He would have had a lot more resources to achieve the needed results at the schools I like to compare us to. That’s what you like to conveniently ignore:
- their campuses are much better
- their facilities are much better
- they donate a lot more
- their stadium atmosphere is very likely much better
- their level of pride is much higher
- ultimately they have e more to offer
when you go to Central Park, NYC, there are more Michigan Shirts than that of any other school.
I think Greg could win a National Championship at Rutgers if enough people are interested. Miami is such a small school that is now competing for National Championships because enough people have invested in their success. Indiana is a big school that competes for Championships because enough people have invested in their success.
either school can serve as a template for Rutgers. But success isn’t going to come without enough financial support.
What you are failing to see….
these schools have history on winning which has resulted in donors stepping up and wanting to continue that success. Michigan has the most wins out of any D1 football program EVER!!! Miami has produced an enormous amount of NFL talent and has won championships.
You keep staring the donations have to come first for there to be success and that is utter ********.
Look no further than Indiana—the beloved school you keep recalling in this thread about their winning success and donor support. That stadium could BARELY be filled 3yrs ago and football was a complete afterthought to basketball. Their donor support was nonexistent. It wasn’t until they started winning that they saw an increase in demand, attention, and donors stepping up (big whales like Cuban). Again no one gave TWO ***** until they started to see some success on the field. That was the spark for them. It was NOT established with prior donor support or even support from the school.
I wish Schiano the best and hope he proves everyone wrong that he can have a championship caliber team on the field—-history tells us otherwise except for a lightning in a bottle year 20yrs ago. Until we start showing something on the field we are not going to see people coming out of the woodwork to Increase attendance or donations. People want to invest in winners!! For now, we are left with those optimists who continue to support the program and consider the “what if”. I am one of them.
I did notice in my priority points that we seemed to have gained ~10k new donors YoY if the numbers are accurate (50k total donor). That is positive momentum even if they are minimal just to get people in the habit. I sit in the top 10% in priority points and donate 5 figures per year for what I can afford.
You are wrong though in your approach and what needs to happen is success in the field. Make people dream. A coach needs to prove they can do more with less and that has not happened. We can’t even get over the hump of beating a top 25 team or even a team that we aren’t expected to beat. That’s the primary issue so hold your beloved coach to a higher standard