Mega conferences or more smaller conferences?

Which CFB structure do you prefer?

  • Lets just delete all sports now and become like those futuristic movies where sports dont exist

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    35
  • Poll closed .

GoHawks2009

Freshman
Feb 18, 2010
15,950
99
48
I think we can all agree that nobody but the media sickos wants these super conferences, and the NFL-lite 20-32 team mega conference. They stand to gain the most from it because they get to only focus on the big matchups they want to see. In their perfect world, we'd have USC-Ohio State, Texas-Oregon, and Alabama-Michigan EVERY week. They'd rather it be like the NFL, except they also forget they (yes, the media) complain about the same problem with the NFL because they don't get Chiefs-Ravens and Chiefs-Packers on Sunday Night and Chiefs-Cowboys on Fox at Noon every single week, and are occasionally forced to watch Chiefs-Jaguars and Chiefs-Falcons and Cardinals-Texans on a Thursday night.

But here we are with a "Power 4" in the loosest of terms because if the B10 and the SEC had their way, it would be an exclusive showdown between those two conferences for CFB supremacy every year (and you can argue all you want about how "well that's how it's been for years, and therefore we should throw out all of CFB history just because all the best moron high school kids want to only go to those schools to keep them at the top of the CFB hierarchy, and of course so they can go to the NFL and what not..........but only after they've made millions and millions of dollars just playing football (or in some cases not even doing that). We're not even talking about the ones that actually f***ing win championships and awards for being recognized as the best at what they do"............................................ why yes, you will certainly try to make that argument and stand on the table believing that with every dying bone in your body). 🙃

So what do we do about it? Why we complain, of course, on social media until nothing changes, because that is how Americans "solve" their problems, right? 😀

And the best part is, reading that will immediately trigger some people into dismissing what I'm saying because this truth hits too close to home for them, and they'd never willingly admit that to some stranger online. 😁 (But it's okay, your secret is safe with me...............)

But let's get to the point of this thread. Are we really gonna sit here and just let college football devolve and consolidate into an untenable structure with just the "best of the best" moneymaking programs playing each other for profit? Or would you rather CFB go back to smaller, more regionally-based conferences? This would mean MORE conferences (aka new conferences or previously-defunct conferences being reborn), but also more opportunities for everyone. This seems like the right thing to do, but the funny thing is, we can't make this happen, you see, because, you see, the people allegedly in charge of college football, along with the TV networks like ESPN and Fox would never allow this simply because it in their minds "wouldn't make them as much money"......you see.

So which is it gonna be?

Complain about the way things are while nothing changes or continues to change for the worse...............or push back at every turn against ways to do what we all know IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO with college athletics, simply because you can't wrap your heads around how it would work, or be allowed to work?

Take your pick. 😃
 

paednoch23

Senior
Oct 23, 2009
422
974
93
I think we can all agree that nobody but the media sickos wants these super conferences, and the NFL-lite 20-32 team mega conference. They stand to gain the most from it because they get to only focus on the big matchups they want to see. In their perfect world, we'd have USC-Ohio State, Texas-Oregon, and Alabama-Michigan EVERY week. They'd rather it be like the NFL, except they also forget they (yes, the media) complain about the same problem with the NFL because they don't get Chiefs-Ravens and Chiefs-Packers on Sunday Night and Chiefs-Cowboys on Fox at Noon every single week, and are occasionally forced to watch Chiefs-Jaguars and Chiefs-Falcons and Cardinals-Texans on a Thursday night.
But here we are with a "Power 4" in the loosest of terms because if the B10 and the SEC had their way, it would be an exclusive showdown between those two conferences for CFB supremacy every year (and you can argue all you want about how "well that's how it's been for years, and therefore we should throw out all of CFB history just because all the best moron high school kids want to only go to those schools to keep them at the top of the CFB hierarchy, and of course so they can go to the NFL and what not..........but only after they've made millions and millions of dollars just playing football (or in some cases not even doing that). We're not even talking about the ones that actually f***ing win championships and awards for being recognized as the best at what they do"............................................ why yes, you will certainly try to make that argument and stand on the table believing that with every dying bone in your body). 🙃

So what do we do about it? Why we complain, of course, on social media until nothing changes, because that is how Americans "solve" their problems, right? 😀

And the best part is, reading that will immediately trigger some people into dismissing what I'm saying because this truth hits too close to home for them, and they'd never willingly admit that to some stranger online. 😁 (But it's okay, your secret is safe with me...............)

