Fauci Lied, People Died

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,157
30,639
113
Posting 2+ year old research that has long been debunked in the current climate is a bold strategy, cultist.


"Long since debunked", lol, said a tweet you seened.

You’ve taken “scientist asks question before evidence exists” and turned it into “scientist secretly knew the answer.” That’s not a bombshell. That’s how science works, edited for people who don’t understand science. Science proved it was safe for pregnant women and that hasn't changed.
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
10,848
14,357
113


This is exactly why fauci invoked the 5th. The penalty for contempt of congress is nothing compared to state charges that would come if he told the truth. His auto pen pardon would have protected him from all federal charges but that evidence could 100% be used by states to pursue charges.

Thankfully several states are already proceeding anyways. Fauci's day is coming, and the photos of him out in public show that he knows it too.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,157
30,639
113


This is exactly why fauci invoked the 5th. The penalty for contempt of congress is nothing compared to state charges that would come if he told the truth. His auto pen pardon would have protected him from all federal charges but that evidence could 100% be used by states to pursue charges.

Thankfully several states are already proceeding anyways. Fauci's day is coming, and the photos of him out in public show that he knows it too.

So should we charge the current principals at the CDC with manslaughter too since they also say it's safe for pregnant women or should we trust <checks notes> a tweeter named Cernovich?
 

Finance85

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2022
1,473
2,493
113
"Long since debunked", lol, said a tweet you seened.

You’ve taken “scientist asks question before evidence exists” and turned it into “scientist secretly knew the answer.” That’s not a bombshell. That’s how science works, edited for people who don’t understand science. Science proved it was safe for pregnant women and that hasn't changed.
You might be right, but ignoring some science and cherry picking contradictory evidence isn't science. Also, non-clinical studies are less valuable than clinical evidence. Look no further than the Fauci e-mails.
 

LafayetteBear

Heisman
Nov 30, 2009
34,847
10,332
113


BREAKING: A former senior advisor to Anthony Fauci has been INDICTED for his role in the COVID-19 coverup

This guy might throw Anthony Fauci under the BUS 👀

David Morens and his co-conspirators FALSIFIED records in an effort to SUPPRESS the lab-leak theory, and used his personal Gmail account rather than his NIH email in order to avoid being FOIA'd

Fauci might just be next!

Yawn ...
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,157
30,639
113
9 doses of the clot shot have destroyed you. You're about to go the way of Joes Place.
I haven't had close to that many but your lordship has. Is he still alive? Has he come down with turbo cancer?
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
10,848
14,357
113
I haven't had close to that many but your lordship has. Is he still alive? Has he come down with turbo cancer?
Link? How many are you up to? 7? It doesn't sound like you've been doing your part to help slow the spread if you're not up to date on that vaccine schedule, buddy! Gonna need to put a red mark on that vaccine passport for this transgression. You're worse than parents that don't want to give their 3 month old a hep b shot.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,157
30,639
113
You might be right, but ignoring some science and cherry picking contradictory evidence isn't science. Also, non-clinical studies are less valuable than clinical evidence. Look no further than the Fauci e-mails.
Cool, partisan dude who ignores clinical trials and refers to the vax as "the jab".

Robust data from large-scale clinical trials and real-world monitoring studies involving more than one million pregnant women worldwide have proven that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective before and during pregnancy.


While pregnant individuals were initially excluded from the early 2020 randomized clinical trials, extensive subsequent prospective cohort studies, clinical trial data from manufacturers like Pfizer, and massive global safety tracking networks have confirmed no increased risk of complications.
Reduced Maternal Risk: Contracting COVID-19 while pregnant imposes a significantly higher risk of severe illness, hospitalization, and intensive care admission. Vaccination drastically minimizes these risks.


"Large-scale analysis using the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) explicitly confirmed that COVID-19 vaccination does not increase the risk of miscarriage."

 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,157
30,639
113
Link? How many are you up to? 7? It doesn't sound like you've been doing your part to help slow the spread if you're not up to date on that vaccine schedule, buddy! Gonna need to put a red mark on that vaccine passport for this transgression. You're worse than parents that don't want to give their 3 month old a hep b shot.
What a pvssy he is

 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
10,848
14,357
113


What a pvssy he is

I don't care if Trump does take those shots, dingus. His body his choice. Trump never attempted to force vaccinations on me via illegal mandate like dementia joe and his band of retarded communist followers (you).

