Military Strikes on Iran Imminent

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,164
4,567
113
I have less respect for Trump voters who claim to not really like him than I do for the ones who own it.

For someone who "doesn't like" Trump, it's astonishing how often you take the Maga side of things. It's in the neighborhood of literally every single time you post anything.
It's amazing to me how you have a hard time coming to grips with the fact That I could "like" somebody or even "dislike" somebody and still agree or disagree with some policy decisions/actions of either person. it's kind of like John fetterman. He just came out and said he's in favor of picture ID but won't vote for the SAVE act. He can see the benefit of one part but not another. Most normal human beings can compartmentalize differences.

You on the other hand, dislike trump, maybe even hate him, and that clouds your opinion of everything he does. In my opinion that's nuts.

By the way, I neither like nor dislike trump. I have never met the man, never had a conversation with him, and likely never will. I take the same position as he does when I agree with him and disagree when I'm opposed to his policy or action. I have said numerous times on here, I don't believe that any human being is right all the time, and am pretty certain that no one is wrong all the time either.

So that means there's hope for you. Based on my philosophy, you're bound to be right about something sooner or later.
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,683
19,969
113
It's definitely dumb for Trump to say the war was started by Obama. That's typical Trump.

It would be much more accurate to say that prior presidents didn't do anything to stop Iran's aggression and military build up which included nuclear. "Don't" certainly didn't work. Of course there's also no guarantee that Trump's efforts will do much more than slow them down.
Makes me sad that just straight up lying is considered “typical” for the most powerful man on the planet.
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,164
4,567
113
Makes me sad that just straight up lying is considered “typical” for the most powerful man on the planet.

Makes me sad that just straight up lying is considered “typical” for the most powerful man on the planet.
it is sad, but Trump isn't the first president to outright lie. In my lifetime they all have.

We might be talking degrees, I'll agree there.
 

Chumpsky

All-American
Oct 19, 2025
3,680
5,594
113
Trump and his fcking idiot regime have fcked this situation up so royally it's almost hard to fathom.
 

JohnHughsPartner

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
4,820
7,073
113
If me posting less often than you means I don't have a job ... what does that say about you, sport? Once again you end up trolling yourself. So, using your own logic, we've established, not just that you're an insecure little troll, but an unemployed one. At least we accomplished something here.

As to your attempt at an argument (finally!) ... first, you ended up agreeing with me. I simply stated no one wanted the war ... you provided support for my statement. Well done. So you agreed with me.

Second, that portion of my post was just "flavor" ... it wasn't central to the argument. You avoided the actual substance ... and ended up agreeing with my statement, regardless, despite trying to insult me repeatedly. The substance of my post was a retort to your post ... where Clay Travis tried to attack the left ... for, in his opinion, not crying enough about Trump's failures, which are getting people tortured/killed. You'd think a reasonable human would want to criticize the guy getting innocents killed/tortured, not yell at the political opposition for not crying about this fact enough.

As to your additional commentary about what was necessary ... according to whom? Trump criticized Obama ... said war was completely unnecessary ... said Obama was going to get us into a needless war because he sucked at negotiating, and because he wanted to divert attention away from other things. Then he ran for POTUS with one of his pillars being he was going to be the peace POTUS ... no new wars, no regime change, no nation building. So, what happened, sport? Trump abandoned all his previous stances, admitted he sucks at negotiating, and admitted he lied about one of the main things that got him elected ... and we're supposed to trust him that killing people and harming many countries, including our own, was "necessary"? The last time he bombed Iran, he said the job was done ... nuke program completely obliterated ... a short time later ... not nearly enough time to rebuild an obliterated nuke program ... we're back at it ... this time in a full blown war because, apparently, things are even worse than when a "little bit of bombing" would do the trick.
Nobody is gonna read all this. lol Are you okay with that, SimplyComplicated?
Another book incoming … in 3,2,1…..⬇️
 

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
2,247
3,159
113
Still seems so to me. Still pro tariff and pissing off allies. That he seems to be good going along with Israel doesn’t mean he isn’t isolationist necessarily.
understand. the definition of isolationinst depends on what you do and which foreign country you align with when you engage internationally.
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
5,664
4,089
113
Is it good that Trump isn't an isolationist? That was of epic concern not too long ago.