But let's get to the point of this thread. Are we really gonna sit here and just let college football devolve and consolidate into an untenable structure with just the "best of the best" moneymaking programs playing each other for profit? Or would you rather CFB go back to smaller, more regionally-based conferences? This would mean MORE conferences (aka new conferences or previously-defunct conferences being reborn), but also more opportunities for everyone. This seems like the right thing to do, but the funny thing is, we can't make this happen, you see, because, you see, the people allegedly in charge of college football, along with the TV networks like ESPN and Fox would never allow this simply because it in their minds "wouldn't make them as much money"......you see.

So which is it gonna be?

Complain about the way things are while nothing changes or continues to change for the worse...............or push back at every turn against ways to do what we all know IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO with college athletics, simply because you can't wrap your heads around how it would work, or be allowed to work?

Take your pick. 😃
I don’t see the coming changes as a tragedy. I see them as a correction.

The state of Iowa was never really big enough for two major college football programs. Iowa has always been the flagship, and if the Hawkeyes had been the only major program all along, we’d probably look a lot more like Nebraska: one fan base, one television audience, one statewide identity.

Meanwhile, a lot of energy over the years was spent maintaining the illusion that Iowa had two nationally relevant brands. One school never seemed comfortable with what it was and spent decades chasing an identity it never quite possessed.

The super league won’t create a new reality. It’ll simply acknowledge the one that was always there.

Markets are ruthless. Pretenders can survive for a while. They rarely survive forever.
 

GoHawks2009

Freshman
Feb 18, 2010
15,950
99
48
I don’t see the coming changes as a tragedy. I see them as a correction.

The state of Iowa was never really big enough for two major college football programs. Iowa has always been the flagship, and if the Hawkeyes had been the only major program all along, we’d probably look a lot more like Nebraska: one fan base, one television audience, one statewide identity.

Meanwhile, a lot of energy over the years was spent maintaining the illusion that Iowa had two nationally relevant brands. One school never seemed comfortable with what it was and spent decades chasing an identity it never quite possessed.

The super league won’t create a new reality. It’ll simply acknowledge the one that was always there.

Markets are ruthless. Pretenders can survive for a while. They rarely survive forever.
Ya know, my favorite part about your line of thinking is that you always think you're right, and are very comfortable and smug in the belief of those ideals..................until you're eventually betrayed by the very principles you believe in. ;)

Of course, you're probably one of those people who will say publicly that you won't be bothered (okay maybe for just a little bit initially) if the system you're defending, and hoping casts Iowa State into college sports purgatory, turns on Iowa and they get left behind as well. You seem very much like an "Ehhh, oh well, it happens. I'll move on and find something else." kind of guy. And that kind of thinking is exactly what's wrong with and needs to get out of college athletics.

I know that's not what you want to hear and I know you'll disagree with it because it goes against your belief structure.......................and that's just too gotdam bad. 😃
 

Palmerhawk

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
1,944
3,866
113
Let's get rid of the Internet as well.
While we are at it let's get rid of computers.
And BTN and SEC Network.

Should be rather easy to go back to 1990..just spin the globe backwards.
Sorry,genie is out of the bottle.
 

paednoch23

Senior
Oct 23, 2009
422
974
93
Ya know, my favorite part about your line of thinking is that you always think you're right, and are very comfortable and smug in the belief of those ideals..................until you're eventually betrayed by the very principles you believe in. ;)

Of course, you're probably one of those people who will say publicly that you won't be bothered (okay maybe for just a little bit initially) if the system you're defending, and hoping casts Iowa State into college sports purgatory, turns on Iowa and they get left behind as well. You seem very much like an "Ehhh, oh well, it happens. I'll move on and find something else." kind of guy. And that kind of thinking is exactly what's wrong with and needs to get out of college athletics.

I know that's not what you want to hear and I know you'll disagree with it because it goes against your belief structure.......................and that's just too gotdam bad. 😃
I put up a little thing about Iowa State and, by some miracle of modern civilization, it summoned a four-paragraph report on the defects of my character.
A man who commits himself to the sacred office of Guy Who Takes Message Boards Too Seriously ought to get a ribbon or a commemorative plate.

The interesting part is how fast your boiler started rattling. Most Hawkeye fans spend their energy worrying about the Hawkeyes. You, however, saw an Iowa State post and reacted as though the smoke alarm had gone off. For a fellow flying a Hawkeye banner, you seem awfully interested in the neighbors. Funny thing, that.