Now again, comrade.. show your papers and prove you are up to date on your injections. If they're not up to date I am banning you from the grocery store.
 

jimneffer

All-American
Jan 27, 2026
2,111
6,263
113



I don't care if Trump does take those shots, dingus. His body his choice. Trump never attempted to force vaccinations on me via illegal mandate like dementia joe and his band of retarded communist followers (you).

Now again, comrade.. show your papers and prove you are up to date on your injections. If they're not up to date I am banning you from the grocery store.

just so i understand

you're saying it's been conclusively demonstrated that covid vaccines are dangerous for (at minimum) pregnant women and their offspring

and yet the CDC, despite ultimately being led by a man for whom truth in vaccine risk is a top priority, is still recommending the covid vaccine is "especially important" for "Are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant, or might become pregnant in the future."

 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,157
30,639
113



I don't care if Trump does take those shots, dingus. His body his choice. Trump never attempted to force vaccinations on me via illegal mandate like dementia joe and his band of retarded communist followers (you).

Now again, comrade.. show your papers and prove you are up to date on your injections. If they're not up to date I am banning you from the grocery store.

X is destroying you. Do you ever read articles from non-biased sources or do you insist on trusting everything that pops up in your dark algorithm even though it's been repeatedly proven that it lies to you? Some people have miscarriages after they eat hamburgers - was it the hamburger that killed their babies?


Here's what's going on with this post.

What it's referring to: Naomi Wolf and her "War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project" — a group of self-organized volunteers, not epidemiologists or a peer-reviewed body — has been mining Pfizer's internal pharmacovigilance filings (documents Pfizer was required to submit to the FDA and that were later released via FOIA litigation). One of these is a "Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review," an internal adverse-event summary. Wolf's claim is that this document showed fetal deaths and menstrual harm, that Walensky had it in hand, and gave a press conference days later saying vaccination was safe in pregnancy anyway.

What's true:
  • The Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review is a real Pfizer document.
  • It does contain case reports of miscarriage, in-utero deaths, and adverse events in breastfed infants.
  • Walensky did make public statements encouraging vaccination during pregnancy in this period.
What's misleading or false:
  • This is a pharmacovigilance (adverse-event) report, not a causation study. These documents are built from spontaneous reports — anyone can submit one, and an event being reported after vaccination doesn't mean it was caused by vaccination. Regulatory agencies collect these precisely so they can be statistically screened against background rates; a raw list of reported deaths or miscarriages isn't evidence of elevated risk by itself.
  • Wolf's team has a documented track record of misreading these same documents. Her earlier viral claim that 44% of pregnant women in Pfizer's trial miscarried was fact-checked by FactCheck.org and PolitiFact and found to be a data error — miscarriages were double-counted and cases from the placebo group were folded into the vaccine tally. The actual trial miscarriage rate was normal and not elevated.
  • The best available evidence points the other way. Large studies — including the CDC's v-safe pregnancy registry, published in a major peer-reviewed journal — followed tens of thousands of vaccinated pregnant people and found no increased risk of miscarriage or adverse fetal outcomes. That's the actual evidentiary basis for Walensky's recommendation, not something she ignored.
  • "Pfizer knew and covered it up" is an interpretive leap, not established fact. Pharmaceutical companies are legally required to log every reported adverse event regardless of merit; routine collection and later FOIA disclosure of that log is not the same as proof of suppression or of a causal "genocide," as Wolf has explicitly framed it elsewhere.
Bottom line: The document is real, but the post presents raw, uncontrolled adverse-event tallies as proven causation while omitting that (1) this is exactly what pharmacovigilance systems are supposed to collect regardless of cause, and (2) the controlled studies that actually establish causation found no elevated risk. Wolf and DailyClout have a specific history of over-reading this same category of document in ways that didn't hold up under scrutiny.



