Kohler and Hall would be the best additions, scoring and reboundingThey also crystal balled Kohler to us, just think those posts are for clicks
Kohler and Hall would be the best additions, scoring and reboundingThey also crystal balled Kohler to us, just think those posts are for clicks
Laws are acts passed by Congress. Executive Orders are not in any way law, they are supposed to be administrative directions on how the Executive branch interprets such laws.I’m regarded and really don’t know the difference with that stuff. I just kinda put everything he signs on his desk into a “law category”
Sorry if I sounded rude
Ok cool let’s talk about basketball!Laws are acts passed by Congress. Executive Orders are not in any way law, they are supposed to be administrative directions on how the Executive branch interprets such laws.
A President can only sign, veto, allow to go into law without their signature, or possibly a "pocket veto" when Congress is out of session.
They cannot legally create any laws so no anything he signs does not go into a law bucket because most of what he signs is nothing of the sort at all.
This is great. I hope your basketball knowledge is greater than your civics knowledge.Yes judges are supposed to pass “laws”
if a judge rules for a restraining order that’s law. It doesn’t need to go to the President first.
If a judge couldn’t pass rulings/ laws America wouldn’t work
Yep. I put very little into these type of tweets. They are for clicks and followers.They also crystal balled Kohler to us, just think those posts are for clicks
I’m not saying we should change the American justice system. I’m saying we should find a way to weed out corrupt and politically bias judges. Not just that but common sense. SCOTUS ruling that it’s good for America to have companies all over the world recruiting people to come here for 3 days, have a baby and get citizenship is against common sense. It will destroy America if allowed to continue. They know this but vote based on politics.It works the exact same way it always has. What would you disbar them for? This is what people always say when the rulings go against what they want but courts are generally consistent and if this is truly not legal it can be appealed in moved up the ladder. Same as it ever was. It can be frustrating but changing it because of this seems silly.
I feel you but the other side feels the exact same way and has their own examples. I like the idea of using AI personally but that would have its own issues I'm sure. It's how its always been. Desegregation was done by a radical judge. Trump might have gone to prison if not for what the liberals think is a radical judge. If you've got a good solution break it out but acting like anything is different now than it was 100 years ago is flat wrong. Both sides appoint judges they think will do their bidding. They write opeds to show how down to clown they are. None of this is different than its ever been you're just getting more exposure into how it works because an issue is going against the party you support and the are blaming the judges. 6-3? You want to call SCOTUS radicals over a 6-3 ruling FRFR? How about demand that Congress write a law that does something about the issue instead? Like it's supposed to work.I’m not saying we should change the American justice system. I’m saying we should find a way to weed out corrupt and politically bias judges. Not just that but common sense. SCOTUS ruling that it’s good for America to have companies all over the world recruiting people to come here for 3 days, have a baby and get citizenship is against common sense. It will destroy America if allowed to continue. They know this but vote based on politics.
It’s not judges job to pass laws.Lmao so to pass a law we need 5 judges to convene and agree on something?
You really don’t know how our government works do you?Yes judges are supposed to pass “laws”
if a judge rules for a restraining order that’s law. It doesn’t need to go to the President first.
If a judge couldn’t pass rulings/ laws America wouldn’t work
Bro bringing up like days old stuff go try and fight someone else and get bannedIt’s not judges job to pass laws.
In the 60s and 70s. China wasn’t trying and spending millions to attempt to overthrow democracy. I’m in my 60s and this is by far the worst turmoil America has ever seen. I pray a lot for my grandbabies because I was in the military 8 years in the 82nd Airborne. Traveled the world. Korea, Japan, Philippines, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador . Been to them all. People who have never been anywhere downing America hurts. They have no idea how bad life can get.I feel you but the other side feels the exact same way and has their own examples. I like the idea of using AI personally but that would have its own issues I'm sure. It's how its always been. Desegregation was done by a radical judge. Trump might have gone to prison if not for what the liberals think is a radical judge. If you've got a good solution break it out but acting like anything is different now than it was 100 years ago is flat wrong. Both sides appoint judges they think will do their bidding. They write opeds to show how down to clown they are. None of this is different than its ever been you're just getting more exposure into how it works because an issue is going against the party you support and the are blaming the judges. 6-3? You want to call SCOTUS radicals over a 6-3 ruling FRFR? How about demand that Congress write a law that does something about the issue instead? Like it's supposed to work.