And then came the manifesto. Nothing announces “I’m perfectly calm” quite like composing an essay about another man’s fandom.

Human beings are marvelous creatures.

Truly captivating.
 

Istvan Teleky

Freshman
Nov 3, 2022
28
59
13
I think it will eventually be a hybrid of both.

2 super conferences (B1G and SEC) with their own games and playoffs. NFL style

And then the "smaller FBS conferences" who will be free to have their playoff system as well. Maybe more like the current FBS style.

Bowl games will not go away. Most will be assimilated into the playoff games.

Honestly, I have no issue with Iowa playing more B1G games or cross over games with the SEC than playing Albany, UNI, Northern Illinois. etc.

Either way it is money driven and changes are coming.
 

paednoch23

Senior
Oct 23, 2009
422
974
93
I think it will eventually be a hybrid of both.

2 super conferences (B1G and SEC) with their own games and playoffs. NFL style

And then the "smaller FBS conferences" who will be free to have their playoff system as well. Maybe more like the current FBS style.

Bowl games will not go away. Most will be assimilated into the playoff games.

Honestly, I have no issue with Iowa playing more B1G games or cross over games with the SEC than playing Albany, UNI, Northern Illinois. etc.

Either way it is money driven and changes are coming.
This is the way.
 
Feb 25, 2008
31,373
29,752
113
Let's get rid of the Internet as well.
While we are at it let's get rid of computers.
And BTN and SEC Network.

Should be rather easy to go back to 1990..just spin the globe backwards.
Sorry,genie is out of the bottle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoHawks2009
Feb 25, 2008
31,373
29,752
113
I put up a little thing about Iowa State and, by some miracle of modern civilization, it summoned a four-paragraph report on the defects of my character.
A man who commits himself to the sacred office of Guy Who Takes Message Boards Too Seriously ought to get a ribbon or a commemorative plate.

The interesting part is how fast your boiler started rattling. Most Hawkeye fans spend their energy worrying about the Hawkeyes. You, however, saw an Iowa State post and reacted as though the smoke alarm had gone off. For a fellow flying a Hawkeye banner, you seem awfully interested in the neighbors. Funny thing, that.

And then came the manifesto. Nothing announces “I’m perfectly calm” quite like composing an essay about another man’s fandom.

Human beings are marvelous creatures.

Truly captivating.
Too bad he was right about you, though.

It's okay to be hurt by the fact that you'll never live to see Iowa State off of Iowa's schedule. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoHawks2009

paednoch23

Senior
Oct 23, 2009
422
974
93
Too bad he was right about you, though.

It's okay to be hurt by the fact that you'll never live to see Iowa State off of Iowa's schedule. 😉
People once thought Sears would be around forever. Strange creatures, we are.

I’ve already lived to see ISU off the schedule.

I started going to Iowa games in 1975. Iowa State wasn’t on the schedule. Both schools somehow managed to carry on.

Times change. They seem to be doing so again.

Don’t become an old man shaking his fist at history. History has a poor record of listening
 
Last edited:
Feb 25, 2008
31,373
29,752
113
People once thought Sears would be around forever. Strange creatures, we are.

I’ve already lived to see ISU off the schedule.
Mmm yes, good catch. I should've worded it better so you couldn't play with the intent. Fart noises.
I started going to Iowa games in 1975. Iowa State wasn’t on the schedule. Both schools somehow managed to carry on.
See but they didn't "carry on", by that logic because they ended up ON our schedule soon after you started going to games...........
Times change. They seem to be doing so again.
But should they?.........(answer is no)
Don’t become an old man shaking his fist at history. History has a poor record of listening
I also find that "never say never" is a very overrated and often overblown approach.
 

OnlyTheObscure

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
3,014
4,337
113
I think it will eventually be a hybrid of both.

2 super conferences (B1G and SEC) with their own games and playoffs. NFL style

And then the "smaller FBS conferences" who will be free to have their playoff system as well. Maybe more like the current FBS style.

Bowl games will not go away. Most will be assimilated into the playoff games.

Honestly, I have no issue with Iowa playing more B1G games or cross over games with the SEC than playing Albany, UNI, Northern Illinois. etc.

Either way it is money driven and changes are coming.
A true super conference IMO isn’t going to hold onto turd teams like Purdue and Northwestern when you got teams like Texas Tech willing to spend a lot more.

