Fauci Lied, People Died

[dpic73]

View attachment 1385049

She was qualified and wasn't a pathological liar like BrainWorm

RFK Jr is Asking to Be Proven Wrong Again So Here Are 40 Examples From Just One CNN Interview

He's just creating work for us at this point

rasmussenretorts.substack.com

 

[Scrubby]

Contempt vote first thing tomorrow AM

 

[Scrubby]

She was qualified and wasn't a pathological liar like BrainWorm

RFK Jr is Asking to Be Proven Wrong Again So Here Are 40 Examples From Just One CNN Interview

He's just creating work for us at this point

rasmussenretorts.substack.com

That's a dude. A mentally unwell/unqualified dude. He is also a liar lol

 

[Scrubby]

"We didn't lie! The people we have bought and paid for lied on our behalf!"

Then the short bus individuals like @dpic73 and most of the leftists from the hawkeye board regurgitated those lies.

 

[dpic73]

"We didn't lie! The people we have bought and paid for lied on our behalf!"

Then the short bus individuals like @dpic73 and most of the leftists from the hawkeye board regurgitated those lies.

Lowly troll seened a tweet?

Did lowly troll verify it before dropping this turd and pretending like he was the smart one?

 

[Finance85]

Try January 10th, which the Chinese government repressed and no one (including the American officials) knew whether to take seriously or not, though fauci realized the imminent threat based on the unsanctioned data and immediately requested a vaccine developed.

None of these are gotchas

Ten out of twelve of Fauci's advisors disagreed with you.

 

[Scrubby]

Lowly troll seened a tweet?

Did lowly troll verify it before dropping this turd and pretending like he was the smart one?

Need a tissue?

 

[PapaGanoush]

Lowly troll seened a tweet?

Did lowly troll verify it before dropping this turd and pretending like he was the smart one?

You are embarrassing yourself.

 

[dpic73]

You are embarrassing yourself.

Wrong, don't forget that you're too dumb to debate so you really need to stay out of adult conversations.

Went to Scrubby's tweet, clicked on the grok button and asked if this was true and what do you know - Scrubby lied again(you two deserve each other). Sit your azz down.

"No, the claim is not accurate. Pfizer and Moderna did publicly state that their COVID-19 vaccines were safe and effective (based on clinical trial data available at the time), and there is no clear evidence from court filings or reliable reporting that they have defended themselves in litigation by saying “We never said it was safe and effective.”

Public statements by the companies
Both companies repeatedly used “safe and effective” language in press releases, CEO comments, and other communications.

• Pfizer/BioNTech announced Phase 3 results showing high efficacy and a favorable safety profile, with CEO Albert Bourla and others describing the goal of delivering a “safe and effective” vaccine. Company materials and statements continued to affirm safety and efficacy based on the data.

• Moderna similarly reported strong efficacy results (around 94%) and an acceptable safety profile from its trials, with executives and company communications describing the vaccine in those terms.

Regulators (FDA, Health Canada, and others) also independently reviewed the data and authorized/approved the vaccines on the basis that the benefits outweighed the risks, using similar language. The companies’ claims were tied to the evidence from their trials at the time of authorization (primarily protection against symptomatic disease in the original variants), not absolute guarantees of permanent sterilizing immunity or zero risk of side effects.

The specific court-defense claim
The assertion that Pfizer and Moderna are defending themselves in court with the exact phrase “We never said it was safe and effective” appears to stem from commentary in the Allison Inquiry-related video/interview rather than from documented court transcripts or filings. Multiple searches for primary legal sources, news coverage of lawsuits, and related records turn up no verified instances of that specific defense.

Related lawsuits (for example, state AG cases accusing Pfizer of misleading claims about efficacy or safety) generally allege the opposite—that the company did make strong public representations. Vaccine manufacturers have significant liability protections under laws like the U.S. PREP Act for COVID countermeasures (with limited exceptions for willful misconduct), which is a separate legal issue from what they publicly stated.

In short: The companies did say their vaccines were safe and effective based on the trial data they presented. The stronger version of the claim—that they never said it, or that this is their explicit courtroom defense—is not supported by available evidence. Government and media messaging often amplified the language more broadly (including on transmission and durability), which is a distinct point of criticism that some raise independently of what the manufacturers themselves stated.

https://x.com/i/grok/share/16e14789c7324650b34a79db69d471e0

 

[Scrubby]

Wrong, don't forget that you're too dumb to debate so you really need to stay out of adult conversations.

