OnlyFan cam girls have found a lucrative audience of needy, easily manipulated, desperate manchildren . . .

[DoubleDutch]

This thread delivers.

You delivered last night big boi.

 

[Easthawk1062]

Do we have to have actual porn in a discussion?

 

[LunchBox50]

Do we have to have actual porn in a discussion?

It appears we do.

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

Crowder, displaying his usual respect for women, said Cannon’s pelvis-centric posing was merely a matter of degrees difference from female TPUSA influencer “ambassadors” or Fox News hosts.

“This is the sex appeal nuclear arms race,” Crowder said.

Cannon didn’t respond to a request for comment.

You could write dozens of dissertations on the gender politics going on here. But clearly the growing symbiosis between OnlyFans models and conservative activists—many of them ostensibly opposed to OnlyFans on religious grounds—has proven successful for all parties involved. Florida GOP gubernatorial candidate James Fishback saw his first major burst of attention when he called for a 50 percent tax on OnlyFans models’ income. That started a “feud” with OnlyFans star Sophie Rain (a Florida resident) and a debate between her and Fishback on Piers Morgan’s show. It was a win-win. Fishback was platformed on a popular news program. Rain got more exposure to atypical audiences.

White nationalist Nick Fuentes—not incidentally, a regular guest on Fresh and Fit—has also benefited from a largely one-way association with Rain. On his show, Fuentes frequently talks about how hot he finds Rain.

“Dude, she was bad as ****. Did you see her at the fashion show?” Fuentes asked his fans.

When Fuentes’s incel-heavy fanbase revolted over his “simping,” he persisted.

“It’s like, dude, if she spit in your direction, you’d be all over that,” Fuentes told his followers.

After a viewer named “Miami Groypette” gave him $10,000, Fuentes speculated that it could be Rain.

“Who is this mystery woman?” Fuentes said. “Chat, is it Sophie Rain? Dude, that would be crazy.”

In return, Rain has courted Fuentes’s groypers. She reposted a photoshopped picture of herself in groyper merchandise that praised her as hotter than the usual “chopped groypettes,” and thanked Fuentes for the compliments.

“Can someone explain to me what a groyp is and what’s going on here ,” Rain wrote on X.

If anything, Cannon stands out because she merges the two roles. Rather than being an OnlyFans model subject to the whims of a dating podcast host or a feud with a far-right pundit, she is creating the MAGA content on her own. Perhaps it was only a matter of time before some enterprising ingénue tapped this particular market.

And apparently, she’s pleased with how it’s going for her. After critics accused her of taking money from Israel this week, Cannon responded in a video that she didn’t need foreign money to state her opinions.

“I do OnlyFans,” she explained.

Right-Wing Media and OnlyFans Are in a Symbiotic Relationship

Crotchety views and crotch views.

www.thebulwark.com

Not sure what crying was taking place in the article. Didn’t care to read about it but that’s an easy wood for the lady in the article.

 

[NDallasRuss]

I've thought this for a long time. It would be so easy to put together some dipshit pseudo-patriotic crap and sell it online to MAGA. The stuff they buy is like a parody of itself.

It doesn't even have to be real. It's been shown that a hot AI chick parroting far right talking points can be profitable.

This Scammer Used an AI-Generated MAGA Girl to Grift ‘Super Dumb’ Men

A med student says he’s made thousands of dollars selling photos and videos of a young conservative woman he created using generative tools. He’s not alone.

www.wired.com

 

[Easthawk1062]

"Politics, but it's softcore pron."

 

[GOHOX69]

And to think the internet was invented for Department of Defense Applications. Haha, holy shiite.

 

[DoubleDutch]

It appears we do.

It sure does.

 

[WDDT]

The people who will watch a person with 6 face piercings ***** about foreign policy with a hand held mic and their cell phone have an issue with a cute girl saying stuff opposite to their beliefs.......


And you wonder why we laugh at you.


Decent attempt to save the thread @Easthawk1062. Job well done as usual.

 

[TigerGrowls]

I guess even at 85 she's an upgrade over the sheep out in Iowa???