I don’t see much happening for a decade. Get to 24 team playoff then see how the economy of football adjusts, then we will see something driven by the logic of the economics dictate the next move. My hunch is the teams spending all the money and drawing all the eyeballs are going to get sick of the leeches getting rich off their efforts.
 

Burghawk87

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2023
797
1,420
93
I think we can all agree that nobody but the media sickos wants these super conferences, and the NFL-lite 20-32 team mega conference. They stand to gain the most from it because they get to only focus on the big matchups they want to see. In their perfect world, we'd have USC-Ohio State, Texas-Oregon, and Alabama-Michigan EVERY week. They'd rather it be like the NFL, except they also forget they (yes, the media) complain about the same problem with the NFL because they don't get Chiefs-Ravens and Chiefs-Packers on Sunday Night and Chiefs-Cowboys on Fox at Noon every single week, and are occasionally forced to watch Chiefs-Jaguars and Chiefs-Falcons and Cardinals-Texans on a Thursday night.

But here we are with a "Power 4" in the loosest of terms because if the B10 and the SEC had their way, it would be an exclusive showdown between those two conferences for CFB supremacy every year (and you can argue all you want about how "well that's how it's been for years, and therefore we should throw out all of CFB history just because all the best moron high school kids want to only go to those schools to keep them at the top of the CFB hierarchy, and of course so they can go to the NFL and what not..........but only after they've made millions and millions of dollars just playing football (or in some cases not even doing that). We're not even talking about the ones that actually f***ing win championships and awards for being recognized as the best at what they do"............................................ why yes, you will certainly try to make that argument and stand on the table believing that with every dying bone in your body). 🙃

So what do we do about it? Why we complain, of course, on social media until nothing changes, because that is how Americans "solve" their problems, right? 😀

And the best part is, reading that will immediately trigger some people into dismissing what I'm saying because this truth hits too close to home for them, and they'd never willingly admit that to some stranger online. 😁 (But it's okay, your secret is safe with me...............)

But let's get to the point of this thread. Are we really gonna sit here and just let college football devolve and consolidate into an untenable structure with just the "best of the best" moneymaking programs playing each other for profit? Or would you rather CFB go back to smaller, more regionally-based conferences? This would mean MORE conferences (aka new conferences or previously-defunct conferences being reborn), but also more opportunities for everyone. This seems like the right thing to do, but the funny thing is, we can't make this happen, you see, because, you see, the people allegedly in charge of college football, along with the TV networks like ESPN and Fox would never allow this simply because it in their minds "wouldn't make them as much money"......you see.

So which is it gonna be?

Complain about the way things are while nothing changes or continues to change for the worse...............or push back at every turn against ways to do what we all know IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO with college athletics, simply because you can't wrap your heads around how it would work, or be allowed to work?

Take your pick. 😃
Penguin Read GIF by Pudgy Penguins
 

paednoch23

Senior
Oct 23, 2009
422
974
93
A true super conference IMO isn’t going to hold onto turd teams like Purdue and Northwestern when you got teams like Texas Tech willing to spend a lot more.

I don’t see much happening for a decade. Get to 24 team playoff then see how the economy of football adjusts, then we will see something driven by the logic of the economics dictate the next move. My hunch is the teams spending all the money and drawing all the eyeballs are going to get sick of the leeches getting rich off their
The pace at which things change today 10 years seems like an eternity.
 

paednoch23

Senior
Oct 23, 2009
422
974
93
I honestly do not see how the outcome would be much different if a Super League forms and Iowa is in it while Iowa State is not. Some effects would be immediate. Recruiting within the state, NIL money, donor support, and corporate sponsorships would shift quickly because players, businesses, and boosters follow exposure and opportunity. Iowa would likely dominate in state recruiting and become the obvious destination for Iowa kids who want to compete at the highest level. Over time, television audiences, casual fans, and even family loyalties would increasingly consolidate around one brand. Iowa would gradually drift toward a Nebraska-like situation, with one dominant program representing the state. History suggests that once those habits and loyalties are established, they become very difficult to reverse, and I simply do not see how the long term outcome would be anything else.
If such a scenario comes to fruition everything would eventually settle out. I really could care less anout our neighbors in Ames. Things would eventually settle if there was a collapse and folks would move on. I’m fairly convinced there will soon be a super conference scenario. I’m also confident the state of Iowa will have one team in that super conference.
I think the Cruz-Cantwell Save College Sports Act could have a classic cobra effect. The term comes from British India, where a bounty on dead cobras led people to breed more cobras, making the problem worse. Likewise, legislation intended to preserve college sports could instead push the major conferences to move faster toward a Super League. In trying to prevent consolidation, Congress may end up accelerating it.
 
