Stop with the "I want this coach"

Cats_2010

Heisman
Jan 8, 2010
11,700
19,828
103
I could be the only one, but I find it frustrating that there are some threads on here who want certain coaches because of one game or one season. This entire mindset of "they did something good for one, year" that must mean they are UK ready. No.

What does UK ready look like? To me it's a coach who is clear as day ready for the job. It requires a specific temperament (alpha, who wants to win no matter what), recruiting, an interesting basketball philosophy that is centered around offensive or defense. They have shown they can compete consistently in their conference, consistently make the NCAA tournament and win games in the NCAAT and their conference tournament. Preferably, someone with final 4 experience or has one a title. Or someone who can make a sweet 16 to elite 8 a handful of times over a 5-10 year span.

There are many variables that would qualify a UK coach.

Some of these names on here are interesting, but are 100% not ready to take the UK job. Do they have potential? Yes. Basically some of the names being thrown around are just a step above Pope but not proven yet.

Kentucky needs a proven coach. Not a coach based off potential.

Here are some of the names that I have seen been thrown around the last few weeks that don't yet meet the standards of being a UK coach, but has the highest possibility in the future based off recruiting and consistency.

Jai Lucas - Miami
Grant McCasland - Texas Tech
T.J Otzelberger - Iowa State
Ben McCollum - Iowa
Flynn Clayman - High Point
Tommy Lloyd - Arizona
Sean Miller - Texas
Josh Shertz - St. Louis

Out of all of those coaches, Tommy Llyod is by far has the highest potential because of his recruiting ability and play style. He has never been to an elite 8 yet. If he can make a final four this year, he leaves this group.

I am sure I am missing a few, just going based off memory.

I just wish more would sit and think before they want someone who has "what have you done for me lately".

Kentucky needs a proven winner, a proven recruiter and someone with the right temperament.
Why do you care what is discussed on a message board. You do realize no one on this board is going to have even a fraction of a say in who the next coach is or potentially is. Also by your criteria you are eliminating 99.8% (just a guess) of available candidates narrowing it down to a small handful. If you swing and miss with your handful of coaches then what is plan B. Again this is just fan talk. Why should fans on a message Baird stop talking about things involving their favorite team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1774274437

Farsight Clone

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2025
2,416
4,558
103
Why do you care what is discussed on a message board. You do realize no one on this board is going to have even a fraction of a say in who the next coach is or potentially is. Also by your criteria you are eliminating 99.8% (just a guess) of available candidates narrowing it down to a small handful. If you swing and miss with your handful of coaches then what is plan B. Again this is just fan talk. Why should fans on a message Baird stop talking about things involving their favorite team.
I don't think you comprehend the point of the thread.
 

Tri-Countycat

All-Conference
Jul 1, 2025
1,280
2,727
113
None of these post matter. Pope isn’t leaving unless he steps down. He must be a glutton for punishment. When media members like Matt Jones still pump for him, he won’t step down. Listening to KSR, I’m not sure what more they need to see to come to the conclusion that this won’t work.
 

UKCowboys

All-American
Oct 14, 2019
3,324
5,605
113
It's not that I have some kind of direct séance-absolute truthy pipeline; it's that all evidence, except in some instances maybe for a cash grab, shows that the candidates being discussed already have a better job than UK would be for them.

So before proposing a new UK coach, I'm first asking if that proposed choice is someone who:
  1. Already is exactly where they want to be,
  2. Already is at a place with no limitations of how big they can win,
  3. Has a fan base that unconditionally loves and appreciates them,
  4. Gets paid a ton of money (even if they aren't maximizing their paychecks)
  5. Has extraordinary control over their respective programs
  6. Gets along really well with the current university AD and President
  7. Generally takes joy in outperforming the supposed 'bluebloods' like UK, UNC, Kansas, and IU
  8. Wants to take on the mantle of turning their current program into a perennial national power
McCollum, Otz, Oats, Lucas, Lloyd, May, Odom, Golden, Hurley, McCasland, and Hoiberg are each eight for eight under those criteria in their current jobs. Therefore, a 'no'.

