Trump needs to

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
11,399
12,373
113
Agreed. I hope at this point Trump doesn't think he can just wait out Iran. They are clearly willing to go all rounds. He either needs to take an off-ramp, which he should have done a long time ago, or get to it. Ultimately, to reach the stated objectives, we're going to have to have boots on the ground, which is going to be really, really, really bad. I mean, unfortunately, I see a lot of American soldiers being killed. So sad that we're at this place.
You won’t ever be one of them though.

All you do is”fake yankee” is *****, moan, and complain about everything like a *****.

You should really move to Minnesota where you could get those “free” tampons Tim Walz is giving out.

P****!
 

magaboy

Senior
Apr 26, 2026
265
440
63
S--t or get off the pot on Iran. Enough with "the war is almost over, we've destroyed their aircraft and sunk their navy, they want to make a deal, etc"

The entire world is starting to really hurt due to fuel shortages.

Either do it or don't, stop just talking about it.
Oh no, I'm so sorry for you. Did you not vote for this even though Kamala Harris literally said during a nationally televised debate that trump would start a war with Iran?

Your sudden concern for ALL the peoples of the world is very sincere, Ned.
 

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
11,399
12,373
113
Remember "weeks, not months"? It's clear that he underestimated Iran's resolve.

I have to assume a lot of things are happing in the background that would allow the U.S. and allies to take control of the straits even if no deal is reached.
Hopefully you realize Iran could be decimated with conventional weapons in a matter of hours.

The reason this has not happened is it would affect the good people of Iran.
 

What Would Jesus Do?

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2010
34,592
3,734
113
Agreed. I hope at this point Trump doesn't think he can just wait out Iran. They are clearly willing to go all rounds. He either needs to take an off-ramp, which he should have done a long time ago, or get to it. Ultimately, to reach the stated objectives, we're going to have to have boots on the ground, which is going to be really, really, really bad. I mean, unfortunately, I see a lot of American soldiers being killed. So sad that we're at this place.
The "Off Ramp" solution could be problematic.

If Trump walks away now, he can claim victory, and surely Iran has been badly hurt, but walking away leaves Iran in control of the Strait of Hormuz. Their oil will flow, and tankers from other producers will pay fees into Iran's till.

Iran didn't have a nuke before the war - and wasn't plausibly trying to build one. But while building one has been set back, what Iran has almost certainly learned is that they need a nuke. Even though it will take them longer, they are more likely to actually try to build nukes.

I blame Obama. Doesn't everyone?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole

What Would Jesus Do?

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2010
34,592
3,734
113
It can fix it. But the cost will be in the many trillions and many thousands of dead. But technically he isn’t wrong - we could take over Iran if we truly wanted to*



* That would be a shockingly stupid thing to do, but we are capable of such shockingly stupid things
Afghanistan population = 45 million
Iraq population = 48 million
Iran population = 93 million

Why do we expect a better outcome in Iran? I'm open to arguments, but I can't see it myself.
 

hawkeyetraveler

Heisman
Aug 10, 2010
4,977
20,157
108
Afghanistan population = 45 million
Iraq population = 48 million
Iran population = 93 million

Why do we expect a better outcome in Iran? I'm open to arguments, but I can't see it myself.
Oh to be clear I expect a dramatically worse outcome if we take over Iran. I’m just saying we could do it.

If we did do it - well, that would cost many lives, trillions of dollars and 20 years from now, after we leave, we would hear “Iran is 2 weeks away from having a nuke”.
 

Torbee

Heisman
Sep 13, 2002
12,099
56,547
113
You won’t ever be one of them though.

All you do is”fake yankee” is *****, moan, and complain about everything like a *****.

You should really move to Minnesota where you could get those “free” tampons Tim Walz is giving out.

P****!
I am sorry your parents dropped you on your head as an infant and let you eat lead paint.

Ts and Ps.
 

What Would Jesus Do?

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2010
34,592
3,734
113
It'd have been so awesome if we could have had some sort of a deal with Iran where they weren't allowed to build nukes, were subject to inspections that they were compliant with, and the Straight of Hormuz was awesome open. It'd take a real fûcking moron to throw something like that away.
To make it worse, Trump's ego will require him to get a better deal.

Or, I suppose, he could just lie about it.
 

Anon1750875978

Heisman
Dec 26, 2018
7,196
12,457
113
Hopefully you realize Iran could be decimated with conventional weapons in a matter of hours.

