Active Duty Major calls for Trump to be impeached and removed

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,380
35,466
113
Hope hes happy with whats coming for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scrubby

RoseBowlorBust

Heisman
Jan 4, 2019
5,285
11,357
113
He was absolutely right and he made a great case for impeachment, just like your side would if we ever had a Dem president who was this obnoxiously, blatantly corrupt. If you cared about your country more than this waste of orange skin, you'd see it too.
Nailed it
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
9,310
12,388
113
He didn't light himself on fire like the last leftist wackadoo who did this? Forgive me for not caring what he's crying about if he isn't even going to commit.

Nice of him to do it in uniform at least. It's gonna be quite the punishment coming.
 

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,608
3,847
93
He didn't light himself on fire like the last leftist wackadoo who did this? Forgive me for not caring what he's crying about if he isn't even going to commit.

Nice of him to do it in uniform at least. It's gonna be quite the punishment coming.
You dumb (it has a “b” on the end! Did you know?). Pretty sure he “committed”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,380
35,466
113
He was absolutely right and he made a great case for impeachment, just like your side would if we ever had a Dem president who was this obnoxiously, blatantly corrupt. If you cared about your country more than this waste of orange skin, you'd see it too.
You are incredibly misguided and wrong cousin goober.
 

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
245,290
11,469
103
Hope hes happy with whats coming for him.

He is knowing full well the righteous "consequences"

He didn't light himself on fire like the last leftist wackadoo who did this? Forgive me for not caring what he's crying about if he isn't even going to commit.

Nice of him to do it in uniform at least. It's gonna be quite the punishment coming.
Agree or disagree, he'll likely be facing a court martial (if it turns out he's a legitmate active duty member in uniform). As a military member, he's expected to remain politically neutral (at least while in uniform). They'll probably hit him with Articles 88, 92 possibly Article 134. So, ya he's goiong to have to face the music on this one. ...hopefully he doesn't have a family depending on his income and benefits.
 

RoseBowlorBust

Heisman
Jan 4, 2019
5,285
11,357
113
Agree or disagree, he'll likely be facing a court martial (if it turns out he's a legitmate active duty member in uniform). As a military member, he's expected to remain politically neutral (at least while in uniform). They'll probably hit him with Articles 88, 92 possibly Article 134. So, ya he's goiong to have to face the music on this one. ...hopefully he doesn't have a family depending on his income and benefits.
He's a true Patriot.
 

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
245,290
11,469
103
He's a true Patriot.
Agreeing with what he said doesn't automatically make him a true patriot. Patriotism isn't just about what you believe...it's also about honoring the responsibilities you voluntarily took on. If he's active duty and in uniform, those responsibilities include staying politically neutral. So, while I personally agree with much of what he said, I still think he exercised poor judgment and violated military regs.
 

RoseBowlorBust

Heisman
Jan 4, 2019
5,285
11,357
113
Agreeing with what he said doesn't automatically make him a true patriot. Patriotism isn't just about what you believe...it's also about honoring the responsibilities you voluntarily took on. If he's active duty and in uniform, those responsibilities include staying politically neutral. So, while I personally agree with much of what he said, I still think he exercised poor judgment and violated military regs.
His Oath is to the Constitution so what he did represents that. The worst Commander in Chief absolutely needs to be removed.
 

Huey Grey 2

Heisman
Jul 1, 2025
4,557
15,206
113
Agreeing with what he said doesn't automatically make him a true patriot. Patriotism isn't just about what you believe...it's also about honoring the responsibilities you voluntarily took on. If he's active duty and in uniform, those responsibilities include staying politically neutral. So, while I personally agree with much of what he said, I still think he exercised poor judgment and violated military regs.
How is he violating military regs? Troops are sworn to protect the country, not the president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArtRadley

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
245,290
11,469
103
His Oath is to the Constitution so what he did represents that.
I don't disagree that his oath is to support and defend the Constitution. But that same oath doesn't give him a pass to ignore the rules that come with serving on active duty. If he truly believes the President should be impeached, there are lawful ways to express that. he can contact his members of Congress, write letters, vote, or (this is the biggest one---> speak as a private citizen.

If he chooses the path he's chosen, then he'll have to face the consequences, that's all I'm saying. He doesn't get a pass simple because we agree with his opinion. You served, Chis, you know this.
The worst Commander in Chief absolutely needs to be removed.
Whether this administration is the worst or whether impeachment is warranted is a completely separate discussion. Even if someone believes impeachment is justified, that doesn't automatically make it appropriate for an active-duty service member to publicly advocate for it while in uniform. What unlawful order was he, personnaly, given?

FWIW, I agree with your last sentence.
 

