Remember when that gay choir in San Francisco posted that video of them singing about coming for the children? Every so often the mask slips down.
I can't imagine why people don't believe you when the gays are literally on video singing "we're coming for the children"How many times do you have to be reminded that your disinformation sewer lies to you? Why doesn't that piss you off? Do you want to be lied to? Do you enjoy being cucked?
"No, the specific viral claims in that meme/video—that San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus (SFGMC) members shown in the footage or on their roster are convicted pedophiles—are not reliably true. They rely on loose name matches that fact-checks have debunked as different people.
The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.
The sex offender claims
Counter-evidence from local reporting (SFist and others): These were common names with similar-but-not-identical matches. The registry offenders often lived hundreds of miles away, had mismatched photos (visibly different people), and different middle names/aliases/details. No verified proof that the actual chorus members (with public photos in the video/roster) were the same individuals.
- Activists and sites (e.g., Western Journal, Natural News, 4chan threads) cross-referenced the public chorus roster with California's Megan's Law database.
- They flagged names like David Wallace (vs. David Eugene Wallace, convicted 1985), Lawrence Earl Friedberg / Earl Friedberg (convicted ~2001), Luis Cuadra (convicted 2018), Keith Pepper, and others for "lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14."
- Some added photo comparisons or aliases, claiming "face recognition" matches.
Local journalists and the chorus noted this led to harassment: members' workplaces were contacted with false pedophile accusations, and threats poured in. The video was made private for safety.
Why the confusion persists
Bottom line: There is no credible evidence that the specific SFGMC singers in the viral content were convicted child sex offenders. The claims are based on sloppy name-matching that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. That doesn't mean zero risk in any large organization (including churches, scouts, etc.), but the meme exaggerates and misrepresents for effect. The chorus has continued performing publicly since, with updated rosters available on their site. Always check primary sources like official registries + photos rather than edited memes.
- Common names (David Wallace, etc.) make false positives easy in a large group.
- Sex offender registries are public and searchable, so anyone can cherry-pick.
- The provocative song lyrics + existing cultural distrust fueled rapid spread of the meme without verification.
- Some conservative outlets presented the name matches as conclusive without addressing photo/location discrepancies.
Read *****I can't imagine why people don't believe you when the gays are literally on video singing "we're coming for the children"
That’s why I threw in a question mark at the end you stupid, no king marching, phaggot.How many times do you have to be reminded that your disinformation sewer lies to you? Why doesn't that piss you off? Do you want to be lied to? Do you enjoy being cucked?
"No, the specific viral claims in that meme/video—that San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus (SFGMC) members shown in the footage or on their roster are convicted pedophiles—are not reliably true. They rely on loose name matches that fact-checks have debunked as different people.
The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.
The sex offender claims
Counter-evidence from local reporting (SFist and others): These were common names with similar-but-not-identical matches. The registry offenders often lived hundreds of miles away, had mismatched photos (visibly different people), and different middle names/aliases/details. No verified proof that the actual chorus members (with public photos in the video/roster) were the same individuals.
- Activists and sites (e.g., Western Journal, Natural News, 4chan threads) cross-referenced the public chorus roster with California's Megan's Law database.
- They flagged names like David Wallace (vs. David Eugene Wallace, convicted 1985), Lawrence Earl Friedberg / Earl Friedberg (convicted ~2001), Luis Cuadra (convicted 2018), Keith Pepper, and others for "lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14."
- Some added photo comparisons or aliases, claiming "face recognition" matches.
Local journalists and the chorus noted this led to harassment: members' workplaces were contacted with false pedophile accusations, and threats poured in. The video was made private for safety.
Why the confusion persists
Bottom line: There is no credible evidence that the specific SFGMC singers in the viral content were convicted child sex offenders. The claims are based on sloppy name-matching that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. That doesn't mean zero risk in any large organization (including churches, scouts, etc.), but the meme exaggerates and misrepresents for effect. The chorus has continued performing publicly since, with updated rosters available on their site. Always check primary sources like official registries + photos rather than edited memes.
- Common names (David Wallace, etc.) make false positives easy in a large group.
- Sex offender registries are public and searchable, so anyone can cherry-pick.
- The provocative song lyrics + existing cultural distrust fueled rapid spread of the meme without verification.
- Some conservative outlets presented the name matches as conclusive without addressing photo/location discrepancies.
That’s why I threw in a question mark at the end you stupid, no king marching, phaggot.
You just can’t stop getting nuts drug across your forehead can you. Even the new guys are coming in shatting all over you lolLook at how salty your dumb little maggity *** gets when it's proven for the thousandth time that you are a gullible buffoon that gets all of his news from the maga cesspool.
JinxyPat is so dumb and credulous that he's entertaining. He apparently doesn't even understand that a "gender neutral" bathroom is typically like the bathroom in one's home: either males or females can use it, but only one person at a time. Now, that may not be how the bathroom in JinxyPat's home operates. I shudder to think of it ...Look at how salty your dumb little maggity *** gets when it's proven for the thousandth time that you are a gullible buffoon that gets all of his news from the maga cesspool.
Stop it with your facts. They would rather believe “alternative truths”How many times do you have to be reminded that your disinformation sewer lies to you? Why doesn't that piss you off? Do you want to be lied to? Do you enjoy being cucked?
"No, the specific viral claims in that meme/video—that San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus (SFGMC) members shown in the footage or on their roster are convicted pedophiles—are not reliably true. They rely on loose name matches that fact-checks have debunked as different people.
The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.
The sex offender claims
Counter-evidence from local reporting (SFist and others): These were common names with similar-but-not-identical matches. The registry offenders often lived hundreds of miles away, had mismatched photos (visibly different people), and different middle names/aliases/details. No verified proof that the actual chorus members (with public photos in the video/roster) were the same individuals.
- Activists and sites (e.g., Western Journal, Natural News, 4chan threads) cross-referenced the public chorus roster with California's Megan's Law database.
- They flagged names like David Wallace (vs. David Eugene Wallace, convicted 1985), Lawrence Earl Friedberg / Earl Friedberg (convicted ~2001), Luis Cuadra (convicted 2018), Keith Pepper, and others for "lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14."
- Some added photo comparisons or aliases, claiming "face recognition" matches.
Local journalists and the chorus noted this led to harassment: members' workplaces were contacted with false pedophile accusations, and threats poured in. The video was made private for safety.
Why the confusion persists
Bottom line: There is no credible evidence that the specific SFGMC singers in the viral content were convicted child sex offenders. The claims are based on sloppy name-matching that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. That doesn't mean zero risk in any large organization (including churches, scouts, etc.), but the meme exaggerates and misrepresents for effect. The chorus has continued performing publicly since, with updated rosters available on their site. Always check primary sources like official registries + photos rather than edited memes.
- Common names (David Wallace, etc.) make false positives easy in a large group.
- Sex offender registries are public and searchable, so anyone can cherry-pick.
- The provocative song lyrics + existing cultural distrust fueled rapid spread of the meme without verification.
- Some conservative outlets presented the name matches as conclusive without addressing photo/location discrepancies.
I’d hate to share any kind of bathroom with your fata$$ lolJinxyPat is so dumb and credulous that he's entertaining. He apparently doesn't even understand that a "gender neutral" bathroom is typically like the bathroom in one's home: either males or females can use it, but only one person at a time. Now, that may not be how the bathroom in JinxyPat's home operates. I shudder to think of it ...
Bwah, again you prove how elementary and stupid you are. The ONE troll you're talking about is their board's most hated and he hasn't drug sh*t you dumb@ss who doesn't recognize when his lies have been disproven. Every one of them!You just can’t stop getting nuts drug across your forehead can you. Even the new guys are coming in shatting all over you lol
careful @dpic73, actually being free scares them. Don't push too far with all this freedom stuff or they will call you a 'communist'Look at how salty your dumb little maggity *** gets when it's proven for the thousandth time that you are a gullible buffoon that gets all of his news from the maga cesspool.
It's also a requirement that the children have to be accompanied by an adult.JinxyPat is so dumb and credulous that he's entertaining. He apparently doesn't even understand that a "gender neutral" bathroom is typically like the bathroom in one's home: either males or females can use it, but only one person at a time. Now, that may not be how the bathroom in JinxyPat's home operates. I shudder to think of it ...
"It was satire guys! Believe us! TheAI told me!!!"Read *****
The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.
This is SHOCKING. How could all of these straight white men use their 'freedom' to accost children at this event if other adults are present?? MAGA is in shambles over itIt's also a requirement that the children have to be accompanied by an adult.
Bwah, again you prove how elementary and stupid you are. The ONE troll you're talking about is their board's most hated and he hasn't drug sh*t you dumb@ss who doesn't recognize when his lies have been disproven. Every one of them!
Why are you being such a salty little pvssy JHP? You can avoid being cucked altogether if you just don't lie. Why is that so hard for you?
Speaking of cuck fests…. lol jfccareful @dpic73, actually being free scares them. Don't push too far with all this freedom stuff or they will call you a 'communist'
yes, we know you like to be in the cuck chair with 2 dudes. You're always welcome to watch bbSpeaking of cuck fests…. lol jfc
Yes it was but it's no surprise that you can't figure it out. It would be the same thing if the board decided to troll you and JHP with "the trannies are coming! Hide yo children, hide yo wife!""It was satire guys! Believe us! TheAI told me!!!"
What is a bb again? You sound like a colossal phaggot btwyes, we know you like to be in the cuck chair with 2 dudes. You're always welcome to watch bb
I'm so close keep goingWhat is a bb again? You sound like a colossal phaggot btw
A pedo loving colossal phaggot
Throw on some drag porn. You’ll get there, cvnt lolI'm so close keep going
My wife and I took our 15 month old daughter to a drag brunch the other week in Park Circle. It was a ton of fun!Throw on some drag porn. You’ll get there, cvnt lol
Totally normal thing to joke about. Coming after kids.. nothing remotely weird or creepy about that at all.Yes it was but it's no surprise that you can't figure it out. It would be the same thing if the board decided to troll you and JHP with "the trannies are coming! Hide yo children, hide yo wife!"![]()
Look up the word "analogy" sad troll.Totally normal thing to joke about. Coming after kids.. nothing remotely weird or creepy about that at all.
What do trannies have to do with a gay choir singing about predatory behavior with children btw?
My wife and I took our 15 month old daughter to a drag brunch the other week in Park Circle. It was a ton of fun!
DERP
Now I see why you SOFT freaks are in a tizzy today
Now I see why you SOFT freaks are in a tizzy today
Sure, sureDidn't know this but respect![]()
Why do Repubs love pedophilia sO mUcH!?I don’t know who these people are. Are we just throwing political labels on random people? Do they have anything to do with Biden raping his own underage daughter?