The reason this has not happened is it would affect the good people of Iran.
Then why make a foolish statements claiming Iran has been obliterated?

The Strait of Hormuz says otherwise.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole

What Would Jesus Do?

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2010
34,592
3,734
113
Agreed. I hope at this point Trump doesn't think he can just wait out Iran. They are clearly willing to go all rounds. He either needs to take an off-ramp, which he should have done a long time ago, or get to it. Ultimately, to reach the stated objectives, we're going to have to have boots on the ground, which is going to be really, really, really bad. I mean, unfortunately, I see a lot of American soldiers being killed. So sad that we're at this place.
Actually, I think we can wait out Iran. But does the US have the willpower?

The last I heard, Iran is taking tankers out of mothballs to use as floating storage tanks. That gives them some breathing space but their revenues are crippled.

At some point soon, Iran will have to start shutting down their fields - if they haven't already.

The storage tankers are said to be anchoring around Kharg Island. We could take Kharg Island. We could take those tankers. If we can clear the Strait, we could send those tankers to our friends (for a fee, of course).
 

hawkeyetraveler

Heisman
Aug 10, 2010
4,977
20,157
108
Actually, I think we can wait out Iran. But does the US have the willpower?

The last I heard, Iran is taking tankers out of mothballs to use as floating storage tanks. That gives them some breathing space but their revenues are crippled.

At some point soon, Iran will have to start shutting down their fields - if they haven't already.

The storage tankers are said to be anchoring around Kharg Island. We could take Kharg Island. We could take those tankers. If we can clear the Strait, we could send those tankers to our friends (for a fee, of course).
I imagine before that happens China would step in to escort Iranian oil to Chinese refineries. I doubt even Trump is dumb enough to attack the Chinese navy over this.

Then again, he keeps finding new ways to be the dumbest president in the history of the United States.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,448
4,380
113
Hopefully you realize Iran could be decimated with conventional weapons in a matter of hours.

The reason this has not happened is it would affect the good people of Iran.
The American public wouldn't like it, especially if American soldiers got killed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torbee

pjhawk

All-Conference
Oct 13, 2001
1,378
4,141
113
Yeah, the militany could topple their government for sure. Then we would need a proxy to take over like in Iraq/Afghanistan.

Sad this is even a possibility. Yesterday was a better day than today to just walk away from Iran. And today is a better day than tomorrow.
Iran isn't Iraq or Afghanistan or Venezuela. The needed troops on the ground are way way way outside the capacity and will of the current United States of America.

We would have to go on a WW2 footing, and we have no real allies unless you want to count Israel. And they can't help with the boots on the ground.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,448
4,380
113
Iran didn't have a nuke before the war - and wasn't plausibly trying to build one.
According to IAEA reporting and multiple media summaries, Iran’s uranium stockpile enriched to 60% U-235 stands at approximately 440–461 kilograms. This enrichment level is significantly higher than civilian reactor levels (3–5%)
 

hawkeyetraveler

Heisman
Aug 10, 2010
4,977
20,157
108
Iran isn't Iraq or Afghanistan or Venezuela. The needed troops on the ground are way way way outside the capacity and will of the current United States of America.

We would have to go on a WW2 footing, and we have no real allies unless you want to count Israel. And they can't help with the boots on the ground.
It would be a disaster significantly bigger than Vietnam. But it could be done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sleepy64561

What Would Jesus Do?

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2010
34,592
3,734
113
Meh, it's time to be concerned. If the last election proved anything, Americans want lower prices. The #1 issue last election was inflation and the economy. Gas prices are a large component of the inflation CPI index, and it hit's almost all Americans directly in the pocket (except EV drivers now).

Inflation is just a hidden tax. I think Trump can sell a temporary increase in inflation as a cost of preventing Iran from getting a Nuke. Americans will buy that for 1-2 months, but then they are going to want the cost of their gas down.

Trump is walking a tight rope here, if he doesn't get oil moving before late summer, mid terms will be a blood bath for repuiblicans.

On the flip side, if the war with Iran wraps up and oil starts flowing, you will see prices "tumble" (or come back down to pre-war prices) and Trump will really be able to sell "handling Iran" and getting gas prices "lower".
That must be Team Trump's calculation. But it may be a miscalculation.

We are already using our Strategic Reserves. Europe and others are using theirs even faster.

If major producers like Iran, Iraq, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait... start shutting down their production fields and refineries, there will be nothing quick about oil flowing again.

Foreign nations holding US debt are already selling our paper at a loss to pay for higher energy costs. Driving up rates - because nobody wants our paper at face value.

We are making deals to subsidize UAE and, soon, others. Where does that money come from?
 

What Would Jesus Do?

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2010
34,592
3,734
113
Agreed. I hope at this point Trump doesn't think he can just wait out Iran. They are clearly willing to go all rounds. He either needs to take an off-ramp, which he should have done a long time ago, or get to it. Ultimately, to reach the stated objectives, we're going to have to have boots on the ground, which is going to be really, really, really bad. I mean, unfortunately, I see a lot of American soldiers being killed. So sad that we're at this place.
Or we could nuke Iran.

We're already a pariah nation.

Who's going to stop us?
 

What Would Jesus Do?

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2010
34,592
3,734
113
Iran doesn’t get to call the shots with the US. The alternative to putting and end to this is allowing it to go on in perpetuity until Iran actually has a nuke and the world order is rearranged not in our favor.
Bush let N.Korea get nukes. The world barely noticed.

We looked the other way (and some say helped) as Pakistan got nukes. Ho hum.

India (then a Soviet client state) got nukes. BFD.

Why should Iran having nukes be the end of the world order?
 

Anon1750875978

Heisman
Dec 26, 2018
7,196
12,457
113
That must be Team Trump's calculation. But it may be a miscalculation.

We are already using our Strategic Reserves. Europe and others are using theirs even faster.

If major producers like Iran, Iraq, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait... start shutting down their production fields and refineries, there will be nothing quick about oil flowing again.

Foreign nations holding US debt are already selling our paper at a loss to pay for higher energy costs. Driving up rates - because nobody wants our paper at face value.

We are making deals to subsidize UAE and, soon, others. Where does that money come from?
Gas would be $7.00 on Election Day.

Can you imagine what GOP candidates are thinking now with $5.00 gas?
 

What Would Jesus Do?

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2010
34,592
3,734
113
According to IAEA reporting and multiple media summaries, Iran’s uranium stockpile enriched to 60% U-235 stands at approximately 440–461 kilograms. This enrichment level is significantly higher than civilian reactor levels (3–5%)
Yes, that made them closer to a nuke.

IIRC, Iran previously enriched to 5% for routine civilian purposes and to 20% for research and medical uses. No big deal. The JCPOA reduced that to 300kg of 3.67%, and Iran complied.

Then Trump pulled us out of the agreement. Iran continued to comply for over a year.

[below from Gemini]

According to international inspectors, the U.S. intelligence community, and the U.S. State Department itself, Iran complied with the official limits of the JCPOA until after the United States unilaterally withdrew from the deal in May 2018.​
Iran did not immediately break the limits when President Trump pulled the U.S. out of the deal and reimposed economic sanctions. For roughly a year, Iran continued to observe the restrictions while attempting to negotiate with the remaining European signatories (Britain, France, and Germany) to secure economic relief.​
It was not until July 2019—fourteen months after the U.S. withdrawal—that Iran began intentionally and publicly violating the caps on enrichment purity and stockpiles as a strategy to pressure the other nations for sanctions relief.​

This is entirely Trump's fault!
 

firegiver

Heisman
Sep 10, 2007
73,460
19,729
113
Don’t have to kill em. Just bomb their bridges and electricity plants. War ain’t pretty. Iran should have thought about that before running their yap.
Denying people food, water, electricity and such, will kill them. It will also cause a mass evacuation which will cause the neighboring countries to either: Slaughter them, or take them in and be in a humanitarian crisis.

Are you going to pay to house the people who's home you've destroyed in this scenario?
 

What Would Jesus Do?

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2010
34,592
3,734
113
Denying people food, water, electricity and such, will kill them. It will also cause a mass evacuation which will cause the neighboring countries to either: Slaughter them, or take them in and be in a humanitarian crisis.

Are you going to pay to house the people who's home you've destroyed in this scenario?
Most of those things are widely considered war crimes or crimes against humanity. Except when we do it, of course. Or Israel.
 

tarheelbybirth1

Heisman
Jul 4, 2025
4,161
12,791
113
I have to assume a lot of things are happing in the background that would allow the U.S. and allies to take control of the straits even if no deal is reached.
What would that even look like? We have no "allies" on this issue. Why should anyone commit to helping us fix something we unilaterally destroyed? Under Iranian threat, this will require a full-time US presence not just on the water but on either side of the entire gulf.