Whatever it takes to support the Fuhrer. They've already sold their souls, so they figure they may as well go all in on the road to hell.
Trump needs to
- Thread starter baltimorened
- Start date
Whatever it takes to support the Fuhrer. They've already sold their souls, so they figure they may as well go all in on the road to hell.
Could you please let me know why you're replying at 3am? Working the night shift security guard gig again? Or do I just live in your head so much that you felt the need to reply at this time of night?
Sad!
So if we can target the infrastructure that powers military installations, why don't we just target the military installations?
You should have studied world history.
Everything you said is a violation of the Geneva Convention.
Carry on.
The military uses both bridges and electricity,.. not a problem.
hahahaha. You brag about living the the city that never sleeps, yet it appears you always are.
"The only thing that comes to sleepers, is dreams".
That's your new go to? What time someone responds to your bull****. Pathetic.
That's a gray area at best and one that I would not want Trump's crack legal team defending me in court over if I was a military leader.
Hell of a response as always.
Broken record.
You sure do cry a lot. Trump is president and will be for 2 1/2 more years unless the left succeeds in assassinating him.
Reasonable response,.. you're obviously too indecisive to be directing any aspect of the military.
What exactly would you have me respond to? I made a valid point. Instead of coming back with a semi-intelligent response to refute it, you came back with a bunch of childish nonsense insults.
Your inability to think critically is why you remain a failure in life. Poor, uneducated, failing to meet the potential that God gave you.
The military also needs food and medical care. OK to destroy their agriculture and hospitals.
Oh, I am decisively anti-blowing up civilians/civilian infrastructure that may double as a soft military target.
Mentioning that something is a gray area is also not indecisive, it is acknowledging that a topic is morally/legally up to interpretation.
Indecisive
The military also breathes air, so chemical warfare should be in the cards and okay too, right?
I say we all proclaim that Trump couldn't hold a candle, as POTUS, to someone like George Washington, because George would go out onto the frontlines in battle. Any POTUS who hasn't gone to the frontlines in war times, and battled the opposition directly, is a poser,
And we just keep hammering that home, and let nature take its course.
Which is also likely what made him vulnerable to the MAGA cult. MAGA provides a comforting sense of community, exhilarating fantasies of victory, matched by fantasies of victimhood, groups to blame and enemies to hate.
In that sense, the poster you identified as a failure, could also be viewed as a sympathetic and vulnerable person preyed on by MAGA and ultimately the cult leader.
Not because they told us so, but because every credentialed group told us so, including our own intelligence agencies.
Are you not aware of that?
Yes. we ratified the geveva protocol of 1925 which phohibited the deployment of chem weapons in war. That protocol did not ban production and stockpiling and allowed use in retaliation... and it took us decades to ratify. The 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (Which the use Ratified in 1997) prohibits them period, so we destroyed our stockpiles. AI says that we finishished in 2023. the final munition being a M55 rocket filled with GB.
Last edited:
"you came back with a bunch of childish nonsense insults." Can you point to those in the post above?
"is why you remain a failure in life. Poor, uneducated, failing to meet the potential that God gave you."
Who is trying to insult who? I don't need to insult you, I will get a paycheck regardless.
All that being said, you are still a LIAR!
The only line he would ever see the front of is at McDonald's.
And we should all encourage that.
What battle uniform do you wear?
You going to bring Clinton, and Barrack Hussein Obama with you? I'm all for that. Suit the "F" up.
F'ing poser!
Look at our lil nutter with the anger management issues ... your motto is: be angry first, think never.
Newsflash for Allasterisksornothing ... I'm not President. I'm not throwing the country into a needless war, getting soldiers killed and screwing up the entire world.
So your poser rant is completely irrelevant ... yadouche. Now out there and yell at your precious Orange Hitler about which battle uniform he wears, and call him an "F'ing poser!". Make sure to tell him that George Washington was a real man, and real POTUS, because he was on the frontlines.
You're just a *****! Live with it.
Why don't you quit sucking his **** for a second.
There again, where was Clinton and BHO!
Damn, you're stupid.
I’m just a bunch of asterisks?!? NOOOOOOOO!!!!
Whose asterisks am I supposed to be sucking? Use your words.
Where were Clinton and BHO? When? Where? How? You really suck at this. “This” being thinking and writing.
Did you suffer debilitating brain trauma while serving? Does that explain your state? That would be tragic.
Sad...libs grasping at straws hoping America fails due to terminal tds.
Quoting myself for continuity
@TigerGrowls @GesterHawk @baltimorened
I did a little more digging while having my first cup of coffee this morning to provide some additonal context/amplification of my previous post., if interested.
The US made extensive use of riot control agents (CS primarily) in Vietnam. (CS is stronger than what police used at the time) Various delivery menthods. Deliver to an area to force troops out of dug in politions for immediate follow up with conventional weapons to kill them in the open. Pump into tunnel complexes to force the enemy out etc. Cyrstal form of CS was also used for area denial. Similarly it was used to enhance the deterrent effect of diretional mines, by taping bags of CS powder to them, when used for that purpose by small ground elements being pursued and trying to break contact.
US also made extensive use of herbicides ("agent orange") (google operation RANCH HAND ... ran from 1962-1971 employing 19M gallons of various "Raninbow" herbicides (orange, blue, white, purple, orange II/III) (per AI)
The international community took the position that the US was violating the 1925 protocol, which the US had not ratified to date. The US took the position that the protocol only applied to lethal chemical weapons. There was a UN resolution in 1969 combined with domestic unrest that led tu the US scaling back use as our participation in the war came to a close. In 1975 we finally ratified the 1925 protocol and accepted the expanded definition in the 1969 UN resolution.
(P.S. Ned, i know you know the vietnam history... you lived it!)
Last edited:
Don't worry, Ned. Those guys are still the enemy, Things haven't changed THAT much.
Yes, we remember you were advocating for sending Iran back to the Stone Age.
I don't make it a habit of jumping into a 2 way back and forth uninvied, but that last part of this statement is total ********, If you want to insult a pushing 80yr old vietnam combat vet then just be a man and do it directly @fskillet .
How were you raised differently? Let's hear it. Let's hear about your family history.
Yeah, i think your "i was just raised differently" is really, "I've nver seen combat" Am I rightr?