Yea, nothing to see here

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,442
23,116
113

How many times do you have to be reminded that your disinformation sewer lies to you? Why doesn't that piss you off? Do you want to be lied to? Do you enjoy being cucked?



"No, the specific viral claims in that meme/video—that San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus (SFGMC) members shown in the footage or on their roster are convicted pedophiles—are not reliably true. They rely on loose name matches that fact-checks have debunked as different people.


The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.


The sex offender claims
  • Activists and sites (e.g., Western Journal, Natural News, 4chan threads) cross-referenced the public chorus roster with California's Megan's Law database.
  • They flagged names like David Wallace (vs. David Eugene Wallace, convicted 1985), Lawrence Earl Friedberg / Earl Friedberg (convicted ~2001), Luis Cuadra (convicted 2018), Keith Pepper, and others for "lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14."
    • Some added photo comparisons or aliases, claiming "face recognition" matches.
Counter-evidence from local reporting (SFist and others): These were common names with similar-but-not-identical matches. The registry offenders often lived hundreds of miles away, had mismatched photos (visibly different people), and different middle names/aliases/details. No verified proof that the actual chorus members (with public photos in the video/roster) were the same individuals.


Local journalists and the chorus noted this led to harassment: members' workplaces were contacted with false pedophile accusations, and threats poured in. The video was made private for safety.

Why the confusion persists
  • Common names (David Wallace, etc.) make false positives easy in a large group.
  • Sex offender registries are public and searchable, so anyone can cherry-pick.
  • The provocative song lyrics + existing cultural distrust fueled rapid spread of the meme without verification.
  • Some conservative outlets presented the name matches as conclusive without addressing photo/location discrepancies.
Bottom line: There is no credible evidence that the specific SFGMC singers in the viral content were convicted child sex offenders. The claims are based on sloppy name-matching that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. That doesn't mean zero risk in any large organization (including churches, scouts, etc.), but the meme exaggerates and misrepresents for effect. The chorus has continued performing publicly since, with updated rosters available on their site. Always check primary sources like official registries + photos rather than edited memes.

 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
8,439
11,001
113
How many times do you have to be reminded that your disinformation sewer lies to you? Why doesn't that piss you off? Do you want to be lied to? Do you enjoy being cucked?



"No, the specific viral claims in that meme/video—that San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus (SFGMC) members shown in the footage or on their roster are convicted pedophiles—are not reliably true. They rely on loose name matches that fact-checks have debunked as different people.


The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.


The sex offender claims
  • Activists and sites (e.g., Western Journal, Natural News, 4chan threads) cross-referenced the public chorus roster with California's Megan's Law database.
  • They flagged names like David Wallace (vs. David Eugene Wallace, convicted 1985), Lawrence Earl Friedberg / Earl Friedberg (convicted ~2001), Luis Cuadra (convicted 2018), Keith Pepper, and others for "lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14."
    • Some added photo comparisons or aliases, claiming "face recognition" matches.
Counter-evidence from local reporting (SFist and others): These were common names with similar-but-not-identical matches. The registry offenders often lived hundreds of miles away, had mismatched photos (visibly different people), and different middle names/aliases/details. No verified proof that the actual chorus members (with public photos in the video/roster) were the same individuals.


Local journalists and the chorus noted this led to harassment: members' workplaces were contacted with false pedophile accusations, and threats poured in. The video was made private for safety.

Why the confusion persists
  • Common names (David Wallace, etc.) make false positives easy in a large group.
  • Sex offender registries are public and searchable, so anyone can cherry-pick.
  • The provocative song lyrics + existing cultural distrust fueled rapid spread of the meme without verification.
  • Some conservative outlets presented the name matches as conclusive without addressing photo/location discrepancies.
Bottom line: There is no credible evidence that the specific SFGMC singers in the viral content were convicted child sex offenders. The claims are based on sloppy name-matching that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. That doesn't mean zero risk in any large organization (including churches, scouts, etc.), but the meme exaggerates and misrepresents for effect. The chorus has continued performing publicly since, with updated rosters available on their site. Always check primary sources like official registries + photos rather than edited memes.

I can't imagine why people don't believe you when the gays are literally on video singing "we're coming for the children"
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,442
23,116
113
I can't imagine why people don't believe you when the gays are literally on video singing "we're coming for the children"
Read *****

The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigres88

JohnHughsPartner

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
4,726
6,987
113
How many times do you have to be reminded that your disinformation sewer lies to you? Why doesn't that piss you off? Do you want to be lied to? Do you enjoy being cucked?



