There are none so blind then those who will not see.
Refuting the fact of the voter registration rolls heavily favors democratic and sticking to unproven conspiracy theories that fit a political agenda is not going to convince anyone except those thsat don't want to look at the truth of the matter
Just one of the many false claims gets the truth treatment
She might have come in second in her district to Bass, as you implied.
But Raman did come out strong in other areas of the city
>She also dominated the Westwood precinct that includes UCLA, winning 56% of the vote in one precinct, compared with Bass’ 19% and Pratt’s 10%. And in a Los Feliz precinct in her council district, Raman so far has 58% of the vote, far ahead of Bass and Pratt.
Pratt took large swaths of the Westside and West Valley, Bass locked up South L.A. and Raman showed strength in renter-dominant neighborhoods such as Echo Park, partial election returns show.
www.latimes.com
Also love the photo you provided, though can't say it means anything of value
But your using it and where it comes from makes me wonder if you're getting vaild information to base your opinions on
a quick check on google found this
>The Daily Mail is widely considered an unreliable source for objective, factual journalism. Major media watchdogs
AllSides and fact-checkers consistently classify the publication as highly sensationalized and right-leaning, often prioritizing clickbait and emotional outrage over strict editorial accuracy<
I feel i have backed up my opinion with facts and if they are accepted, fine by me.
If not, that's also fine.
I understand that in life there are those who will see only what they want to see and a convenient lie takes precedence over the facts if the lie fits what they want to believe .
So I'll stop posting facts to convince the unconceivable and just wish them a nice day .
Meaning on this issue, for me it's
View attachment 1321318