The local government has more direct effect on the day to day issues that affect quality of life . Law and order , infrastructure maintenance and upkeep , public utilities ETC . The same thing has happened to many Delta towns that has happened to Jackson . Poor management and leadership has caused many (black and white) who could afford it to leave.
Infrastructure maintenance and repair, like roads and bridges, is sometimes paid for by counties and sometimes paid for by the state...at least in the states where I have lived.
And counties often receive state and federal funding to pay for the county funded maintenance and repair.
So state and federal Representatives are allocating funds to one area of a state and/or away from another area of that state.
To be very clear, I am not arguing that the Delta is well run at a local level.
Please do not think that is why I am posting.
I am posting because I think state and federal representatives, as well as state governors, can have a large impact on an area of a state.
And I am posting because I reject the claim that an area of a state is run by a single US House rep or that the success/failure of an area of a state is based on a single US House rep.
it is comical to claim the Delta is the way it is because of a single democratic US representative. The state has been run in the state legislature, federal legislature, and executive by Republicans for years now. All of them have a direct significant impact on success of the Delta.
and I also don’t blame Republicans for not fixing the Delta despite having outsized control on the area. The Delta simply is not something that can be pointed to as evidence of either party's abilities or inabilities.