Less than a minute video. She gets speared at end.
Is it really a spear if it's not close to being true?Less than a minute video. She gets speared at end.

Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:Musk stutters, says he doesn't care if people don't like him, says more people probably like him than don't, then says people hate the press more than they know.
Not very impressive.
Also his approval rating is underwater.
| Trust in news overall (2025) | 35% | 30% |
| Trust in news overall (2026) | 30% | 25% |
| People who avoid news (2026) | 50% | 45% |
And - again - for the slow-witted, that is entirely immaterial. You can't compare an entire industry to a single individual. It's idiotic.Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:
Trust in news overall (2025) 35% 30%
Trust in news overall (2026) 30% 25% She is in no position to criticize Musk because some people may loath him. Will correct title of thread. She is from the Economist, not the BBC.
People who avoid news (2026) 50% 45%
Not pompous, saying exactly what the majority of people who hate him want to be said to his face. He has repulsively inserted himself into politics in a disgusting way and he needs to hear it. He deserves it.Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:
Trust in news overall (2025) 35% 30%
Trust in news overall (2026) 30% 25% She is in no position to criticize Musk because some people may loath him. Will correct title of thread. She is from the Economist, not the BBC.
People who avoid news (2026) 50% 45%


Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:
Trust in news overall (2025) 35% 30%
Trust in news overall (2026) 30% 25% She is in no position to criticize Musk because some people may loath him. Will correct title of thread. She is from the Economist, not the BBC.
People who avoid news (2026) 50% 45%
You believe @TarponSpringsNole is a broad because, sometimes, some dudes are born with internal testes.And - again - for the slow-witted, that is entirely immaterial. You can't compare an entire industry to a single individual. It's idiotic.
Less than a minute video. She gets speared at end.
No one loves me, and I'm uhscurred to come out of the closet and change my gender, but I'm dying to do so. I need attention so badly.
Hey! I totally wrote that!
I wish I could be Alice Iverson!
The leftist scum who have infiltrated all of our institutions via their slow march?Interesting, but what do you have to say on the topic at hand? I wonder if you're man/woman enough to post for at least a month without insulting your own kind - the LGBTQ+ community. Be brave.
I love cu.m. Infiltrate my hole.
Kill Elon. Up against the wall, brother. I might be your brother or sister ... I'm just so confused in this tempestuous time. I think I have my period in my anus.
Holy ****. The trannyphaggot HROTards were right.Whoa! I don't think it's appropriate to wish that on Elon. Settle down. Be brave. Stop lashing out when your battle is inward.
I want to be ****ed in my hole. I'm a trannyphaggot HROTard.
I AM an uberautisticretardo @joesplace.
I Have MRSA!
Not pompous, saying exactly what the majority of people who hate him want to be said to his face. He has repulsively inserted himself into politics in a disgusting way and he needs to hear it. He deserves it.
View attachment 1371566
![]()
Unmusked: How Elon Musk is Using X to Poison our Democracy
Heidi Siegmund Cuda reveals how Elon Musk has used Twitter to launch an assault on the most foundational parts of of our democratic systemswww.bylinesupplement.com
The Economist
View attachment 1371565
![]()
The Economist: News & Analysis - Ratings & Reviews - App Store
See reviews and ratings for The Economist: News & Analysis and more on the App Store.apps.apple.com
The Economist is generally trusted for its high factual reporting and global analysis, though readers often debate its distinct political and economic slant. People view it as a credible source, balancing clear viewpoints with a commitment to open debate. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Trust and Reliability
- High Factual Standards: Independent media watchdogs rate the publication high for factual reporting and reliable global coverage.
- Anonymous Authorship: Articles traditionally lack individual bylines, creating a unified institutional voice that some see as authoritative and others find detached.
- Broad Appeal: Surveys show steady trust across diverse political groups compared to partisan domestic media. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Hubbard?You should get that treated. And don't be so down on yourself. Turn the anger and hate around. Anything to say about Elon?
This. They can’t stand him, because he makes them argue facts and not feelings. And that’s when they turn into a twisted pretzel."Not pompous, saying exactly what the majority of people who hate him want to be said to his face. He has repulsively inserted himself into politics in a disgusting way and he needs to hear it. He deserves it."
If you and the lazy interviewer knew the way that Musk thinks, in addition to being rude, it is stupid. He has on multiple occasions stated that he considers it a weakness to worry about what other people think about him. He doesn't care at all what her unsubstantiated opinion is nor what yours is. To have any hope at getting a chink out of his armor, you have to confront him with facts. Otherwise you and the interviewer are simply 4-year-olds yelling and screaming in the playroom. The interviewer was obviously unprofessional and unprepared for the interview.
What do you think journalism is? He's a pompus douche canoe that has more money and power than any other private citizen in the world.Didn't realize you discriminated against people with disabilities. Lazy, pompous interviewer asks rude question, with no statistical basis about why "some people" loath you (2 people or a billion people?). A rude question is ok if there are factual underpinnings. This is just a a cheap lazy shot. Here are trust figures for UK & US media from chat gpt:
Trust in news overall (2025) 35% 30%
Trust in news overall (2026) 30% 25% She is in no position to criticize Musk because some people may loath him. Will correct title of thread. She is from the Economist, not the BBC.
People who avoid news (2026) 50% 45%
Journalism is more than lazy name calling which is what this woman did. He can obviously take it because he knows it's coming and he doesn't care. It is the listeners of the interview who are cheated by a lazy stupid interviewer who can't lay a Foundation to discuss issues.What do you think journalism is? He's a pompus douche canoe that has more money and power than any other private citizen in the world.
He deserves some contempt and criticism. If he can't take it, just fly off to mars already.
Leftists are such worthless people. All they do is lie.
Leftists are far more authoritarian than those on the right. Europe is burning to the ground due to the incompetence of the far left.Theres a difference between having secure boarders, and electing people who will enforce those rules via authoritarian means.
no its notLeftists are far more authoritarian than those on the right. Europe is burning to the ground due to the incompetence of the far left.
Tell me about george soros and reid hoffmanAmazing how the MAGAs worship and idolize weird billionaires. They are their gods.
no its not
I was in Europe this spring. It was an amazing place.
And there is a difference between enforcing the rules and what the Biden admin did.Theres a difference between having secure boarders, and electing people who will enforce those rules via authoritarian means.
they're political financiers that have never been elected to government leadership or directly given levers of powerTell me about george soros and reid hoffman
Amazing how the MAGAs worship and idolize weird billionaires. They are their gods.
I'm shocked that you omited reid Hoffman's bff relationship with jeffrey epstein. Classic democrat moment.they're political financiers that have never been elected to government leadership or directly given levers of power
they're kind of like the koch brothers of the left
Europe arrests more people every year over speech "violations" than russia and China combined. The far left of europe are the same fascists as the far left in the USA.
There is valid criticism for Biden's presidency.And there is a difference between enforcing the rules and what the Biden admin did.