BB: Serbian F/C Pavle Backo zoom with Pope

UKgrad22

All-Conference
Apr 9, 2026
594
1,542
93
Not convinced by our C position depth, don’t think adding another guy that could contribute minutes behind MM would be a bad addition at all. If we’re lucky, Cronin will do what Cronin does and Nikola will be portalling after his year at UCLA (speculative as nothing is official with him to the Bruins)
 
Nov 19, 2025
196
435
63
Watching that video creates a lot of concern for me. Slow release, has to have the ball in his hands, actually slow footed, seems to shoot well when no contact, but no evidence of great passing skills or rebounding. Agree with others that we may have missed on a truly talented player that could have been a difference maker.
 

FilsonCat

All-Conference
Apr 5, 2007
3,516
4,301
113
Not sure how he'd play on the defensive end in the SEC. But can you stack lottery talent around what we already have committed and expect it to work? We need a guy who will be happy filling in when Moreno has a breather or is in foul trouble, if Kepnang can't go. Skilled big men are where the game is going. If we can't get Kusturica, you've got to look at gaps and needs more.
 

ruppsrunt1

All-Conference
Jun 14, 2014
917
2,019
93
evaluation of the big SERB--with videos

thecenterhub.substack.com/p/prospect-evaluation-pavle-backo

rr
8-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon668007

UKCowboys

All-American
Oct 14, 2019
4,674
8,733
113
1st of all i never mentioned momcilovic
2nd of all in terms of game changing season changing talent, also no

Good college players, but theres a reason why he wont ever be a contributer at the highest level of professional basketball
What in the living **** does it matter what he will do at the next level? Would you like me to go down the list of players who will never sniff an NBA roster that won titles or kicked the crap out of us the last 20 years? How about the two top 5 NBA guards we had that got smashed by a guy who is probably working at Home Depot now?
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,337
72,185
113
1st of all i never mentioned momcilovic
2nd of all in terms of game changing season changing talent, also no

Good college players, but theres a reason why he wont ever be a contributer at the highest level of professional basketball
It's a good thing UK doesn’t play in the NBA then.

So, the next question is, FOR THE COLLEGE GAME, would you, or would you not consider Wilkins, MM, Diallo and Momcilovic game changers?

Who gives a squat about the NBA, when UK plays college ball?

The teams winning titles, are not doing so with stacked NBA talent, it's the teams with veteran college dudes that are good enough to catch a cup of coffee in the NBA. The games are completely different.
 

Anon200440

Senior
Mar 28, 2026
353
697
93
It's a good thing UK doesn’t play in the NBA then.

So, the next question is, FOR THE COLLEGE GAME, would you, or would you not consider Wilkins, MM, Diallo and Momcilovic game changers?

Who gives a squat about the NBA, when UK plays college ball?

The teams winning titles, are not doing so with stacked NBA talent, it's the teams with veteran college dudes that are good enough to catch a cup of coffee in the NBA. The games are completely different.
"Who gives a squat about the NBA, when UK plays college ball?"

You gotta have guys like that to win
Hurley had em, may had em, cal had em when he won here, scheyer has em, self had em, pitini had em, florida was an outlier

but to be an elite team you gotta have elite coaching or elite players, ideally both

Pope isnt elite, so we have to get elite players to be really good and we dont have that, which is why we are constantly 10 loss teams
 

Wildcat_in_DC

All-Conference
Nov 25, 2025
981
1,642
93
It's a good thing UK doesn’t play in the NBA then.

So, the next question is, FOR THE COLLEGE GAME, would you, or would you not consider Wilkins, MM, Diallo and Momcilovic game changers?

Who gives a squat about the NBA, when UK plays college ball?

The teams winning titles, are not doing so with stacked NBA talent, it's the teams with veteran college dudes that are good enough to catch a cup of coffee in the NBA. The games are completely different.
this logic is how you end up with a team full of trent noah's and wonder why at the end of the year you have 14 losses.
 

FilsonCat

All-Conference
Apr 5, 2007
3,516
4,301
113
this logic is how you end up with a team full of trent noah's and wonder why at the end of the year you have 14 losses.
This dude isn't Trent Noah. He's close to 7 feet tall and is highly skilled. We've got multiple guys who can play minutes on the wing. It's the minutes behind Moreno that I am more concerned about. If we can't land Kustarica, I think we need another post player.
 

TheBlueMist

All-American
Feb 5, 2004
2,118
5,125
113
I get the cynicism from some of our fans. I was intrigued by Jelavic's highlights last summer only to be disappointed by how he was used and how he played when he got floor time. Backo looks like he could play a stretch four and a backup five. I will reserve judgement until I see him play against American/SEC players (if we get him).
 

Wildcat_in_DC

All-Conference
Nov 25, 2025
981
1,642
93
This dude isn't Trent Noah. He's close to 7 feet tall and is highly skilled. We've got multiple guys who can play minutes on the wing. It's the minutes behind Moreno that I am more concerned about. If we can't land Kustarica, I think we need another post player.
you are just adding bodies for the sake of adding bodies. "we have guys that can play"......thats the problem. they can play, but are they dudes? no one knows and its just banking on hope. we need to add studs for it to really impact the trajectory of the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cornbreadnmilk

HipTer

Senior
Apr 11, 2012
1,119
902
113
1st of all i never mentioned momcilovic
2nd of all in terms of game changing season changing talent, also no

Good college players, but theres a reason why he wont ever be a contributer at the highest level of professional basketball
Ok, but there’s also a reason why contributors at the highest level of professional basketball were not good enough at 18 years old to take a college team to a title.

