Why is it, that some teams never get talked about….

Vek96

All-American
Jul 4, 2025
2,765
5,826
113
…..when it comes to NIL spending? I never hear about how much Duke, Kansas, or Michigan has to spend to get loaded rosters, but the media always talks about how Louisville, Kentucky, and BYU is spending? Duke has to be spending a fortune, but no on in the media brings that up.
 

VC99

Senior
Sep 16, 2025
246
569
93
…..when it comes to NIL spending? I never hear about how much Duke, Kansas, or Michigan has to spend to get loaded rosters, but the media always talks about how Louisville, Kentucky, and BYU is spending? Duke has to be spending a fortune, but no on in the media brings that up.
Because Duke's NIL comes from ESPN, Nike and Amazon. They have no alumni boosters, just corporations. And since it's a private school they don't want you to know.
 

megablue

Heisman
Oct 2, 2012
16,246
16,742
113
…..when it comes to NIL spending? I never hear about how much Duke, Kansas, or Michigan has to spend to get loaded rosters, but the media always talks about how Louisville, Kentucky, and BYU is spending? Duke has to be spending a fortune, but no on in the media brings that up.
This was posted on Reddit ... "Expenses" ... fwiw:
 
Last edited:

megablue

Heisman
Oct 2, 2012
16,246
16,742
113
  • Like
Reactions: philstat

TFCat11

Heisman
Mar 25, 2019
6,268
11,567
108
Honestly, until there’s a cap, if there ever is one, it shouldn’t matter what any school/ boosters spend… It’s Pay for Play now, and may the best and most expensive team win!

If I was a billionaire UK booster, UK would have a blank check annually, to buy whoever, whenever they needed to, and they would outspend Duke, Michigan, UCONN, or whoever else would be required to have the deepest and most expensive team.
 

megablue

Heisman
Oct 2, 2012
16,246
16,742
113
Honestly, until there’s a cap, if there ever is one, it shouldn’t matter what any school/ boosters spend… It’s Pay for Play now, and may the best and most expensive team win!

If I was a billionaire UK booster, UK would have a blank check annually, to buy whoever, whenever they needed to, and they would outspend Duke, Michigan, UCONN, or whoever else would be required to have the deepest and most expensive team.
I understand your point, but how would each year's performance affect what you will give ... would it ALWAYS remain a "blank check" ????
Trust me, deciding on how many millions to give UK would be a nice problem to have ... !!! :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: philstat

KyKevin

All-Conference
Dec 28, 2021
1,984
3,073
113
Because Duke's NIL comes from ESPN, Nike and Amazon. They have no alumni boosters, just corporations. And since it's a private school they don't want you to know.



Damn Devils
They have the backing, and there s.hit together on recruiting.







Sorry for the delay there, I had to go to the bathroom, and throw up 🤢
Those people saying NIL has made a level playing field, aren't watching.

Let the billionaires competition begin, which one of them wants it more. We're going to see NIL pay more then the NBA, real soon.
 

BookofMormon

Senior
Mar 27, 2026
588
758
93
Honestly, until there’s a cap, if there ever is one, it shouldn’t matter what any school/ boosters spend… It’s Pay for Play now, and may the best and most expensive team win!

If I was a billionaire UK booster, UK would have a blank check annually, to buy whoever, whenever they needed to, and they would outspend Duke, Michigan, UCONN, or whoever else would be required to have the deepest and most expensive team.
If there is no cap, then what is the point of the sport honestly? An unlevel playing field is unsustainable. Fans will lose interest at some point.

College sports have been loose around the rules for ages, so I'd assume that even if rules were put in place, most programs wouldn't follow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: megablue

megablue

Heisman
Oct 2, 2012
16,246
16,742
113
If there is no cap, then what is the point of the sport honestly? An unlevel playing field is unsustainable. Fans will lose interest at some point.

College sports have been loose around the rules for ages, so I'd assume that even if rules were put in place, most programs wouldn't follow.
I agree 100% with your last sentence ... no question about it.
 

BookofMormon

Senior
Mar 27, 2026
588
758
93
I agree 100% with your last sentence ... no question about it.
There will need to be an intervention at some point to put guard rails on all this - otherwise there will be a max of 5-6 universities only in the P2 + Duke that can compete. Then the question will become how do they manage it, will programs follow. There is no sport like this at the moment - it's fully 100% professionalized. Case in point 23 YO Euros coming in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: megablue

megablue

Heisman
Oct 2, 2012
16,246
16,742
113
There will need to be an intervention at some point to put guard rails on all this - otherwise there will be a max of 5-6 universities only in the P2 + Duke that can compete. Then the question will become how do they manage it, will programs follow. There is no sport like this at the moment - it's fully 100% professionalized. Case in point 23 YO Euros coming in.
It would seem to me that money would pour into the WINNING programs and slowly leak away from those who do not WIN BIG ... we'll see, I guess.
Another factor that might enter into things is the ASSUMED non-deductibility of NIL contributions. maybe even for corporations. Just a thought ... ???
 
Last edited:

BookofMormon

Senior
Mar 27, 2026
588
758
93
It would seem to me that money would pour into the WINNING programs and slowly leak away from those who do not WIN BIG ... we'll see, I guess.
Another factor that might enter into things is the ASSUMED non-deductibility of NIL contributions. maybe even for corporations. Just a thought ... ???
Of course.

No one is going to pour money into a program that has no chance. There are still programs trying to see whether $$ can win them titles, like Ville, UK, Tenn, Indiana. (basically all in the same region, which is funny) with all their might.

At a point where the money runs so far ahead and dictates winning, why would any donor buy into someone that has no chance?

That said, the sport will be stupid. It's popular now because it's all new, but this would wear thin over time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: megablue

CRZ4UK

Heisman
Jun 6, 2008
5,083
10,170
103
Honestly, until there’s a cap, if there ever is one, it shouldn’t matter what any school/ boosters spend… It’s Pay for Play now, and may the best and most expensive team win!

If I was a billionaire UK booster, UK would have a blank check annually, to buy whoever, whenever they needed to, and they would outspend Duke, Michigan, UCONN, or whoever else would be required to have the deepest and most expensive team.
Then the officials would step in and cheat us. Just like our games against Wisconsin and UCONN. Champions are picked now.