PW Herman

All-Conference
Nov 13, 2007
2,400
3,735
113
I don't disagree that his oath is to support and defend the Constitution. But that same oath doesn't give him a pass to ignore the rules that come with serving on active duty. If he truly believes the President should be impeached, there are lawful ways to express that. he can contact his members of Congress, write letters, vote, or (this is the biggest one---> speak as a private citizen.

If he chooses the path he's chosen, then he'll have to face the consequences, that's all I'm saying. He doesn't get a pass simple because we agree with his opinion. You served, Chis, you know this.

Whether this administration is the worst or whether impeachment is warranted is a completely separate discussion. Even if someone believes impeachment is justified, that doesn't automatically make it appropriate for an active-duty service member to publicly advocate for it while in uniform. What unlawful order was he, personnaly, given?

FWIW, I agree with your last sentence.

So your Freedom of Speech is taken away? I could see discharging him just like someone could lose their job. Arrested? GTFO and with all due respect, F you for even supporting such a suggestion regardless of some "rules". He wasn't hurting anyone with his speech
 

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
245,290
11,469
103
How is he violating military regs? Troops are sworn to protect the country, not the president.
Did you not read my post. I explained it. Its because active-duty service members aren't allowed to engage in partisan political activity while in uniform or in a way that creates the appearance the military is taking a political position. We can't go vote in uniform, take part in protests, etc.

DoD Directive 1344.10 – Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces.
- "A member of the Armed Forces on active duty may... express a personal opinion on political candidates and issues, but not as a representative of the Armed Forces." (Para. 4.1.1.1)

- "A member of the Armed Forces on active duty shall not... speak before a partisan political gathering, including any gathering that promotes a partisan political party, candidate, or cause." (Para. 4.1.2.5)

- "A member of the Armed Forces on active duty shall not... participate in any radio, television, or other program or group discussion as an advocate for or against a partisan political party, candidate, or cause." (Para. 4.1.2.6)

As for the second part of response. You're asking "Who does the oath serve?" I'm specifically talking about "What are active-duty members allowed to do while in uniform?" Those arent the same thing.

Like I told Chis, I agree with the Major. All I was pointing out is he's opening himself up to a court martial, and knowing how petty Pete is, I'm pretty certain if this guy is truly an active duty service memeber (I haven't looked him up) then he'd better be prepared to face the music. Nothing more.

Heck, a father can kill the guy who raped his daughter and we ALL support him. ...doesn't mean he wont be arrested and charged with murder.
 

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
245,290
11,469
103
So your Freedom of Speech is taken away? I could see discharging him just like someone could lose their job.
No. They still have free speech rights, but those rights aren't unlimited while serving on active duty. The military places restrictions on certain political activities to preserve good order, discipline, and political neutrality. That's part of the job we ALL voluntarily accepted. (there's no draft ;) )
Arrested? GTFO and with all due respect, F you for even supporting such a suggestion regardless of some "rules". He wasn't hurting anyone with his speech
Did I say I supported it? I'm not advocating for anything, so take the emotion out of it. I'm simply explaining that his particular actions do, in fact have consequences. When you serve, you do have to give up some personal freedoms. Hell, not once in 20 years did I get to choose the city I lived in--the miltiary chose that for me. Not once did Iget to decide, Na..I think I'll skip work today and go to the beach.

Chill Calm Down GIF by The Chosen Brasil
 

WDDT

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
10,860
11,694
113
So your Freedom of Speech is taken away? I could see discharging him just like someone could lose their job. Arrested? GTFO and with all due respect, F you for even supporting such a suggestion regardless of some "rules". He wasn't hurting anyone with his speech
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scrubby

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,123
21,372
113
Did you not read my post. I explained it. Its because active-duty service members aren't allowed to engage in partisan political activity while in uniform or in a way that creates the appearance the military is taking a political position. We can't go vote in uniform, take part in protests, etc.

DoD Directive 1344.10 – Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces.
- "A member of the Armed Forces on active duty may... express a personal opinion on political candidates and issues, but not as a representative of the Armed Forces." (Para. 4.1.1.1)

- "A member of the Armed Forces on active duty shall not... speak before a partisan political gathering, including any gathering that promotes a partisan political party, candidate, or cause." (Para. 4.1.2.5)

- "A member of the Armed Forces on active duty shall not... participate in any radio, television, or other program or group discussion as an advocate for or against a partisan political party, candidate, or cause." (Para. 4.1.2.6)

As for the second part of response. You're asking "Who does the oath serve?" I'm specifically talking about "What are active-duty members allowed to do while in uniform?" Those arent the same thing.