And under those criteria, Shertz is about four for eight and is a possibility and I guess Sean Miller could be a possibility too (btw, this year he was an 11 seed that finished behind Pope/UK in the SEC). Btw, I would expect that UNC and Kansas will be sniffing hard around Shertz.
I think of the eleven guys you listed as "no", every one of them would take the UK job if offered with the exception of Golden, Hurley and possibly May. Oats I would put 50-50. I think the rest are a quick yes
 
  • Like
Reactions: theBlues

Broker

All-Conference
Aug 29, 2012
1,634
1,623
113
Jai Lucas is young and unproven. I don’t think he’s quite ready for a job like Kentucky. If Pope is let go next off-season and Jai has Miami cooking next year. Takes them to a sweet 16 or elite eight. He would be my number one choice to replace Mark Pope. If we don’t take Jai when we have a chance. I have a feeling we’re gonna look back in 10 years and be kicking ourselves that we did not hire him. He’s a top-notch recruiter and his teams play hard. Also, he was an assistant under Coach K and Coach Cal. I think he may have learned a thing or two under them.
Miami is one of the easiest schools to recruit to just because of great weather and unlimited things to do year round. Would you as a college age kid prefer Miami, FL over the most northern SEC school? Just a thought!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch

Tri-Countycat

All-Conference
Jul 1, 2025
1,280
2,727
113
Temperment is key and in the end will be Pope's downfall. As mentioned by the OP, an absolute Alpha is imperative and nothing less will do. How many elite, top tier coaches throughout history are primarily intellectual, philosophical and super nice people? Maybe a few but by far the most successful coaches are Alpha's who want to rip their opponents throats out on game day and do whatever it takes to ready a team to do just that.
Careful about saying Alpha! I got ripped by someone for saying it last night and they educated me on the studies of wolf packs and then transitioned to Trump and politics. Using words like alpha and beta send a few off apparently.
 

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
3,740
5,050
82
Sounds like the same type of defense that Tubby used and most hated because they wanted a quicker paste......
Paste is important. It's reasonably similar, paste wise. McCollum's rep and titles are built around his offensive efficiency. His offenses are among the most efficient at all levels annually, including the NBA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tri-Countycat

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,519
68,012
113
It's not that I have some kind of direct séance-absolute truthy pipeline; it's that all evidence, except in some instances maybe for a cash grab, shows that the candidates being discussed already have a better job than UK would be for them.

So before proposing a new UK coach, I'm first asking if that proposed choice is someone who:
  1. Already is exactly where they want to be,
  2. Already is at a place with no limitations of how big they can win,
  3. Has a fan base that unconditionally loves and appreciates them,
  4. Gets paid a ton of money (even if they aren't maximizing their paychecks)
  5. Has extraordinary control over their respective programs
  6. Gets along really well with the current university AD and President
  7. Generally takes joy in outperforming the supposed 'bluebloods' like UK, UNC, Kansas, and IU
  8. Wants to take on the mantle of turning their current program into a perennial national power
McCollum, Otz, Oats, Lucas, Lloyd, May, Odom, Golden, Hurley, McCasland, and Hoiberg are each eight for eight under those criteria in their current jobs. Therefore, a 'no'.

And under those criteria, Shertz is about four for eight and is a possibility and I guess Sean Miller could be a possibility too (btw, this year he was an 11 seed that finished behind Pope/UK in the SEC). Btw, I would expect that UNC and Kansas will be sniffing hard around Shertz.
Like Calipari in 2009?
 