Just saw the thread. Sorry I don’t live on here. Get banned? What are you going on about?Bro bringing up like days old stuff go try and fight someone else and get banned
Agree, huge upgrade over Kam scoring wise plus Kam is hurtHall made 64 threes last year on 38% shooting.
He fits the Pope system and is a huge upgrade over Kam. He also gives you another legit All-SEC scoring option.
Diallo
Wilkins
Milan
Hall
Moreno
With a high-level bench led by Kam and McBride.
That's an Elite Eight/ Final Four level roster.
Precedent law is one of the most self-destructive things a society can do. Our founding fathers went out of their way to warn us away from using it based on all the problems it caused Britain over the years. But sadly they didn’t codify it and here we are.As a commentary, it is ludicrous that one judge can make up whatever rules they want on a whim like this.
Yep. If we can pull either Hall or Kohler out of a hat we’re suddenly in a very good position.Hall made 64 threes last year on 38% shooting.
He fits the Pope system and is a huge upgrade over Kam. He also gives you another legit All-SEC scoring option.
Diallo
Wilkins
Milan
Hall
Moreno
With a high-level bench led by Kam and McBride.
That's an Elite Eight/ Final Four level roster.
I think the biggest problem our country faces is not a hand full of district judges but the president that has forced their hands.Precedent law is one of the most self-destructive things a society can do. Our founding fathers went out of their way to warn us away from using it based on all the problems it caused Britain over the years. But sadly they didn’t codify it and here we are.
I think the biggest problem our country faces is not a hand full of district judges but the president that has forced their hands.
what other president has tried to change the constitution or straight up ignored it as much as orangutan does
I just feeel like the “both sides” shtick is getting old. How can it be “both sides” always when only one side has the powerBoth sides are ***. You’re just a hack for one of those sides. Trump 2.0 sucks sans sealing the border but to act like everything was fine and dandy pre Trump requires an insane amount of dissonance.
Both sides want you poor, dumb, dependent, and replaced.
Because they are the same "side" of the coin. Same actual values, same actual investors, same actual goals. They just project different views to the masses.I just feeel like the “both sides” shtick is getting old. How can it be “both sides” always when only one side has the power
I agree screw both sides.Because they are the same "side" of the coin. Same actual values, same actual investors, same actual goals. They just project different views to the masses.
There will be exceptions who come along and actually believe what they are saying. They usually are quickly silenced though. Politics is meant to keep you stupid and dependent. Screw both sides.
That talk actually does get us somewhere though if you follow through with it. Stop voting in wings of the same corrupt bird. Nationally, in your state elections, you local elections, all of em. The two party system is set up to advance the "club's" agenda. It literally does not matter what party is in power, in the oval office, or pandering to you on TV. The agenda will still happen. But enough about politics, the sheepherders get mad when the wool gets pulled away from one of the sheep's eyes. No need to poke the bear. Back to actual basketball.I agree screw both sides.
but that talk gets us absolutely no where
“Turnip just pardoned a criminal”
“Well so did byeden!!”
I mean cmon guys when one party is in almost complete power they are the ones who get made fun of not the President from Like 5 years ago![]()
maybe this guy......
maybe this guy......
Todd Golden seems to be ahead of the game. Again.Makes Aberdeen look pretty smart entering the portal even when he was out of eligibility. Just in case.
maybe this guy......
KSR
Kentucky has TWO of the Top 10 Returning SEC EDGE Players
KSR
Mark Pope continues to push for a 15th roster spot as summer practice ends
KSR
Rhyne Howard will represent Team USA in the 2026 FIBA Women’s World Cup
KSR
A horse named Coach Pope runs at Saratoga this weekend
KSR
KSR Show, 8/7: Spend your Friday morning with KSR