Do we have to have actual porn in a discussion?
It appears we do.Do we have to have actual porn in a discussion?
Not sure what crying was taking place in the article. Didn’t care to read about it but that’s an easy wood for the lady in the article.Crowder, displaying his usual respect for women, said Cannon’s pelvis-centric posing was merely a matter of degrees difference from female TPUSA influencer “ambassadors” or Fox News hosts.
“This is the sex appeal nuclear arms race,” Crowder said.
Cannon didn’t respond to a request for comment.
You could write dozens of dissertations on the gender politics going on here. But clearly the growing symbiosis between OnlyFans models and conservative activists—many of them ostensibly opposed to OnlyFans on religious grounds—has proven successful for all parties involved. Florida GOP gubernatorial candidate James Fishback saw his first major burst of attention when he called for a 50 percent tax on OnlyFans models’ income. That started a “feud” with OnlyFans star Sophie Rain (a Florida resident) and a debate between her and Fishback on Piers Morgan’s show. It was a win-win. Fishback was platformed on a popular news program. Rain got more exposure to atypical audiences.
White nationalist Nick Fuentes—not incidentally, a regular guest on Fresh and Fit—has also benefited from a largely one-way association with Rain. On his show, Fuentes frequently talks about how hot he finds Rain.
“Dude, she was bad as ****. Did you see her at the fashion show?” Fuentes asked his fans.
When Fuentes’s incel-heavy fanbase revolted over his “simping,” he persisted.
“It’s like, dude, if she spit in your direction, you’d be all over that,” Fuentes told his followers.
After a viewer named “Miami Groypette” gave him $10,000, Fuentes speculated that it could be Rain.
“Who is this mystery woman?” Fuentes said. “Chat, is it Sophie Rain? Dude, that would be crazy.”
In return, Rain has courted Fuentes’s groypers. She reposted a photoshopped picture of herself in groyper merchandise that praised her as hotter than the usual “chopped groypettes,” and thanked Fuentes for the compliments.
“Can someone explain to me what a groyp is and what’s going on here,” Rain wrote on X.
If anything, Cannon stands out because she merges the two roles. Rather than being an OnlyFans model subject to the whims of a dating podcast host or a feud with a far-right pundit, she is creating the MAGA content on her own. Perhaps it was only a matter of time before some enterprising ingénue tapped this particular market.
And apparently, she’s pleased with how it’s going for her. After critics accused her of taking money from Israel this week, Cannon responded in a video that she didn’t need foreign money to state her opinions.
“I do OnlyFans,” she explained.
![]()
Right-Wing Media and OnlyFans Are in a Symbiotic Relationship
Crotchety views and crotch views.www.thebulwark.com
It doesn't even have to be real. It's been shown that a hot AI chick parroting far right talking points can be profitable.I've thought this for a long time. It would be so easy to put together some dipshit pseudo-patriotic crap and sell it online to MAGA. The stuff they buy is like a parody of itself.
I can usually find the "logic" ... or the emotion ... that drives any and all decisions ... but the desire to pay money for what is entirely free on the web ... it's a strange situation, indeed. It's just so alien to me. I can find any and all perversions on the web, and not have to pay a dime to view them ... yet a huge contingent of folks feel compelled to pay for same. Presumably seeing it "live" (over video) is somehow worth the money? Or I guess sometimes you can talk to the "performers" and request things? That faked-up connection and interaction is somehow worth the money? I don't know ... I don't get it ... if I wanted to experience it live, I'd engage in it/watch it live for free, or, if desperate enough, pay to watch it live, in person. But I guess if folks are isolated, or their perversions are secretive to them, this is their outlet? I'd assume this would be a super niche low revenue situation, but I guess I underestimate the stupidity and desperation of many in society.
Do we have to have actual porn in a discussion?
Anyone else not surprised that Moogs isn't opposed to being the guy sitting in the corner of the room tugging on his pud? You scream cuck so it aligns
Everytime I think you couldn't be a bigger cvnt, you go out and totally redeem yourself!
Someone's boss caught them lookin' at work.Actual nudity ... including spread eagle *** shots ... hasn't been allowed on sites like these ... ever. And no one, except the most pathetic of individuals would want them here ... they're all over the internet with a simple search.
Imagine if we shared our photos from last night. He’d really **** his pants at work.Someone's boss caught them lookin' at work.
You named yourself after a gay dude who was caught spanking it in public, and who dressed himself up and pretended to be a pre-pubescent boy. You have your own issues to worry about there, sport, rather than fantasizing about me in certain scenarios that don't follow at all from what I've said.
Some people just believe in paying people for their time and effort, regardless of whether a similar product is available for free. An analogue: I have never pirated music or books or games, despite all of those being available for free on the internet.I can usually find the "logic" ... or the emotion ... that drives any and all decisions ... but the desire to pay money for what is entirely free on the web ... it's a strange situation, indeed. It's just so alien to me. I can find any and all perversions on the web, and not have to pay a dime to view them ... yet a huge contingent of folks feel compelled to pay for same. Presumably seeing it "live" (over video) is somehow worth the money? Or I guess sometimes you can talk to the "performers" and request things? That faked-up connection and interaction is somehow worth the money? I don't know ... I don't get it ... if I wanted to experience it live, I'd engage in it/watch it live for free, or, if desperate enough, pay to watch it live, in person. But I guess if folks are isolated, or their perversions are secretive to them, this is their outlet? I'd assume this would be a super niche low revenue situation, but I guess I underestimate the stupidity and desperation of many in society.
MOOG GOT FUC.KIN WRECKEDI'm actually the Jame Brolin character from the movie they made about Pee Wees life. Since you are a self proclaimed know it all....
![]()
Tiger Illustrated
Part 4: Tiger Illustrated's predictions for August camp in Clemson
Tiger Illustrated
It's hard to go against Clemson getting its quarterback from Georgia
Tiger Illustrated
Part 3: Tiger Illustrated's predictions for August camp in Clemson
On3
Clemson guard Dillon Hunter plans to enter transfer portal after NCAA injunction
Tiger Illustrated
Clemson Football Roster & Recruiting Big Board: Quarterback