Katscratch

Freshman
Oct 9, 2022
68
78
18
I think of the eleven guys you listed as "no", every one of them would take the UK job if offered with the exception of Golden, Hurley and possibly May. Oats I would put 50-50. I think the rest are a quick yes
So you disagree that guys like Lloyd, McCollum, Hoiberg, Otz, etc. are eight for eight for these criteria in their current jobs?
  1. Already exactly where they want to be,
  2. Already is at a place with no limitations of how big they can win,
  3. Has a fan base that unconditionally loves and appreciates them,
  4. Gets paid a ton of money (even if they aren't maximizing their paychecks)
  5. Has extraordinary control over their respective programs
  6. Gets along really well with the current university AD and President
  7. Generally takes joy in outperforming the supposed 'bluebloods' like UK, UNC, Kansas, and IU
  8. Wants to take on the mantle of turning their current program into a perennial national power
If you don't think that each and every one of those criteria applies, tell me where I'm wrong.
 

TFCat11

Heisman
Mar 25, 2019
5,745
10,074
108
I agree! We should stop talking about coaches, because after UNC and Kansas take the top 2 available, UK will settle for the next Pope or Clyde!

The administration and a decent portion (and growing) of the fan base are so woke AF now, they have forgotten what the sport means to the state and BBN!

UK will fall below IU, and some day soon, our former rivals will start a thread on their fan sites entitled, “Bump this thread when UK sucks!”

Mark my words… This very scenario is knocking at UK’s door as I post this!
 

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
3,740
5,050
82
Bennett Stirtz has eased the transition to high D1.
He had a 9 seed regular season
He's also at a football first school that is content to let him play any style he wants.
I doubt he has any interest in coaching the kids that UK is used to having.
He recruited Stirtz from Liberty MO HS to Northwest. Stirtz had DI offers. Now Stirtz is going to get drafted in the first round. Point? He can recruit and he can develop...But he ain't going anywhere.
 

UKCowboys

All-American
Oct 14, 2019
3,324
5,605
113
So you disagree that guys like Lloyd, McCollum, Hoiberg, Otz, etc. are eight for eight for these criteria in their current jobs?
  1. Already exactly where they want to be,
  2. Already is at a place with no limitations of how big they can win,
  3. Has a fan base that unconditionally loves and appreciates them,
  4. Gets paid a ton of money (even if they aren't maximizing their paychecks)
  5. Has extraordinary control over their respective programs
  6. Gets along really well with the current university AD and President
  7. Generally takes joy in outperforming the supposed 'bluebloods' like UK, UNC, Kansas, and IU
  8. Wants to take on the mantle of turning their current program into a perennial national power
If you don't think that each and every one of those criteria applies, tell me where I'm wrong.
They do...but IMO, when you are, say Otzelberger for example... His rise has been South Dakota State to UNLV to Iowa State. The man is a basketball coach..Did he get into this with the life's ambition of coaching Iowa State? Is that his dream destination? Do you really think he would turn down substantially more money to coach a Blue Blood program like Kentucky, with all the resources and advantages we have, would be a gig he would jump at....ESPECIALLY following Pope instead of Cal. Its one thing to be compared to Cal or Pitino....he will be initially judged vs Pope lol. And he is so much better at his job than Pope its laughable
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch

FatCatMan

All-Conference
Feb 19, 2026
1,355
3,222
113
Nate Oats is going to win a national championship. It’s just a matter of whose bench he’s sitting on when he does it. Might as well be ours.
I’m not so convinced by Oats winning a title, imo. His teams still struggle with defense, but at least according to Kenpom, there’s an occasional team that has decent defense. I could see him make multiple Final Fours but never winning it all. Always a bride’s maid but never a bride.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theBlues

KyWideWes

Junior
Dec 11, 2025
105
202
43
They do...but IMO, when you are, say Otzelberger for example... His rise has been South Dakota State to UNLV to Iowa State. The man is a basketball coach..Did he get into this with the life's ambition of coaching Iowa State? Is that his dream destination? Do you really think he would turn down substantially more money to coach a Blue Blood program like Kentucky, with all the resources and advantages we have, would be a gig he would jump at....ESPECIALLY following Pope instead of Cal. Its one thing to be compared to Cal or Pitino....he will be initially judged vs Pope lol. And he is so much better at his job than Pope its laughable
His wife played at ISU so that would be a possible roadblock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKCowboys

