What are you expecting to win with what Rutgers has? At best, we’re trying to replicate last season except the part where we just missed 6 wins. Hopefully we get at least 6. But it’s going to be challenging, because we have a lot of new kids in key positions. The defense is learning a new system. The defensive coaches are coaching on this level for the first time. we might be breaking in a new quarterback. We have one big ten lineman in Kobe Asamoah. The jury is out on everyone else. We have lots of question marks. Very few answers. Our seasonal success will likely depend on how much our redshirts and newcomers can contribute, especially on the lines, which is the biggest concern.
This is where you miss the point.
You consider the ONLY way to improve even a fraction is through more money.
You refuse to even consider the possibility of doing it (even over 1 season) without more money.
What if I said - Rutgers would never get more money without winning first. Just 1 season of 10 wins.
Without that, money never comes in like its needed.
You would say Rutgers has 0% chance of ever having 10 wins?
Because you think Schiano is the best coach Rutgers could ever have, you are limited in your assessment.
For you, there will never be a better coach than Schiano at Rutgers.
A coach who maybe could get Rutgers to a 1 year breakthrough that would then lead to more money.
So because you refuse to even consider the possibility of better coaching, you are left with "it must be money".
The reality is that "better coaching" is infinitely more likely than more money.
You say "no other coach had won in 150 years". Well no money has come in despite your near monthly threads.