Went to Scrubby's tweet, clicked on the grok button and asked if this was true and what do you know - Scrubby lied again(you two deserve each other). Sit your azz down.

"No, the claim is not accurate. Pfizer and Moderna did publicly state that their COVID-19 vaccines were safe and effective (based on clinical trial data available at the time), and there is no clear evidence from court filings or reliable reporting that they have defended themselves in litigation by saying “We never said it was safe and effective.”

Public statements by the companies
Both companies repeatedly used “safe and effective” language in press releases, CEO comments, and other communications.

• Pfizer/BioNTech announced Phase 3 results showing high efficacy and a favorable safety profile, with CEO Albert Bourla and others describing the goal of delivering a “safe and effective” vaccine. Company materials and statements continued to affirm safety and efficacy based on the data.

• Moderna similarly reported strong efficacy results (around 94%) and an acceptable safety profile from its trials, with executives and company communications describing the vaccine in those terms.

Regulators (FDA, Health Canada, and others) also independently reviewed the data and authorized/approved the vaccines on the basis that the benefits outweighed the risks, using similar language. The companies’ claims were tied to the evidence from their trials at the time of authorization (primarily protection against symptomatic disease in the original variants), not absolute guarantees of permanent sterilizing immunity or zero risk of side effects.

The specific court-defense claim
The assertion that Pfizer and Moderna are defending themselves in court with the exact phrase “We never said it was safe and effective” appears to stem from commentary in the Allison Inquiry-related video/interview rather than from documented court transcripts or filings. Multiple searches for primary legal sources, news coverage of lawsuits, and related records turn up no verified instances of that specific defense.

Related lawsuits (for example, state AG cases accusing Pfizer of misleading claims about efficacy or safety) generally allege the opposite—that the company did make strong public representations. Vaccine manufacturers have significant liability protections under laws like the U.S. PREP Act for COVID countermeasures (with limited exceptions for willful misconduct), which is a separate legal issue from what they publicly stated.

In short: The companies did say their vaccines were safe and effective based on the trial data they presented. The stronger version of the claim—that they never said it, or that this is their explicit courtroom defense—is not supported by available evidence. Government and media messaging often amplified the language more broadly (including on transmission and durability), which is a distinct point of criticism that some raise independently of what the manufacturers themselves stated.

https://x.com/i/grok/share/16e14789c7324650b34a79db69d471e0

Poor fauci, first the whole world got to read his diary (still very gay btw) and now we get to go through his text messages and phone calls too lol bro is absolutely ******.

 

[dpic73]

View attachment 1386229

Poor fauci, first the whole world got to read his diary (still very gay btw) and now we get to go through his text messages and phone calls too lol bro is absolutely ******.

This is legally baseless. Fauci’s pardon related to conduct or statements prior to the date of the pardon. It does not apply to his testimony last week, for which he could be charged for making false statements to Congress. Given Trump’s hatred of Fauci and his repeated efforts to put his enemies in prison based on bogus charges, Fauci had every right to take the 5th to protect against the corrupt use of his testimony. This contempt charge will go nowhere.

 

[Scrubby]

This is legally baseless. Fauci’s pardon related to conduct or statements prior to the date of the pardon. It does not apply to his testimony last week, for which he could be charged for making false statements to Congress. Given Trump’s hatred of Fauci and his repeated efforts to put his enemies in prison based on bogus charges, Fauci had every right to take the 5th to protect against the corrupt use of his testimony. This contempt charge will go nowhere.

Anthony Fauci funded Wuhan research that ‘needed to be completed by 2019’

- Fauci’s NIAID and USAID sent over $40M in taxpayer money to a scientist in Wuhan
- That same scientist became "patient zero" for COVID-19
- That research STARTED IN 2014, THE SAME YEAR ANTHONY FAUCI’S PARDON STARTS
- Elon Musk confirms this is why his pronouns were Prosecute/Fauci
- Elon Musk first made this declaration after reviewing the Twitter Files

And the most damning part, the research had a deadline to be finished by 2019

This is the crime of the century. This is Crimes Against Humanity

This proves Joe Biden and The DNC are ALL involved, because why else would the perfectly date Anthony Fauci’s pardon to 2014

All fauci had to do was (finally) tell the truth and he couldn't do it. Supreme court case brown vs walker already ruled that if a person has received a full pardon then they can no longer claim the 5th ammendment privilege against self incrimination for that offense bc the crime is treated as if it never happened.