He's managing to be the worst of both worlds. Isolationism can be a good thing in some respects, when you use that time and energy working on self improvement. You can also become an isolationist by focusing negative energy toward those around you, thereby effectively working to isolate yourself from others in a negative manner, and actually harming yourself in the process.

Trump appears to be an isolationist of the latter persuasion.

It's actually the result of his lust for power and adoration (the mob boss mentality) ... you either worship him, or he tosses you aside. So if you can enrich him, personally, he's your fake buddy ... if he can't get you to do what he wants you to do, for his benefit, then you're dead to him. He does nothing for the world, for his country, for his fellow citizens, etc. ... that doesn't benefit him personally.
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,683
19,969
113
understand. the definition of isolationinst depends on what you do and which foreign country you align with when you engage internationally.
For sure. Not 100% isolationist. But my read is that we are being led that direction step by step (not that it is a like thought through strategy with steps, but rather that he/we keep isolating all our allies but one little by little with each further decision/taunt/untrustworthiness)
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

PalmettoTiger1

Heisman
Jan 24, 2009
12,665
12,462
113
Nobody I know would have been in an uproar if the UK or another country bombed Iran. I think you're wrong about that.

I think the UN is totally worthless. We don't need that.

I agree 100% that it would be in our best interest to have a strong alliance with NATO countries but I also think we've won favor with these countries by shouldering a disproportionate share of the burden. The "allies" want us to continue doing that and I support Trump calling them out. I just wish he did in in private instead of making public insults.

Let me use the mantra that as long as the USA has something Europe wants then they will be our friends

Let the Europeans worry about getting oil through the straits or B OPTION THE USA CHARGES A TRANSIT FEE TO PASS THROUGH STRAITS LIKE A. DAM TARIFF

NO ONE SHOULD TRANSIT THE STRAITS FREE IF AMERICAN BLOOD FREED IT
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,683
19,969
113
Let me use the mantra that as long as the USA has something Europe wants then they will be our friends

Let the Europeans worry about getting oil through the straits or B OPTION THE USA CHARGES A TRANSIT FEE TO PASS THROUGH STRAITS LIKE A. DAM TARIFF

NO ONE SHOULD TRANSIT THE STRAITS FREE IF AMERICAN BLOOD FREED IT
A protection racket basically. Cause the issue, then charge them to solve it.
 

Chumpsky

All-American
Oct 19, 2025
3,680
5,594
113
Let me use the mantra that as long as the USA has something Europe wants then they will be our friends

Let the Europeans worry about getting oil through the straits or B OPTION THE USA CHARGES A TRANSIT FEE TO PASS THROUGH STRAITS LIKE A. DAM TARIFF

NO ONE SHOULD TRANSIT THE STRAITS FREE IF AMERICAN BLOOD FREED IT
The Europeans are going to turn back to Russia for oil and natural gas if this goes on much longer. But you have a very vivid imagination.
 

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
2,247
3,159
113
My grandpa loved his time there as well. So much so that he and my grandmother are buried overlooking it at Arlington.
"Love" is a complicated concept. With the Miltary With respect to the Pentagon, especially so. For Army personnel, we can go all the way back to 1933 and Douglas MacArthur during his time as Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA), when he created what is now called the, Army Staff Identification Badge(ASIB) a really cool metal badge worn prominently on your dress uniform to signify qualifying service on the Army staff (at the pentagon). Basically you did your time honorably as a galley slave in service to your nation. literally.. nameless, thankless, staff work.

Not sure when the tradition started, but when i was on the Army staff, there were periodic "welcome" events where seriously high ranking individuals woudl attend and speak, to basically front-load thanks and recognition to all the incoming/new staff officers. Wow. They would get almost informal at times with senior leaders on up to the SecDef giving a coulple minutes of unfiltered commentary. Wild. But the intent was obvious.. try and connect the galley slaves with the overall mission. It was effective. Obviously.. i'm still talking about it over a decade two decades later.

edit: time flies
 
Last edited:

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
2,247
3,159
113
For sure. Not 100% isolationist. But my read is that we are being led that direction step by step (not that it is a like thought through strategy with steps, but rather that he/we keep isolating all our allies but one little by little with each further decision/taunt/untrustworthiness)
ok so in reaction other countries will, little by little, not contrbute to their own national defense and contribute to NATO (for example) at the level they've committed to?
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,683
19,969
113
ok so in reaction other countries will, little by little, not contrbute to their own national defense and contribute to NATO (for example) at the level they've committed to?
Sure they will, needing us less, reducing our influence, giving us less leverage in any future negotiations, and having them get friendlier with our rival. Two sides to the coin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,718
23,377
113
Still seems so to me. Still pro tariff and pissing off allies. That he seems to be good going along with Israel doesn’t mean he isn’t isolationist necessarily.
Still pro tariff? Does not come off as a credible argument.

