I can't believe this was challenged. The Constitution couldn't have been any clearer.Birthright citizenship upheld. SUPCO says if you are born in US, you are an American citizen
Will require an ammendment. It's not exactly clear, especially how it's used by the Left to grant citizenship to illegals who cross the border just to give birth and de facto also become citizens themselves.I can't believe this was challenged. The Constitution couldn't have been any clearer.
Unless the point was to bring attention to it.
There is no question the Constitution is outdated. That was written in a time when it took a month to cross the Atlantic and ordinary citizens provided the military protection the country. Several of the Bill of Rights definitely need tweaked and there are a lot of little things throughout the Articles like pardons that need addressed.Will require an ammendment. It's not exactly clear, especially how it's used by the Left to grant citizenship to illegals who cross the border just to give birth and de facto also become citizens themselves.
It's up to Congress to stop that caca (chain migration) through legislation. However on birthright citizenship, while I disagree with the majority ruling here, it was upheld based on how the 14th ammendment is written.
If we want that changed, we'll have to ammend the Constitution. Not so easy to do.
Both answers the question and explains why we don't have solutions.The problem is Congress
Just drop an executive order to limit all immigration requiring proof of non-pregnancy for all travel into the country. Like a vaccine limitation. Write it the exact same way as the left did, just change the wording to reflect pregnancy.Birthright citizenship upheld. SUPCO says if you are born in US, you are an American citizen
Yup, that would work. I can also see some type of legislation perhaps in the next Congress banning both chain migration and birth tourism.Just drop an executive order to limit all immigration requiring proof of non-pregnancy for all travel into the country. Like a vaccine limitation. Write it the exact same way as the left did, just change the wording to reflect pregnancy.
You mean the part where it says it is not intended for children of illegals?I can't believe this was challenged. The Constitution couldn't have been any clearer.
Unless the point was to bring attention to it.
Huh? The constitution doesn’t say that at all.You mean the part where it says it is not intended for children of illegals?
I did not know this until I heard a guest on Sirius Patriot 125 this morning saying there is already a Law on the books preventing "birth tourism"! Like most immigration Laws today, it is randomly enforced.Just drop an executive order to limit all immigration requiring proof of non-pregnancy for all travel into the country. Like a vaccine limitation. Write it the exact same way as the left did, just change the wording to reflect pregnancy.