It's amazing to me how you have a hard time coming to grips with the fact That I could "like" somebody or even "dislike" somebody and still agree or disagree with some policy decisions/actions of either person. it's kind of like John fetterman. He just came out and said he's in favor of picture ID but won't vote for the SAVE act. He can see the benefit of one part but not another. Most normal human beings can compartmentalize differences.I have less respect for Trump voters who claim to not really like him than I do for the ones who own it.
For someone who "doesn't like" Trump, it's astonishing how often you take the Maga side of things. It's in the neighborhood of literally every single time you post anything.
Makes me sad that just straight up lying is considered “typical” for the most powerful man on the planet.It's definitely dumb for Trump to say the war was started by Obama. That's typical Trump.
It would be much more accurate to say that prior presidents didn't do anything to stop Iran's aggression and military build up which included nuclear. "Don't" certainly didn't work. Of course there's also no guarantee that Trump's efforts will do much more than slow them down.
Makes me sad that just straight up lying is considered “typical” for the most powerful man on the planet.
it is sad, but Trump isn't the first president to outright lie. In my lifetime they all have.Makes me sad that just straight up lying is considered “typical” for the most powerful man on the planet.
Don't use a word with "gism" in it, or JinxyPat will get all worked up and start looking for someone to blow.Walk me through that syllogism.
Rather stark degrees imoit is sad, but Trump isn't the first president to outright lie. In my lifetime they all have.
We might be talking degrees, I'll agree there.
Degrees are problematic to whataboutists these days.Rather stark degrees imo
Still seems so to me. Still pro tariff and pissing off allies. That he seems to be good going along with Israel doesn’t mean he isn’t isolationist necessarily.Is it good that Trump isn't an isolationist? That was of epic concern not too long ago.
Nobody is gonna read all this. lol Are you okay with that, SimplyComplicated?If me posting less often than you means I don't have a job ... what does that say about you, sport? Once again you end up trolling yourself. So, using your own logic, we've established, not just that you're an insecure little troll, but an unemployed one. At least we accomplished something here.
As to your attempt at an argument (finally!) ... first, you ended up agreeing with me. I simply stated no one wanted the war ... you provided support for my statement. Well done. So you agreed with me.
Second, that portion of my post was just "flavor" ... it wasn't central to the argument. You avoided the actual substance ... and ended up agreeing with my statement, regardless, despite trying to insult me repeatedly. The substance of my post was a retort to your post ... where Clay Travis tried to attack the left ... for, in his opinion, not crying enough about Trump's failures, which are getting people tortured/killed. You'd think a reasonable human would want to criticize the guy getting innocents killed/tortured, not yell at the political opposition for not crying about this fact enough.
As to your additional commentary about what was necessary ... according to whom? Trump criticized Obama ... said war was completely unnecessary ... said Obama was going to get us into a needless war because he sucked at negotiating, and because he wanted to divert attention away from other things. Then he ran for POTUS with one of his pillars being he was going to be the peace POTUS ... no new wars, no regime change, no nation building. So, what happened, sport? Trump abandoned all his previous stances, admitted he sucks at negotiating, and admitted he lied about one of the main things that got him elected ... and we're supposed to trust him that killing people and harming many countries, including our own, was "necessary"? The last time he bombed Iran, he said the job was done ... nuke program completely obliterated ... a short time later ... not nearly enough time to rebuild an obliterated nuke program ... we're back at it ... this time in a full blown war because, apparently, things are even worse than when a "little bit of bombing" would do the trick.
understand. the definition of isolationinst depends on what you do and which foreign country you align with when you engage internationally.Still seems so to me. Still pro tariff and pissing off allies. That he seems to be good going along with Israel doesn’t mean he isn’t isolationist necessarily.
Is it good that Trump isn't an isolationist? That was of epic concern not too long ago.
For sure. Not 100% isolationist. But my read is that we are being led that direction step by step (not that it is a like thought through strategy with steps, but rather that he/we keep isolating all our allies but one little by little with each further decision/taunt/untrustworthiness)understand. the definition of isolationinst depends on what you do and which foreign country you align with when you engage internationally.
Nobody I know would have been in an uproar if the UK or another country bombed Iran. I think you're wrong about that.
I think the UN is totally worthless. We don't need that.
I agree 100% that it would be in our best interest to have a strong alliance with NATO countries but I also think we've won favor with these countries by shouldering a disproportionate share of the burden. The "allies" want us to continue doing that and I support Trump calling them out. I just wish he did in in private instead of making public insults.