 

[dpic73]

Many people are misunderstanding today’s Senate Committee vote. The contempt vote was solely for Dr. Fauci invoking the Fifth and refusing to answer questions. It was not a finding that he lied, funded gain-of-function research, or committed any other specific wrongdoing.

Given Rand Paul’s prior public statements that he expected Fauci to catch Dr. Fauci in a "lie" under questioning and that any new false statement would fall outside the pardon, I asked Grok a simple question: Would any reasonable lawyer, knowing all this, advise his client to do anything other than take the Fifth?

 

[Scrubby]

Holy **** the left has lost the LA Times even You know it’s bad when even Democrats are talking about the Covid shots causing cancer in kids

 

[dpic73]

Holy **** the left has lost the LA Times even You know it’s bad when even Democrats are talking about the Covid shots causing cancer in kids

If maga didn't have lies and propaganda, they'd have nothing but they are thankful there are still gumps like you who will believe anything. You've been busted for spreading lies so many times, why aren't you embarrassed?

---

"US data from the American Cancer Society shows colorectal cancer incidence rising 3% annually in ages 20-49 and shifting toward younger adults since the 1990s, predating COVID, with nearly half of new cases now under age 65, driven mainly by distal colon and rectal tumors.

No established causal connection exists between COVID-19 vaccines and colon (colorectal) cancer according to major health authorities, though early-onset rates have risen for decades and some observational studies report modest associations that experts attribute largely to bias rather than causation.

Early-onset colorectal cancer (diagnosed under age 50–55) has been increasing steadily since the mid-1990s—well before the COVID-19 pandemic or vaccines—at roughly 1–2% per year in the US, with similar trends in other countries. The American Cancer Society and other sources document this long-term rise, linked primarily to lifestyle and environmental factors such as diet, obesity, physical inactivity, alcohol, and smoking, along with possible contributions from improved detection or other unknowns. Cancer diagnoses temporarily dropped during the pandemic due to disrupted screening, which can create later catch-up effects.

The US National Cancer Institute (NCI), American Cancer Society, Mayo Clinic, and European regulators state there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer, accelerate existing cancer, cause recurrence, or alter DNA. Large safety monitoring systems have not identified cancer as a side effect. Vaccines are generally recommended for people with cancer because they face higher risks from COVID-19 infection itself.

https://x.com/i/grok/share/f0eb958403074de3b2b4ce8a5d65ff1d

 

[Scrubby]

If maga didn't have lies and propaganda, they'd have nothing but they are thankful there are still gumps like you who will believe anything. You've been busted for spreading lies so many times, why aren't you embarrassed?

---

"US data from the American Cancer Society shows colorectal cancer incidence rising 3% annually in ages 20-49 and shifting toward younger adults since the 1990s, predating COVID, with nearly half of new cases now under age 65, driven mainly by distal colon and rectal tumors.

No established causal connection exists between COVID-19 vaccines and colon (colorectal) cancer according to major health authorities, though early-onset rates have risen for decades and some observational studies report modest associations that experts attribute largely to bias rather than causation.

Early-onset colorectal cancer (diagnosed under age 50–55) has been increasing steadily since the mid-1990s—well before the COVID-19 pandemic or vaccines—at roughly 1–2% per year in the US, with similar trends in other countries. The American Cancer Society and other sources document this long-term rise, linked primarily to lifestyle and environmental factors such as diet, obesity, physical inactivity, alcohol, and smoking, along with possible contributions from improved detection or other unknowns. Cancer diagnoses temporarily dropped during the pandemic due to disrupted screening, which can create later catch-up effects.