TotheMoon88

Senior
Apr 12, 2024
539
735
93
Great coach. However, I don’t think he’s the “type” of guy for the job. Like, does he like recruiting high level players?! I think he likes it where he’s at. Idk if he would even take the job. I guess Lloyd is the best fit, even though he hasn’t made it past the Sweet 16 yet. Sean Miller would be good, but he has a lot of baggage.
Not sure Lloyd would want to leave the west, next to him I think I’d go for tj oltzelberger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

Katscratch

Freshman
Oct 9, 2022
68
78
18
They do...but IMO, when you are, say Otzelberger for example. His rise has been South Dakota State to UNLV to Iowa State. The man is a basketball coach..Did he get into this with the life's ambition of coaching Iowa State? Is that his dream destination? Do you really think he would turn down substantially more money to coach a Blue Blood program like Kentucky, with all the resources and advantages we have, would be a gig he would jump at....ESPECIALLY following Pope instead of Cal. Its one thing to be compared to Cal or Pitino....he will be initially judged vs Pope lol. And he is so much better at his job than Pope its laughable
Let's use your Otzelberger example and answer your questions:
  • Did he get into this with the life's ambition of coaching Iowa State? YES; it's his and his wife/family's dream school
  • Is that his dream destination? YES
  • Do you really think he would turn down substantially more money to coach a Blue Blood program like Kentucky, with all the resources and advantages we have? YES- though he might use a UK offer to leverage a pay raise. BTW; he makes about the same as Pope currently, and has a $29 million buyout.
    • Also, why should he consider UK (or IU, KU, etc) more of a "blue blood" program? He is currently in:
      • Just as good a conference
      • Just as basketball-centric/passionate a fan base
      • Just as good a chance to win a natty
  • He is so much better at his job than Pope its laughable. YES
So, other than maybe for a cash grab why would he prefer UK to Iowa State?
 
Last edited:

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,630
33,916
113
I agree! We should stop talking about coaches, because after UNC and Kansas take the top 2 available, UK will settle for the next Pope or Clyde!

The administration and a decent portion (and growing) of the fan base are so woke AF now, they have forgotten what the sport means to the state and BBN!

UK will fall below IU, and some day soon, our former rivals will start a thread on their fan sites entitled, “Bump this thread when UK sucks!”

Mark my words… This very scenario is knocking at UK’s door as I post this!
so a lot of republicans are woke now too... must be a virus
 

SkyPrince

Senior
Jul 7, 2025
533
901
93
He recruited Stirtz from Liberty MO HS to Northwest. Stirtz had DI offers. Now Stirtz is going to get drafted in the first round. Point? He can recruit and he can develop...But he ain't going anywhere.
I doubt he has P4 offers.
Guys like Stirtz don't come along often.
I'll be shocked if he improves on the 9 seed next season
 

USARMYWILDCAT

All-Conference
Jan 11, 2016
546
1,153
93
Miami is one of the easiest schools to recruit to just because of great weather and unlimited things to do year round. Would you as a college age kid prefer Miami, FL over the most northern SEC school? Just a thought!
If weather was the biggest factor in getting recruits. Miami, USC and UCLA would be getting every top recruit in the country. As far as having things to do. These kids live on college campuses. There’s always something to do on a college campus. I believe kids go to schools that have coaches that can make them better and pay them the most money. I’m not saying we’re going to hire Jai. I do think we will regret it when the time comes not hiring him. Most of your great coaches were assistance under great coaches. Coach K is one of the greatest in game coaches of all time. He seemed to always have the perfect game plan and made the right adjustments always. Coach Cal is the greatest recruiter in college basketball history. Jai was an assistant under both of them. He may not end up being a great coach. He certainly has the pedigree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch

Katscratch

Freshman
Oct 9, 2022
68
78
18
If weather was the biggest factor in getting recruits. Miami, USC and UCLA would be getting every top recruit in the country. As far as having things to do. These kids live on college campuses. There’s always something to do on a college campus. I believe kids go to schools that have coaches that can make them better and pay them the most money. I’m not saying we’re going to hire Jai. I do think we will regret it when the time comes not hiring him. Most of your great coaches were assistance under great coaches. Coach K is one of the greatest in game coaches of all time. He seemed to always have the perfect game plan and made the right adjustments always. Coach Cal is the greatest recruiter in college basketball history. Jai was an assistant under both of them. He may not end up being a great coach. He certainly has the pedigree.
Great post - "I believe kids go to schools that have coaches that can make them better and pay them the most money."

And I believe coaches go to places that their families love, where they can win and win big with program control and without restrictions, and where they get paid a ton. Based on that Jai Lucas is not interested in UK over Miami.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USARMYWILDCAT

tjhunter

Freshman
Feb 22, 2026
37
50
18
I could be the only one, but I find it frustrating that there are some threads on here who want certain coaches because of one game or one season. This entire mindset of "they did something good for one, year" that must mean they are UK ready. No.

What does UK ready look like? To me it's a coach who is clear as day ready for the job. It requires a specific temperament (alpha, who wants to win no matter what), recruiting, an interesting basketball philosophy that is centered around offensive or defense. They have shown they can compete consistently in their conference, consistently make the NCAA tournament and win games in the NCAAT and their conference tournament. Preferably, someone with final 4 experience or has one a title. Or someone who can make a sweet 16 to elite 8 a handful of times over a 5-10 year span.

There are many variables that would qualify a UK coach.

Some of these names on here are interesting, but are 100% not ready to take the UK job. Do they have potential? Yes. Basically some of the names being thrown around are just a step above Pope but not proven yet.

Kentucky needs a proven coach. Not a coach based off potential.

Here are some of the names that I have seen been thrown around the last few weeks that don't yet meet the standards of being a UK coach, but has the highest possibility in the future based off recruiting and consistency.

Jai Lucas - Miami
Grant McCasland - Texas Tech
T.J Otzelberger - Iowa State
Ben McCollum - Iowa
Flynn Clayman - High Point
Tommy Lloyd - Arizona
Sean Miller - Texas
Josh Shertz - St. Louis

Out of all of those coaches, Tommy Llyod is by far has the highest potential because of his recruiting ability and play style. He has never been to an elite 8 yet. If he can make a final four this year, he leaves this group.

I am sure I am missing a few, just going based off memory.

I just wish more would sit and think before they want someone who has "what have you done for me lately".

Kentucky needs a proven winner, a proven recruiter and someone with the right temperament.
I agree with you! You can look back on my previous posts, I'm not certain pope is the right guy! But these fans that allow there emotions to take over is ridiculous! They are asking for pope 2.0!
Since MITCH dropped the ball last go around,this was and is not the year to get a new coach!
1st. In my opinion it'll be hard to get a top coach to leave a good/great situation that they would leave
to come to ky! Also not sure that we can swing a crazy offer financially with stoops and pope buyout on the books!
2. You don't have a clear list of secondary candidates. Next year should provide some separation.
3. While pope may not be the right candidate, I do think he should have 1 opportunity to correct a miss on his roster. Last year he had a competitive roster before the Butler/Robinson injuries! I really believe we would've made elite 8 to final four with a healthy roster. He had no players to start with when he was hired!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farsight Clone

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
3,740
5,050
82
I doubt he has P4 offers.
Guys like Stirtz don't come along often.
I'll be shocked if he improves on the 9 seed next season
I can't remember specifically, but I don't think any were P4. I know he had an MVC or two, at least one OVC, and I think an AAC or two. It's hard to both remember and then sort out what conference some of those schools were in then vs. now too.

Prepare to be shocked. I can't imagine Ben McCollum losing 10 games many more years. But I guess if it's only next year, you could be correct. As long as he's at Iowa, he'll be a 1-4 seed more often than he will be a 8-10. The dude is just a winner.
 

