, agree with it. It so happens that Pope was part of the topic because it pertained to Mitchell. Nothing said was false about what was going on. It wont be the last time you have to defend Pope's methods, his recruiting or, lack thereof.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
43,418
66,051
113
Cal , and other coaches, have questions thrown at them regularly. The Mitchell saga was a common topic for discussion a week ago. I see nothing wrong with his answer. Many, myself included, agree with it. It so happens that Pope was part of the topic because it pertained to Mitchell. Nothing said was false about what was going on. It wont be the last time you have to defend Pope's methods, his recruiting or, lack thereof.
I suspect it was false. Prove your point.
 

ukwildcat2004

Heisman
Jan 12, 2003
5,207
12,498
113
Nobody is getting cut from Missouri's roster.

Ok I'll grant you no one is getting cut from Mizzou's roster but someone will be moved from a scholarship to walk on (or whatever term they use now). So again I ask who is doing a disservice to a student athlete? It wasn't gonna be us.
 
KSR

Latest

  1. 01 KSR J Batt to hire executive associate AD for player management at Kentucky
  2. 02 KSR Football Kentucky needs more from Nic Anderson and DJ Miller — and Will Stein knows it
  3. 03 KSR Football Recruiting Kentucky is finalist for blue-chip QB Josiah Boyd
  4. 04 KSR Around the SEC Take a look at Tennessee’s new Entertainment District as Kentucky plans one of its own
  5. 05 KSR KSR Show, 9/17: Listen live from 10 to noon