The US National Cancer Institute (NCI), American Cancer Society, Mayo Clinic, and European regulators state there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer, accelerate existing cancer, cause recurrence, or alter DNA. Large safety monitoring systems have not identified cancer as a side effect. Vaccines are generally recommended for people with cancer because they face higher risks from COVID-19 infection itself.

https://x.com/i/grok/share/f0eb958403074de3b2b4ce8a5d65ff1d

Can you elaborate on the number of vaccines on the childhood vaccone schedule from the late 80s to today? Let's see how that correlates to these rising cancer rates.

The clot shot is proven to increase the risk of certain cancers btw. This is, of course, on top of the known blood clotting (like fauci got) and myocarditis which are also known side effects of the covid shots. Absolute garbage.

 

[dpic73]

Can you elaborate on the number of vaccines on the childhood vaccone schedule from the late 80s to today? Let's see how that correlates to these rising cancer rates.

The clot shot is proven to increase the risk of certain cancers btw. This is, of course, on top of the known blood clotting (like fauci got) and myocarditis which are also known side effects of the covid shots. Absolute garbage.

Your understanding of anything science related is limited to your Twitter algorithm since that's the only place you go for your own research, lolol.

The J&J vaccine was known for a small number of people getting blood clots but the US quit using it almost immediately.

Covid mRNA vaccines DO NOT cause blood clots and there is NO evidence they are related to cancer.

You are 11 times MORE likely to get myocarditis from covid itself than from the mRNA vaccine, but even then, it's a tiny handful of mostly young men after their second shot, easily treated and not a cause of death or lingering medical issues.

You are a complete dumbass and you should be ashamed of your negative contributions to our country.

 

[Scrubby]

Your understanding of anything science related is limited to your Twitter algorithm since that's the only place you go for your own research, lolol.

The J&J vaccine was known for a small number of people getting blood clots but the US quit using it almost immediately.

Covid mRNA vaccines DO NOT cause blood clots and there is NO evidence they are related to cancer.

You are 11 times MORE likely to get myocarditis from covid itself than from the mRNA vaccine, but even then, it's a tiny handful of mostly young men after their second shot, easily treated and not a cause of death or lingering medical issues.

You are a complete dumbass and you should be ashamed of your negative contributions to our country.

Quiet clown. Everything you say is a lie lol

 

[dpic73]

Quiet clown. Everything you say is a lie lol

OH NOES! YOU SEENED A TWEET! I CAN"T COMPETE!

Read a fuggin book or how about a scientific journal sometime ya dope.

 

[Scrubby]

OH NOES! YOU SEENED A TWEET! I CAN"T COMPETE!

Read a fuggin book or how about a scientific journal sometime ya dope.

I linked you multiple scientific studies. Take your cope and move on. Now you're just dodging facts.

 

[dpic73]

I linked you multiple scientific studies. Take your cope and move on. Now you're just dodging facts.

LOLOLOL...Nicholas Hulscher......catches breath.....LOLOLOL

You have no idea how utterly stupid this makes you look.

 

[Scrubby]

LOLOLOL...Nicholas Hulscher......catches breath.....LOLOLOL

You have no idea how utterly stupid this makes you look.

View attachment 1386907

You links he supplied were from NIH and the CDC you absolute buffoon

 

[jimneffer]

Quiet clown. Everything you say is a lie lol

anyone who actually cares about this - and isn't simply trying to score social media points, please read the study in that link

here's the actual conculsion, verbatim, from the study:
The subjects who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed almost half the risk of all-cause death after a median follow-up of 25 months. We also observed an inconstant association between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer hospitalization, depending on infection status, cancer site, and the minimum lag-time between vaccination and cancer. As the results might be influenced by the confounding effect of a differential healthcare utilization by vaccinated individuals, they must be considered preliminary, and further data are definitely required to elucidate the potential association between cancer and COVID-19 vaccination.

 

[dpic73]

You links he supplied were from NIH and the CDC you absolute buffoon

Swear to god Scummy. Just because these studies were published in this journal does not mean they are endorsed by the NIH.

You may have(we know you did actually) missed this at the top of the page.

