His CEO skills are pretty good. He’s a good public speaker and, generally speaking, does an above average job managing locker room chemistry and off court stuff. Both behavior related and personnel matters.
Now I’m certain you could come up with a few examples to challenge this position, but remember, there are a lot of years of data going into this assessment. Usually when he doesn’t see eye to eye with someone on his staff, he doesn’t let it linger long (think Gleeson). Whether that was the right decision or not is not the point I’m making (I’m not in the mood to debate that one again and it’s not relevant). Greg historically has not tolerated locker room cancer situations - if it’s a clash between him and someone else that person is usually sent packing pretty quickly. He can’t fire everyone.
