Total listing of signed players in this Class

Walleye 1

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2021
4,976
1,825
113
Only person I know that signed was the DT. I have no idea who other names or positions are
 

SuperBigFan69

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2021
4,620
4,211
113
Only person I know that signed was the DT. I have no idea who other names or positions are
HS signing day really isn't like it used to be and really there is not a huge need for it like in the past.

I would rather get a 21 year old guy that has had 2-3 years in a college program, lifting, school, eating, meetings and so on...
 

SuperBigFan69

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2021
4,620
4,211
113
Good...HS kids are a waste of time unless they are elite. Spend d that money on the portal

The CB and DT were the only players of need from this class for next year.

Makes it a great class to me.
Yep!

There is generally a huge difference from a 300 pound 18 year old and a 300 pound 21 year old that has been lifting in a college weight room and eating at a training table.

Go get ready made guys.
 

Man Woman & Child

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2003
3,355
1,232
113
Are there any reasons why this is a small class? And it’s a low ranked class because it’s so small not because they’re not good prospects.

Of course there are reasons. What those reasons are seems to be the question. Especially when we were told that money isn’t the issue. Generally speaking, when you’re talking about one high school and one transfer class in a given year, when one is small/weak, you hope that it’s offset by by one that’s big and strong. Pretty straight forward stuff here. It ain’t rocket science.
 

WHCSC

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2002
10,795
3,605
88
Of course there are reasons. What those reasons are seems to be the question. Especially when we were told that money isn’t the issue. Generally speaking, when you’re talking about one high school and one transfer class in a given year, when one is small/weak, you hope that it’s offset by by one that’s big and strong. Pretty straight forward stuff here. It ain’t rocket science.
I think the players brought in through both avenues are good looking prospects that fill needs. Younger team means fewer recruits. I guess you feel differently?
 

Man Woman & Child

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2003
3,355
1,232
113
I think the players brought in through both avenues are good looking prospects that fill needs. Younger team means fewer recruits. I guess you feel differently?

No, the #37 transfer class and the #84 recruiting class combined to make up the #70 overall class is not good enough. Not even close. And anyone being even remotely objective knows this. It’s not even a matter of opinion.
 

Walleye 1

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2021
4,976
1,825
113
Oh well. Rhule has zero momentum going into next year. No excitement with current players. No excitement with new players and can’t keep his best coaches on staff. 4 wins next year is my prediction. Sticking to it
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskAir

Walleye 1

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2021
4,976
1,825
113
HS signing day really isn't like it used to be and really there is not a huge need for it like in the past.

I would rather get a 21 year old guy that has had 2-3 years in a college program, lifting, school, eating, meetings and so on...
I get it. Just stated that for how different it is now. Although 12 Hs recruits and being the least in the power 4. Head scratcher. He should sign as many as he can and hire an actual talent evaluator to watch them practice and create the depth chart. His evaluations suck
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blackdog8
Aug 18, 2016
16,644
10,918
113
No, the #37 transfer class and the #84 recruiting class combined to make up the #70 overall class is not good enough. Not even close. And anyone being even remotely objective knows this. It’s not even a matter of opinion.
I would imagine it matters a lot of what you already have on the roster. Nebraska brought in 27 new players, some will fill holes, some will compete for playing time and some will hopefully be developed. Outside of Raiola and Davis, the remainder of the 17 players that left were either not playing regularly because of talent or they were injured.
 

SuperBigFan69

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2021
4,620
4,211
113
I get it. Just stated that for how different it is now. Although 12 Hs recruits and being the least in the power 4. Head scratcher. He should sign as many as he can and hire an actual talent evaluator to watch them practice and create the depth chart. His evaluations suck
I could not agree more on all of that!
 

Man Woman & Child

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2003
3,355
1,232
113
Sure it is

I would imagine it matters a lot of what you already have on the roster. Nebraska brought in 27 new players, some will fill holes, some will compete for playing time and some will hopefully be developed. Outside of Raiola and Davis, the remainder of the 17 players that left were either not playing regularly because of talent or they were injured.

You two can put a bullsh*t spin on anything, can’t you? Number 70 overall class and you’ve actually convinced yourselves that’s a good thing. Wow
 

cestrup

All-Conference
Sep 23, 2021
3,073
1,228
113
If you come into this hating Rhule or trying to be positive no matter what, you’re going to skew reality around it, cognitive bias.


Reality is this class was/is a smaller class that isn’t ranked high (whether that matters will be seen over the next few years if the staff remains consistent).

However, with 3 years of data on MR we can see little development, a lot of staff turnover, average to less than average results.

There is little to be excited about for next season. Rhule is on the hot seat. Let’s see what he’s got because a losing season next year will probably get him fired, despite his massive contract
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wasker73

K Rod

Senior
Oct 1, 2025
372
544
93
The small class and the rankings are not the real story. The real story is our large number of underclassmen. Can any of them contribute? Are they being developed into B1G grade players? If they are, why do we need the number of portal guys we signed? Has anybody taken a look at the S & C program? Is it producing the results we need? A small class is no big deal if you already have the horses you need in the barn. By year four you should have some real "dudes" coming up to help you win. You should have a depth chart that is 2-3 deep with players you know you can count on. Honestly I do not know how close/far we are from that.
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,644
10,918
113
You two can put a bullsh*t spin on anything, can’t you? Number 70 overall class and you’ve actually convinced yourselves that’s a good thing. Wow
No one said it was a good thing. It is just the facts. A lot of young players a team is ready to give up on yet. 70th ranked or whatever, 1/3 of the high school class are top 247 players, who will be getting snaps this year.
Luckily for Nebraska the whole team will get to determine the outcomes of games and not just th 27 players in this class.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,460
12,865
78
The small class and the rankings are not the real story. The real story is our large number of underclassmen. Can any of them contribute? Are they being developed into B1G grade players? If they are, why do we need the number of portal guys we signed? Has anybody taken a look at the S & C program? Is it producing the results we need? A small class is no big deal if you already have the horses you need in the barn. By year four you should have some real "dudes" coming up to help you win. You should have a depth chart that is 2-3 deep with players you know you can count on. Honestly I do not know how close/far we are from that.
That's where I’m at. Show me that the last two O and D line classes are being developed and can play. We have enough dudes. Make it work with what we have now. I think the depth chart of “2-3 deep that you can count on” isn’t probably realistic. Show us that we can field a good O line and not drop off much if you lose A guy. Show us the same for a D line where you can rotate D linemen and not notice much who is in the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wasker73 and K Rod
Aug 18, 2016
16,644
10,918
113
So much for Rhules comment about having the financials to sign anybody they want. Gonna be along 2 years until he is gone
It is widely reported that Nebraska was on par with most everyone they went against in the recruitment of players. Verghese stated this several times over the course of the portal period. Other factors contributed to those players going elsewhere. These players don't have to pick Nebraska even if the financial offers were equal.