After learning about the new ruling stipulations will Keyshawn Hall be one of the only ones actually available?

Jul 17, 2025
234
237
43
I’m regarded and really don’t know the difference with that stuff. I just kinda put everything he signs on his desk into a “law category”

Sorry if I sounded rude
Laws are acts passed by Congress. Executive Orders are not in any way law, they are supposed to be administrative directions on how the Executive branch interprets such laws.

A President can only sign, veto, allow to go into law without their signature, or possibly a "pocket veto" when Congress is out of session.

They cannot legally create any laws so no anything he signs does not go into a law bucket because most of what he signs is nothing of the sort at all.
 

ThreeDogNight2

Sophomore
Jul 24, 2026
155
167
43
Laws are acts passed by Congress. Executive Orders are not in any way law, they are supposed to be administrative directions on how the Executive branch interprets such laws.

A President can only sign, veto, allow to go into law without their signature, or possibly a "pocket veto" when Congress is out of session.

They cannot legally create any laws so no anything he signs does not go into a law bucket because most of what he signs is nothing of the sort at all.
Ok cool let’s talk about basketball!
 

Bowfreak.

All-Conference
Mar 26, 2009
1,775
2,903
66
Yes judges are supposed to pass “laws”

if a judge rules for a restraining order that’s law. It doesn’t need to go to the President first.

If a judge couldn’t pass rulings/ laws America wouldn’t work
This is great. I hope your basketball knowledge is greater than your civics knowledge.
 
Last edited:

CRZ4UK

Heisman
Jun 6, 2008
5,147
10,281
103
It works the exact same way it always has. What would you disbar them for? This is what people always say when the rulings go against what they want but courts are generally consistent and if this is truly not legal it can be appealed in moved up the ladder. Same as it ever was. It can be frustrating but changing it because of this seems silly.
I’m not saying we should change the American justice system. I’m saying we should find a way to weed out corrupt and politically bias judges. Not just that but common sense. SCOTUS ruling that it’s good for America to have companies all over the world recruiting people to come here for 3 days, have a baby and get citizenship is against common sense. It will destroy America if allowed to continue. They know this but vote based on politics.
 

chroix

Heisman
Jul 22, 2013
10,664
26,966
113
I’m not saying we should change the American justice system. I’m saying we should find a way to weed out corrupt and politically bias judges. Not just that but common sense. SCOTUS ruling that it’s good for America to have companies all over the world recruiting people to come here for 3 days, have a baby and get citizenship is against common sense. It will destroy America if allowed to continue. They know this but vote based on politics.
I feel you but the other side feels the exact same way and has their own examples. I like the idea of using AI personally but that would have its own issues I'm sure. It's how its always been. Desegregation was done by a radical judge. Trump might have gone to prison if not for what the liberals think is a radical judge. If you've got a good solution break it out but acting like anything is different now than it was 100 years ago is flat wrong. Both sides appoint judges they think will do their bidding. They write opeds to show how down to clown they are. None of this is different than its ever been you're just getting more exposure into how it works because an issue is going against the party you support and the are blaming the judges. 6-3? You want to call SCOTUS radicals over a 6-3 ruling FRFR? How about demand that Congress write a law that does something about the issue instead? Like it's supposed to work.
 

DudahUK

Heisman
Jul 23, 2020
8,011
12,480
113
Yes judges are supposed to pass “laws”

if a judge rules for a restraining order that’s law. It doesn’t need to go to the President first.

If a judge couldn’t pass rulings/ laws America wouldn’t work
You really don’t know how our government works do you?
 

Son_Of_Saul

Hall of Famer
Dec 7, 2007
45,776
101,349
113
Hall made 64 threes last year on 38% shooting.

He fits the Pope system and is a huge upgrade over Kam. He also gives you another legit All-SEC scoring option.

Diallo
Wilkins
Milan
Hall
Moreno

With a high-level bench led by Kam and McBride.

That's an Elite Eight/ Final Four level roster.
 

CRZ4UK

Heisman
Jun 6, 2008
5,147
10,281
103
I feel you but the other side feels the exact same way and has their own examples. I like the idea of using AI personally but that would have its own issues I'm sure. It's how its always been. Desegregation was done by a radical judge. Trump might have gone to prison if not for what the liberals think is a radical judge. If you've got a good solution break it out but acting like anything is different now than it was 100 years ago is flat wrong. Both sides appoint judges they think will do their bidding. They write opeds to show how down to clown they are. None of this is different than its ever been you're just getting more exposure into how it works because an issue is going against the party you support and the are blaming the judges. 6-3? You want to call SCOTUS radicals over a 6-3 ruling FRFR? How about demand that Congress write a law that does something about the issue instead? Like it's supposed to work.
In the 60s and 70s. China wasn’t trying and spending millions to attempt to overthrow democracy. I’m in my 60s and this is by far the worst turmoil America has ever seen. I pray a lot for my grandbabies because I was in the military 8 years in the 82nd Airborne. Traveled the world. Korea, Japan, Philippines, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador . Been to them all. People who have never been anywhere downing America hurts. They have no idea how bad life can get.
We really need to get our ish together before it’s too late.
 

bnewt5

Senior
Feb 17, 2026
530
660
93
Hall made 64 threes last year on 38% shooting.