Smeegs

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2025
505
1,377
93
Would you take Pitino for 4-5 yrs?
He’d be nearly 80 years old by the end of that “4-5 year” stint.

So, no, I would not. It’s bad enough that we choose fading geriatrics to be our political leaders, let’s not also hire them as our coaches.
 

UKCowboys

All-American
Oct 14, 2019
3,324
5,605
113
Let's use your Otzelberger example and answer your questions:
  • Did he get into this with the life's ambition of coaching Iowa State? YES; it's his and his wife/family's dream school
  • Is that his dream destination? YES
  • Do you really think he would turn down substantially more money to coach a Blue Blood program like Kentucky, with all the resources and advantages we have? YES- though he might use a UK offer to leverage a pay raise. BTW; he makes about the same as Pope currently, and has a $29 million buyout.
    • Also, why should he consider UK (or IU, KU, etc) more of a "blue blood" program? He is currently in:
      • Just as good a conference
      • Just as basketball-centric/passionate a fan base
      • Just as good a chance to win a natty
  • He is so much better at his job than Pope its laughable. YES
So, other than maybe for a cash grab why would he prefer UK to Iowa State?
You have a lower opinion of what being the Head Basketball Coach at the University of Kentucky is than I do if you think Iowa State is equal to this gig
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1774274437

Katscratch

Freshman
Oct 9, 2022
68
78
18
You have a lower opinion of what being the Head Basketball Coach at the University of Kentucky is than I do if you think Iowa State is equal to this gig
I think that if someone had all of those things at Kentucky they would never consider a different job. And the theory applies to other schools too.

So tell me; what specific points did I make that you disagree with?
 

SkyPrince

Senior
Jul 7, 2025
533
901
93
I can't remember specifically, but I don't think any were P4. I know he had an MVC or two, at least one OVC, and I think an AAC or two. It's hard to both remember and then sort out what conference some of those schools were in then vs. now too.

Prepare to be shocked. I can't imagine Ben McCollum losing 10 games many more years. But I guess if it's only next year, you could be correct. As long as he's at Iowa, he'll be a 1-4 seed more often than he will be a 8-10. The dude is just a winner.
He's definitely the perfect Iowa coach.
He's kinda in the same boat as UK coaches in that he can't rely on in state talent to build a program.
What is available, he'll have to battle Otz for.
 

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
3,740
5,050
82
He's definitely the perfect Iowa coach.
He's kinda in the same boat as UK coaches in that he can't rely on in state talent to build a program.
What is available, he'll have to battle Otz for.
Yeah...I think that dynamic is extremely interesting. I think they are both where they want to be. That's a budding in state rivalry that could be extremely fun to watch over the next number of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SkyPrince

UKCowboys

All-American
Oct 14, 2019
3,324
5,605
113
I think that if someone had all of those things at Kentucky they would never consider a different job. And the theory applies to other schools too.

So tell me; what specific points did I make that you disagree with?
I disagree with the fact that his wife played at ISU means he would stay there over Kentucky. He played at Wisconsin-Whitewater, would that be his dream job if he were single?
It would be like someone saying my wife is a Lawyer in Texas and I am now a Senator in Texas...but I am going to turn down being the President of the United States. I don't think so
 
Jul 6, 2025
182
338
63
I could be the only one, but I find it frustrating that there are some threads on here who want certain coaches because of one game or one season. This entire mindset of "they did something good for one, year" that must mean they are UK ready. No.

What does UK ready look like? To me it's a coach who is clear as day ready for the job. It requires a specific temperament (alpha, who wants to win no matter what), recruiting, an interesting basketball philosophy that is centered around offensive or defense. They have shown they can compete consistently in their conference, consistently make the NCAA tournament and win games in the NCAAT and their conference tournament. Preferably, someone with final 4 experience or has one a title. Or someone who can make a sweet 16 to elite 8 a handful of times over a 5-10 year span.

There are many variables that would qualify a UK coach.

