Spencer Pratt - Next Los Angeles Mayor - CA Vote Counting Is Complete Sham
- Thread starter fatpiggy
- Start date
I thought you were a medical doctor?
I know a few phd's. They don't call themselves doctor.
Actual evidence for election fraud is a tape recording of Donald John Trump asking the Secretary of State of Georgia in a phone call to find 11,780 votes to overturn an election. Evidence that was utilized as part of an indictment that was returned against Trump and co-conspirators in Fulton County GA in 2023.Read this entire thread and then come back grazzhoppa.
You're just posting twitter slop that will never ever be part of any actionable prosecution.
Oh. I've always heard it called MD when talking about a medical doctor. Doctorate or phd when talking about the highest level of academic degree (non-medical).
You are basically just a cheerleader for Trump.
Libs...that light at the end of the tunnel is the Trump Train coming hard.
US Attorney Bill Essayli is letting everyone know that charges are INCOMING — approximately one to two months away — for people caught manipulating the California elections.
They watched the cheating happen in real time. The USPS barcodes, the GPS telemetry, the timestamp sequencing across logistics networks — every ballot movement left a digital footprint. Every reroute left a pattern.
The audit trail is already there. California is example A.
US Attorney Bill Essayli is letting everyone know that charges are INCOMING — approximately one to two months away — for people caught manipulating the California elections.
They watched the cheating happen in real time. The USPS barcodes, the GPS telemetry, the timestamp sequencing across logistics networks — every ballot movement left a digital footprint. Every reroute left a pattern.
The audit trail is already there. California is example A.
Give us a line by line, factual with evidence, how anything was suspect about the LA mayoral race. Please. What was unprecedented, what was fraudulent? Cite your sources from real journalists. This is your chance to honestly own the libs, and not just be angry. Please, we are asking you, give us real evidence.
JUST IN: President Trump calls California's election process WORSE then a 3RD WORLD COUNTRY as Democrats win surprisingly huge shares of late mail-in ballots
"Watch California, everybody! Our Election process is as bad, or worse, than any Third World Country. The biggest difference is, they count their Votes much faster — They don’t wait seven days to tell you who won, rigging the Election during each and every one of them. Americans are ashamed of what is happening! President DONALD J. TRUMP"
The timeline of the vote drops and the statistical improbability of the voting in those vote drops should make any intellectually honest person say something is wrong. The sad part is that Pratt really had no chance in the general election, yet someone decided they needed to eliminate his chances entirely. The homeless community apparently rose up in unity and showed their power as a voting bloc. ::sarcasm::
Of course there is no evidence of voting fraud. That's not sarcasm because it's the truth. Fraud is about deception. It's not fraud when the system works as designed.
Of course there is no evidence of voting fraud. That's not sarcasm because it's the truth. Fraud is about deception. It's not fraud when the system works as designed.
An intellectually honest person would dig deeper than what they hear from Catturd and Sean Hannity.
There were no vote drops that had zero votes for Pratt but conservatards saw a single online update from the AP's election tracker as evidence of statistical improbability while ignoring that one minute later they recorded thousands of votes for Pratt but zero for frontrunners Bass and Raman.
Trump's own U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli reviewed official county records and stated the claim was false — that each candidate received votes in every update — and invited anyone with credible evidence of fraud to contact his office.
As far as the late vote drops that favored Raman, it is entirely typical for mail-in ballots counted in the days after the election to lean democratic as this is a well-established pattern in California elections - not a red flag.
And I can assure you that Bass would have preferred to run against Pratt than Raman, so I promise you no one was trying to ensure that he was eliminated entirely.
But go on with your attempts to undermine our election process when you don't get your way. We are not Venezuela no matter how much you want to believe it.
Last edited:
I wish Democrats were as crafty and sneaky as the right continually try to paint them as. The party that couldn't beat a clearly mentally incompetent Trump 2 out of 3 times.
So crafty and sneaky that Republicans control the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches.
You actually made claims about my post that I never made. That said, when the 3rd place candidate gets an inconsistent number of votes compared to both the 1st and second place candidates, that raises questions,
I don't know what Hannity has said, and don't care. California's system leads to this. There won't be any fraud uncovered because it is what it is. It's ignorant to believe the system doesn't favor the party in charge.