"No, the specific viral claims in that meme/video—that San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus (SFGMC) members shown in the footage or on their roster are convicted pedophiles—are not reliably true. They rely on loose name matches that fact-checks have debunked as different people.


The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.


The sex offender claims
  • Activists and sites (e.g., Western Journal, Natural News, 4chan threads) cross-referenced the public chorus roster with California's Megan's Law database.
  • They flagged names like David Wallace (vs. David Eugene Wallace, convicted 1985), Lawrence Earl Friedberg / Earl Friedberg (convicted ~2001), Luis Cuadra (convicted 2018), Keith Pepper, and others for "lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14."
    • Some added photo comparisons or aliases, claiming "face recognition" matches.
Counter-evidence from local reporting (SFist and others): These were common names with similar-but-not-identical matches. The registry offenders often lived hundreds of miles away, had mismatched photos (visibly different people), and different middle names/aliases/details. No verified proof that the actual chorus members (with public photos in the video/roster) were the same individuals.


Local journalists and the chorus noted this led to harassment: members' workplaces were contacted with false pedophile accusations, and threats poured in. The video was made private for safety.

Why the confusion persists
  • Common names (David Wallace, etc.) make false positives easy in a large group.
  • Sex offender registries are public and searchable, so anyone can cherry-pick.
  • The provocative song lyrics + existing cultural distrust fueled rapid spread of the meme without verification.
  • Some conservative outlets presented the name matches as conclusive without addressing photo/location discrepancies.
Bottom line: There is no credible evidence that the specific SFGMC singers in the viral content were convicted child sex offenders. The claims are based on sloppy name-matching that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. That doesn't mean zero risk in any large organization (including churches, scouts, etc.), but the meme exaggerates and misrepresents for effect. The chorus has continued performing publicly since, with updated rosters available on their site. Always check primary sources like official registries + photos rather than edited memes.

That’s why I threw in a question mark at the end you stupid, no king marching, phaggot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

JohnHughsPartner

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
4,726
6,987
113
😅 Look at how salty your dumb little maggity *** gets when it's proven for the thousandth time that you are a gullible buffoon that gets all of his news from the maga cesspool.
You just can’t stop getting nuts drug across your forehead can you. Even the new guys are coming in shatting all over you lol

Now, would you like to address the original post, sick phuck?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: fatpiggy and dpic73

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,659
8,879
113
😅 Look at how salty your dumb little maggity *** gets when it's proven for the thousandth time that you are a gullible buffoon that gets all of his news from the maga cesspool.
JinxyPat is so dumb and credulous that he's entertaining. He apparently doesn't even understand that a "gender neutral" bathroom is typically like the bathroom in one's home: either males or females can use it, but only one person at a time. Now, that may not be how the bathroom in JinxyPat's home operates. I shudder to think of it ...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ktrain1969

Twoooooo

Senior
Mar 2, 2013
169
430
62
How many times do you have to be reminded that your disinformation sewer lies to you? Why doesn't that piss you off? Do you want to be lied to? Do you enjoy being cucked?



"No, the specific viral claims in that meme/video—that San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus (SFGMC) members shown in the footage or on their roster are convicted pedophiles—are not reliably true. They rely on loose name matches that fact-checks have debunked as different people.


The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.


The sex offender claims
  • Activists and sites (e.g., Western Journal, Natural News, 4chan threads) cross-referenced the public chorus roster with California's Megan's Law database.
  • They flagged names like David Wallace (vs. David Eugene Wallace, convicted 1985), Lawrence Earl Friedberg / Earl Friedberg (convicted ~2001), Luis Cuadra (convicted 2018), Keith Pepper, and others for "lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14."
    • Some added photo comparisons or aliases, claiming "face recognition" matches.
Counter-evidence from local reporting (SFist and others): These were common names with similar-but-not-identical matches. The registry offenders often lived hundreds of miles away, had mismatched photos (visibly different people), and different middle names/aliases/details. No verified proof that the actual chorus members (with public photos in the video/roster) were the same individuals.


Local journalists and the chorus noted this led to harassment: members' workplaces were contacted with false pedophile accusations, and threats poured in. The video was made private for safety.