I think the evidence points to the fact that those “good college players” – especially college All-Americans and proven All-conference players – are the surest way to win in CBB. And many of those upperclassmen do/will contribute in the NBA.

On the other hand, I believe it’s clear that an OAD 18 yr. old freshman (regardless of where he’s from) is not a necessary component of a title contender; and if he’s your team’s go-to-guy then it’s like playing the lottery and expecting to win big. Meaning it could happen but it’s not likely. So, why go the more difficult route if you don’t have to? The high school players that are expected to be (or are determined to be) OAD are generally just not worth the investment of time and money that seems to be required – and I think the college coaches willing to make that investment are dwindling more all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyjeff1

Anon200440

Senior
Mar 28, 2026
353
697
93
Ok, but there’s also a reason why contributors at the highest level of professional basketball were not good enough at 18 years old to take a college team to a title.

I think the evidence points to the fact that those “good college players” – especially college All-Americans and proven All-conference players – are the surest way to win in CBB. And many of those upperclassmen do/will contribute in the NBA.

On the other hand, I believe it’s clear that an OAD 18 yr. old freshman (regardless of where he’s from) is not a necessary component of a title contender; and if he’s your team’s go-to-guy then it’s like playing the lottery and expecting to win big. Meaning it could happen but it’s not likely. So, why go the more difficult route if you don’t have to? The high school players that are expected to be (or are determined to be) OAD are generally just not worth the investment of time and money that seems to be required – and I think the college coaches willing to make that investment are dwindling more all the time.
When i said nba guys didnt necessarily mean oad guys

yaxel wasnt a OAD but he was a lotto pick
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,337
72,185
113
"Who gives a squat about the NBA, when UK plays college ball?"

You gotta have guys like that to win
Hurley had em, may had em, cal had em when he won here, scheyer has em, self had em, pitini had em, florida was an outlier

but to be an elite team you gotta have elite coaching or elite players, ideally both

Pope isnt elite, so we have to get elite players to be really good and we dont have that, which is why we are constantly 10 loss teams
BS, the teams with freshmen lottery picks aren’t winning sh*t and Cal's 2012 title was a long time ago and was aided by a lockout and a generational talent.
Look at the teams winning titles, they're loaded with juniors, seniors and super seniors.
Duke has been absolutely loaded with NBA talent the last few years, what have they won? Look at the makeup of the teams they keep losing to when it really counts.
If you want lottery picks, go watch the NBA, give me a senior laden team that has battled to get here.
 
Last edited:

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,337
72,185
113
this logic is how you end up with a team full of trent noah's and wonder why at the end of the year you have 14 losses.
So Walter Clayton, Will Richard, Alijah Martin, Denzel Aberdeen, Chinyelu, Thomas Haugh, Tristan Newton, Donovan Clingan, Cam Spenser, Alex Karaban, Hassan Diarra, Elliot Cadeau and Yaxel Lendenborg are Trent Noah level guys???

Trent Noah is a glorified walk on, I thought we all knew that. Guess not. Your point is garbage.

Can you list all the freshmen lottery picks that won a title.

Stephon Castle is one, but it's not like he was Carmello Anthony in 2003, he was a piece on a dominant, senior laden team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix and HipTer

FilsonCat

All-Conference
Apr 5, 2007
3,516
4,301
113
you are just adding bodies for the sake of adding bodies. "we have guys that can play"......thats the problem. they can play, but are they dudes? no one knows and its just banking on hope. we need to add studs for it to really impact the trajectory of the season.
We've got one spot left. Pope already has multiple guys slated to play the wing spots. If you can get a sure fire contributor like a Kusturica, then you do it. But aside from that, we do need another post body down low. Kepnang can't be counted on to give you those minutes all season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattrudd

bnewt5

Senior
Feb 17, 2026
497
631
93
We've got one spot left. Pope already has multiple guys slated to play the wing spots. If you can get a sure fire contributor like a Kusturica, then you do it. But aside from that, we do need another post body down low. Kepnang can't be counted on to give you those minutes all season.
Maybe plenty of wings in quantity not quality. Need more scoring from wing and guard
 
  • Like
Reactions: cornbreadnmilk

seccats04

Heisman
Dec 6, 2004
14,537
23,457
113
BS, the teams with freshmen lottery picks aren’t winning sh*t and Cal's 2012 title was a long tine ago and was aided by a lockout and a generational talenr.
Look at the teams winning titles, they're loaded with juniors, seniors and super seniors.
Duke has been absolutely loaded with NBA talent the last few years, what have they won? Look at the makeup of the teams they keep losing to when it really counts.
If you want lottery picks, go watch the NBA, give me a senior laden team that has battled to get here.
I hate Duke more than anybody but give credit where credit's due. In Scheyer's four years, they have won the ACC twice (with only one loss each season), finished second another year, have won the ACC tournament three times, has two E8's and a F4. I know the current ACC is pretty much what the SEC used to be most years, garbage, but we would love to be in their current position as a program. We are turning into Georgia basketball unless Pope can turn things around this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyjeff1

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
42,710
65,047
113
I hate Duke more than anybody but give credit where credit's due. In Scheyer's four years, they have won the ACC twice (with only one loss each season), finished second another year, have won the ACC tournament three times, has two E8's and a F4. I know the current ACC is pretty much what the SEC used to be most years, garbage, but we would love to be in their current position as a program. We are turning into Georgia basketball unless Pope can turn things around this year.
And the ACC has been soooooo impressive during that time. I guess “Georgia” beat Sheyer’s Duke, but who notices such things??? You sure hate Duke!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torpedo