Is the top of women's college basketball better than the WNBA?

Status
Not open for further replies.

615dawg

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
7,163
4,512
113
I'm not even joking. I think women's basketball is multiple steps behind men's to begin with, but when we were rolling and I was watching more games, it did not seem this bad. Watch these highlights from today's WNBA All Star Game

 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

OG Goat Holder

Heisman
Sep 30, 2022
13,780
12,620
113
Shlt yes. The WNBA doubled down on the Cunningham stuff because they know they can’t make money. NBA is just using it to get more NBA fans and pretend like they care.

The reason college works is because people care about the teams. When you don’t have the best athletes on the planet, pro sports don’t work. This is why women’s basketball doesn’t work and never will.
 

jethreauxdawg

Heisman
Dec 20, 2010
11,497
16,045
113
I'm really not so sure. Something is different about the WNBA.

I think Geno or Staley's teams could win the WNBA, right now. Vic and a few others could make a playoff run.
Well, like most things on this board, I don’t really know much about what I’m opining on, I’m just going off the fact that very few college players are able to make a pro team. And I’ll dog the wnba as much as anyone, the product is boring, but that clip above is the selected worst from their game. No, I did not watch any of it or know it was on, but I think both teams scored over 120 points, so they did some things correctly.
 

OG Goat Holder

Heisman
Sep 30, 2022
13,780
12,620
113
I'm really not so sure. Something is different about the WNBA.

I think Geno or Staley's teams could win the WNBA, right now. Vic and a few others could make a playoff run.
The worst WNBA team would beat the dog shlt out of the best college team, don’t be dumb.

The issue is, nobody cares. Ever notice that the only reason the WNBA is getting pub is due to race stupidity?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FormerBully

Chesusdog

All-American
May 2, 2006
5,029
5,302
113
Let's just say a men's team that failed to qualify for the NIT would DESTROY any women's team, college or WNBA.
 

FormerBully

All-American
Sep 2, 2022
5,035
8,412
113
The WNBA’s best shot at making money is Caitlin Clark. Sophie Cunningham has gained attention too, but largely because of her connection to Clark. The problem is that too many players keep fighting the league’s biggest draw. The NBA has paid the bills for years, and Bill Burr’s joke still fits: plenty of women criticize men for not supporting the WNBA, but all of them do not watch or buy tickets either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

OG Goat Holder

Heisman
Sep 30, 2022
13,780
12,620
113
The WNBA’s best shot at making money is Caitlin Clark. Sophie Cunningham has gained attention too, but largely because of her connection to Clark. The problem is that too many players keep fighting the league’s biggest draw. The NBA has paid the bills for years, and Bill Burr’s joke still fits: plenty of women criticize men for not supporting the WNBA, but all of them do not watch or buy tickets either.
They aren’t about making money. Until we all realize that, we won’t understand the league. It’s there to create more NBA fans……women.
 
Last edited:

She Mate Me

Heisman
Dec 7, 2008
14,810
13,948
113
If you want to honestly opine on this you should actually force yourself to watch a real game or two between the better WNBA teams. This was a silly exhibition and they were playing around. Taking crazy long shots, trying to play as little D as possible and generally just 17ing around ensuring nobody got hurt.

A WNBA team would destroy the best college teams, just like any NBA team would in the men’s game.
 
Last edited:

dickiedawg

All-Conference
Feb 22, 2008
4,507
1,411
113
I might believe the best college team could beat the worst WNBA team. I don’t know how big the disparity is between teams in that league.
I don’t believe there’s any chance they’re beating the best though.
 
Nov 16, 2005
28,946
23,497
113
I might believe the best college team could beat the worst WNBA team. I don’t know how big the disparity is between teams in that league.
I don’t believe there’s any chance they’re beating the best though.
No chance. Even the worst WNBA team would smoke the best college team.

Watching an all star game where they’re just screwing around is different than watching an actual team play.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
59,647
30,336
113
The best boys high school team would beat the WNBA champions.
Easily.
I might believe the best college team could beat the worst WNBA team. I don’t know how big the disparity is between teams in that league.
I don’t believe there’s any chance they’re beating the best though.
The worst WNBA team would beat the national champions by 40 points if it wanted to.
 

greenbean.sixpack

All-American
Oct 6, 2012
9,318
8,723
113
I've never watched the WNBA, but is this an all star game? If so, from what i read, even NBA players put little effort into all star games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

MSUDAWGFAN

Senior
Apr 17, 2014
1,141
756
113
Someone once told me they thought Alabama football could beat a bad pro team.

No. Just no. The Browns could have spotted Alabama 21 points and still beaten them. Sure, Alabama was a great college team at that time, but they would have at most half their team that could even make the pros, and that's being very, very generous. By default, everyone on the Browns is in the pros.

It's just not even close. When you go up a level like that, the upper level is going to win. The teams in the WNBA would beat any college team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: olblue and patdog

She Mate Me

Heisman
Dec 7, 2008
14,810
13,948
113
Apparently if you watch 2 or 3 of these Thunderstruck short videos featuring Sophie, it’ll get in your algorithm and you’ll constantly get new ones. They’re kinda fun…

 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
59,647
30,336
113
Someone once told me they thought Alabama football could beat a bad pro team.