If you don't care if Trump got vaccinated why would you care if I or anyone else did? A normal person wouldn't mock people who care about public health. Also, I never had to show anything at a grocery store during covid but enjoy your delusions.
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
10,848
14,357
113
X is destroying you. Do you ever read articles from non-biased sources or do you insist on trusting everything that pops up in your dark algorithm even though it's been repeatedly proven that it lies to you? Some people have miscarriages after they eat hamburgers - was it the hamburger that killed their babies?


Here's what's going on with this post.

What it's referring to: Naomi Wolf and her "War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project" — a group of self-organized volunteers, not epidemiologists or a peer-reviewed body — has been mining Pfizer's internal pharmacovigilance filings (documents Pfizer was required to submit to the FDA and that were later released via FOIA litigation). One of these is a "Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review," an internal adverse-event summary. Wolf's claim is that this document showed fetal deaths and menstrual harm, that Walensky had it in hand, and gave a press conference days later saying vaccination was safe in pregnancy anyway.

What's true:
  • The Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review is a real Pfizer document.
  • It does contain case reports of miscarriage, in-utero deaths, and adverse events in breastfed infants.
  • Walensky did make public statements encouraging vaccination during pregnancy in this period.
What's misleading or false:
  • This is a pharmacovigilance (adverse-event) report, not a causation study. These documents are built from spontaneous reports — anyone can submit one, and an event being reported after vaccination doesn't mean it was caused by vaccination. Regulatory agencies collect these precisely so they can be statistically screened against background rates; a raw list of reported deaths or miscarriages isn't evidence of elevated risk by itself.
  • Wolf's team has a documented track record of misreading these same documents. Her earlier viral claim that 44% of pregnant women in Pfizer's trial miscarried was fact-checked by FactCheck.org and PolitiFact and found to be a data error — miscarriages were double-counted and cases from the placebo group were folded into the vaccine tally. The actual trial miscarriage rate was normal and not elevated.
  • The best available evidence points the other way. Large studies — including the CDC's v-safe pregnancy registry, published in a major peer-reviewed journal — followed tens of thousands of vaccinated pregnant people and found no increased risk of miscarriage or adverse fetal outcomes. That's the actual evidentiary basis for Walensky's recommendation, not something she ignored.
  • "Pfizer knew and covered it up" is an interpretive leap, not established fact. Pharmaceutical companies are legally required to log every reported adverse event regardless of merit; routine collection and later FOIA disclosure of that log is not the same as proof of suppression or of a causal "genocide," as Wolf has explicitly framed it elsewhere.
Bottom line: The document is real, but the post presents raw, uncontrolled adverse-event tallies as proven causation while omitting that (1) this is exactly what pharmacovigilance systems are supposed to collect regardless of cause, and (2) the controlled studies that actually establish causation found no elevated risk. Wolf and DailyClout have a specific history of over-reading this same category of document in ways that didn't hold up under scrutiny.



If you don't care if Trump got vaccinated why would you care if I or anyone else did? A normal person wouldn't mock people who care about public health. Also, I never had to show anything at a grocery store during covid but enjoy your delusions.
"Claude told meeeeee!!!!"

Do you spend more time talking to your AI or actual people in a given day? Genuine question though I'm 90% sure I already know the answer
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
10,848
14,357
113
just so i understand

you're saying it's been conclusively demonstrated that covid vaccines are dangerous for (at minimum) pregnant women and their offspring

and yet the CDC, despite ultimately being led by a man for whom truth in vaccine risk is a top priority, is still recommending the covid vaccine is "especially important" for "Are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant, or might become pregnant in the future."

Comrade I need to see your papers for you to access this thread. Please confirm your status of booster shots immediately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,157
30,639
113
"Claude told meeeeee!!!!"

Do you spend more time talking to your AI or actual people in a given day? Genuine question though I'm 90% sure I already know the answer
This is a typical pattern with you and your tweeter lovin buddies. When you get busted, mock fact checkers, the MSM, legacy media and AI and then take personal shots at the poster instead of staying on subject. How many people are you talking to right now? Nevermind, I don't care because I'm a mature adult and don't need to change the subject to make myself look cool.
 

jimneffer

All-American
Jan 27, 2026
2,111
6,263
113
This is a typical pattern with you and your tweeter lovin buddies. When you get busted, mock fact checkers, the MSM, legacy media and AI and then take personal shots at the poster instead of staying on subject. How many people are you talking to right now? Nevermind, I don't care because I'm a mature adult and don't need to change the subject to make myself look cool.
it's our fault for expecting anything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
10,848
14,357
113
This is a typical pattern with you and your tweeter lovin buddies. When you get busted, mock fact checkers, the MSM, legacy media and AI and then take personal shots at the poster instead of staying on subject. How many people are you talking to right now? Nevermind, I don't care because I'm a mature adult and don't need to change the subject to make myself look cool.