"As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice"

AND

"Readers are alerted that concerns with this article have been raised with the Editors. Editorial action will be taken as appropriate once the concerns have been fully investigated"

Further reading and you will see:


Key Findings

• Massive Reduction in Death: The study found that individuals who received at least one vaccine dose had a significantly lower likelihood of all-cause death compared to the unvaccinated. [1, 2]
• Temporary Rise in Cancer Hospitalizations: The researchers initially noticed a slightly higher likelihood of hospitalization for cancer among the vaccinated (Hazard Ratio: 1.23). However, this association completely vanished and reversed when the researchers applied a 12-month lag time between vaccination and hospital tracking. [1]

Why the "Cancer" Link is Considered Biased
The authors themselves, along with subsequent scientific commentaries, explicitly stated that the data does not prove vaccines cause cancer due to built-in study limitations: [1, 2, 3]

Nicholas Hulscher is a non-credible charlatan who works for quack-a -doodle "Dr." Peter McCullough who sells supplements for Spike Protein detox (LOL). His whole agenda is to drive you to their wellness store to get you to buy supplements that do nothing - nothing.

Laughing at you for trusting this clown.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Your understanding of anything science related is limited to your Twitter algorithm since that's the only place you go for your own research, lolol.

The J&J vaccine was known for a small number of people getting blood clots but the US quit using it almost immediately.

Covid mRNA vaccines DO NOT cause blood clots and there is NO evidence they are related to cancer.

You are 11 times MORE likely to get myocarditis from covid itself than from the mRNA vaccine, but even then, it's a tiny handful of mostly young men after their second shot, easily treated and not a cause of death or lingering medical issues.

You are a complete dumbass and you should be ashamed of your negative contributions to our country.

Leftist talking points and all BS.

 

[dpic73]

Leftist talking points and all BS.

Prove me wrong. You can't.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Prove me wrong. You can't.

Lol. Ive been doing it for years cousin.

 

[dpic73]

Lol. Ive been doing it for years cousin.

Bwah, you don't know how and a tweet from a credulous ghoul on Xchan doesn't prove a thing except that you're a gullible fool.

Now take each of my talking points above and disprove them without dropping a tweet from a clown on Twitsh*t. I dare you.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Bwah, you don't know how and a tweet from a credulous ghoul on Xchan doesn't prove a thing except that you're a gullible fool.

Now take each of my talking points above and disprove them without dropping a tweet from a clown on Twitsh*t. I dare you.

Can you post for a whole day without cut and paste from your lib oriented AI of choice?

 

[dpic73]

Can you post for a whole day without cut and paste from your lib oriented AI of choice?

If you didn't lie, I wouldn't need to. If you don't want to be embarrassed, start doing something that you're allergic to and tell the truth.

Now use your own words and credible sources and disprove my talking points. Don't change the subject.

 

[TigerGrowls]

If you didn't lie, I wouldn't need to. If you don't want to be embarrassed, start doing something that you're allergic to and tell the truth.

Now use your own words and credible sources and disprove my talking points. Don't change the subject.

Dpic....im giving my opinion on what i believe is right.

 

[dpic73]

Dpic....im giving my opinion on what i believe is right.

Opinions don't matter when the facts are easily verifiable. Ok, just take one.

Did the US stop using the J&J vaccine due to concerns except for patients who specifically requested it?

 

[TigerGrowls]

Opinions don't matter when the facts are easily verifiable. Ok, just take one.

Did the US stop using the J&J vaccine due to concerns except for patients who specifically requested it?

Thats true but its only one provider dpic. Related to facts its all in dispute.

 

[dpic73]

Thats true but its only one provider dpic. Related to facts its all in dispute.

Boom, see how easy that was to show it wasn't a BS leftist talking point?

 

[Scrubby]

 

[m.knox]

"The sexiest man alive...." lmfao....

The Cult of Fauci​

https://www.sashastone.com/p/the-cult-of-fauci

I was caught between worlds in 2020. I began the year as a faithful, loyal Democrat and a true believer in Fauci the Hero vs. Trump the Villain. I was never an anti-masker or anti-vaxxer, at least, not in the beginning. As the year wore on, however, the questions started piling up in my head.

Why, I wondered, was it politics as usual if this pandemic was as serious as CNN said it was?

Why, if the virus was microscopic, did masks suddenly become not only essential but mandatory identifiers in our society?

Why, if it was so serious, did millions flood the street on Memorial Day Weekend to protest the death of George Floyd at the hands of the police, and 1,000 health experts signed a letter saying protesting was more important than a pandemic that was supposedly hitting the black community especially hard?

