She took herself out of position on a ton of plays tonight.
***CC22 and the Fever mega thread***
- Thread starter LetsGoHawks83
- Start date
No, that's actually a question. She averages about 5 a game. There's a reason she shoots 40% from 5 feet or closer.
Not saying that Sophie is lying, but like with many things surrounding the Fever, this is another tidbit that's being blown oit of proportion.
That and the whole Kelsey Mitchell not celebrating with the team congratulating Caitlin right after the game.
It's the same energy as all the anti-CC/anti-"CC fans" people online attacking Caitlin because she didn't initially return her teammate's high five gesture while she was pouting on the sideline because of the situation she/they were in late in the Liberty game.
Well we wouldn't want to inconvenience you now would we.
You're someone who sticks to their convictions when it comes to problem solving by putting yourself first. I admire that...............
4 minutes to go........game's getting a little interesting.
Aww shucks, eyes......87-81. Oh well.
But ya know what they say......................it's only money.
But ya know what they say......................it's only money.
Yeah, you know what they say...........it's only reading comprehension/the decency to not mischaracterize others.Aww shucks, eyes......87-81. Oh well.
But ya know what they say......................it's only money.
Because intentionally/unintentionally, and by way of an awful feature on the site, you managed to leave out the part where I won heavily on the money line.
Also won on GS-3.5 in-game, just to keep your boner hard.
You really are beyond annoying
You keep saying that word......you know you've been mischaracterizing Iowa fans for years now. Nobody cares that you feel you've been mischaracterized, and saying it in every post isn't going to change that.
Lol.........
The -350 ML. I'm sure you raked in the cash on that one. Probably got enough off those winnings alone to buy Iowa another elite WR.
Don't mischaracterize me and the word won't get used.You keep saying that word......you know you've been mischaracterizing Iowa fans for years now. Nobody cares that you feel you've been mischaracterized, and saying it in every post isn't going to change that.
Lol.........
The -350 ML. I'm sure you raked in the cash on that one. Probably got enough off those winnings alone to buy Iowa another elite WR.
-305. Read better.
I didn't know Iowa already had an elite WR. I like RVZ. And early returns on Diaz seem good. But elite?
And WR is the last place I'd be putting any money
Don't mischaracterize the fanbase first, and you won't get properly characterized.
Nah, I trusted that I could goad you into correcting me on the number you actually bet pregame (on whichever site you used), because I honestly didn't care enough to go back a page or two and look it up. Thank you for your cooperation.........My point about your profits also stands.
I never said they did. Just because I said "another" doesn't mean I meant on this current team.....don't mischaracterize me. Read better.
(See how that works?
)In all fairness, I don't actually care. That wasn't the point.
You amuse yourself far too easily.Don't mischaracterize the fanbase first, and you won't get properly characterized.
Nah, I trusted that I could goad you into correcting me on the number you actually bet pregame (on whichever site you used), because I honestly didn't care enough to go back a page or two and look it up. Thank you for your cooperation.........My point about your profits also stands.
I never said they did. Just because I said "another" doesn't mean I meant on this current team.....don't mischaracterize me. Read better.
(See how that works?
In all fairness, I don't actually care. That wasn't the point.
Let me know when you actually have something somewhat significant to argue about
I certainly hope the plan wasn’t to have CC be the first option from 30 feet away down by one. That would have been dumb.
You make these kind of responses often to try to end conversations. Here's basically what you just wrote:
You- "Don't mischaracterize me. I'm bothered by this."
Me: "I didn't mischaracterize you."
You- "Let me know when you actually have something to argue about that's worth my time."
Yes, you attached my post that you had altered to show my losing bet but not the winning bets.You make these kind of responses often to try to end conversations. Here's basically what you just wrote:
You- "Don't mischaracterize me. I'm bothered by this."
Me: "I didn't mischaracterize you."
You- "Let me know when you actually have something to argue about that's worth my time."
That is a misrepresentation.
Get a life
Because we don't care about your winning bets. Only showing when you're wrong.
But see, it proves a point, so it's not a misrepresentation.
Whose life should I
At some point you must realize that GOAT has become a cliche and some people throw it around just to get other folk's.... goat.
Didn't Hayden Fry say if you don't want folks to get your goat, don't show em where you keep it?
I don't have the full stats, but just how many rebounds come from her own missed layups? That way she gets more of each!
Do you ever pull your panties out of your azz?
Hey, lets take a vote! Who would like all accounts that start with the letter 'E' be removed! Wouldn't these threads be soooo nice!
Are you an alt handle for Joe's Place?
True, but people are criticizing White because it wasn’t supposed to be the first option.
It was a great play as drawn up. I don't think SW drew it up or called it. Washington blew it up by a combination of covering KM and stupidly losing CC (AB was going to screen down on CC's defender, force a switch, and roll to the basket covered by a guard - but there was no one to set a pick on). Sophie and Caitlin were brilliant in saving that play.