Why the confusion persists
  • Common names (David Wallace, etc.) make false positives easy in a large group.
  • Sex offender registries are public and searchable, so anyone can cherry-pick.
  • The provocative song lyrics + existing cultural distrust fueled rapid spread of the meme without verification.
  • Some conservative outlets presented the name matches as conclusive without addressing photo/location discrepancies.
Bottom line: There is no credible evidence that the specific SFGMC singers in the viral content were convicted child sex offenders. The claims are based on sloppy name-matching that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. That doesn't mean zero risk in any large organization (including churches, scouts, etc.), but the meme exaggerates and misrepresents for effect. The chorus has continued performing publicly since, with updated rosters available on their site. Always check primary sources like official registries + photos rather than edited memes.

Stop it with your facts. They would rather believe “alternative truths”
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

JohnHughsPartner

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
4,726
6,987
113
JinxyPat is so dumb and credulous that he's entertaining. He apparently doesn't even understand that a "gender neutral" bathroom is typically like the bathroom in one's home: either males or females can use it, but only one person at a time. Now, that may not be how the bathroom in JinxyPat's home operates. I shudder to think of it ...
I’d hate to share any kind of bathroom with your fata$$ lol
Can’t even begin to imagine the stinch you put out with those eating habits
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,442
23,116
113
You just can’t stop getting nuts drug across your forehead can you. Even the new guys are coming in shatting all over you lol
Bwah, again you prove how elementary and stupid you are. The ONE troll you're talking about is their board's most hated and he hasn't drug sh*t you dumb@ss who doesn't recognize when his lies have been disproven. Every one of them!

Why are you being such a salty little pvssy JHP? You can avoid being cucked altogether if you just don't lie. Why is that so hard for you?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: JohnHughsPartner

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,442
23,116
113
JinxyPat is so dumb and credulous that he's entertaining. He apparently doesn't even understand that a "gender neutral" bathroom is typically like the bathroom in one's home: either males or females can use it, but only one person at a time. Now, that may not be how the bathroom in JinxyPat's home operates. I shudder to think of it ...
It's also a requirement that the children have to be accompanied by an adult.
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
8,439
11,001
113
Read *****

The origin
This stems from a 2021 satirical video by the chorus ("A Message From the Gay Community") with lyrics like "We'll convert your children" and "We're coming for your children." It was meant as tongue-in-cheek commentary on cultural shifts and acceptance (e.g., Gen Z being more open, fairness/justice themes). Conservatives interpreted it literally as grooming/pedophilia advocacy, sparking backlash, death threats, and doxxing.
"It was satire guys! Believe us! TheAI told me!!!"
 
  • Haha
Reactions: JohnHughsPartner

JohnHughsPartner

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
4,726
6,987
113
Bwah, again you prove how elementary and stupid you are. The ONE troll you're talking about is their board's most hated and he hasn't drug sh*t you dumb@ss who doesn't recognize when his lies have been disproven. Every one of them!

Why are you being such a salty little pvssy JHP? You can avoid being cucked altogether if you just don't lie. Why is that so hard for you?
careful @dpic73, actually being free scares them. Don't push too far with all this freedom stuff or they will call you a 'communist'
Speaking of cuck fests…. lol jfc
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,442
23,116
113
"It was satire guys! Believe us! TheAI told me!!!"
Yes it was but it's no surprise that you can't figure it out. It would be the same thing if the board decided to troll you and JHP with "the trannies are coming! Hide yo children, hide yo wife!" 😅
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tigres88

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
8,439
11,001
113
Yes it was but it's no surprise that you can't figure it out. It would be the same thing if the board decided to troll you and JHP with "the trannies are coming! Hide yo children, hide yo wife!" 😅
Totally normal thing to joke about. Coming after kids.. nothing remotely weird or creepy about that at all.

What do trannies have to do with a gay choir singing about predatory behavior with children btw?
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,442
23,116
113
Totally normal thing to joke about. Coming after kids.. nothing remotely weird or creepy about that at all.

What do trannies have to do with a gay choir singing about predatory behavior with children btw?
Look up the word "analogy" sad troll.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,442
23,116
113
Now I see why you SOFT freaks are in a tizzy today
🤣🤣


Wouldn't have been aware of it if not for you sharing it but I have no problem with it. Why do you? Can you think of nothing else to do with your sad life except mock gays and trans people?
 

BlIIlken2

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2021
528
1,540
92
comedy central season 3 episode 17 GIF by Workaholics
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindemann