Elon Musk Spears Pompous Leftie BBC Interviewer

DailyBuck7

Senior
Mar 4, 2026
389
411
63
Musk stutters, says he doesn't care if people don't like him, says more people probably like him than don't, then says people hate the press more than they know.

Not very impressive.

Also his approval rating is underwater.
Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:

Trust in news overall (2025)35%30%
Trust in news overall (2026)30%25%
People who avoid news (2026)50%45%
She is in no position to criticize Musk because some people may loath him. Will correct title of thread. She is from the Economist, not the BBC.
 

tarheelbybirth1

Heisman
Jul 4, 2025
5,067
14,979
113
Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:

Trust in news overall (2025)35%30%
Trust in news overall (2026)30%25%
People who avoid news (2026)50%45%
She is in no position to criticize Musk because some people may loath him. Will correct title of thread. She is from the Economist, not the BBC.
And - again - for the slow-witted, that is entirely immaterial. You can't compare an entire industry to a single individual. It's idiotic.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,931
28,450
113
Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:

Trust in news overall (2025)35%30%
Trust in news overall (2026)30%25%
People who avoid news (2026)50%45%
She is in no position to criticize Musk because some people may loath him. Will correct title of thread. She is from the Economist, not the BBC.
Not pompous, saying exactly what the majority of people who hate him want to be said to his face. He has repulsively inserted himself into politics in a disgusting way and he needs to hear it. He deserves it.

1784865064223.png




The Economist
1784865009136.png

The Economist is generally trusted for its high factual reporting and global analysis, though readers often debate its distinct political and economic slant. People view it as a credible source, balancing clear viewpoints with a commitment to open debate. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Trust and Reliability
    • High Factual Standards: Independent media watchdogs rate the publication high for factual reporting and reliable global coverage.
    • Anonymous Authorship: Articles traditionally lack individual bylines, creating a unified institutional voice that some see as authoritative and others find detached.
    • Broad Appeal: Surveys show steady trust across diverse political groups compared to partisan domestic media. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
6,580
4,730
113
Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:

Trust in news overall (2025)35%30%
Trust in news overall (2026)30%25%
People who avoid news (2026)50%45%
She is in no position to criticize Musk because some people may loath him. Will correct title of thread. She is from the Economist, not the BBC.

Thanks, Fox News and the MAGAts.
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
6,580
4,730
113
Jun 4, 2026
1,136
295
83
Interesting, but what do you have to say on the topic at hand? I wonder if you're man/woman enough to post for at least a month without insulting your own kind - the LGBTQ+ community. Be brave.
The leftist scum who have infiltrated all of our institutions via their slow march?

Kill 'em all, Holmes. Up against the wall, brother. (or sister, if that's how you are currently identifying during this tempestuous time period)

You know how we Sureños do, ese!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scrubby

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
6,580
4,730
113
I love cu.m. Infiltrate my hole.

Kill Elon. Up against the wall, brother. I might be your brother or sister ... I'm just so confused in this tempestuous time. I think I have my period in my anus.

Whoa! I don't think it's appropriate to wish that on Elon. Settle down. But at least you're kinda on topic for once. Be brave. Stop lashing out when your battle is inward.
 

DailyBuck7

Senior
Mar 4, 2026
389
411
63
Not pompous, saying exactly what the majority of people who hate him want to be said to his face. He has repulsively inserted himself into politics in a disgusting way and he needs to hear it. He deserves it.

View attachment 1371566




The Economist
View attachment 1371565

The Economist is generally trusted for its high factual reporting and global analysis, though readers often debate its distinct political and economic slant. People view it as a credible source, balancing clear viewpoints with a commitment to open debate. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Trust and Reliability
    • High Factual Standards: Independent media watchdogs rate the publication high for factual reporting and reliable global coverage.
    • Anonymous Authorship: Articles traditionally lack individual bylines, creating a unified institutional voice that some see as authoritative and others find detached.
    • Broad Appeal: Surveys show steady trust across diverse political groups compared to partisan domestic media. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

"Not pompous, saying exactly what the majority of people who hate him want to be said to his face. He has repulsively inserted himself into politics in a disgusting way and he needs to hear it. He deserves it."

If you and the lazy interviewer knew the way that Musk thinks, in addition to being rude, it is stupid. He has on multiple occasions stated that he considers it a weakness to worry about what other people think about him. He doesn't care at all what her unsubstantiated opinion is nor what yours is. To have any hope at getting a chink out of his armor, you have to confront him with facts. Otherwise you and the interviewer are simply 4-year-olds yelling and screaming in the playroom. The interviewer was obviously unprofessional and unprepared for the interview.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
25,860
24,789
113
"Not pompous, saying exactly what the majority of people who hate him want to be said to his face. He has repulsively inserted himself into politics in a disgusting way and he needs to hear it. He deserves it."

If you and the lazy interviewer knew the way that Musk thinks, in addition to being rude, it is stupid. He has on multiple occasions stated that he considers it a weakness to worry about what other people think about him. He doesn't care at all what her unsubstantiated opinion is nor what yours is. To have any hope at getting a chink out of his armor, you have to confront him with facts. Otherwise you and the interviewer are simply 4-year-olds yelling and screaming in the playroom. The interviewer was obviously unprofessional and unprepared for the interview.
This. They can’t stand him, because he makes them argue facts and not feelings. And that’s when they turn into a twisted pretzel.

It’s like watching Brandon Gill interview the retarded DEi people, it’s so glorious to watch smart people just shred the idiots. It’s better than any TV show on that is for sure.
 

firegiver

Heisman
Sep 10, 2007
74,012
21,006
113
Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:

Trust in news overall (2025)35%30%
Trust in news overall (2026)30%25%
People who avoid news (2026)50%45%
She is in no position to criticize Musk because some people may loath him. Will correct title of thread. She is from the Economist, not the BBC.
What do you think journalism is? He's a pompus douche canoe that has more money and power than any other private citizen in the world.

He was given all kinds of accolades by the media that fostered his image and led to his successful career. But when they ask him a valid question. He gets butt hurt, loses his composure and you think he spears them? He looks inept. He's a drug addict who has 20 kids with different women. He's careening towards a crash out half the waking hours of his days.

His companies have been buying each other, writing off debt with less than honest accounting and that shell game will eventually have to stop. Spcx has never made a profit and is behnind by years in there government contracts. His plan to get to the moon has been called idiotic by former NASA top commanders.

He deserves some contempt and criticism. If he can't take it, just fly off to mars already.
 

DailyBuck7

Senior
Mar 4, 2026
389
411
63
What do you think journalism is? He's a pompus douche canoe that has more money and power than any other private citizen in the world.


He deserves some contempt and criticism. If he can't take it, just fly off to mars already.
Journalism is more than lazy name calling which is what this woman did. He can obviously take it because he knows it's coming and he doesn't care. It is the listeners of the interview who are cheated by a lazy stupid interviewer who can't lay a Foundation to discuss issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
9,929
13,271
113
no its not
I was in Europe this spring. It was an amazing place.


Europe arrests more people every year over speech "violations" than russia and China combined. The far left of europe are the same fascists as the far left in the USA.
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
9,929
13,271
113
they're political financiers that have never been elected to government leadership or directly given levers of power

they're kind of like the koch brothers of the left
I'm shocked that you omited reid Hoffman's bff relationship with jeffrey epstein. Classic democrat moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
25,860
24,789
113


Europe arrests more people every year over speech "violations" than russia and China combined. The far left of europe are the same fascists as the far left in the USA.

Yeah, but he didn’t see it with his own two eyes
 

firegiver

Heisman
Sep 10, 2007
74,012
21,006
113
And there is a difference between enforcing the rules and what the Biden admin did.
There is valid criticism for Biden's presidency.
There is valid criticism for Trump's everything. Both can be true.

ICE enforcement has been politicized due to the excessive violence its has incorporated into its operating model. The government deserves criticism when it ends up murdering private citizens. They tried to claim everyone they killed was a terrorist. Thats an out of control fascist policy coming from our government. It deserves to be put in check by the people.