 

[PW Herman]

I can usually find the "logic" ... or the emotion ... that drives any and all decisions ... but the desire to pay money for what is entirely free on the web ... it's a strange situation, indeed. It's just so alien to me. I can find any and all perversions on the web, and not have to pay a dime to view them ... yet a huge contingent of folks feel compelled to pay for same. Presumably seeing it "live" (over video) is somehow worth the money? Or I guess sometimes you can talk to the "performers" and request things? That faked-up connection and interaction is somehow worth the money? I don't know ... I don't get it ... if I wanted to experience it live, I'd engage in it/watch it live for free, or, if desperate enough, pay to watch it live, in person. But I guess if folks are isolated, or their perversions are secretive to them, this is their outlet? I'd assume this would be a super niche low revenue situation, but I guess I underestimate the stupidity and desperation of many in society.

Anyone else not surprised that Moogs isn't opposed to being the guy sitting in the corner of the room tugging on his pud? You scream cuck so it aligns

 

[PW Herman]

Do we have to have actual porn in a discussion?

Everytime I think you couldn't be a bigger cvnt, you go out and totally redeem yourself!

 

[52317Hawk]

 

[Moogy]

Anyone else not surprised that Moogs isn't opposed to being the guy sitting in the corner of the room tugging on his pud? You scream cuck so it aligns

You named yourself after a gay dude who was caught spanking it in public, and who dressed himself up and pretended to be a pre-pubescent boy. You have your own issues to worry about there, sport, rather than fantasizing about me in certain scenarios that don't follow at all from what I've said.

 

[Moogy]

Everytime I think you couldn't be a bigger cvnt, you go out and totally redeem yourself!

Actual nudity ... including spread eagle *** shots ... hasn't been allowed on sites like these ... ever. And no one, except the most pathetic of individuals would want them here ... they're all over the internet with a simple search.

 

[LunchBox50]

Actual nudity ... including spread eagle *** shots ... hasn't been allowed on sites like these ... ever. And no one, except the most pathetic of individuals would want them here ... they're all over the internet with a simple search.

Someone's boss caught them lookin' at work.

 

[Yellowsnow51]

View attachment 1378351

thats the funniest thing ever right there.

 

[TC_Nole_OX]

 

[QChawks]

 

[DoubleDutch]

Someone's boss caught them lookin' at work.

Imagine if we shared our photos from last night. He’d really **** his pants at work.

 

[PW Herman]

You named yourself after a gay dude who was caught spanking it in public, and who dressed himself up and pretended to be a pre-pubescent boy. You have your own issues to worry about there, sport, rather than fantasizing about me in certain scenarios that don't follow at all from what I've said.

I'm actually the Jame Brolin character from the movie they made about Pee Wees life. Since you are a self proclaimed know it all....

 

[BrainVision]

I can usually find the "logic" ... or the emotion ... that drives any and all decisions ... but the desire to pay money for what is entirely free on the web ... it's a strange situation, indeed. It's just so alien to me. I can find any and all perversions on the web, and not have to pay a dime to view them ... yet a huge contingent of folks feel compelled to pay for same. Presumably seeing it "live" (over video) is somehow worth the money? Or I guess sometimes you can talk to the "performers" and request things? That faked-up connection and interaction is somehow worth the money? I don't know ... I don't get it ... if I wanted to experience it live, I'd engage in it/watch it live for free, or, if desperate enough, pay to watch it live, in person. But I guess if folks are isolated, or their perversions are secretive to them, this is their outlet? I'd assume this would be a super niche low revenue situation, but I guess I underestimate the stupidity and desperation of many in society.

Some people just believe in paying people for their time and effort, regardless of whether a similar product is available for free. An analogue: I have never pirated music or books or games, despite all of those being available for free on the internet.

Sex work, including online pornography, often involves exploitation of the performers. Paying those performers directly lessens that risk.

 

[Hydro2.0]

I'm actually the Jame Brolin character from the movie they made about Pee Wees life. Since you are a self proclaimed know it all....

MOOG GOT FUC.KIN WRECKED