It's California. They don't have to be crafty.
I'm not a Trump supporter. I was sad the Dems couldn't field a competent candidate to beat him.
Then what were you claiming? It's obvious that you don't trust elections that don't turn out the way you want them to and you're clearly alledging fraud based on nothing except your feelings. You just repeated one of your charges again, even after I explained it to you " when the 3rd place candidate gets an inconsistent number of votes compared to both the 1st and second place candidates, that raises questions"
That's not what happened unless you also ackowledge inconsistent drops for Bass and Raman because based on the evidence you're using, the same could be said for them. Maybe try harder to understand how elections work before trying to undermine our democracy by making claims about "the system" that simply aren't true.
I highly doubt there are hordes of election workers willing to risk long prison terms so their favorite candidates will win. The vast majority are just regular citizens doing their civic duty, not the criminals the Right accuses them of being.
You still haven't answered this question: If the Dems fixed the LA mayor's race, why didn't they also fix the governor's race so no Republicans would advance?
Oh FFS. This is complete BS. There was no statistical improbability in any of the "drops" or what the hell ever you're talking about. This is fantasy and you also have no idea what percentage of the vote was "homeless" or not.
And you're basically sounding like a fascist/communist/totalitarian here. Elections can't be trusted.
And I've no doubt you have put absolutely zippo research into how the elections are actually conducted in California vs the twitter slop/nonsense. It would actually make you feel better about the security of the elections in California if you did consult some legitimate sources. Part of the schtick with how long it takes is that they're trying to get it right.
Just completely ridiculous lying. Probably one of the worst aspects of the Trump fascists taking over a major political party in this country is that they're undermining faith in the electoral process in this country. Because that's what fascists do.
WTF are you even talking about here? What about California's system leads to this?
She’s a Black woman Democrat. Those are the only three reasons. She was also apparently supposed to magically stop a raging wild fire in Southern California, an area that has seen homes burn down ever since people have built there. That and his social media propaganda brainwashers feed him a steady diet of BS. Look at the moronic accounts he reposts here. Far right media induced mental illness.
I cant delve into the minds of the commiecrats. They have a strategy though. I think they were afraid for bass to have to debate Pratt though. She's about as smart as a rock.
Yes, they were afraid of the silver spoon tv douchebag with absolutely no qualifications.
Do you actually believe the nonsense you type?
You didn't comprehend a very concise point, and very concise followup, so there's no need in clarifying again. I personally don't care who is mayor of LA because it doesn't affect me, and because it's going to end up going to an idiot.
Anytime a vote drop gets more votes for the 3rd place candidate than the 1st place and 2nd place candidates combined, that's an anomaly. It's laughable you're lecturing me on understanding how elections work, and saying I'm undermining Democracy. It's also laughable that any election worker in California is worried about going to jail. California's system doesn't require fraud to favor the party in control. Get over yourself.
Is that as deep as it goes for you?
The AP explained it was simply a "lag" in automated updates: an electronic pull from the LA County website captured votes for one group of candidates, and exactly one minute later, the next update captured the rest. Together, the two updates included over 21,000 votes for Pratt, 12,000 for Bass, and 9,500 for Raman.
Most tellingly, Trump's own U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli reviewed official county records and stated the claim was false — that each candidate received votes in every update — and invited anyone with credible evidence of fraud to contact his office.
https://www.democracydocket.com/new...m-gets-debunked-by-trumps-justice-department/
Last edited:
Oh yeah??? You guys will be peeing yourself before its over.
BOOM. President Trump drops the hammer: US Attorney in California says voter fraud investigation WILL result in charges!Finally, real action on cleaning up California’s rigged elections. No more looking the other way. The swamp is getting drained and election integrity is coming back.
This is HUGE!
Oh yeah??? You guys will be peeing yourself before its over.
Finally, real action on cleaning up California’s rigged elections. No more looking the other way. The swamp is getting drained and election integrity is coming back.
This is HUGE!
"suspects" is bluster for the gumps.
Surely this will be the voting fraud lawsuit Trump brings up that he actually wins