It's not that I have some kind of direct séance-absolute truthy pipeline; it's that all evidence, except in some instances maybe for a cash grab, shows that
the candidates being discussed already have a better job than UK would be for them.
So before proposing a new UK coach, I'm first asking if that proposed choice is someone who:
- Already is exactly where they want to be,
- Already is at a place with no limitations of how big they can win,
- Has a fan base that unconditionally loves and appreciates them,
- Gets paid a ton of money (even if they aren't maximizing their paychecks)
- Has extraordinary control over their respective programs
- Gets along really well with the current university AD and President
- Generally takes joy in outperforming the supposed 'bluebloods' like UK, UNC, Kansas, and IU
- Wants to take on the mantle of turning their current program into a perennial national power
McCollum, Otz, Oats, Lucas, Lloyd, May, Odom, Golden, Hurley, McCasland, and Hoiberg are each eight for eight under those criteria in their current jobs. Therefore, a 'no'.
And under those criteria, Shertz is about four for eight and is a possibility and I guess Sean Miller could be a possibility too (btw, this year he was an 11 seed that finished behind Pope/UK in the SEC). Btw, I would expect that UNC and Kansas will be sniffing hard around Shertz.