Don't know about drivers/warehouse workers, but they treat other employees very well.Look at the way Amazon treats their employees. I wouldn't want to be in bed with them.
Don't know about drivers/warehouse workers, but they treat other employees very well.Look at the way Amazon treats their employees. I wouldn't want to be in bed with them.
******' A, I live right next door to our county tax ***-essor.I hope the Data Center wins. My house is overvalued when it comes to tax. All counties do that bull ****. The house is appraised at 350K, but the county values it at 400K to get more money. The data center has the money to fight it and maybe the homeowners of Madison County can piggyback that fight.
Sir that is Madison The City not Madison The County. The county supervisor majority is decidedly aGAINST Madison the city.This is especially relevant in Madison because the servers are made of brick
I know I know but I was all jacked up on Chick Fil A this morning and felt the need to make a brick jokeSir that is Madison The City not Madison The County. The county supervisor majority is decidedly aGAINST Madison the city.
Update on the property tax assessments. AWS is not appealing the personal property tax assessment which is $860 million. So in terms of the entire project the difference is about 10%.
Total assessment was $292 million for the real property & $860 million for the personal Property.So, does this mean that Cannady’s assessment of each data center building at $292 million included approximately $172 million ($860/5) per building in personal property?
Total assessment was $292 million for the real property & $860 million for the personal Property.
TLDR. But wow!Look at the transcript of the meeting at the kingfish link in the OP. Cannady’s assessment of each of the 5 buildings was $292 million. That’s each.
TLDR. But wow!
You can't get it if you don't ask for it.Look at the transcript of the meeting at the kingfish link in the OP. Cannady’s assessment of each of the 5 buildings was $292 million. That’s each.
You can't get it if you don't ask for it.
So it seems data centers may not be as bad as some have made them out to be.Total assessment was $292 million for the real property & $860 million for the personal Property.
Shocking news.So it seems data centers may not be as bad as some have made them out to be.
I don't want it in my backyard.So it seems data centers may not be as bad as some have made them out to be.
I'm still floored that all these big companies might not have actually just fallen in love with MS and could perhaps be trying to take advantage of us on all fronts. We might not even get a kiss...please don't tell Tate...
https://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2026/08/aws-clashes-with-madison-county-over.html
They got you workin' hard manIndustry insider here- the reason that AWS does not want to share their actual internal cost numbers is because they have several unique sweetheart deals with certain equipment manufacturers, which if exposed, would piss off every other big name in the industry and ultimately end a massive strategic advantage for the company. As it pertains to the discrepancy in tax assessments, they have a whole team dedicated to arguing for lower property taxes across the entire portfolio. They dig for data at each site to build the best argument for lowering the taxes. But I can tell you- they don’t lie. They don’t fabricate data to defraud the public. Let Madison and AWS work it out, but you have to understand, irrespective of the outcome of this individual event, Madison has won the economic development lottery. Every municipality should be knives out against each other to fight for these deals. Especially for a poor state like Mississippi, the amount of investment, capital, and money coming from the big tech companies (who functionally have the vast majority of investable cash and overall market value of the US Stock Market) is going to be so transformative for the state. Not to mention the high paying jobs that come with this and the support industries which pop up but never get counted in the press releases. Data centers are fantastic for communities. You don’t want to live within 200 feet of one because of sound, but I want my city and county to have as many data centers as can fit.
Project much? I was unaware that data centers had a political party…So you're telling me the tax payer is trying to pay the least amount possible and the tax collector wants the max possible? Wow, breaking news there. They'll wind up in the middle somewhere. Yawn.
Even less surprising is a sixpacker running to the board (sports board, btw) trying to start a political debate. Less surprising than that is who started the thread. Football season is like 2 weeks away. Man I hope we're good.
Project much? I was unaware that data centers had a political party…
I work hard for myself, thanks. For the record, I have no involvement with the AWS data centers in Mississippi. Just am able to provide some insight into the stupidly opaque data center industry.They got you workin' hard man
Seems like smart development of data centers is the way to go.Industry insider here- the reason that AWS does not want to share their actual internal cost numbers is because they have several unique sweetheart deals with certain equipment manufacturers, which if exposed, would piss off every other big name in the industry and ultimately end a massive strategic advantage for the company. As it pertains to the discrepancy in tax assessments, they have a whole team dedicated to arguing for lower property taxes across the entire portfolio. They dig for data at each site to build the best argument for lowering the taxes. But I can tell you- they don’t lie. They don’t fabricate data to defraud the public. Let Madison and AWS work it out, but you have to understand, irrespective of the outcome of this individual event, Madison has won the economic development lottery. Every municipality should be knives out against each other to fight for these deals. Especially for a poor state like Mississippi, the amount of investment, capital, and money coming from the big tech companies (who functionally have the vast majority of investable cash and overall market value of the US Stock Market) is going to be so transformative for the state. Not to mention the high paying jobs that come with this and the support industries which pop up but never get counted in the press releases. Data centers are fantastic for communities. You don’t want to live within 200 feet of one because of sound, but I want my city and county to have as many data centers as can fit.
The resident shill.Industry insider here- the reason that AWS does not want to share their actual internal cost numbers is because they have several unique sweetheart deals with certain equipment manufacturers, which if exposed, would piss off every other big name in the industry and ultimately end a massive strategic advantage for the company. As it pertains to the discrepancy in tax assessments, they have a whole team dedicated to arguing for lower property taxes across the entire portfolio. They dig for data at each site to build the best argument for lowering the taxes. But I can tell you- they don’t lie. They don’t fabricate data to defraud the public. Let Madison and AWS work it out, but you have to understand, irrespective of the outcome of this individual event, Madison has won the economic development lottery. Every municipality should be knives out against each other to fight for these deals. Especially for a poor state like Mississippi, the amount of investment, capital, and money coming from the big tech companies (who functionally have the vast majority of investable cash and overall market value of the US Stock Market) is going to be so transformative for the state. Not to mention the high paying jobs that come with this and the support industries which pop up but never get counted in the press releases. Data centers are fantastic for communities. You don’t want to live within 200 feet of one because of sound, but I want my city and county to have as many data centers as can fit.
I don't know much about their US datacenter perspective, but I'm not a fan of them. I think we need a measured approach. A bubble is building that will pop. I hope that technology improvement/invention will offset/overcome the drain on natural resources. Typically, the tech curve has stayed ahead of the concerns of depletion, but pretending that these data centers aren't here to take advantage of our willingness to do nearly anything to find a way off of the economic bottom is what frustrates me. Let's at least admit that they laid a dollar on the table and our politicians are dancing without considering what that lifestyle might mean long term...I can tell you about a political party that’s actively rooting for us to build as few data centers as possible. The Chinese Communist one.
I don't know much about their US datacenter perspective, but I'm not a fan of them. I think we need a measured approach. A bubble is building that will pop. I hope that technology improvement/invention will offset/overcome the drain on natural resources. Typically, the tech curve has stayed ahead of the concerns of depletion, but pretending that these data centers aren't here to take advantage of our willingness to do nearly anything to find a way off of the economic bottom is what frustrates me. Let's at least admit that they laid a dollar on the table and our politicians are dancing without considering what that lifestyle might mean long term...
It’s absolutely because of the abundance of land and infrastructure. It’s exactly where data centers should be. That’s a great position to be in.I’m certainly no expert, but I don’t quickly jump to the tech bros taking advantage of the yokels as the reason for their interest in Mississippi.
Yes, they’re probably hoping to get less pushback here, but I suspect it’s more to do with an abundance of relatively cheap land, water and power.
Interesting. I think that your 2nd sentence supports the taking advantage position. I don't expect that they will be all bad. I do expect that we will have some unintended negative consequences and there is a possibility that some of those are not ones we would have accepted had we known about it in advance. Below are just a few examples of things we've seen pumped up over the years that were failures and what stands out to me about those is that, in stark contrast to the data center craze, these were not also being built on every piece of flat earth in the world (i.e. direct competition at scale was not as big of a factor). Don't get me wrong, I hope we all win. However, this datacenter building craze is going to be an expensive game of musical chairs, and we all aren't gonna get a piece of Ms Doris' chocolate cake.I’m certainly no expert, but I don’t quickly jump to the tech bros taking advantage of the yokels as the reason for their interest in Mississippi.
Yes, they’re probably hoping to get less pushback here, but I suspect it’s more to do with an abundance of relatively cheap land, water and power.
| Period | Project | What state leaders expected | Public exposure and outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003–2004 | Mississippi Beef Processors, Yalobusha County | A state-supported beef-processing operation intended to create an agricultural market and manufacturing jobs | The plant failed shortly after opening. The State Auditor treated it as a long-running taxpayer-loss investigation; six individuals were convicted or pleaded guilty, and only $617,115.86 had been recovered by March 2014. The auditor specifically called for greater oversight of state-supported economic-development programs. |
| 2010–2012 | Twin Creeks Technologies, Senatobia | A solar-technology manufacturing facility expected to invest at least $132 million and create at least 500 jobs | Mississippi provided approximately $26 million through building, equipment, site and infrastructure assistance. The company reportedly never employed more than 25 people and liquidated in 2012. The State Auditor later classified $23,480,239 in public funding as associated with the failed project. |
| 2010–2014 | KiOR, Columbus | A high-profile biofuel refinery that would convert wood chips into transportation fuel and was promoted as creating approximately 1,000 jobs | Mississippi provided a $75 million state loan. The facility did not operate as designed, most employees were laid off, the company defaulted and entered bankruptcy in 2014. The State Auditor’s later accounting classified $76.25 million in public funding as connected to the failed project. |
| 2010–2017 | Kemper County Energy Facility | A first-of-its-kind “clean coal” power plant using Mississippi lignite, coal gasification and carbon capture | The expected cost grew from approximately $2.4 billion to $7.5 billion, and the coal-gasification portion was abandoned in 2017. Under the eventual settlement, Mississippi Power took a reported $6.4 billion write-down, while customers were responsible for approximately $1.1 billion associated with the natural-gas portion. This was primarily a ratepayer/shareholder loss, not an MDA loan default. |
| 2011–2017 | Stion Corporation, Hattiesburg | A solar-panel manufacturing operation expected initially to invest $400 million and create 1,000 jobs | MDA provided a $75 million loan. After the requirements were subsequently reduced, Stion still had only 137 employees when it closed in October 2017. The State Auditor found the company in default, classified $74,760,199 as public funding tied to the failed project and issued a total demand of $92,943,780.86, including principal, interest, local fees and recovery costs. |
| 2011–2017 | GreenTech Automotive, Tunica/Robinsonville | An automobile manufacturing operation expected to invest $60 million and create 350 full-time jobs | The project received $3 million from MDA, while another $2 million state loan went to Tunica County for land. The State Auditor found that GreenTech failed to make loan payments, make the promised investment or create the promised jobs, and issued a demand for $6,360,019.60. The auditor’s broader review identified $4,879,292 in public funding associated with the failed project. |
Maybe the part about someone telling Tater.Project much? I was unaware that data centers had a political party…
I’m old enough to remember all these too. The biggest difference between data centers and those are: investment grade credit backstops from the most valuable companies on the planet are behind the data center construction. It’s not musical chairs, and the state isn’t holding the bag.Interesting. I think that your 2nd sentence supports the taking advantage position. I don't expect that they will be all bad. I do expect that we will have some unintended negative consequences and there is a possibility that some of those are not ones we would have accepted had we known about it in advance. Below are just a few examples of things we've seen pumped up over the years that were failures and what stands out to me about those is that, in stark contrast to the data center craze, these were not also being built on every piece of flat earth in the world (i.e. direct competition at scale was not as big of a factor). Don't get me wrong, I hope we all win. However, this datacenter building craze is going to be an expensive game of musical chairs, and we all aren't gonna get a piece of Ms Doris' chocolate cake.
I just don't trust our politicians to look much beyond the end of their noses (perhaps as far as their wallets).