Last edited:

Istvan Teleky

Freshman
Nov 3, 2022
28
59
13
Once AI replaces you, perhaps you'll have a new perspective.
The transition to Web3 has already begun, AI is exponentially ramping up, tokenization is happening with Black Rock, Bitcoin's time chain is being used by the military and the global financial system is now undergoing changes.

Everything is moving fast........I don't think 2 super conferences are that far off either.
 
Feb 25, 2008
31,373
29,752
113
rchawk:

Interesting.
I DON'T recall saying that about the ACC/Big12.
Of course I could be senile.
The top 8 from the ACC and Big 12:

(East)
Virginia
Virginia Tech
North Carolina
Duke
Georgia Tech
Clemson
Florida State
Miami

(West)
Arizona
Arizona State
Colorado
Utah
BYU
Houston
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
 
Feb 25, 2008
31,373
29,752
113
The top 8 from the ACC and Big 12:

(East)
Virginia
Virginia Tech
North Carolina
Duke
Georgia Tech
Clemson
Florida State
Miami

(West)
Arizona
Arizona State
Colorado
Utah
BYU
Houston
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
The resulting fallout from the ACC/Big 12 merger:

Gulf Coast Conference-
(West)
TCU
Baylor
SMU
UTSA
Rice
Louisiana Tech

(East)
UCF
USF
Tulane
Memphis
UAB
Southern Mississippi

Big North Conference-
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Cincinnati
West Virginia
Louisville
Pittsburgh
Syracuse
Boston College
Connecticut

New AAC:
Army
Navy
Temple
*North Carolina State
*Wake Forest
East Carolina
Charlotte
Florida Atlantic
Tulsa
North Texas

New Pac 10*:
Boise State
Washington State
Oregon State
*California
*Stanford
San Diego State
Fresno State
Utah State
Colorado State
Texas State
 

Iron Doc

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2005
705
1,050
93
The resulting fallout from the ACC/Big 12 merger:

Gulf Coast Conference-
(West)
TCU
Baylor
SMU
UTSA
Rice
Louisiana Tech

(East)
UCF
USF
Tulane
Memphis
UAB
Southern Mississippi

Big North Conference-
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Cincinnati
West Virginia
Louisville
Pittsburgh
Syracuse
Boston College
Connecticut

New AAC:
Army
Navy
Temple
*North Carolina State
*Wake Forest
East Carolina
Charlotte
Florida Atlantic
Tulsa
North Texas

New Pac 10*:
Boise State
Washington State
Oregon State
*California
*Stanford
San Diego State
Fresno State
Utah State
Colorado State
Texas State
Actually, NOT BAD at all!!
Speak it into existence!!!
 

GoHawks2009

Freshman
Feb 18, 2010
15,950
99
48
I should probably give an update on the final results........

The people have spoken! 71% would rather see the rational, logical, logistically smart decision of going back to smaller, more regionally-based conferences. 11 people foolishly still believe that mega conferences are the way to go (or they're just too afraid to jump off the ship because they "don't think it'll happen" in regards to making the smarter decision to go back to smaller conferences focusing on regional rivalries).........................

Back to regional conferences, it is!!!!
 

rchawk

All-American
Oct 27, 2001
74,445
9,021
113
I should probably give an update on the final results........

The people have spoken! 71% would rather see the rational, logical, logistically smart decision of going back to smaller, more regionally-based conferences. 11 people foolishly still believe that mega conferences are the way to go (or they're just too afraid to jump off the ship because they "don't think it'll happen" in regards to making the smarter decision to go back to smaller conferences focusing on regional rivalries).........................

Back to regional conferences, it is!!!!
How do you think the Big Ten presidents would vote on the proposal? My bet is that it would be 18-0 against.

And don't forget the Big Ten is also a prestigious academic alliance that brings in more money to schools than athletics does. I'm not aware of any FBS conference that has anything like it, although I wouldn't be surprised if the Ivy League has something very impressive.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GoHawks2009

GoHawks2009

Freshman
Feb 18, 2010
15,950
99
48
How do you think the Big Ten presidents would vote on the proposal? My bet is that it would be 18-0 against.