Some of these names on here are interesting, but are 100% not ready to take the UK job. Do they have potential? Yes. Basically some of the names being thrown around are just a step above Pope but not proven yet.

Kentucky needs a proven coach. Not a coach based off potential.

Here are some of the names that I have seen been thrown around the last few weeks that don't yet meet the standards of being a UK coach, but has the highest possibility in the future based off recruiting and consistency.

Jai Lucas - Miami
Grant McCasland - Texas Tech
T.J Otzelberger - Iowa State
Ben McCollum - Iowa
Flynn Clayman - High Point
Tommy Lloyd - Arizona
Sean Miller - Texas
Josh Shertz - St. Louis

Out of all of those coaches, Tommy Llyod is by far has the highest potential because of his recruiting ability and play style. He has never been to an elite 8 yet. If he can make a final four this year, he leaves this group.

I am sure I am missing a few, just going based off memory.

I just wish more would sit and think before they want someone who has "what have you done for me lately".

Kentucky needs a proven winner, a proven recruiter and someone with the right temperament.
Stop with the threads complaining about others wanting certain coaches on here. They just want to win and WTH is wrong with that?
 

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
3,740
5,050
82
I disagree with the fact that his wife played at ISU means he would stay there over Kentucky. He played at Wisconsin-Whitewater, would that be his dream job if he were single?
It would be like someone saying my wife is a Lawyer in Texas and I am now a Senator in Texas...but I am going to turn down being the President of the United States. I don't think so
I think you might be stretching it there. He's spent over half of his professional career in Ames IA. His wife played there, is from there, and they met when "she was done playing" at ISU and prepping for the WNBA draft. She's about as Ames IA as they come. I think, as UK fans, we certainly understand the pull of the Mrs.

Senator of TX to Prez is akin to Iowa St HC to UK HC? I think you might be overvaluing the UK job as it currently is. Take away the mystique and there are quite a few professional/logistical roadblocks in place. IDK if he's leave Ames or not, but I think it's silly to discount the ties they have to Ames/ISU just because UK comes calling. I'm not sure a vast majority of BBN realizes the mess that we are currently.
 

Ash Williams

Heisman
Aug 3, 2022
8,050
26,070
113
Miami is one of the easiest schools to recruit to just because of great weather and unlimited things to do year round. Would you as a college age kid prefer Miami, FL over the most northern SEC school? Just a thought!
Explain Michigan's success.
Illinois
Connecticut
Iowa State

Kansas and Arkansas are flat mudpiles.
 

Woodrow24

Heisman
Dec 21, 2015
6,310
15,309
78
So you disagree that guys like Lloyd, McCollum, Hoiberg, Otz, etc. are eight for eight for these criteria in their current jobs?
  1. Already exactly where they want to be,
  2. Already is at a place with no limitations of how big they can win,
  3. Has a fan base that unconditionally loves and appreciates them,
  4. Gets paid a ton of money (even if they aren't maximizing their paychecks)
  5. Has extraordinary control over their respective programs
  6. Gets along really well with the current university AD and President
  7. Generally takes joy in outperforming the supposed 'bluebloods' like UK, UNC, Kansas, and IU
  8. Wants to take on the mantle of turning their current program into a perennial national power
If you don't think that each and every one of those criteria applies, tell me where I'm wrong.
You have no idea just like the rest of us who would want this job or not want it. You would have to know those guys personally to know all of their “criteria’s” for a job. I think that you claiming all of those coaches would turn this job down is really irrational honestly. Several coaches dream of getting a job like UK. Lmao saying any different is crazy
 

theBlues

All-Conference
Oct 18, 2025
1,357
3,035
113
Careful about saying Alpha! I got ripped by someone for saying it last night and they educated me on the studies of wolf packs and then transitioned to Trump and politics. Using words like alpha and beta send a few off apparently.
If you ever want to send those guys off the deep end just reply to one of their posts and use the word "wrong". They flip out every time.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tri-Countycat