A protection racket basically. Cause the issue, then charge them to solve it.Let me use the mantra that as long as the USA has something Europe wants then they will be our friends
Let the Europeans worry about getting oil through the straits or B OPTION THE USA CHARGES A TRANSIT FEE TO PASS THROUGH STRAITS LIKE A. DAM TARIFF
NO ONE SHOULD TRANSIT THE STRAITS FREE IF AMERICAN BLOOD FREED IT
The Europeans are going to turn back to Russia for oil and natural gas if this goes on much longer. But you have a very vivid imagination.Let me use the mantra that as long as the USA has something Europe wants then they will be our friends
Let the Europeans worry about getting oil through the straits or B OPTION THE USA CHARGES A TRANSIT FEE TO PASS THROUGH STRAITS LIKE A. DAM TARIFF
NO ONE SHOULD TRANSIT THE STRAITS FREE IF AMERICAN BLOOD FREED IT
Post in thread 'SOLVING THE HORMEZ STRAIT ISSUE OF SAFE TRANSIT' https://www.on3.com/boards/threads/...-issue-of-safe-transit.8735276/post-182894579A protection racket basically. Cause the issue, then charge them to solve it.
"Love" is a complicated concept. With the Miltary With respect to the Pentagon, especially so. For Army personnel, we can go all the way back to 1933 and Douglas MacArthur during his time as Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA), when he created what is now called the, Army Staff Identification Badge(ASIB) a really cool metal badge worn prominently on your dress uniform to signify qualifying service on the Army staff (at the pentagon). Basically you did your time honorably as a galley slave in service to your nation. literally.. nameless, thankless, staff work.My grandpa loved his time there as well. So much so that he and my grandmother are buried overlooking it at Arlington.
ok so in reaction other countries will, little by little, not contrbute to their own national defense and contribute to NATO (for example) at the level they've committed to?For sure. Not 100% isolationist. But my read is that we are being led that direction step by step (not that it is a like thought through strategy with steps, but rather that he/we keep isolating all our allies but one little by little with each further decision/taunt/untrustworthiness)
Sure they will, needing us less, reducing our influence, giving us less leverage in any future negotiations, and having them get friendlier with our rival. Two sides to the coin.ok so in reaction other countries will, little by little, not contrbute to their own national defense and contribute to NATO (for example) at the level they've committed to?
Where have you been the last 50 years?Makes me sad that just straight up lying is considered “typical” for the most powerful man on the planet.
Still pro tariff? Does not come off as a credible argument.Still seems so to me. Still pro tariff and pissing off allies. That he seems to be good going along with Israel doesn’t mean he isn’t isolationist necessarily.
Are they our ally’s if they won’t help us in our time of need?For sure. Not 100% isolationist. But my read is that we are being led that direction step by step (not that it is a like thought through strategy with steps, but rather that he/we keep isolating all our allies but one little by little with each further decision/taunt/untrustworthiness)
I actually think Trump may implement this. Great idea.Let me use the mantra that as long as the USA has something Europe wants then they will be our friends
Let the Europeans worry about getting oil through the straits or B OPTION THE USA CHARGES A TRANSIT FEE TO PASS THROUGH STRAITS LIKE A. DAM TARIFF
NO ONE SHOULD TRANSIT THE STRAITS FREE IF AMERICAN BLOOD FREED IT
A protection racket basically. Cause the issue, then charge them to solve it.
Needing us less? lol.Sure they will, needing us less, reducing our influence, giving us less leverage in any future negotiations, and having them get friendlier with our rival. Two sides to the coin.
Yes, because globalization has done so well for the EU and GB. GB manufacturing is now down to 10% of their GDP. They have one, just one virgin raw material steel plant left. Absolutely, they should depend far more on Russia and China. Exactly like what Trump told them years ago, when Germany laughed at Trump. That worked out well also. They should continue on with their green energy nonsense some more. Maybe ever more Europeans can freeze over the winter. All hail Greata the wonder kid. Lmao. Even when the truth smacks y'all in the face, you deny it for a frking political party. 1/2 of y'all here are literally running propaganda and AI nonsense for Iran, just to get Trump.Sure they will, needing us less, reducing our influence, giving us less leverage in any future negotiations, and having them get friendlier with our rival. Two sides to the coin.
Aight coolYes, because globalization has done so well for the EU and GB. GB manufacturing is now down to 10% of their GDP. They have one, just one virgin raw material steel plant left. Absolutely, they should depend far more on Russia and China. Exactly like what Trump told them years ago, when Germany laughed at Trump. That worked out well also. They should continue on with their green energy nonsense some more. Maybe ever more Europeans can freeze over the winter. All hail Greata the wonder kid. Lmao. Even when the truth smacks y'all in the face, you deny it for a frking political party. 1/2 of y'all here are literally running propaganda and AI nonsense for Iran, just to get Trump.
I don't think he believes he's lying. I think he's just a huge narcissist and that's how he responds to criticism. Regardless of the reason it's obvious that Obama & Biden didn't start the problems in Iran.Makes me sad that just straight up lying is considered “typical” for the most powerful man on the planet.
Much of Europe still buys oil and gas from Russia. They've scaled back but they haven't stopped. The last I read they were spending $1.35 billion euros per month buying Russian energy.The Europeans are going to turn back to Russia for oil and natural gas if this goes on much longer. But you have a very vivid imagination.
You might be correct but I don't like the idea of having to pay people to be our friends.Sure they will, needing us less, reducing our influence, giving us less leverage in any future negotiations, and having them get friendlier with our rival. Two sides to the coin.