Period Project What state leaders expected Public exposure and outcome 2003–2004 Mississippi Beef Processors, Yalobusha County A state-supported beef-processing operation intended to create an agricultural market and manufacturing jobs The plant failed shortly after opening. The State Auditor treated it as a long-running taxpayer-loss investigation; six individuals were convicted or pleaded guilty, and only $617,115.86 had been recovered by March 2014. The auditor specifically called for greater oversight of state-supported economic-development programs. 2010–2012 Twin Creeks Technologies, Senatobia A solar-technology manufacturing facility expected to invest at least $132 million and create at least 500 jobs Mississippi provided approximately $26 million through building, equipment, site and infrastructure assistance. The company reportedly never employed more than 25 people and liquidated in 2012. The State Auditor later classified $23,480,239 in public funding as associated with the failed project. 2010–2014 KiOR, Columbus A high-profile biofuel refinery that would convert wood chips into transportation fuel and was promoted as creating approximately 1,000 jobs Mississippi provided a $75 million state loan. The facility did not operate as designed, most employees were laid off, the company defaulted and entered bankruptcy in 2014. The State Auditor’s later accounting classified $76.25 million in public funding as connected to the failed project. 2010–2017 Kemper County Energy Facility A first-of-its-kind “clean coal” power plant using Mississippi lignite, coal gasification and carbon capture The expected cost grew from approximately $2.4 billion to $7.5 billion, and the coal-gasification portion was abandoned in 2017. Under the eventual settlement, Mississippi Power took a reported $6.4 billion write-down, while customers were responsible for approximately $1.1 billion associated with the natural-gas portion. This was primarily a ratepayer/shareholder loss, not an MDA loan default. 2011–2017 Stion Corporation, Hattiesburg A solar-panel manufacturing operation expected initially to invest $400 million and create 1,000 jobs MDA provided a $75 million loan. After the requirements were subsequently reduced, Stion still had only 137 employees when it closed in October 2017. The State Auditor found the company in default, classified $74,760,199 as public funding tied to the failed project and issued a total demand of $92,943,780.86, including principal, interest, local fees and recovery costs. 2011–2017 GreenTech Automotive, Tunica/Robinsonville An automobile manufacturing operation expected to invest $60 million and create 350 full-time jobs The project received $3 million from MDA, while another $2 million state loan went to Tunica County for land. The State Auditor found that GreenTech failed to make loan payments, make the promised investment or create the promised jobs, and issued a demand for $6,360,019.60. The auditor’s broader review identified $4,879,292 in public funding associated with the failed project.
I’m old enough to remember all these too. The biggest difference between data centers and those are: investment grade credit backstops from the most valuable companies on the planet are behind the data center construction. It’s not musical chairs, and the state isn’t holding the bag.
When, exactly, was it appraised at $350k?I hope the Data Center wins. My house is overvalued when it comes to tax. All counties do that bull ****. The house is appraised at 350K, but the county values it at 400K to get more money. The data center has the money to fight it and maybe the homeowners of Madison County can piggyback that fight.
I see why you might think that, but the truth is the county (through MCEDA) was instrumental in bringing AWS here, and they were in on the negotiations throughout the whole process. The county stands to gain the most from the AWS locating there, because they get the ad valorem taxes, and would have had to sign off on any rebates/abatements/incentives that were promised. The state gets some benefit, related to some sales tax revenue and job creation.
I'm assuming the millage rate or whatever the issue is in discussion, was simply not discussed or agreed to during those negotiations. Seems like a huge miss on AWS' attorney's part if that's the case. So was it also a miss by the county not to address it, or was it an intentional tag left hanging, knowing they could come back now and put the squeeze on AWS? That's the unknown here to me. Either way, it's kind of a bad look for the board to be doing this after the fact.
The FILOTs don’t prevent assessment fights. The language simply spells out the “rules of engagement.”Why did they not settle this through fee-in-lieu agreements on the front end?
The FILOTs don’t prevent assessment fights. The language simply spells out the “rules of engagement.”
The better question is why did the company reps and the assessor/staff let it become a public spectacle? Should never have gotten to that point.
Maroon and White
Amaree Williams all in on defensive transition at Mississippi State, wants to "impact the game on all levels"
Maroon and White
Mississippi State Edge Amaree Williams Q&A
Maroon and White
Mississippi State S Marcus Williams Q&A
Maroon and White
DJ Chester, Mississippi State OL "Speaking the same language"
Transfer Portal
College Basketball Transfer Portal Rankings: Top players entering after NCAA fifth-year eligibility ruling