Quiet piggy. You've been used and abused enough in this thread. Why don't you go back to defending talarico for texting kids at midnight and attending drag shows for children as a keynote speaker
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
10,848
14,357
113
True, he's incapable of learning or admitting fault but people reading these posts may learn something and that's the only reason I engage.
Says the person who claimed the clot shot prevented transmission of covid. That was another fauci and wolenski lie lol you literally fell for all of them because you lack any and all critical thinking skills (which is why you are addicted to AI)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
34,157
30,639
113
Says the person who claimed the clot shot prevented transmission of covid. That was another fauci and wolenski lie lol you literally fell for all of them because you lack any and all critical thinking skills (which is why you are addicted to AI)
k
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
10,848
14,357
113
Covid survival rate for childbearing aged women…

Age: 20-29
Survival Rate: 99.99%

Age: 30-39
Survival Rate: 99.97%

Age: 40-49
Survival Rate: 99.98%

There was never any need for mothers taking the vaccine.

Every child lost due to the vaccine was premeditated murder.

Evil.

 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
48,253
37,338
113


Covid (flu) wasn’t deadly enough to cause hysteria so Fauci and his co-conspirators…

Forced a dangerous vaccine.

Made Remdesivir and ventilators hospital protocol.

Put Covid positive elderly in nursing homes with other elderly.

Made it impossible to get ivermectin and others treatments.

And so on…

Every action was to create as much hysteria and death as possible to lock down America.

Produce 70 million mail in ballots.

Steal the 2020 election.
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
10,848
14,357
113


Dr. James Thorp says the surge in severe birth defects and placental abnormalities after the COVID shots rolled out was unfathomable.

He personally saw the horrors in his own OB-GYN practice.

Dr. Thorp says one “well-known” hospital had EIGHT babies in the neonatal ICU suffering from the same rare, life-threatening birth defect at the same time.

He ran the numbers on this happening by chance, and the odds were 1 in 10 trillion.

THORP: "I saw a significant increase in fetal malformations of virtually every organ system."

"There literally were cystic hygromas (a fluid-filled sac in the head or neck), cardiac malformations, diaphragmatic hernias."

“Diaphragmatic hernias are very rare malformations. And I won’t mention which hospital, but there was a hospital that’s well known to me and to you. At one point in time, the neonatal intensive care unit had eight infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."

"Now, you can run the numbers on that... but it’s one in several trillion—10 trillion."

"I saw severe placental abnormalities that I’ve documented and published."

“Severe growth restriction, blood clots in the mother and in the fetus. Seizure-like activity in the fetus, in mothers as well. There were multiple thrombotic events, both in the fetus and in the mother."

“Premature labor and delivery, premature death in the babies that were born. Increased risk of death."

"Substantial increase in babies that went... to the neonatal intensive care nursery."

ADDED CONTEXT: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a life-threatening birth defect where a hole in the baby’s diaphragm allows abdominal organs to move into the chest, crowding the developing lungs and causing severe breathing problems.

It occurs in approximately 1 in 3,030 U.S. births and generally requires intensive neonatal care followed by surgery, per the CDC.

Dr. Thorp says one hospital had eight cases of this rare birth defect present at the same time.
 
Tiger Illustrated

Latest

  1. 01 Tiger Illustrated Part 2: Tiger Illustrated's Projected Clemson Football Depth Chart vs. LSU
  2. 02 Tiger Illustrated Tiger Illustrated's Projected Clemson Football Depth Chart vs. LSU
  3. 03 The Bengal Tiger One Week Out: What to know about LSU-Clemson
  4. 04 On3 SEC says it will comply with court orders granting players eligibility despite being listed as defendant
  5. 05 Tiger Illustrated Friday Evening Clemson Football Insider