can you do me a favorAnd how many of them got their team to a final 4?
Of course but it would need to be an obvious stud like Wilson or Stokes. I don't see this reclass kid as on their level.can you do me a favor
name me the coaches that were in the final 4
then name me our coach
give me the talent
im just saying its not good practice to "punt" on a hs class and miss on everyone impactful just to miss on everyone in the portal as wellOf course but it would need to be an obvious stud like Wilson or Stokes. I don't see this reclass kid as on their level.
Back up Bidunga this year and start next year.Why do you care about him . He will only play a few mins a game
He’ll be 19 in May, I really don’t think his goal is to reclass just to sit, could definitely be wrong, though.Back up Bidunga this year and start next year.
Rainmaker also said Louisville ran out of NIL money the first week the portal opened.Rainmaker says we're in on some euro guys who have much bigger upside than this guy.
Even if he had Dusty May's team do you think he is a good enough coach to win it all with them?No but Michigan just did it with mostly talented transfers. The biggest problem to me right now with Pope is more that he can't get the top transfers.
It has absolutely shown older is better to win games Not even a question. Sure it’s great to have one maybe two young talents, but to win big you need to get older and have experience. Edit, I read your other posts and do agree with a lot of it. We all want the Cooper flags , but we’re having trouble getting the uncle Clarence Flaggs. Lmao.i think weve seen the past couple years that having older guys doesnt always mean they are a better player lol
I think a lot more ubertalented kids will be doing this . Go to HS for a year or go to a top college program and make a couple million.He’ll be 19 in May, I really don’t think his goal is to reclass just to sit, could definitely be wrong, though.
I agree, but it doesn't hurt to take a talented youngster if you get the chance.It has absolutely shown older is better to win games Not even a question. Sure it’s great to have one maybe two young talents, but to win big you need to get older and have experience.
Speaking of clueless…it’s Moreno.BS . He would not start over Marino . You’re clueless
Also guaranteed a top 3 portal class. Guy doesn't know diddly pooRainmaker also said Louisville ran out of NIL money the first week the portal opened.
Start him wherever he goes in the portal. lol. It’s one and done for any player worth a dime. Even if they love the place. Highest offer wins.Back up Bidunga this year and start next year.
Honestly fair, the ones that know they’ll be drafted based off highschool pedigree will probably just see it as a year to get paid and then leave. Good point.I think a lot more ubertalented kids will be doing this . Go to HS for a year or go to a top college program and make a couple million.
Me too. So apparently Kelsey can beat Calipari for a recruit but the $5M man can't.I thought he was going to Arkansas.
Seriously -- can any of our supposed "real fans" spell the kid's name right? Yesterday there was another thread where some jackass pumper spelled it wrong two different ways in a single post. Such a "real" fan.Speaking of clueless…it’s Moreno.
I don't think that is true anymore. The talent that stayed in College this year is off the wall good. Even guys who were lock draft picks are staying in school now.Start him wherever he goes in the portal. lol. It’s one and done for any player worth a dime. Even if they love the place. Highest offer wins.
Yes. But not at the same school. That’s the point I was making. They’re exceptions of course, but unless they grew up fans of the program or maybe a legacy player, it’s the highest bidder that gets the player.I don't think that is true anymore. The talent that stayed in College this year is off the wall good. Even guys who were lock draft picks are staying in school now.
well the thing with the "older teams win" like the last 3 nattys have been older teams, but u gotta keep in mind who their coaches areIt has absolutely shown older is better to win games Not even a question. Sure it’s great to have one maybe two young talents, but to win big you need to get older and have experience. Edit, I read your other posts and do agree with a lot of it. We all want the Cooper flags , but we’re having trouble getting the uncle Clarence Flaggs. Lmao.![]()
What are you talking about “all you all drool”? the last few years, with NIL and players staying in school, the experience has more value than a freshman new to college. No ones drooling about anything. The older teams are winning more, winning championships. The coach can’t win a game without the players to win.well the thing with the "older teams win" like the last 3 nattys have been older teams, but u gotta keep in mind who their coaches are
thats something people forget, all yall drool over the older guys just bc thats what the winning teams have looked like but forget who the coaches winning them are
What’s wrong with that? You a homophobe or something????You seem really obsessed by penis.
Where did you "hear" this?They might also be in with Juke Harris too from what I hear.
"The coach can’t win a game without the players to win."What are you talking about “all you all drool”? the last few years, with NIL and players staying in school, the experience has more value than a freshman new to college. No ones drooling about anything. The older teams are winning more, winning championships. The coach can’t win a game without the players to win.
They 100% have had the best players that made the best teams. Anyone in the country could take that team last season and won. I respect what they’re doing for sure, but without great players they’re just some guys coaching Eastern Michigan or EKU. I’d like to have those two as coaches, because they get the players, not because of their coaching abilities. That’s not to say they don’t make players better or are great X and O guys. They get paid because of the players though."The coach can’t win a game without the players to win."
Disagree with this, weve seen time and time again that the better team doesnt always win
I think what Hurley May and other coaches have done is remarkable because they dont have the best of the best, but they still win
Even though may had the #1 porfal class but still
They're not.Part of me would prefer him to Arkansas, Cal’s entire projected starting 5 would be freshman, barring Meleek and Billie Richmond returning. Even then not convinced they’re true contenders.
Talking about coaches getting great players is making me feel even worse about Kentucky right now. lolThey 100% have had the best players that made the best teams. Anyone in the country could take that team last season and won. I respect what they’re doing for sure, but without great players they’re just some guys coaching Eastern Michigan or EKU. I’d like to have those two as coaches, because they get the players, not because of their coaching abilities. That’s not to say they don’t make players better or are great X and O guys. They get paid because of the players though.
I disagree about the best players part, I think its more about a coaching and game planning thing then a straight up player thingThey 100% have had the best players that made the best teams. Anyone in the country could take that team last season and won. I respect what they’re doing for sure, but without great players they’re just some guys coaching Eastern Michigan or EKU. I’d like to have those two as coaches, because they get the players, not because of their coaching abilities. That’s not to say they don’t make players better or are great X and O guys. They get paid because of the players though.
I believe that’s the point he’s making! So Arkansas can suck even more. lol.They're not.
That roster isn't beating the real teams, UM, UF, UConn,, etc. They'd get beaten down just like they did against Arizona.
I believe that’s the point he’s making! So Arkansas can suck even more. lol.
I appreciate your opinion about this but respectfully have to disagree. I’ve heard hundreds of coaches say, “ we’re nothing without the players “! Never heard a player say we are nothing without some dude sitting on the bench. lol. I hear what you’re saying though.I disagree about the best players part, I think its more about a coaching and game planning thing then a straight up player thing
When I look at the champions of the 2020's especially I dont think I would consider any of them as the best team
Although this Michigan team was good all year they were the closest to that
AgreeCal's schtick isn't going to start winning titles this day and age - if it didn't work when highschool recruiting was the only way, it's certainly not going to work now when you have the portal and euros. He's a S16 max kind of program - they'll win, but they aren't winning titles.
i mean sure, but at the same time you could say 4 out of the last 5 championships had future hof coachesI appreciate your opinion about this but respectfully have to disagree. I’ve heard hundreds of coaches say, “ we’re nothing without the players “! Never heard a player say we are nothing without some dude sitting on the bench. lol. I hear what you’re saying though.
Being able to get great Players can certainly make that happen. Without them you’re always looking for another job.i mean sure, but at the same time you could say 4 out of the last 5 championships had future hof coaches
so u gotta take that into consideration
Where did you "hear" this?