No. Just no. The Browns could have spotted Alabama 21 points and still beaten them. Sure, Alabama was a great college team at that time, but they would have at most half their team that could even make the pros, and that's being very, very generous. By default, everyone on the Browns is in the pros.

It's just not even close. When you go up a level like that, the upper level is going to win. The teams in the WNBA would beat any college team.
Even at their peak, Alabama had maybe 6 or 7 all americans and maybe 10-15 future NFL players on it. And every one of those players was not as good at Alabama as they would be with more experience in the NFL. Alabama would have had a few players who could compete vs the worst NFL team. But would have zero quality depth and would have several holes even in the starters that real NFL players could exploit over and over. This would be like sending Gulfport to play Mississippi State. A mismatch.
 

aTotal360

Heisman
Nov 12, 2009
22,353
15,854
113
It's bad. I don't care what anyone says. Sure there can be some compelling games, but it's a tough watch in general.
 

FormerBully

All-American
Sep 2, 2022
5,035
8,412
113
They aren’t about making money. Until we all realize that, we won’t understand the league. It’s there to create more NBA fans……women.
I agree with you, but they are doing a poor job. Men make up a higher percentage of WNBA viewers than women. It does a poor job at creating more fans. For example, my wife has never watched an WNBA game, but will watch the NBA with me.
 
Nov 16, 2005
28,946
23,497
113
Even at their peak, Alabama had maybe 6 or 7 all americans and maybe 10-15 future NFL players on it. And every one of those players was not as good at Alabama as they would be with more experience in the NFL. Alabama would have had a few players who could compete vs the worst NFL team. But would have zero quality depth and would have several holes even in the starters that real NFL players could exploit over and over. This would be like sending Gulfport to play Mississippi State. A mismatch.
If you look at an NFL roster in most cases each of those players was either the best player on their college team or in the top 5. There are exceptions of course but you could say every NFL roster is a college all star team.
 

She Mate Me

Heisman
Dec 7, 2008
14,810
13,948
113
It's bad. I don't care what anyone says. Sure there can be some compelling games, but it's a tough watch in general.

I’ve watched a few Fever games this season and mostly enjoyed them. At least when CC, Kelsey Mitchell and Boston are in together they look like a competent pretty talented unit.

I’ll never quite understand why even some of the best women players struggle mightily to make shots right around the hoop.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,703
6,520
113
Let's just say a men's team that failed to qualify for the NIT would DESTROY any women's team, college or WNBA.
The best boys high school team would beat the WNBA champions.

Ok, but...so what? The thread question wasnt about if boys could beat a WNBA team. It was about women vs women.

Can we sticky an SPS fact at the top of the main page? "SPS collectively knows a top 100 men's college team, and even the best HS boys team, would beat any women's college basketball team or any WNBA team."

That sticky might then keep such a non-sequitur from being forced into conversations like this.
 

She Mate Me

Heisman
Dec 7, 2008
14,810
13,948
113
Ok, but...so what? The thread question wasnt about if boys could beat a WNBA team. It was about women vs women.

Can we sticky an SPS fact at the top of the main page? "SPS collectively knows a top 100 men's college team, and even the best HS boys team, would beat any women's college basketball team or any WNBA team."

That sticky might then keep such a non-sequitur from being forced into conversations like this.

Its kinda DS’s job to extend thread engagement. Non-sequiters are thread lifeblood.
 

MSUDAWGFAN

Senior
Apr 17, 2014
1,141
756
113
Even at their peak, Alabama had maybe 6 or 7 all americans and maybe 10-15 future NFL players on it. And every one of those players was not as good at Alabama as they would be with more experience in the NFL. Alabama would have had a few players who could compete vs the worst NFL team. But would have zero quality depth and would have several holes even in the starters that real NFL players could exploit over and over. This would be like sending Gulfport to play Mississippi State. A mismatch.
My point was that they had freshman who would did not have the talent to be in the pros at that very moment, but ended up making the pros.

I think you are right about a snapshot in time, but even then, most of those guys won't stay in the pros but just a couple of years or so. There are actually only a very few that have been able to stay around for a significant amount of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog
Nov 16, 2005
28,946
23,497
113
Ok, but...so what? The thread question wasnt about if boys could beat a WNBA team. It was about women vs women.

Can we sticky an SPS fact at the top of the main page? "SPS collectively knows a top 100 men's college team, and even the best HS boys team, would beat any women's college basketball team or any WNBA team."

That sticky might then keep such a non-sequitur from being forced into conversations like this.
The message board nanny has entered the conversation
 
  • Like
Reactions: sandwolf.sixpack
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Jeff Lebby talks Mississippi State Saturday Scrimmage: "A ton of good on good"
  2. 02 On3 UNLV transfer forward Kimani Hamilton signs with Mississippi State
  3. 03 Maroon and White Mississippi State's WR room is a strength, the question is "how strong?"
  4. 04 Maroon and White OL Mario Nash Jr. no longer on Mississippi State roster
  5. 05 Maroon and White Mississippi State WBK adds international transfer Grace Ndubueze