Every time I’d ask a question, the unified whole would scream back at me, parroting the exact same talking points from the legacy media and the Democrats. No one was allowed to even ask a question, much less question the official party line.

Why? The cult of Dr. Fauci. We hadn’t seen a hero rise like that since Barack Obama in 2008. We believed in him. We trusted him. We loved him. To question him became blasphemy, and even now, if you say his name among liberals, they will scowl at you.

The cult of Fauci and the legacy media became one in 2020. They made him a star and, in turn, he went along with the official narrative that Trump was not competent in a crisis and helped the media convince the public to vote him out.

 

[Finance85]

I'm in the same boat as Stephen A Smith. I trusted the government, and I trusted Fauci. I was betrayed by both. Fortunately for me, I recognized the betrayal early, and didn't compound my mistakes. Part of my own makeup is my skepticism, and I do lots of research on things that interest me. I don't always go with the flow if it seems wrong. There's so much confirmation bias these days that people have forgotten how to be objective.

In any event, I think people have lost focus of the most important thing - Fauci is responsible for the gain of function research that led to the development of a virus that was made more infectious to humans. That research went on for years, and when it was stopped in the US by Obama in 2014, Fauci shifted the funding for it to Wuhan. Fauci approved the grants. Fauci had an ongoing relationship with EcoHealth Alliance. Fauci published multiple articles going back years saying the gain of function risk was worth it.

I was surprised when Fauci said in March 2020 that Moderna was already working on a vaccine and should have an initial trial ready in a month. I've had multiple pharma companies as clients, and nothing moves that fast, even at warp speed. My conclusion was Fauci already knew about the genome of the virus, and had a plan.

The rest of the stuff about the masks, and social distancing, and school shutdowns, and business shutdowns was apparent at the time. Discovering Fauci admitting to the BS lies only matters now to the people who closed their eyes back at the time. There was plenty of evidence, but people needed something or someone to believe in.

As far as Trump goes, he was Fauci's useful idiot. Fauci played Trump by feeding Trump information, knowing Trump would publicly try to take credit. Then Fauci's own ego, and realization of what might happen to himself kicked in.

In the end, I don't care to go back and revisit masks, etc., etc.. The only lie that matters is the lie about Fauci's role in creating the virus. I'm sad that people can't see that, accept that, and hold Fauci accountable for that. Only then can they answer the question - "was it worth the risk?"

 

[WDDT]

I'm in the same boat as Stephen A Smith. I trusted the government, and I trusted Fauci. I was betrayed by both. Fortunately for me, I recognized the betrayal early, and didn't compound my mistakes. Part of my own makeup is my skepticism, and I do lots of research on things that interest me. I don't always go with the flow if it seems wrong. There's so much confirmation bias these days that people have forgotten how to be objective.

In any event, I think people have lost focus of the most important thing - Fauci is responsible for the gain of function research that led to the development of a virus that was made more infectious to humans. That research went on for years, and when it was stopped in the US by Obama in 2014, Fauci shifted the funding for it to Wuhan. Fauci approved the grants. Fauci had an ongoing relationship with EcoHealth Alliance. Fauci published multiple articles going back years saying the gain of function risk was worth it.

I was surprised when Fauci said in March 2020 that Moderna was already working on a vaccine and should have an initial trial ready in a month. I've had multiple pharma companies as clients, and nothing moves that fast, even at warp speed. My conclusion was Fauci already knew about the genome of the virus, and had a plan.

The rest of the stuff about the masks, and social distancing, and school shutdowns, and business shutdowns was apparent at the time. Discovering Fauci admitting to the BS lies only matters now to the people who closed their eyes back at the time. There was plenty of evidence, but people needed something or someone to believe in.

As far as Trump goes, he was Fauci's useful idiot. Fauci played Trump by feeding Trump information, knowing Trump would publicly try to take credit. Then Fauci's own ego, and realization of what might happen to himself kicked in.

In the end, I don't care to go back and revisit masks, etc., etc.. The only lie that matters is the lie about Fauci's role in creating the virus. I'm sad that people can't see that, accept that, and hold Fauci accountable for that. Only then can they answer the question - "was it worth the risk?"

Fauci lied, people died.

 

[Scrubby]

The fauci texts are coming...

 

[TigerGrowls]