Huge mistake. And I said that at the time so it's not hindsight 20/20. He was the Sadio Mane of the group - just a constant playmaker.Luis Diaz, ex-Liverpool.
![]()
Thanks for takin’ the time.The first World Cup that I remember watching was in 1982 when my Azzurri won. I have to say that so far, this World Cup has been the best that I've seen, not only because it seems as if most of the teams actually are going for it, but the crowds have been great, which I think have made the players go for it. Also, almost every one of the so-called minnows have acquitted themselves very well. Finally, the fact that most of this World Cup is being played in the good ole USA also has made a difference with the crowds.
I saw some games in 1978 but it was hard as not much was televised, so 1982 was it for me as well.The first World Cup that I remember watching was in 1982 when my Azzurri won. I have to say that so far, this World Cup has been the best that I've seen, not only because it seems as if most of the teams actually are going for it, but the crowds have been great, which I think have made the players go for it. Also, almost every one of the so-called minnows have acquitted themselves very well. Finally, the fact that most of this World Cup is being played in the good ole USA also has made a difference with the crowds.
They both really needed a win in this one. Unless one of them pulls an upset over Mexico or South Korea, Group A will only get two teams through.
As an Azzurri fan, the 94 Final was disappointing to me. I think that the fact that that game was played in the middle of the day in the blazing sun at the Rose Bowl had a lot to do with the quality of that game.I saw some games in 1978 but it was hard as not much was televised, so 1982 was it for me as well.
And I would agree - excellent start to the tournament. Only 1 stinker so far - Ghana-Panama. The new rules about simulation have helped a lot too - so much less injury fakery and shithousery.
A big boost has been the enthusiastic crowds and the stars playing well. Exciting knock out stage games and a good final will tell the tale. 1994 was pretty good but the final was so terrible it dragged the overall vibe down.
Also in 1978 there wasn't HD TV let alone 4k.I saw some games in 1978 but it was hard as not much was televised, so 1982 was it for me as well.
And I would agree - excellent start to the tournament. Only 1 stinker so far - Ghana-Panama. The new rules about simulation have helped a lot too - so much less injury fakery and shithousery.
A big boost has been the enthusiastic crowds and the stars playing well. Exciting knock out stage games and a good final will tell the tale. 1994 was pretty good but the final was so terrible it dragged the overall vibe down.
How Switzerland managed to not score just now…Switzerland putting it away, 2-0 at 86’. Bosnia playing with 10 since ~80’. A pretty goal, nicely done.
Not something that happens too often. Bu ref tests always seem to include a question about this, and what the proper restart is.
That’s a good summation of that game.Qatar isn't great...9 man Qatar is horrific.
Qatar isn't great...9 man Qatar is horrific.
It was pretty bad once it went 11v9…looked more like 11v7.So I'm not feeling as bad about having to miss the game.
It was pretty bad once it went 11v9…looked more like 11v7.
I thought Canada refusing to shake hands after the game was a poor display. It was a bad red…but dude was distraught and obviously not intentional.
The match momentum chart that they’ve been using was pretty funny…