And don't forget the Big Ten is also a prestigious academic alliance that brings in more money to schools than athletics does. I'm not aware of any FBS conference that has anything like it, although I wouldn't be surprised if the Ivy League has something very impressive.
Why would they need to leave this academic alliance simply because they're no longer in a "football" conference?

There's countless examples of schools in different conferences for sports than the one they play in for football or one of their other major sports. (Did you know Notre Dame is a member of the Big Ten?........................;))

Let's think 4 dimensionally here........
 

rchawk

All-American
Oct 27, 2001
74,445
9,021
113
Why would they need to leave this academic alliance simply because they're no longer in a "football" conference?

There's countless examples of schools in different conferences for sports than the one they play in for football or one of their other major sports. (Did you know Notre Dame is a member of the Big Ten?........................;))

Let's think 4 dimensionally here........
The Big Ten is already holding the hammer here, athletically and academically. What possible incentive does the conference and it's member schools have to change anything?

Regional alignment and smaller conferences were going the way of the dinosaurs when Penn State joined the Big Ten (in the early 1990s I think).

It's not realistic. You can dream and wish and play with maps all you want, but if you truly believe it is possible I have bad news for you about Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.
 
Last edited:

Clonewithasigh

Heisman
Jun 18, 2001
97,345
39,629
113
I don’t see the coming changes as a tragedy. I see them as a correction.

The state of Iowa was never really big enough for two major college football programs. Iowa has always been the flagship, and if the Hawkeyes had been the only major program all along, we’d probably look a lot more like Nebraska: one fan base, one television audience, one statewide identity.

Meanwhile, a lot of energy over the years was spent maintaining the illusion that Iowa had two nationally relevant brands. One school never seemed comfortable with what it was and spent decades chasing an identity it never quite possessed.

The super league won’t create a new reality. It’ll simply acknowledge the one that was always there.

Markets are ruthless. Pretenders can survive for a while. They rarely survive forever.
This simply isn’t the case anymore, and with Iowa being a small market team the risk is much greater if they don’t pass the Scores Act. Hawkeye fans seem to think that being in the B10 insulates them for the future. If plain market economics continues to drive the carriers and big brands, the Hawkeyes will eventually find themselves on the outside looking in. Some of you fans think that the Hawkeyes are a big brand but it is doubtful that you were alive when Hawkeye football was the worst program in the nation for two decades. You will never be able to change the fact that Iowa is small market.
 

rchawk

All-American
Oct 27, 2001
74,445
9,021
113
This simply isn’t the case anymore, and with Iowa being a small market team the risk is much greater if they don’t pass the Scores Act. Hawkeye fans seem to think that being in the B10 insulates them for the future. If plain market economics continues to drive the carriers and big brands, the Hawkeyes will eventually find themselves on the outside looking in. Some of you fans think that the Hawkeyes are a big brand but it is doubtful that you were alive when Hawkeye football was the worst program in the nation for two decades. You will never be able to change the fact that Iowa is small market.
Clown fans know they are going down and are trying to convince themselves that, eventually, Iowa will go down with them. They hate the Hawkeyes that much.

Never mind that Iowa annually appears in the top 25 of P4 athletic department revenues. It doesn't matter that Iowa does better than schools in much more populated states. The fact that in 131 years the Big Ten has NEVER kicked out a member school (we discussed this when Maryland and Rutgers were admitted).

The clowns know they are going down if they don't get a share of the football TV money that schools in more successful conferences have earned. They can't stand the thought of sinking to the bottom while Iowa thrives.
 

Clonewithasigh

Heisman
Jun 18, 2001
97,345
39,629
113
Clown fans know they are going down and are trying to convince themselves that, eventually, Iowa will go down with them. They hate the Hawkeyes that much.

Never mind that Iowa annually appears in the top 25 of P4 athletic department revenues. It doesn't matter that Iowa does better than schools in much more populated states. The fact that in 131 years the Big Ten has NEVER kicked out a member school (we discussed this when Maryland and Rutgers were admitted).

The clowns know they are going down if they don't get a share of the football TV money that schools in more successful conferences have earned. They can't stand the thought of sinking to the bottom while Iowa thrives.
Not a clone fan so you are off base. The market for the hawks is small and always will be regardless of the process you use to convince yourselves otherwise.