Like I told Chis, I agree with the Major. All I was pointing out is he's opening himself up to a court martial, and knowing how petty Pete is, I'm pretty certain if this guy is truly an active duty service memeber (I haven't looked him up) then he'd better be prepared to face the music. Nothing more.

Heck, a father can kill the guy who raped his daughter and we ALL support him. ...doesn't mean he wont be arrested and charged with murder.
While I may agree with the the Major, just wanted to cosign your thoughts in this thread. Pretty easy to see why they would have these regulations as well. I can both think that the major is right, the regulations are right, and that the Major was brave doing what he did knowing the consequences. Whereas having trans members of the military IMO doesn't affect readiness, etc, having officers publicly speak on their commanders absolutely does (even if I believe they are correct).
 

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
245,290
11,469
103
While I may agree with the the Major, just wanted to cosign your thoughts in this thread. Pretty easy to see why they would have these regulations as well. I can both think that the major is right, the regulations are right, and that the Major was brave doing what he did knowing the consequences. Whereas having trans members of the military IMO doesn't affect readiness, etc, having officers publicly speak on their commanders absolutely does (even if I believe they are correct).
...people on here act like I wrote the regs. It's clear why there is little constructive dialog on this forum. Very few want to listen, they just want to insult, name call, deflect, and just look for the next "gotcha" moment.
 

Ghee Buttersnaps 2

All-Conference
Nov 12, 2023
1,562
2,688
113
While I may agree with the the Major, just wanted to cosign your thoughts in this thread. Pretty easy to see why they would have these regulations as well. I can both think that the major is right, the regulations are right, and that the Major was brave doing what he did knowing the consequences. Whereas having trans members of the military IMO doesn't affect readiness, etc, having officers publicly speak on their commanders absolutely does (even if I believe they are correct).
I never served (my pop did), so I always appreciate alaska guy's military expertise. Just wait until there's an intelligence leak, though.

Anticipation Popcorn GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: RagnarLothbrok

WDDT

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
10,860
11,694
113
...people on here act like I wrote the regs. It's clear why there is little constructive dialog on this forum. Very few want to listen, they just want to insult, name call, deflect, and just look for the next "gotcha" moment.
Well... to be fair.... the OP is an anti American, terriost sympathizer, who has zero concept of democratic policy and wants to impose his beliefs on everyone like the cock sucking facist he is.


So.....you know.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Scrubby

Ghee Buttersnaps 2

All-Conference
Nov 12, 2023
1,562
2,688
113
Is the intelligence leak mention some lore I'm not aware of?
alaska guy was a former intelligence officer or some $h!t. It's just entertaining when dumb@$$es try to argue with him (at least on that topic) and get effing owned. Hence, grab your popcorn. Signalgate was solid entertainment. MAGAs got destroyed.
 

WDDT

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
10,860
11,694
113
What do you think should be coming for him?
The unemployment line.

Ya think there might be a few maga types in the military that would speak their mind if they didnt know to shut their mouth?



In the military....
 
Last edited:

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
245,290
11,469
103
Well... to be fair.... the OP is an anti American, terriost sympathizer, who has zero concept of democratic policy and wants to impose his beliefs on everyone like the cock sucking facist he is.


So.....you know.
Geesh, Whiskey. Thanks for coloring in my point. Good grief, man.

"Very few want to listen, they just want to insult, name call, deflect, and just look for the next "gotcha" moment."

I'm not saying it's easy (I often have a "twattwaffle" typed out), but if this country is ever going to work towards compromise and peace, we have to stop being the MSM and political pawns they want us to be--seperated into good vs evil categories.
 

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
245,290
11,469
103
alaska guy was a former intelligence officer or some $h!t. It's just entertaining when dumb@$$es try to argue with him (at least on that topic) and get effing owned. Hence, grab your popcorn. Signalgate was solid entertainment. MAGAs got destroyed.
You're funny ghee. Sorry I get triggered on that topic. The double standard between the IC and politicians is probably my biggest gripe (don't get me started). Oh, and I was an Intelligence Analyst (not officer). I retired an E-7 in 2013, then became a defense contractor at NSA until 2021. Now I'm just scrub contractor with nothing higher than a Secret clearance. :(
 

WDDT

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
10,860
11,694
113
Geesh, Whiskey. Thanks for coloring in my point. Good grief, man.

"Very few want to listen, they just want to insult, name call, deflect, and just look for the next "gotcha" moment."

I'm not saying it's easy (I often have a "twattwaffle" typed out), but if this country is ever going to work towards compromise and peace, we have to stop being the MSM and political pawns they want us to be--seperated into good vs evil categories.
Sorry bruv.... Just **** posting while starting my day.....

Nothing but love homie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alaskanseminole