He fits the Pope system and is a huge upgrade over Kam. He also gives you another legit All-SEC scoring option.

Diallo
Wilkins
Milan
Hall
Moreno

With a high-level bench led by Kam and McBride.

That's an Elite Eight/ Final Four level roster.
Agree, huge upgrade over Kam scoring wise plus Kam is hurt
 

BlueSince92

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
10,950
3,724
230
As a commentary, it is ludicrous that one judge can make up whatever rules they want on a whim like this.
Precedent law is one of the most self-destructive things a society can do. Our founding fathers went out of their way to warn us away from using it based on all the problems it caused Britain over the years. But sadly they didn’t codify it and here we are.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: ThreeDogNight2

BlueSince92

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
10,950
3,724
230
Hall made 64 threes last year on 38% shooting.

He fits the Pope system and is a huge upgrade over Kam. He also gives you another legit All-SEC scoring option.

Diallo
Wilkins
Milan
Hall
Moreno

With a high-level bench led by Kam and McBride.

That's an Elite Eight/ Final Four level roster.
Yep. If we can pull either Hall or Kohler out of a hat we’re suddenly in a very good position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThreeDogNight2

ThreeDogNight2

Sophomore
Jul 24, 2026
155
167
43
Precedent law is one of the most self-destructive things a society can do. Our founding fathers went out of their way to warn us away from using it based on all the problems it caused Britain over the years. But sadly they didn’t codify it and here we are.
I think the biggest problem our country faces is not a hand full of district judges but the president that has forced their hands.

what other president has tried to change the constitution or straight up ignored it as much as orangutan does
 

phunterd

All-American
Aug 1, 2006
2,237
5,067
62
I think the biggest problem our country faces is not a hand full of district judges but the president that has forced their hands.

what other president has tried to change the constitution or straight up ignored it as much as orangutan does

Both sides are ***. You’re just a hack for one of those sides. Trump 2.0 sucks sans sealing the border but to act like everything was fine and dandy pre Trump requires an insane amount of dissonance.

Both sides want you poor, dumb, dependent, and replaced.
 

ThreeDogNight2

Sophomore
Jul 24, 2026
155
167
43
Both sides are ***. You’re just a hack for one of those sides. Trump 2.0 sucks sans sealing the border but to act like everything was fine and dandy pre Trump requires an insane amount of dissonance.

Both sides want you poor, dumb, dependent, and replaced.
I just feeel like the “both sides” shtick is getting old. How can it be “both sides” always when only one side has the power
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RunninRichie

PastorofMuppets82

All-Conference
Mar 4, 2025
610
1,364
93
I just feeel like the “both sides” shtick is getting old. How can it be “both sides” always when only one side has the power
Because they are the same "side" of the coin. Same actual values, same actual investors, same actual goals. They just project different views to the masses.

There will be exceptions who come along and actually believe what they are saying. They usually are quickly silenced though. Politics is meant to keep you stupid and dependent. Screw both sides.
 

ThreeDogNight2

Sophomore
Jul 24, 2026
155
167
43
Because they are the same "side" of the coin. Same actual values, same actual investors, same actual goals. They just project different views to the masses.

There will be exceptions who come along and actually believe what they are saying. They usually are quickly silenced though. Politics is meant to keep you stupid and dependent. Screw both sides.
I agree screw both sides.
but that talk gets us absolutely no where

“Turnip just pardoned a criminal”

“Well so did byeden!!”

I mean cmon guys when one party is in almost complete power they are the ones who get made fun of not the President from Like 5 years ago 🤦
 

PastorofMuppets82

All-Conference
Mar 4, 2025
610
1,364
93
I agree screw both sides.
but that talk gets us absolutely no where

“Turnip just pardoned a criminal”

“Well so did byeden!!”

I mean cmon guys when one party is in almost complete power they are the ones who get made fun of not the President from Like 5 years ago 🤦
That talk actually does get us somewhere though if you follow through with it. Stop voting in wings of the same corrupt bird. Nationally, in your state elections, you local elections, all of em. The two party system is set up to advance the "club's" agenda. It literally does not matter what party is in power, in the oval office, or pandering to you on TV. The agenda will still happen. But enough about politics, the sheepherders get mad when the wool gets pulled away from one of the sheep's eyes. No need to poke the bear. Back to actual basketball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phunterd

PastorofMuppets82

All-Conference
Mar 4, 2025
610
1,364
93
University of Kentucky (and NCAA scholarship rules as well) prevent removing a scholarship player from the team outside of misconduct or academic ineligibility. In fact, the scholarship is still theirs, if the player chooses not to enter the portal, go professional, drop out of school, etc, for each upcoming year until they graduate/run out of eligibility. The lawsuit that would ensue for cutting a guy to add another guy in August after they've already enrolled for the new school year, taken money, taken the scholarship would be absolutely nuts.
 
KSR

Latest

  1. 01 KSR KSR's takeaways from Kentucky basketball's surprise open practice
  2. 02 KSR KSR's Kentucky Basketball Open Practice Highlights
  3. 03 KSR Coleton Price makes the Rimington Trophy Watch List for the second straight year
  4. 04 KSR Photos, Highlights, and More from the First Day of Kentucky Football Camp
  5. 05 KSR Cincinnati Bengals activate Josh Kattus