Every president, except one, in the last 50 years used tariffs. Jimmy Carter was the only one to not use them, and that should say enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,718
23,377
113
For sure. Not 100% isolationist. But my read is that we are being led that direction step by step (not that it is a like thought through strategy with steps, but rather that he/we keep isolating all our allies but one little by little with each further decision/taunt/untrustworthiness)
Are they our ally’s if they won’t help us in our time of need?

Exit NATO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,718
23,377
113
Let me use the mantra that as long as the USA has something Europe wants then they will be our friends

Let the Europeans worry about getting oil through the straits or B OPTION THE USA CHARGES A TRANSIT FEE TO PASS THROUGH STRAITS LIKE A. DAM TARIFF

NO ONE SHOULD TRANSIT THE STRAITS FREE IF AMERICAN BLOOD FREED IT
I actually think Trump may implement this. Great idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,718
23,377
113
Sure they will, needing us less, reducing our influence, giving us less leverage in any future negotiations, and having them get friendlier with our rival. Two sides to the coin.
Needing us less? lol.

All EU combined spend a small fraction of what the US does. Their needs aren’t going anywhere anytime soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

Hotshoe

All-American
Feb 15, 2012
25,345
5,596
113
Sure they will, needing us less, reducing our influence, giving us less leverage in any future negotiations, and having them get friendlier with our rival. Two sides to the coin.
Yes, because globalization has done so well for the EU and GB. GB manufacturing is now down to 10% of their GDP. They have one, just one virgin raw material steel plant left. Absolutely, they should depend far more on Russia and China. Exactly like what Trump told them years ago, when Germany laughed at Trump. That worked out well also. They should continue on with their green energy nonsense some more. Maybe ever more Europeans can freeze over the winter. All hail Greata the wonder kid. Lmao. Even when the truth smacks y'all in the face, you deny it for a frking political party. 1/2 of y'all here are literally running propaganda and AI nonsense for Iran, just to get Trump.
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,683
19,969
113
Yes, because globalization has done so well for the EU and GB. GB manufacturing is now down to 10% of their GDP. They have one, just one virgin raw material steel plant left. Absolutely, they should depend far more on Russia and China. Exactly like what Trump told them years ago, when Germany laughed at Trump. That worked out well also. They should continue on with their green energy nonsense some more. Maybe ever more Europeans can freeze over the winter. All hail Greata the wonder kid. Lmao. Even when the truth smacks y'all in the face, you deny it for a frking political party. 1/2 of y'all here are literally running propaganda and AI nonsense for Iran, just to get Trump.
Aight cool
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,480
23,220
113



Grok, is this true?



Yes, substantially true on the facts. Pete Hegseth gutted the Pentagon's Civilian Harm Mitigation offices/staff (from ~200 to under 40) in early 2025, prioritizing "lethality" and criticizing prior targeting safeguards as woke/weak ideological constraints. This preceded the Feb 28 US Tomahawk strike (per Pentagon preliminary probe) on/near a girls' school in Minab, Iran—killing 165-180, mostly children—due to outdated intel with no civilian review team. Ritter's "burned alive" description dramatizes the blast/thermal effects on RT; the core link to Hegseth's cuts holds across NYT, ProPublica, Politico, Atlantic reporting. Full investigation ongoing.
https://x.com/grok
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,495
4,417
113
The Europeans are going to turn back to Russia for oil and natural gas if this goes on much longer. But you have a very vivid imagination.
Much of Europe still buys oil and gas from Russia. They've scaled back but they haven't stopped. The last I read they were spending $1.35 billion euros per month buying Russian energy.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,495
4,417
113
Sure they will, needing us less, reducing our influence, giving us less leverage in any future negotiations, and having them get friendlier with our rival. Two sides to the coin.
You might be correct but I don't like the idea of having to pay people to be our friends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls